WEEK AHEAD: Got questions about Highland Park Way lane-conversion project? SDOT @ HPAC on Wednesday

When SDOT held an online meeting earlier this month about the Highland Park Way lane-conversion project (WSB coverage here), community group HPAC‘s co-chair Kay Kirkpatrick got the project team to commit to something the coalition had long been requesting – attending an HPAC meeting to answer community questions. They’re keeping that promise this Wednesday (March 25), 6 pm at Southwest Library (9010 35th SW). HPAC’s meeting announcement says they’re hoping SDOT team members’ in-person appearance will allow “in-depth conversation with the community and a chance to really drill down into the work they are doing.” The project would convert the outside downhill driving lane on the Highland Park Way hill to a bicycle/pedestrian path; the newest version of the plan would separate that path from the remaining driving lane via removable jersey barriers as shown in graphic above), so it could revert to a driving lane in case of a major event like the 2020-2022 West Seattle Bridge closure. HPAC also hopes to update the Glassyard Commons RV/tiny-home site project at Wednesday’s meeting.

75 Replies to "WEEK AHEAD: Got questions about Highland Park Way lane-conversion project? SDOT @ HPAC on Wednesday"

  • Rob March 22, 2026 (5:07 pm)

    Please do not do this. I have been taking this road for years and have seen maybe 3 bikes. We have two options to get out of west Seattle and this is on of them. To reduce it to one lane for maybe a couple bikes a day is beyond insane. This is obviously a power play by the Cascade Bike Club that is deep in politics and a war on cars. 

    • WS Person March 22, 2026 (7:28 pm)

      It’s like how there were so many cheerleaders about the cement barriers going up admiral and people saying they didn’t ride there but would once the barriers were there.  I commute in/out of West Seattle daily and have seen 2 bikes riding up the hill in the past 3 weeks. There are routes that people just don’t ride as much as there’s this fantasy that they will….

      • Rob March 22, 2026 (8:30 pm)

        There is an existing wide paved sidewalk all the way down that hill. Widen and secure that area without taking a full lane of traffic away out of one of our only means of exit off the west Seattle peninsula. Nobody is saying NO BIKE LANE. The common sense commuters just say don’t do it at the expense of a full lane of car, truck, bus lane. The idea LITTERALY makes no sense. 

        • Kathy March 23, 2026 (1:20 pm)

          I AGREE WITH ROB!There is an existing wide paved sidewalk all the way down that hill. Widen and secure that area without taking a full lane of traffic away out of one of our only means of exit off the west Seattle peninsula. Nobody is saying NO BIKE LANE. The common sense commuters just say don’t do it at the expense of a full lane of car, truck, bus lane. The idea LITTERALY makes no sense.  Do make improvements. Widen the existing paved sidewalk and designate two lanes for bikes (uphill and downhill.) Provide turn-outs for walking/joggers/strollers.

      • bill March 22, 2026 (8:52 pm)

        Would you expect to commute via a dead-end street? The uphill Admiral Way bike lane does not go anywhere. While I enjoy stopping the leadfoots on Admiral with the ped light at Olga as much as the next cyclist, that still means wending south around Fairmount ravine. That is too much bother. I can reach other places to do business more easily. Extend the bike lane to the Admiral Junction to make it useful.

      • Alki Stu March 23, 2026 (7:27 am)

        I don’t know who the cheerleaders are for the Admiral barriers. We tried to ask SDOT to use the barriers on Avalon. I ride Admiral westbound to the Admiral Jct. It’s no walk in the park especially getting on and exiting the top, but I and many others do it. 

    • Amy March 22, 2026 (7:45 pm)

      There are more than 2 ways to get out of WS. 

