Highway 99 tunnel bids opened: ‘Winner’ says they’ll finish sooner

(Most recent WSDOT video simulation of the tunnel – from October 2010)
The apparent winning bid has been chosen from the two submitted for the tunnel that the state wants to build to replace the central section of the Alaskan Way Viaduct. According to transportation reporter Mike Lindblom‘s story at SeattleTimes.com (WSB partner), the bidder, Seattle Tunnel Partners, says they could finish sooner than the state asked – and can build the tunnel a bit wider. The state has just sent its official news release – it’s not online yet so far as we can tell, but we’ve got it after the jump:

Gov. Chris Gregoire today announced that Seattle Tunnel Partners submitted to the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) the apparent best-value proposal to design and build the SR 99 bored tunnel. The tunnel is the preferred alternative for replacing the seismically unsafe Alaskan Way Viaduct along Seattle’s waterfront.

Both teams submitted proposals in October that were below the contract price limit of $1.09 billion. Today, the technical scores of those proposals were combined with the bid prices, which were opened as part of a bid-opening event in downtown Seattle.

The design-build contract is expected to be awarded later this month. Design-build combines project design and construction in a single contract.

Seattle Tunnel Partners is a joint venture of Dragados USA and Tutor Perini Corp. The team also includes Frank Coluccio Construction, Mowat Construction, HNTB Corp. and Intecsa. Their bid price is $1,089,700,002, and technical credits totaled 71,577,000. The combined apparent best-value score is 1,018,123,002.

“Both teams submitted proposals that demonstrate this project can be delivered on time and within budget, and went above and beyond in offering creative ideas. It’s time to get to work,” said Gov. Gregoire. “This project will support family-wage jobs and help create a world-class waterfront. It’s the only option that keeps the existing viaduct open to traffic during construction, which is good for businesses, the Port of Seattle and commuters.”

Major items contained in the design-build request for proposals included acquisition of a tunnel boring machine; boring the tunnel; and building the road within the tunnel with ventilation, and emergency and electrical systems. The contract will also cover construction of two operations buildings, mitigation for tunnel settlement and construction of tunnel portals. Most of the work will be performed as a lump-sum, fixed-price bid.

“I want to thank both teams for submitting high-quality proposals. While lowest price is typically the winner, this time we considered both price and the team’s approach to schedule, design and other factors,” said Washington State Transportation Secretary Paula Hammond. “The price from Seattle Tunnel Partners was slightly higher, but our evaluation of their technical approach found it will deliver the best apparent value to WSDOT and taxpayers.”

There were up to 100 million technical credits, in the form of dollars, which could be earned by each team in the areas of overall management, schedule, tunnel roadway clearances, management of tunneling and ground deformation, and design and construction other than tunneling.

The Seattle Tunneling Group submitted a bid price of $1,088,302,002. Technical credits came to 38,152,000. Their combined apparent best-value score was 1,050,150,002.

Total cost of the proposed bored tunnel is estimated to be $1.96 billion. This includes design, right-of-way acquisition, construction management, and more than $200 million set aside for risk. Also included in the $1.96 billion are separate, future construction contracts for roadway connections at the north and south ends of the tunnel.

The proposed bored tunnel is currently under environmental review. A Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that analyzes the bored tunnel alternative is available for public review on the program website. The EIS comment period ends Dec. 13.

35 Replies to "Highway 99 tunnel bids opened: 'Winner' says they'll finish sooner"

  • JAT December 9, 2010 (2:46 pm)

    Can they include access to downtown so that the tunnel will actually be useful? Nah, I didn’t think so.

    It continues to amaze me how many of my fellow West Seattleite downtown co-workers have no idea that access to downtown is not a feature of the tunnel as planned.

  • CB December 9, 2010 (2:47 pm)

    Great news. This project can’t start soon enough.

  • David December 9, 2010 (2:56 pm)

    Funny how that video does not show the tolls being collected, how about a video that shows a surface option that does not cost a toll to use?

  • commuter December 9, 2010 (3:31 pm)

    2 lanes? Are you kidding me?! TWO LANES?????
    The video depicts traffic moving fluidly. It will be a parking lot during the morning and evening commutes.

  • HolyKow December 9, 2010 (3:40 pm)

    Naw, everything is great, our current surface streets can handle the load because NO ONE EVER USES THE VIADUCT TO GET DOWNTOWN, SO THERE WON’T BE ANY OVERFLOW TRAFFIC…RIGHT!!! WE ALL JUST USE THE VIADUCT TO GET TO BALLARD OR THE LADIES-OF-ILL-REPUTE ON NORTH 99…WHY WOULD PEOPLE COMING FROM THE SOUTH END OR WEST SEATTLE NEED TO GO RIGHT INTO DOWNTOWN!

