‘Justice arrives like a thunderbolt’: U.S. Supreme Court’s marriage-equality ruling welcomed by local elected officials

(Photo by Don Brubeck – flags flying @ City Hall for Pride Month)
8:53 AM: The biggest news in the nation this morning is the U.S. Supreme Court‘s ruling for marriage equality, on which President Obama commented this past hour, congratulating those who had worked for decades, and hailing it as a moment in which “justice arrive(d) like a thunderbolt.” It also arrived not only at the start of Seattle’s Pride weekend but also two and a half years after the start of legal same-sex marriage in our state – remember that December 2012 night downtown (WSB coverage here) in which West Seattleites were in the spotlight, both the first couple to get a license – Pete-e Petersen and Jane Abbott Lighty – and the WS-residing elected official, County Executive Dow Constantine, who signed it. This morning, Constantine recalled that moment in his official statement on the Supreme Court ruling:

“One of my proudest moments was issuing the first marriage license to a same-sex couple in Washington state.

“This landmark decision makes our Pride celebrations a little more joyous. I’m looking forward to joining with the LGBT community and allies to celebrate at the Pride Parade this weekend.”

He will raise the Pride flag downtown at the County Administration Building Plaza at 11:45 am. Also reacting this morning, West Seattle-residing City Councilmember Tom Rasmussen, who, as his statement describes him, is the “first and only openly gay man to serve on the Seattle City Council”:

“Today the Supreme Court ruling means that our Constitution stands for equal rights for all. This achievement is the result of decades of persistent, tenacious and courageous work by people throughout the country. Through steadfast advocacy to not accept anything less than full equality, this ruling moves LGBTQ rights forward.

“While we succeeded on this issue, the fight for LGBTQ rights and equality continues. It is incumbent upon all of us to elect leaders who will protect and defend the rights that have been won and who will continue the effort to ensure full and fair treatment for all.

“The quote, ‘The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice’ rings true today, and I couldn’t be more thrilled.”

Mayor Ed Murray, a former West Seattleite and longtime marriage-equality advocate, is speaking with the media in a few minutes (live on Seattle Channel at 9 am), and his office says he will lead a rally at the federal courthouse downtown later today – details to come.

9:17 AM: Joining the mayor at his news conference, Councilmember Rasmussen, who said this day seems “like a dream,” and spoke of younger days in which he was worried that his sexual orientation would keep him from getting a job, and could barely imagine having the right someday to marry:

That’s a screengrab from the ongoing Seattle Channel live feed. We’ll add the video once it’s archived on the SC website. (added 2:02 pm – here it is:)

Meantime, the aforementioned rally has been announced for 7th/Stewart downtown at 5 pm.

12:02 PM: Statement just in from another West Seattle-residing elected official, County Councilmember Joe McDermott:

I’m thrilled to join the jubilation across our country for today’s decision. From today forward, couples across the nation will be able to marry legally and be recognized as a family in the eyes of the law, just like Washington families, including myself and my husband Michael. Today, there is more love in the world, and that is a good thing!

16 Replies to "'Justice arrives like a thunderbolt': U.S. Supreme Court's marriage-equality ruling welcomed by local elected officials"

  • JoB June 26, 2015 (9:23 am)

    Celebrate today
    get back to work solidifying those rights tomorrow.

  • PangolinPie June 26, 2015 (9:28 am)

    Yes! What a wonderful day. This almost moved me to tears:

    “As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.”

    Congratulations to all!

  • 33Pete June 26, 2015 (11:19 am)

    Thank goodness common sense, humanity, love, and human rights prevailed.

    Mark this up as a win for all of us.

  • perspective June 26, 2015 (11:20 am)

    I suppose this may advance some abstract or emotional notion of equality. But “equal rights” really depends on your perspective. In a more quantitative sense, the effect of these rulings is to shift more people from the unmarried pool to the married pool. What’s the difference? The now-smaller number unmarried citizens must pay a now-larger share of the tax burden to support marriage tax benefits. For those of us who are married, and those about to become married, let’s not forget who we’ve left behind: those paying the bills.

  • Smitty June 26, 2015 (11:42 am)

    Great day – although yesterday’s decision sucked. :~)

  • 33Pete June 26, 2015 (11:52 am)

    Perapective – I am not sure this changes anything with respect to unmarried citizens. It’s not like the tax code says X dollars must come from married individual and Y dollars must come from unmarried individuals, such that a change in numbers requires the group with less members to shoulder more of the burden. Rather, I believe the tax rates/deductions apply as written, irrespective of shifts in the number of married/unmarried individuals. Maybe I’m wrong (and if so, let me know).

  • dhg June 26, 2015 (12:47 pm)

    “I suppose this may advance some abstract or emotional notion of equality.” Um, this is not some abstract notion of equality. This is a huge benefit for gays and lesbians, their children and their extended families. So not abstract but very real, very concrete. As for those “left paying the bills”: I was single for 57 yrs, married for two. I’ve paid my way. And last I checked, i’m still paying a hefty tax bill.

    From what I can glean, perspective, you don’t actually know anyone from the lgbtq community or you’d be celebrating with everyone else. This is a big win for equality.

  • Smitty June 26, 2015 (1:14 pm)

    We’re talking about 1 – 2% of the population. Even if they ALL get married – which they won’t – the tax implications nationally are not material.

  • datamuse June 26, 2015 (1:33 pm)

    You’re a bit behind the curve, Perspective. The Windsor decision granted federal benefits to all legally married same sex couples—two years ago today.

  • Evergreen June 26, 2015 (1:42 pm)

    This was a human rights issue that impacts us all, for freedom and justice of any minority group ultimately protects the rights of every American with unique characteristics, viewpoints, or voice. Proud of my country right now!

  • Evergreen June 26, 2015 (1:44 pm)

    ….and as a healthcare provider who has seen “Obamacare” benefit countless people in our community, I’m also very happy about yesterday’s ruling!

  • JanS June 26, 2015 (3:37 pm)

    Evergreen…hear, hear….the realities are…many people who were not insured previously, now are, and getting the healthcare they n eed and deserve. I know personally many that were in that boat. If politics were left out of that decision (hahaha…tell John Boehner that), while the ACA is not perfect, it is working in it’s imperfection…

    now where the hell is that jobs bill?

  • Quilterwoman June 26, 2015 (3:50 pm)

    It’s a great day!

  • West Seattle Hipster June 26, 2015 (5:19 pm)

    Today is a great day to be an American.

    .

    And I was also very happy about yesterday’s ruling.

  • Proud parent June 26, 2015 (6:13 pm)

    Pride Weekend will be transformed to celebrate the SC ruling.

  • ScubaFrog June 26, 2015 (6:39 pm)

    It’s about time. Social conservatives are so out-of-touch, it’s embarrassing.

Sorry, comment time is over.