Ban Airplane Banner Advertising

Home Forums Open Discussion Ban Airplane Banner Advertising

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 18 posts - 1 through 18 (of 18 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #611924

    Anthony H.
    Participant

    Geico insurance has been joined by Weedmaps.com in advertising by use of airplane-dragged banners in the skies over Seattle. I think that burning leaded gasoline in order to advertise anything at all is terribly wrong (using unleaded gas is bad enough.) That’s right folks–the FAA never outlawed use of leaded gasoline for private airplanes and that’s what they run on! Does anyone else find this outrageous?

    #810753

    JayDee
    Participant

    Mostly I find it noisy. First you have the Weekend mow and blowers, then the steam cleaners, and the Alki crotch rocket rev’ers, and then that damn plane. If I had a rocket launcher…

    #810754

    dhg
    Participant

    I’ll join the protest. You know it has been a long long road since The Highway Beautification Act and its intentions have been steadily eroded. Advertisers look to land, sea and sky for a means to get your attention and it should be better regulated. Remember, after 911, how eerie it was to have such quiet skies? We can use less noise and less air pollution.

    And just slightly off topic: Props to the Ivar’s advertising team that came up with billboards at the bottom of Lake Union to attract submarines. I think Ivar would’ve loved that joke.

    #810755

    B-squared
    Participant

    i couldn’t agree more.

    #810756

    emilyc
    Participant

    I cannot stand the geico plane. Circling the house every sunny weekend possible. Around and around. That banner makes me want to NOT buy geico insurance.

    #810757

    Jeannie
    Participant

    Jaydee, thanks for the “Rocket Launcher” reference. I just listened to it again after many years. If it doesn’t give a person shivers, they have no soul. And considering the mess in Central America and elsewhere these days, it still resonates.

    #810758

    wakeflood
    Participant

    No doubt. Pair that with “They Call it Democracy” and “Waiting for a Miracle” and you have the most potent trio of activism-stirring songs of our era. And then some.

    #810759

    au
    Participant

    YES! I would never purchase any ‘product’ from Geico because of that stupid plane circling around our skies.

    All sky advertising should be banned!

    #810760

    Vanessa
    Participant

    Round and round she goes.

    Go home Geico plane, you’re drunk

    Buzzing in circles.

    #810761

    Smitty
    Participant

    Noise, air and sight pollution. The triple crown of irritating.

    Maybe we all need to contact Geico so they know this is actually turning into a sales prevention tool! Or better yet – those covered by them threaten to cancel your plan!

    If not, it will only multiply.

    Anyone remember about a decade ago, someone was going to launch a stationary low-orbit satellite billboard? Can you imagine?

    #810762

    clark5080
    Participant

    I think we should go back to sky writing

    #810763

    Anthony H.
    Participant

    @clark5080

    Yeah, because we just don’t pollute the air enough…great idea, Einstein.

    #810764

    Pibal
    Participant

    Caution: thread creep…

    Lest anyone think that the leaded aviation fuel issue is not being addressed…

    This is a very complex issue. Piston aircraft engines are designed for high octane fuel (prevents detonation in multiple operating environments). Removing the lead lowers the octane to a point where engine failures occur. Operational safety has therefore temporarily trumped the environmental impact until a suitable fuel substitute can be developed. This is an effort that has been underway for more than a decade. Here’s the latest update:

    http://www.eaa.org/en/eaa/eaa-news-and-aviation-news/eaa/2014-07-10-faa-to-begin-evaluation-of-unleaded-fuels-for-ga

    #810765

    wakeflood
    Participant

    And if it fails, they could make bigger rubber bands?

    #810766

    waynster
    Participant

    No worse then the advertising on them stinky buses that run all over Seattle and king county…….

    #810767

    wakeflood
    Participant

    We’re well on our way to Blade Runner, with the 5-story advertising blimps filling the skies and blaring their ads.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if that damn Southwest Plumbing dude has already booked the first Seattle permasign blimp.

    Shoot me now.

    #810768

    metrognome
    Participant

    waynster, I feel the need to defend my former employer as your snark is a few decades off plumb. Thanks to the Clean Air Act, no more stinky public transit buses. Metro has pioneered a lot of clean (bio) diesel/hybrid technology and works closely with bus mfgrs. to reduce emissions even further. Things like bioswales at bus bases and P&R’s add up to a comprehensive pollution reduction program.

    ‘Metro’s motorbus fleet consists of diesel-electric hybrid, electric trolley and diesel buses. At the end of 2013, approximately 64% of Metro’s bus fleet was comprised of zero emission electric trolleys or diesel-electric hybrids. The existing diesel bus fleet is projected to be 100% hybrid by 2019. These hybrid buses are up to 30 percent more fuel efficient than the diesels being replaced.’

    http://metro.kingcounty.gov/am/sustainability/at-metro.html#vehicle-technology

    Sorry for boring everyone else; the noise and irritation issue aside, even military and commercial airlines are working to reduce fuel consumption through engine design and efficiency and use of biofuels.

    I always thought a 50cal sniper rifle was better than a rocket; less collateral damage on the ground as a properly placed shot would allow the pilot to make an emergency landing. Just kidding.

    #810769

    Anthony seems fun.

Viewing 18 posts - 1 through 18 (of 18 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.