VIDEO: ‘Where does the money come from?’ West Seattle businesses talk to city councilmembers about light-rail relocation

By Tracy Record
West Seattle Blog editor

The newest proposal for Sound Transit light rail to West Seattle – dropping the Avalon station, which shifts the tunnel portal eastward – would dramatically cut the number of properties ST would have to acquire.

That was a headline from the “roundtable discussion” that took almost an hour and a half of this morning’s meeting of the Transportation, Waterfront, and Seattle Center Committee, chaired by District 1 City Councilmember Rob Saka.

ST’s West Seattle project executive Jason Hampton told the committee they’re now calculating that about 100 properties would be displaced by the Avalon-less alignment, which also would include a downsized, shallower Junction station. They don’t have the breakdown of exactly how many businesses and residences that would break down to, Hampton said, but it’s about a third of the 160 residences and 130 businesses the original plan would have displaced.

One thing that’s not changing, though, so far, is the Delridge station site, and two of the small-business proprietors facing almost certain displacement were among the guests for the discussion.

Ounces proprietor Laurel Trujillo said it’s great that ST is able to offer more compensation now but she still envisions a gap between what it really will cost to relocate, and what kind of compensation will be available. “Where does the money come from?”

Mode Music Studios (WSB sponsor) and Mode Music and Performing Arts (nonprofit) proprietor Erin Rubin noted that it’s been a long process and she too remains worried about personal impact – like having to take out loans. She said she was happy to hear that some changes in the ST process mean they’ll be able to directly pay vendors involved in relocation, rather than having the businesses themselves cover everything up front and wait for reimbursement later.

Much of what was described as available to business owners involved consulting rather than cash: Representatives from various city teams, as well as the Rainier Valley Community Development Fund, spoke about the ways in which they offer advice and information to help businesses get through the process. (More details are in the slide decks linked to the meeting agenda.)

Some suggestions came during a surprise appearance from County Councilmember and Sound Transit Board member Teresa Mosqueda, returning to the City Council chambers where she served on that body for years. She first recapped (as we reported here) her, and other North King County Sub-Area reps’, commitment to getting light rail to West Seattle and Ballard (plus finishing the Everett-to-Tacoma “spine”). Her suggestions for helping businesses included covering some of the rent that would enable them to stay in their current locations as long as possible, to minimize the number of boarded-up buildings pre-construction, and giving displaced businesses the “right of first (refusal)” to return to their old sites when the new station-area buildings are built there, even knowing that might be five years after a move.

There were no votes taken today; it was acknowledged that the uncertainty has somewhat intensified until the ST Board makes a decision – expected by mid-year – on what to go ahead with building, and how to pay for it.

SIDE NOTE: The issue of who’s involved in these discussions came up toward the start and end of the meeting. In public comment, Jordan Crawley of the Alki Beach Academy – another business that’ll be forced to move because of the Delridge station – accused committee chair Saka of excluding the West Seattle Chamber of Commerce, on whose board Crawley serves. Later, there was mention of a letter to that effect that councilmembers had received from the Chamber. We just requested and obtained that letter – see it here – in which the Chamber’s executive director Rachel Porter asks that the organization be included in any future discussions on helping businesses.

15 Replies to "VIDEO: 'Where does the money come from?' West Seattle businesses talk to city councilmembers about light-rail relocation"

  • Natinstl March 19, 2026 (1:30 pm)

    ST us in a 34 billion $ deficit, stop the madness. 

  • Frank March 19, 2026 (3:09 pm)

    Now we’re talking common sense. How about avoid expensive tunneling or bridges. If you simply went above ground near the duwamish and used a passenger ferry to cross the river, you would save billions more

  • k March 19, 2026 (4:18 pm)

    Glad Crawley called him out on that.  If Saka really wants to rescue his reputation from just being known as the guy in a public feud with a traffic curb, he needs to actually engage with constituents that these things impact.   Including the Chamber is low-hanging fruit.

  • Michael Waldo March 19, 2026 (5:12 pm)

    No to light rail. Too expensive, to disruptive to local businesses. Have more express buses and have more enforcement of the bus only lanes on the viaduct. Have busses go to the King street station to connect to light rail.