    No one has been able to explain to me why they held a vote to see what the voters wanted, the tunnel gets LAST place and then everyone says “Yep, just like we thought, tunnel!”

    this will not go well.

    hk

  • Dale December 9, 2010 (4:25 pm)

    I used to be skeptical because of the costs (like Brightwater fiasco) but I am softening my viewpoint. The only exit/entrance at Columbia is not that crucial to overall traffic movement. Having a straight shot, unencumbered by weather instead of the curvy & dangerous Battery street tunnel should increase the overall flow of traffic over the day.

  • villagegreen December 9, 2010 (4:25 pm)

    Build the f’ing thing already!!!!

  • CCW December 9, 2010 (4:36 pm)

    To be fair, even now, you don’t really use the viaduct for much of the trip to downtown from West Seattle. You use Alaskan Way, which turns into the viaduct around Safeco. Alaskan Way is still going to be there, and the surface street will be expanded. For those of you who, like me, commute to downtown from West Seattle, have you noticed all the people who *don’t* get off at Seneca or Western and proceed to the battery street tunnel? That’s a LOT of people. Those are the people the tunnel is being built for – not us.

    I honestly don’t understand the outrage over the tunnel as a concept. It seems like a perfect solution, if you set aside cost. Preserve surface street aesthetics downtown. Provide a route through the city for those who want to get through it.

    The issue is cost. That’s a difficult analysis, certainly, but unless you’re willing to go there, and really dig in and do the cost/benefit analysis, your complaints sound like hot air to me.

  • D December 9, 2010 (4:44 pm)

    Why is the winner of the bid in quotes?

  • WSB December 9, 2010 (4:47 pm)

    Because it’s not final. You’ll notice the official announcement says “apparent.”

  • WS commuter December 9, 2010 (4:50 pm)

    I continue to be amazed at opposition to this essential project. The fantasy of “surface street” option was always a non starter. To HolyKow – I’ll explain it. The vote – which was only ADVISORY – was for a different project. It had no binding effect, but it made the uninformed feel better about being against genuine solutions to a real problem. The bored tunnel will be built. Deal with it. The only real adverse impact for us in W. Seattle is the loss of the Seneca exit. We’ll have to get off in Pioneer Square. I work in the middle of downtown. I’m fine with this; not a big deal.

  • PSPS December 9, 2010 (6:03 pm)

    “It’s the only option that keeps the existing viaduct open to traffic during construction.”

    That’s a lie. The retrofit option meets that criterion plus it costs a fraction of what this “2-lane underground parking lot” does.
    .
    But the land developers must be appeased.

  • WS commuter AS WELL December 9, 2010 (6:14 pm)

    RE: WS commuter

    Honestly I’m amazed that you’re amazed if you ‘continue to be amazed’ that there is opposition. You’d think after awhile you’d realize its a legitimate opposition.

    Just because those of you that would have voted for this option are happy with the unvoted decision – it doesn’t mean thats what would have happened if there was actually a vote.

    Here we are spending almost 2 billion dollars on something that nobody voted for, that cost more than the lowest bid…meanwhile here in our own neighborhood the city is screwing us on our kids local skatepark by changing the requirements so they can legally accept the lower bid.

    The skatepark is seriously chump change compared to how much this atrocity is going to cost us just so the rest of the world can envy our glamourous waterfront. I would much rather have seen my tax dollars go to something tangible than lost amidst this tunnel: another billion dollar bailout.

  • Pete December 9, 2010 (7:43 pm)

    PSPS….the retrofit would require years of closure and untold traffic issues. Thinnk about it….you ahve to remove entire sections of the viaduct to retrofit it. Where will those vehicles go? How many times have you been stuck in the battery street tunnel? Not many I can say since I travel this way everyday. With the increase in capacity on the downtown street grid when streets are reconencted the flow into downtown will increase yoru commute by 3 -5 minutes by most estimates.

  • dsa December 9, 2010 (8:18 pm)

    Please explain how this improvement helps transportation to Ballard from West Seattle.

  • cj December 9, 2010 (8:21 pm)

    This thing was voted down twice by the public and it didn’t matter I guess. They cut education, fire and police, health care and all our citizen needs but they have this wind fall for this tunnel that IMO just looks dangerous. I predict they will eventually install a toll for it too, to pay for the normal rising cost that hit all these major projects.