      • Emily March 22, 2026 (8:24 pm)

        Into Seattle? Absolutely only 2 ways

      • Rob March 22, 2026 (8:32 pm)

        No there isn’t. You obviously did not live here when the bridge was down and if you’re thinking of Olsen Place, you have to head south to Roxbury just to connect to that and I’m sorry but that is not west seattle. I can link you to google maps if you need… 

        • Amy March 23, 2026 (5:06 am)

          I have absolutely lived in WS for 20+ years. No maps needed. Low bridge, high bridge, W. Marginal to South Park or 1st Ave S bridge, Meyers Way, Boeing hill….also biking, buses, water taxi.

        • Emily March 23, 2026 (7:00 am)

          Even counting Meyer’s way- “no, there’s THREE ways” isn’t much of an argument anyways 😆

    • Tartuffe March 22, 2026 (9:11 pm)

      Please do this. I’ve been riding my bike up the hill M-F for 8 years and every time I do, I see maybe 20-25 cars. Why so many lanes for so few cars?

      • Kyle March 23, 2026 (3:13 pm)

        You must be either a very fast bike rider, riding the hill in the middle of the night, or bad at counting cars while riding your bike.

        • cwit March 24, 2026 (9:58 am)

          Tartuffe is probably as good at counting as anyone else that is using anecdotal evidence for citing how many bikes they see when they drive the hill.  Personally, I don’t see any bikes because I’m too busy looking at my phone while driving (that’s sarcasm).

    • Alki Stu March 23, 2026 (8:24 am)

      Hi Rob, we have young women and men on the way to the Middle East to save you two dollars a gallon on gas. 

    • Harlander March 23, 2026 (9:39 am)

      The reason you haven’t seen many cyclists is because without protected bike lanes cyclists die… often.If you believe in the existance of climate change, you should understand and accept the fact that, in order to make greener transportation like cycling and bussing more appealing and safe, we have to very mildly inconvenience polluting, wasteful car owners.

    • AB March 25, 2026 (5:36 pm)

      I live in the neighborhood and the main reason I do not ride my bike on Highland Park way is because it is not safe, which may be why you see so few bikes on this road. The sidewalk is not built to bike on, and the road is unsafe as cars are driving too fast. If there was a bike lane on the road I would ride my bicycle on it more, at least once per week. 

  • CSinHP March 22, 2026 (5:49 pm)

    This looks really dangerous for downhill drivers to force them into the lane closest to oncoming traffic- I stay in the right lane as long as possible to avoid that adjacency. A barrier should be between the uphill and downhill traffic as well, or at least a separation wider than a double yellow line.  I offer this opinion with resignation that SDOT seems determined to spend money on this regardless of the community uproar over it. I suggest coming to that meeting with some data – not just “accidents on this road” but detailed data for the number of accidents that happen between the intersections – not at the intersections, and those that are not due to impairment, accidents that are head on collisions and accidents that are from cars passing each other. Show us some granular data for making the case to do this because very few of us that use this road multiple times a day are buying it.

    • Alki Stu March 23, 2026 (7:30 am)

      I guess drivers need to slow down, drive attentively and stay in their lane.

  • M. Wayss March 22, 2026 (5:49 pm)

    Wasting more money for a few riders. They just added cement barriers on the uphill side of Admiral which has very few bike riders. It’s a waste of money. Meanwhile the potholes don’t get paved.

    • Platypus March 23, 2026 (11:26 am)

      I have submitted many pot hole requests with a high success rate using the Find it, Fix it app. I encourage everyone to submit any and they see. The team is very responsive. 

      • Look Both Ways March 23, 2026 (12:52 pm)

        False. The team is far from responsive and under-resourced. Our neighborhood has dozens of FiFi requests re: dangerous potholes, cracked concrete and associated road + sidewalk issues throughout the corridor that remain unfixed after multiple years. FiFi is not prioritized well.

  • E March 22, 2026 (6:27 pm)

    Please do this! Vulnerable road users have very few protected ways to move through our public spaces. Not only will this change provide reduced speeds and traffic calming, it will also give a much more direct connection to the Duwamish trail. Thanks!

    • Kyle March 22, 2026 (7:23 pm)

      The bike path can be improved and even further sperated from the road in the existing median. SDOT was supposed to evaluate options back in 2020.

