Sewer overflow facility at Lowman Beach? Next meeting tomorrow

Three weeks after the first public discussion of three options for reducing “Combined Sewer Overflows” from the Murray Pump Station at Lowman Beach – including one that would dig up much of the small park – it’s back on a local agenda tomorrow: The Morgan Community Association‘s quarterly meeting. Meantime, park neighbor Dr. Ron Sterling writes on his website dedicated to the controversial proposal that nearly 400 signatures have been gathered on an “offline” petition, while this online petition is still open to signatures and as of this writing has more than 60 names. At the March 30 public meeting (WSB coverage here), the county described the three alternatives it’s considering for reducing overflows at the site; all involved some form of storage, with the most concern voiced about the option detailed in the graphic above, showing a large tank buried at the park and a storage pipe under part of Beach Drive, plus an above-ground odor-control/electrical vault on the park’ s north side. (The other two listed alternatives include one that would put an underground tank on land across from Lowman that now holds homes and apartments – which could be claimed by eminent domain if their owners chose not to sell – plus one with underground storage under a street uphill.) Neighbors urge anyone interested in the project, pro and con, to be at tomorrow night’s MoCA meeting, 7 pm in the downstairs meeting area at The Kenney (7125 Fauntleroy Way SW). Meantime, the county is taking comments through the end of this month – feedback options are listed here.

6 Replies to "Sewer overflow facility at Lowman Beach? Next meeting tomorrow"

  • sf April 20, 2010 (7:59 pm)

    Great coverage. This is so hard. We want nothing more than to stop the sewage overflow yet taking out this beautiful park with its beautiful treasure of trees OR taking people’s property just makes me sick. Next option.

  • Duckitude April 21, 2010 (12:20 am)

    Thanks, WSB, for covering this issue and concern. My landlord, Jim Coombes and a neighbor, Michael Harkin, have now collected over 500 signatures. Their petition is a little different than the one posted on http://www.SoundAngels.org
    .

    They are targeting Seattle Parks with their petition, but are giving copies to all our city, county, and state reps. Their’s is more about stay out of Lowman Beach Park. Mine, online, is more about “this neighborhood is too small for what needs to be done — don’t try to cram what should be a bigger project into a small neighborhood and, please, pick a site that has the capacity for expansion, if needed (new technologies).” My petition rejects ALL the current options and asks King County to go back to the drawing board. Why? Read more at http://www.SoundAngels.org
    .

    The proposals are underbuilt plans that do not do Puget Sound or our neighborhoods justice. And,, when you come right down to it, such planning without true consultation with the neighborhoods is just plain government at its worst…

  • Mike April 21, 2010 (8:22 am)

    Get a few thousand people to stop flushing their toilets…end of problem. No joke.

  • Bettytheyeti April 21, 2010 (10:36 am)

    @Mike . . . if you had a clue. You would know that it’s not just flushing toilets but runoff water from streets, roofs and impervious surface that are connected to sewer system. Enough said.

  • Tom Rasmussen April 21, 2010 (2:16 pm)

    I plan on attending the meeting tonight to hear the options presented by the County.

  • Duckitude April 21, 2010 (10:11 pm)

    Hi Tom and All: Tom came to the meeting himself, not, well, you know, sending staff. Although, I have nothing against sending staff. I am just saying “Tom is the best!” Thank you so much for wanting to hear and see for yourself what is going on and the neighborhood’s and larger community response. Again, thank you!

Sorry, comment time is over.