    Yes the 3-D movie looks cool but I think this tunnel will be a thorn in our side long after its built in all kinds of ways.

  • Steve December 9, 2010 (8:34 pm)

    Retrofit has been proven a waste of money…I can’t believe anyone in their right mind would consider keeping even one pound of concrete from the current death trap. Tearing it down with no alternative will flood I-5 and downtown streets with tens of thousands of more vehicles every day. I-5 north through downtown will be total gridlock. Imagine the WS bridge morning commute traffic but lasting ALL day. If we don’t build the tunnel we’ll be stuck here in WS with the only way out to the south.

  • BobLoblaw December 9, 2010 (8:35 pm)

    we have a very pretty city behind that gruesome looking viaduct. looking forward to the tunnel!

  • grr December 9, 2010 (9:42 pm)

    I wonder how many cops or teachers salaries could have been paid for by what was spent on that video….

  • Babs December 9, 2010 (9:55 pm)

    I still wonder why we could not have built a high rise bridge over the water like they have back east…we would keep the amazing and spectacular city view too and maybe have a great walking/park combined with business in the old viaduct footprint. The tunnel is a huge mistake and we who voted no and keep saying its not the right decision for Seattle will look back and say, “told you so…”

  • WSnewbie December 9, 2010 (10:51 pm)

    Build the tunnel already.

  • Jiggers December 9, 2010 (11:45 pm)

    If you work in downtown when construction begins, I’ll pray for you.

  • k December 10, 2010 (5:56 am)

    hate to see the word “tunnel” and “winner” used in the same article. ugh.

  • Rower December 10, 2010 (6:24 am)

    “To be fair, even now, you don’t really use the viaduct for much of the trip to downtown from West Seattle.” – CCW

    I would beg to differ. The vast majority of the traffic from West Seattle in the morning hours is taking the downtown exits. This new project dumps all us West Seattle commuters out near Safeco Field and will create a crawl like you have never seen since the snow day a couple weeks ago. this project does zero for West Seattle commuters and I am surprised at the support for it from our neighborhood.

    Anyone else notice they have announced the bidder, yet the public comment process is still underway? for WSDOT, the public comment process is a mere check-box formality.

  • Rob December 10, 2010 (7:13 am)

    I was depressed reading about the attempted break in up near 17th and Trenton and shocked that the 95 pound dog did not help.

    (attempted break-in on our house around 12pm today; we live on 17th and Trenton)

    I was even more depressed watching the You Tube film clip about the lady & husband who were brutally attacked back east.

    (The worst thing that ever happened to me- Debra)

    But…now I am totally depressed after watching the You Tube film clip about our new SR99 bore tunnel.
    (Highway 99 tunnel bids opened: ‘Winner’ says they’ll finish sooner)

    As I see it they are trying to cram at least three lanes of traffic into two. They say it will be done sooner but nowhere can I find when this is to be completed…sooner, on time or later.

    After reading these three articles my Holiday plans are just not the same. It makes me want to cancel my plans, hunker down at home and sulk.

  • Rob December 10, 2010 (7:58 am)

    And Furthermore after carefully reading everyone’s comments I can say:
    1. To WSnewbie: It is funny how people new to West Seattle, who really have no feel for our community, just go off and state their opinions.

    2. West Seattle really might need to consider leaving Seattle & joining the city of Burien if this tunnel thing actually happens.

    3. Yes there will be Tolls, Yes it will be a parking lot, Yes over and over we vote but our votes as people here in Seattle have not counted for years (re the baseball stadium etc), Why do they not give us the names of the owners of Seattle Tunnel Partners? Who is Dragados USA? Who is Tutor Perini? Who are these people that will build our new tunnel. I am almost afraid, fearful to ask these questions. Follow the money is all I can say…

    4. Yes, the land developers must be appeased for sure!!

    5. I cannot understand at all how a skate park comes into this discussion…I think a skate park is far to risky an endeavor for a municipality to engage in.

    6. And finally what would be wrong with a High Rise Bridge??? To me that could be a very attractive option.

  • velo_nut December 10, 2010 (8:17 am)

    @ grr

    You could make that video on an Atari.

  • WS commuter AS WELL December 10, 2010 (8:27 am)

    RE Rob:
    Obviously you don’t keep up much on local news, its been posted here several times: https://westseattleblog.com/2010/10/delridge-skatepark-update-parks-will-re-bid

    The municipality is ALREADY involved with it, as they are with any other parks service. The reference is more a matter of the city’s approval process than the skatepark itself. If they were using the same process then the tunnel should likewise be rebid so they can legally accept the lowest bidder.