      • E March 22, 2026 (8:18 pm)

        Nah, this design is better.

        • Kyle March 22, 2026 (10:08 pm)

          Just saying ‘this design is better’ isn’t really an argument. What specifically is better than improving and separating the bike path in the median without reducing capacity?

          • E March 23, 2026 (11:21 am)

            Seems like a good argument to me. The intentions for this design from the start were to improve safety. Slowing traffic improves safety. Using the space freed up to provide alternative and more sustainable transportation is a great side benefit to the design. Cars ruin cities. Anything to reverse the auto-centric dependency forced upon us always seems like a good design to me. Streets are for people first, not cars. Thanks for encouraging me to expand my response!I’m sure you will ask for more facts. I hope SDOT can give you more answers. Though I have to admit that I am skeptical that any further discussion will convince you. You prefer the status quo. 

          • Kyle March 23, 2026 (3:18 pm)

            ‘cars ruin cities’ sounds more like an anti-car stance than a transportation solution. How does this improve safety more than a separated path in the median and keeps a major corridor working?

          • E March 23, 2026 (6:14 pm)

            Bingo! I am definitely anti-car in cities. They should be the lowest priority when it comes to transportation. For the past few decades, street design has been too narrowly focused on the goal of moving cars. Number of cars move is the wrong metric for determining how successfully our urban designs serve our communities. Safe streets should be designed around natural movement, strong communities, reduced noise and air pollution, etc. This is definitely a transportation solution, or at least moving toward one. This solution gives access to more humans, not just those who can afford to and have the ability to operate and maintain a car. A car that mostly just hauls air per the amount of space it takes up on a road. Buses, bikes and walking are much more efficient. SDOT is really on the right track.

          • E March 23, 2026 (6:28 pm)

            Kyle, no one is going to convince you here that this is a good design. The status quo seems to be working for you, and therefore, you do not want it to change. I do not see that the staus quo is actually working for most people. I like what SDOT is doing, and i continue to support the Vision Zero goals. Since you are concerned about road diets, bring it up to them. I hope they can answer your questions. Wednesday’s meeting is a great opportunity. 

          • k March 23, 2026 (3:16 pm)

            What is specifically better than improving and separating the bike path in the median without reducing capacity is reducing capacity.  I thought we were clear on that.

          • Kyle March 23, 2026 (5:52 pm)

            I see, you don’t actually care about moving people efficiently, including transit. Just trolling that we should “reduce capacity everywhere and cars are bad.” Cool, thanks.

  • k March 22, 2026 (6:38 pm)

    Please do this.  I have been taking this road for nearly 20 years and it is scary on foot, in a bus, or in a car.  The lane reduction desperately needs to happen, and I’m thrilled the safety improvements will also mean an easier bike route for those in the neighborhood.  Please don’t give in to the Cars Only Cars Everywhere activists.  The Department of Transportation needs to accommodate ALL forms of transportation, not just the ones with the loudest supporters.

    • Kyle March 22, 2026 (7:26 pm)

      20,000 daily vehicles, 3,000 daily transit users, 50-75 daily bike users. I love riding my bike, I also need to get to work and my kids to school to contribute to society. Halving road capacity for all vehicles and transit users seems to be the wrong move here.

      • E March 22, 2026 (8:00 pm)

        Nah, this design is better.

        • Look Both Ways March 22, 2026 (9:43 pm)

          Nah, it’s not. It’s a misguided waste of taxpayer funds. 

          • Alki Stu March 23, 2026 (7:36 am)

            Remember that most of the transportation budget goes to maintaining roads that get damaged by heavy vehicles that weigh between one and fifteen n tons. When compared to the small fraction of the budget that goes into safety and infrastructure for venerable users that needs very little maintenance it seems like a good use of taxpayer dollars.

      • k March 22, 2026 (8:10 pm)

        Making roads safer is always the right move, even when it is inconvenient for Kyle.

