TheHouse
Thanks for all of the comments re: moi above.
I’ve stayed neutral until Julie’s cattle prod statement above. I did read the Bill (it is short) and I don’t understand how you interpret “intellectual diversity” to mean “teach controversy”.
I believe that the intent of the Bill was to neutralize politics in the classroom. As many can attest and I have seen with my very eyes, many college professors are liberal and shine their political views/world views on the people in their class. I had several of the same debates I have on this blog with some of my college professors.
My interpretation of this Bill is that it will require professors to show both sides of an argument in a non religious course. Religion courses already teach multiple sides, so there should not be an issue with those types of courses.