First ex-Huling employee sentencing: 9 months

Just back from King County Superior Court, where former Huling Bros. salesperson Paul Rimbey gavel.jpgwas sentenced less than an hour ago for 1st-degree theft, after a jury found him guilty last month for his role in a scheme to steal from a mentally unstable dealership customer. His lawyer wanted the basic maximum, 3 months; the prosecutor asked for 18 months; the judge made it 9 months, with work-release provisions so Rimbey can continue at the fulltime job he says he just finally got after a year of trying to find work. He cried while pleading for leniency, and supporters/relatives in the courtroom cried too. 2:31 PM UPDATE: Here’s our full report:

“I’m 40 years old and I’ve never been in trouble for anything,” Rimbey told Judge Nicole MacInnes. “I’m the father of a 15-year-old daughter and a 4-year-old boy. … I’m the kind of guy who would help anyone. I’m trustworthy and stable.”

His plea for leniency came after the judge heard from several others, including a brief tearful plea from a woman described as his “significant other” and the mother of his children: “I’ve known him for 31 years … he’s never done anything bad. This is a person who takes other people’s kids everywhere … this isn’t a person who would ever turn around and hurt someone.”

From the prosecutor: “The defendant was keenly aware of (the victim’s) vulnerability … (Rimbey) could have stopped the exploitation of the victim but instead continued it, by going to the psych ward and having him sign an unconscionable contract. There aren’t many victims more vulnerable than (this) — what he went through in 2006 is unbearable, and what the defendant did to him is unacceptable.”

The victim himself was in court too, with a woman identified as his legal guardian, and made a short statement, contending that Rimbey “had no business” doing what he did.

Rimbey’s lawyer Tony Savage immediately accused the victim of lying and also suggested the prosecution asked for the extra-long sentence because of “the presence of media” to cover the case (TV crews as well as writers including us). Of his client, he said, “I think he’s a good man who made a bad mistake.”

After hearing from all parties, the judge began her pronouncement by saying, “This is a difficult case in which to determine the appropriate sentence. Mr. Rimbey, I don’t doubt you’ve led the life you say you have — but with no prior contact with this victim, you took advantage of a situation you were well aware of, pursuing him, enticing him to sign a contract, then continuing that behavior with no expectation you were helping him. This was all for yourself. You simply took advantage of an opportunity that arose … a very predatory action.”

She then went on to note the “balancing” factors she saw in his background, including his lack of prior criminal history, in deciding to sentence him not to state prison as prosecutors had requested, but instead to 9 months in the King County Jail, with the work-release provision allowing him out to go to his job. She also ordered him to pay a $500 “victim penalty assessment” and $450 in court costs; any other restitution would be decided at a later hearing. And she granted Savage’s request that Rimbey be able to stay out of prison on “personal recognizance,” rather than the prosecution’s request for a $100,000 bond. “Does the prosecution really think he is going to flee his family and his job?” Savage asked.

He is tentatively scheduled to report to jail February 4th, but that could change depending on what happens with a potential appeal in his case, which would have to be filed within the next 30 days. Meantime, the other two ex-Huling sales staffers charged in the case, Adrian Dillard and Ted Coxwell, are awaiting trial, possibly starting as soon as next Thursday (that’s the newest date, just set after another postponement yesterday).

VIDEO COVERAGE OF TODAY’S SENTENCING:
KING5
KOMO4

18 Replies to "First ex-Huling employee sentencing: 9 months"

  • grr January 4, 2008 (2:22 pm)

    scumbag got off easy, and should NOT have gotten work-release.

  • JohnM January 4, 2008 (2:55 pm)

    and he should have to spend his time on a psych ward, to see how life is for some these folks. I hope his job on work release is not in retail sales.

  • JumboJim January 4, 2008 (3:44 pm)

    I’m glad to see this sentence come down. Anyone know how the work release works? Does that mean he has to stay in jail at all times, except when at work?

  • cherylc January 4, 2008 (4:01 pm)

    No record just means he’s never been caught before. Maybe he lived a totally moral life before this incident, but it’s kind of hard to imagine that that is the case.

    I agree with grr, and JohnM. I think he got off really easy, much less than he deserved.

  • Katherine January 4, 2008 (4:16 pm)

    JumboJim, Work Release means they check you out in the morning just in time to get to work and you check back in after work. You better not be late checking back in, either. They can suspend your W/R and you’ll find yourself just sitting in jail. The job you’re working has to be approved ahead of time.

  • Jiggers January 4, 2008 (4:26 pm)

    Anklebracelet time?

  • Bob Loblaw January 4, 2008 (5:04 pm)

    Katherine: Speaking from experience? :-)

  • KatherineL January 4, 2008 (8:34 pm)

    I wondered if I should clarify how I know that. :) I was a court clerk for many years.

  • miws January 4, 2008 (8:40 pm)

    Excuse me, folks, I need to go cry for Paul Rimbey….. :cry: :cry: :cry:

    Mike

  • Rick January 4, 2008 (9:05 pm)

    I think we could all use a good cry,Mikey! Especially for those poor unfortunates who are burdend with work release and ankle bracelets.BooHoo

  • Jiggers January 4, 2008 (11:02 pm)

    He deserves what he gets for being stupid.

  • acemotel January 5, 2008 (12:12 am)

    Stupid and greedy….

  • miws January 5, 2008 (4:20 am)

    I’ll hafta work that into my schedule, Rick. :)

    I’ll be stuck on crying for Rimbey for awhile because not only was it an emotional burden on him to take advantage of the guy in the first place, but to continue to do so.

    It’s gotta be emotionally devastating to be such a jerk!

    Mike

  • Stephen January 5, 2008 (10:28 am)

    There is a story in the P-I archives that details this story, will all the players, from beginning to end. It was a first-rate piece of journalism in that it captured what a swamp of depravity and greed that whose sorry operation was.

  • Jan January 5, 2008 (1:41 pm)

    Mike…my heart’s breaking for you…a sad day indeed…;-)

  • Paul January 5, 2008 (2:25 pm)

    What this person did was terrible, but really it’s a trickle-down snapshot of the management of the company. Remember this event occurred under the noses of some of the supposedly smartest business executives in Seattle; incredible that know one knew what was going on down on the sales floor. Even with awareness, the silent arrogance of the management lead to continued suffering by victims, millions of dollars being lost by Gee and the loss of work and value to the local economy, along with the convenience of having full auto service right here.

    Huling had ample motive and opportunity to make this entire situation right in a timely fashion.

    Instead they have afflicted West Seattle with a bad voodoo which our community must suffer for years to come. I hold my head in shame each time I pass the property.

  • miws January 5, 2008 (11:30 pm)

    Thank you, Jan……

    *Sniff*

    Mike

  • TJ May 24, 2008 (9:05 pm)

    Seriously people? Yes what he did was wrong but more than 9 months in jail? Do we want our jails overcrowded and murderers in lower security prisons, because first time offenders are taking up all the room?

Sorry, comment time is over.