        • Kyle March 22, 2026 (8:21 pm)

          Hard to take you folks serious without any facts. What’s the safest way to ski? “don’t ski”, seems to be your answer. Would love safety improvements like a center line divider and possibly speed humps. A major arterial out of West Seattle, that has less accidents than the West Seattle bridge, Roxbury, and about the same as admiral way, should not be one lane.

          • Not Kyle March 22, 2026 (9:08 pm)

            Except you’ll still be able to drive down it, so that analogy doesn’t hold up. 

          • Kyle March 22, 2026 (10:01 pm)

            You can still ski with one ski too, it just works a lot worse. Reducing capacity on a road used by 20,000+ vehicles and thousands of transit riders has real tradeoffs. Pretending it doesn’t is the part that doesn’t hold up.

          • K March 23, 2026 (2:49 am)

            So you’re in agreement, then, that this change will slow traffic, which has a strong positive correlation with improved safety per dozens of studies in numerous cities.

          • Kyle March 23, 2026 (3:21 pm)

            Speed is one factor, not the only one. There are safer designs that don’t bottleneck a major arterial.

          • Not Kyle March 23, 2026 (11:18 am)

            I can hear you moving the goal posts from miles away 😅

  • BDR March 22, 2026 (7:24 pm)

    The zoom meeting was interesting as SDOT first said this project was to slow traffic then, when questioned further they stated it was to connect a bike path.  I think a much better way to create a safer bike path would be to widen the sidewalk rather than take away a lane of traffic mobility. It’s not like there is a crowd of people who use the sidewalk there. They could install auto fining speed cameras to make people slow down. As a lifetime Seattle resident and the last 40 in WS, SDOT eliminating traffic down to one lane is each direction on so many roads throughout the city has made traffic worse. When they first announced reducing the lanes on 35th Ave SW the reason given was because of pedestrian deaths. I witnessed one of them. It happened on 35th and Raymond. Others were also between Willow and Juneau on 35th. But the lanes are still 2 in each direction along that area. Meaning, they didn’t make changes where the deaths were happening! Getting from a side street to 35th used to be easy. Now it can take 2 to 4 minutes to get a break in traffic if you need to cross lanes for the direction you want to go. I would sure like to see the SDOT account of the amount of people who use Highland parkway daily for bikes and pedestrians. That was not available when asked during the online meeting. I would also like to see the cost analysis for expanding the sidewalk rather than taking away a lane of traffic. SDOT has ignored the amount of accidents that have happened heading west bound on the WS bridge near the west end by the statues for a few years now. I’m not sure they have their priorities in the right order. SDOT also wouldn’t say how many voted against their plan on the survey they put out. They were clearly trying to downplay the amount of people that think reducing a lane on HPW is not a good decision. If you are against the idea, please show up at the meeting, call or email your thoughts to SDOT. They have other options.  The bus routes have been reduced. Many think busses are not safe either. So they can’t expect people to trade driving for riding the bus regularly.We don’t know when or if light rail will ever make it to WS given the cost overruns that were recently announced. Meanwhile, with zoning changes more living spaces are being created in WS, seems very short sighted to strangle more traffic lanes for the limited ways out of West Seattle when it’s very clear the population of WS will continue to grow. 

    • Kyle March 22, 2026 (8:29 pm)

      SDOT’s survey results were abysmal, that’s why they haven’t put another one out for their new design. 36% was the highest approval for any of their options, on a survey of 2,000+. 

      • Look Both Ways March 22, 2026 (9:50 pm)

        And the survey left out an option to keep both vehicle lanes. It was biased from the outset and the highest vote still only garnered 36%.

  • Scarlett March 22, 2026 (8:20 pm)

    Let’s not reduce car lanes on this critical route in and out of West Seattle.  It’s not just personal auto’s that use roads, its emergency vehicles and all other types of commercial vehicles. No one is going to rush to your medical emergency on a bicycle, or a bus for that matter.  Hate them or love them, roads are indispensable.      