  • The HepCat December 10, 2010 (1:24 pm)

    Gotta agree with Rob, here. This is going to be the most colossal “rhymes with buster-cluck” we have seen since the other “for the greater good” project, the ballfield nobody wanted. But I guess the City of Seattle know best how to spend my tax dollars, because of course, they have my best interests in mind……

  • Capo December 10, 2010 (1:31 pm)

    There are the same number of downtown exits as the viaduct has. TWO. You’re complaining about one being moved a half mile further south and the other a half mile further north. Seriously. A half mile.

    Retrofitting the viaduct would require that it is brought up to current building codes. As a result, the retrofit was just as expensive as replacement and BOTH options requires significant time when the route is unavailable.

    People also seem to forget that when the advisory vote took place, we were looking at a cut and cover tunnel, which tore up the waterfront for a decade and had the SR99 route unavailable just as much as a full replacement of the viaduct. The deep bore tunnel, which goes through bedrock rather than the fill where the cut and cover would have gone, is the only option that maintains capacity while being constructed and has the least impact on the businesses of the area.

    There was also only one advisory “vote” on the viaduct replacement. And it was the worst conceived ballot you could come up with. People could vote for one, both or none of the options. And that’s allowed opponents the opportunity to mangle the stats to mislead. The issue at the time was replacement or not, and the majority of ballots had selected at least one of the two options. In other words, the govt was advised to replace the viaduct and maintain the capacity. Deep bore wasn’t even on the table at the time.

  • WS commuter December 10, 2010 (2:51 pm)

    To “WS Commuter AS WELL” … My amazement is about those who don’t understand that the tunnel is the best solution to our problem. Yes, we have a problem with SR99 and yes, we have to solve it like adults. I respect disagreement … but I don’t respect ignoring facts. Likewise, I don’t have much patience with whining about government choosing a tunnel without another vote. Representative government is supposed to be about elected leaders making informed decisions. The public – as evidenced by most (but not all) of the uninfomed comments against tunnel – is usually NOT in a position to make these kinds of choices, and instead, vote out of ignorance. Sad, but true. To “Grr” … the answer to your question is “zero, none, nada.” Transportation funds are dedicated in this state and have nothing to do with funding police or teachers. But I understand it makes some people feel good to make those sort of false comparisons, even if untrue.

  • JB December 10, 2010 (3:22 pm)

    Get over the “cram 3 lanes into 2 nonsense”. The tunnel is designed to serve traffic that wants to bypass downtown entirely, and it will do so quite nicely, particularly because it eliminates the curve and on-ramp at Battery Street. For those that need to access downtown, there is additional capacity on the waterfront ( via the currently being built improvements @ Marginal Way interchange), 4th Ave (via the “Costco” ramp), and First Ave. Need to go to Ballard, exit at an improved Mercer Street and take an under utilized Westlake or Dexter. I am so sick of the chicken-littles squawking about this. Get informed! This is on part of a series of major traffic revisions currently underway in our city. Yes, we plan on paying the toll. It’s called a user fee, we’re planning on it, and won’t be complaining. Besides, with the bike lane improvements, we’ll be bike commuting much more during the spring – fall, so we’ll recoup costs there. Quite being myopic people. Oh, and finally, yes, this household supports the tunnel and legislation to shield Seattle from cost over-runs.

  • richie December 10, 2010 (4:47 pm)

    is anybody else sick and tired of the debates and votes on any type of infastructure inprovements that this state, county and city desperately need? if we want to be a significant player in this world these things need to get done. plain and simple.

  • Pete December 10, 2010 (10:32 pm)

    Does anyone remember the Viaduct Stakeholder Advisory Group? 26 citizens appointed by the Gov, Mayor and King County Exec who met for almost 18 months and studied all fo the scenarios. The tunnel, surface transit options, retrofit and yes even the idea of a bridge across Elliott Bay. After the many months of study this group was the main voice in support and pushing the transit agencies to pursue the tunnel option. I just wish folks would spend some time in studying all of this before giving their uninformed opinions. You can tell from a lot of the comments that the commentor has paid attention to the media soundbites but not really researched all fo the various options that have been studied.

  • Fred December 13, 2010 (1:52 am)

    WS commuter , JB and Pete – you three definitely have it right.

Sorry, comment time is over.