    • The Real JP March 19, 2026 (10:19 pm)

      Okay, who is going to break the news to Waldo that the viaduct was demolished in 2019?

    • Neighbor March 20, 2026 (4:55 pm)

      Is this satire?  The Alaskan Way Viaduct was demolished 8 years ago, busses don’t run on the Spokane Street Viaduct, and light rail doesn’t stop at King Street Station.  What are you even talking about?

  • WS Res March 19, 2026 (5:36 pm)

    Just astonishing how many people seem eager to subject themselves and others to violation of your Constitutional rights. If only Americans were as loyal to the 4th Amendment as they are to the 2nd.

  • Wet March 19, 2026 (9:18 pm)

    Stop the NIMBYismWe need light rail, yes businesses will be disrupted and more will come with light rail. Better transportation, Better Parks costs money– tax the rich so we can have nice things.

    • North Admiral Cyclist March 20, 2026 (6:11 am)

      If we only listened to the West Seattle business interests, we’d have half of West Seattle paved for “free” parking, and the other half paved for car-brains to drive on.  I’m sorry, it’s not 1970 anymore.  There are hundreds, if not thousands, of examples in the world of cities of similar composition as West Seattle that invested in rail (streetcars, trams, light rail, etc.).  In all of them I have visited, small businesses are thriving.  

    • Natinstl March 20, 2026 (9:33 am)

      We’re not taxing the rich, we’re taxing the middle class out of existence here. We pay and pay and pay and life here has only gotten worse. I’ve been a life long democrat, can’t stand Trump, but this state is ridiculous. Definitely makes you question your choices at times. 

  • DavidWS March 19, 2026 (9:39 pm)

    Lot’s of highs and lows of today’s meeting. But at it’s core, I believe today was an example of the Council’s commitment to moving the project forward in a way that takes into consideration the effects that it will have on small businesses (as well as the maritime industry) in West Seattle. I am saddened that the meeting started out in such a negative way, but feel that once the dialogue with the panel got underway that there was a lot of positive conversation.  There are no easy answers here, but I am confident that Councilmember Saka is the right person to lead and I’m so glad he represents my district on the council.

  • Jeff F. March 20, 2026 (9:43 am)

    NIMBYism. The only thing that cuts across all political spectrums. Just build the damned thing already! It’s what we voted for. 

  • Keith March 20, 2026 (2:20 pm)

    The engineering of getting an effective light rail route to West Seattle is always going to be very expensive.  The trains cannot easily/safely handle steep grades (i.e., more than 4%), which means building tunnels or long bridges/elevated supports to lessen the average incline, which adds costs and complexity.   There is water to cross and land usage zones that are not easily amenable to a rail path between West Seattle and the main rail lines.  I am personally fine with paying my RTA for a system to serve the greatest number of folks for the minimum (it’s never low) cost, even if I lack direct access.  Maximizing the number of cars we can remove from the roads to lessen pollution and traffic will serve the entire region the best, even if that results in a light rail-less West Seattle.  

  • West Marge March 21, 2026 (4:27 pm)

    All of you bike heads roll around in your superior physical fitness and forget all about the reality for those of us who have kids with activities, need to go grocery shopping for a multi person family, or like me, disabled. It’s painful to walk far, I generally need to sit and rest, even in a grocery store. This project is displacing the people who have lived here their whole lives. Businesses will need to start over. Oh and the blue herons. There are dozens of great blue herons that nest on Pidgin Point every spring. They have been here for centuries. This project has become intenible. 

    • K March 22, 2026 (3:32 pm)

      Kids and grocery shopping trips on bikes are not a problem (at least not for any of the people I know who do regularly).  Adaptive bikes exist for all kids of disabilities, even battery-assist bikes to help when stamina is a consideration.

      That said, I do recognize that there is a small subset of people for whom none of those solutions will meet their needs, who need to rely on public transport or taxis to get around.  They should be reassured that light rail is an expansion of their transportation options, and that every person who can now take light rail instead of driving will be one less car on the road to compete with their taxicab for space.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.