    • Platypus March 24, 2026 (1:47 pm)

      If designed right, shared paths can be driven on by ambulances and fire trucks since pedestrians and bikes can easily get out of their way. This is common in Europe.

  • DBurns March 22, 2026 (10:36 pm)

    Hi Everyone! If you oppose this please come share your thoughts live at the HPAC Meeting on Wednesday. We need your voices. We will share ideas about further protesting including to Katie Wilson directly as she has not been a part of this plan and needs to listen to as many people as possible who oppose this idea. Spread the word, please! The East side of HPW specifically, (my neighborhood) is going to be affected in the biggest way – we will have a terrible time getting out on Othello. It’s so unfair. Please help us! 

  • HPBikeCommuter March 22, 2026 (11:59 pm)

    Everyone whining about how few bikes ride the point while also complaining about how scary and dangerous it is driving in the lane next to other traffic are missing the point. This road is one of two connections to the green river trail, 1st ave bridge trail, and the Duwamish trail. It least directly to Boeing on East Marginal, and south of South Park gets you on the Green River out to Renton and the Lake Washington Trail and Cedar River Trail. Those who complain about lack of bikes are missing the point, its incredibly dangerous as it is today.

    Biking downhill at 40MPH I still get passed and cut off by cars. I stopped biking up it altogether because of how aggressive many of you have been, I’ll take the 6 mile detour north or just drive and add to traffic before I bike up it on a given day.This road is a hazard as it is, it does not have the throughput people like to pretend it has and it does not need the second lane. This is just like the lane that got removed on WMW – there’s been no impact except now cars can’t jump you and cut you off while you drive.

    And yeah, you’re on the hill for 30 seconds max – the odds of you seeing a bike are low but many of us do ride the hill, and many more will be able to if they can do so safely. 

    Going down this hill on the bumpy, narrow, refuse filled (ill maintained) sidewalk is a recipe for disaster if there’s someone waiting for the bus or walking up it. Going uphill on the sidewalk is a challenge an an analog bike and tight on an ebike because of all the roots and crags in the sidewalk – and again, if there’s anyone else using it, it’s a pain.

    I would fully support a 14′ wide Multi Use path grade separated, but SDOT isn’t allowed to build bike lanes without carcentric folk losing their minds about taxpayer money. This is a road diet on a road that does not need to be as wide as it is for the traffic it sees and the data shows that. 

    Studies indicate a 19 to 47 percent reduction in overall crashes when a

    Road Diet is installed on a previously four-lane undivided facility as
    well as a decrease in crashes involving drivers under 35 years of age
    and over 65 years of age.

    https://highways.dot.gov/safety/other/road-diets/road-diet-informational-guide/2-why-consider-road-diet

    • My two cents March 23, 2026 (5:27 am)

       Biking downhill at 40MPH I still get passed …”And the speed limit is ??? LOL, so biking along at 40 mph on city streets and paths is safe and prudent for other users; pedestrian, bikers, cars that are navigating and traveling?  Oops – not a good part of your position on this topic.

      • Alki Stu March 23, 2026 (7:45 am)

        If you ride any eastbound lane like HPW or Admiral (actually points south) riding well over the speed limit is for survival. Even in a car you get harassed and feel uncomfortable while driving the speed limit. That’s why eliminating these speeding opportunities (lane reduction) is so important. 

      • Foop March 23, 2026 (8:33 am)

        Have you ridden a bike in traffic? If you ride the speed limit on a road clearly designed for higher speeds you’ll get illegally passed and too close all of the time. If I ride my brakes and go 25, cars will pass me rather aggressively and cut over in front not allowing a safe amount of space. You can nitpick the speed comment but maybe try giving cyclist more space? I personally find that I get passed every time even when I am riding 5 over.going 25-30 down Barton toward the ferry and having a car speed past you on the blind turn near ymca is a harrowing experience.

        If anything this comment and your response is a stronger argument for road design traffic calming.

      • bill March 23, 2026 (9:02 am)

        On a road with speeding drivers it is safer to keep up with the drivers if you can. Of course some still have must pass bicycle derangement syndrome…. Memories of the scofflaw pickup truck driver who passed me doing at least 50 on Avalon when I was going 30. Caught up down at the Chelan intersection in time to see him turn onto the low bridge back when the low bridge was closed to private vehicles. Explained why his tailgate was down, blocking his license plate.

      • cwit March 23, 2026 (9:25 am)

        This is clearly a comment from someone who doesn’t ride bikes in traffic.  Even driving a car at the 25 mph speed limit gets you aggressively (and even illegally at times) passed and brake checked.

    • Kyle March 23, 2026 (7:09 am)

      “I would fully support a 14′ wide Multi Use path grade separated, but SDOT isn’t allowed to build bike lanes without carcentric folk losing their minds about taxpayer money” – I would support this. We’ve got a 1.5B levy. If SDOT proposed it, it would be their most popular alternative by far.

  • DRW March 23, 2026 (6:43 am)

    Noooo! Please widen the existing sidewalk.

  • Alki Stu March 23, 2026 (8:10 am)

    I wish people in cars were not so anxious and aggressive with little or no care for others. No care for other car drivers, pedestrians, bicycle riders, mobility challenged even emergency vehicles. When driving in a car you are sitting in a comfortable seat, have either the heat or AC on, listening to music or a podcast. I guess maybe sitting too comfortable and detached from the responsibility. I see way too many drivers with the smart phone in front of their faces.  We have been forced into a mindset that makes us angry and upset if associating with other road users doesn’t go the way we want it to. I am glad I use a bicycle most of the time. It is a well documented stress relief. Even more so now that a fraction of our tax dollars has gone towards new and better bicycle infrastructure. Things are not going to get better for society or you personally with more car capacity. In fact it will get much worse, more congestion, less physical activity, more pollution that exacerbates the climate crisis and economically with high gas prices and the high cost of car ownership. None of this was ever designed to make you happy. It was a marketing campaign that completely took over our society for the benefit of the oil industry and auto manufacturers. Let’s just have a little respect for those who try harder. Please.

  • Moobs345 March 23, 2026 (8:35 am)

    Great, let’s clog up the only other way out of West Seattle for the handful of people that ride their bike down that hill!  

  • SC March 23, 2026 (8:42 am)

    There’s plenty of space to widen the sidewalk as a multi-use (bike/ped) option WITHOUT eliminating an entire lane for traffic. Why is this so hard? We can achieve both – a safer route for cyclists/peds AND not impact the flow of traffic. 

    • Platypus March 24, 2026 (1:51 pm)

      Some of the safety issue is cars and bikes, but the much bigger safety issue is cars driving fast. Cars drive the speed of the design of the street. That street has a design that is higher that what is safe to drive at. The new design alters the design to match the speed cars drive at with the speed that is safe.

  • Kathy March 23, 2026 (10:41 am)

    This project is absolutely needed. Reducing lanes on West Seattle’s freeway style arterials will make us all safer and has been proven not to significantly slow down traffic while it does reduce the crazy speeding. We could also use lane reductions on the north end of 35th Ave SW and the uphill Admiral Way lanes between the West Seattle Bridge off ramp and Walnut Ave SW (where there is no downhill bike lane). Every time SDOT does one of these safety projects there is a lot of loud noise from car driving commuters and then once finished everyone adapts. I remember attending the five meetings we had about putting in bike lanes on Admiral Way between 63rd Ave and 45th Ave, people breaking down crying in the meeting about possibly losing a parking space in front of their house. We wasted a lot of money pandering to the pearl clutchers.

    • genxgrump March 23, 2026 (11:24 am)

      None of these projects have been needed. In fact, Delridge has been absolutely ruined as a result of this same type of project. Lane reductions, adding bike lanes that very few use, and adding landscaping that dangerously limits visibility. The changes to Delridge have already limited access to many neighborhoods in Southwest West Seattle and now SDOT is determined to limit in/out privileges even more. For those of you who don’t live in Highland Park, South Delridge and Westwood, you may not realize what a critical road HP Way is for us. Limiting it to one lane is going to have serious consequences for travel times, home values and basic livability. Please join us at HPAC to educate yourself

      • Alki Stu March 23, 2026 (11:50 am)

        Are you referring to the Delridge Way that passes schools and libraries as well as public spaces. I must be driving a different Delridge that has been calmed and made more safe. I been driving on Delridge for 40 years and have not experienced any delays or driving the length being noticibly more time consuming. Oh, unless you’re considering the time it takes to get to the next traffic light and wait for it to turn. That takes me longer than those who are in a hurry to stop and wait.

      • Alki Stu March 23, 2026 (11:55 am)

        I remember the outcry about the 35th Ave lane reduction that occurred after a cyclist was killed. That decision has never caused the backups and delays that was predicted. There has not been a fatality since, so maybe this is a safety design on HPW. There will still be 20,000 cars using that street each day. That won’t change. It will just be safer for all.

        • Scarlett March 23, 2026 (3:23 pm)

          To be fair, 35th Ave is not Highland Park; there are more work-arounds for drivers on 35th Ave than there are for Highland Park. This is why comparisons are always tricky. There have to be other ways to improve safety than reducing capacity on this corridor.  

      • E March 23, 2026 (6:35 pm)

        I ride and drive Delridge. It feels much safer and calmer now. Thanks, SDOT! I’d love to see 35th road diet finished and the  the turn lane on California and Fauntleroy replaced with full, protected bike lanes. 

  • Boomer Kathy March 23, 2026 (1:17 pm)

    GenXGrump: that project on Delridge Way took away bike lanes. 

    • Platypus March 24, 2026 (1:53 pm)

      Yes, it was a bad design for north bound bike lanes. They should still remove parking, but in terms of cars, it is better.

  • Kyle March 23, 2026 (4:55 pm)

    The biggest safety improvement on Highland park way in the past 20 years? The light added at Holden, that after years of community pushing for was finally added during the bridge closure. It eliminated the t-bone collisions and actually reduced accidents by 50% compared to the past 4 years. Highland parkway sees less accidents that Olsen Pl Way, 35th, and the West Seattle Bridge. It sees about the same amount as Admiral Way which is also 4 lanes and has no push to reduce capacity for that community. This feels like the exact opposite of the community driven safety improvements leading to the light being installed of a few years ago. SDOT, listen to your constituents.

    • Foop March 23, 2026 (5:35 pm)

      Good point Kyle, I’ll be sure to bring this up at the HPAC meeting if they give us a chance to comment. We should take a similar approach to admiral way!

      • Kyle March 23, 2026 (6:08 pm)

        Enjoy your leisure rides on your e-bike in your two car household! Some of us are just trying to get to work and school. Thanks for the sarcasm too, I guess.

  • genxgrump March 24, 2026 (11:55 am)

    Hopefully, it won’t be just lip service from SDOT as usual. I’ve attended several meeting online and in person and they have not listened to our neighborhood really at all. The overwhelming sentiment is that 1) this will reduce in/out access to our already difficult to access neighborhood which is, inequitable and unfair and 2) a bike lane already exists and just needs a full refurb. The idea that SDOT would spend over $10M taxpayer funds to remove capacity when they have spent YEARS ignoring the massive hole on 12th Ave SW / Cloverdale (the actual greenway for bikes) which floods the entire street when it rains, is insane. I look forward to SDOT providing us with facts on how many cyclists use HP way and Delridge. How many and the type of accidents occurred over the last 5 years on HP Way compared to other similar roads. Wanna bet they won’t share? 

    • Foop March 24, 2026 (2:02 pm)

      Why do you want data about what how many cyclists use roads that don’t have bike infrastructure and have high speed traffic? Where are you getting this 10m number from?

Leave a Reply to Tartuffe Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.