VIDEO: Rezoning ‘doesn’t have to be scary’ – event at West Seattle Realty explains why

(WSB photo: Matt Hutchins and Kevin Broveleit at West Seattle Realty event)

By Tracy Record
West Seattle Blog editor

One of the most pointed audience questions during last night’s discussion of “Zoning Changes in Seattle” was whether everyone whose property has been, or will be, upzoned by those changes is aware of it.

All the discussion leader, local architect Matt Hutchins, could say was, in essence, if not, they should – this all has been years in the making, and it’s not over yet.”You can not like the outcome, but you can’t say this was done hastily,” he contended. (He’s had something of an inside view, as co-chair of the city-convened Planning Commission.)

More than two dozen people filled the seats at West Seattle Realty (WSB sponsor), whose proprietor Kevin Broveleit both hosted and participated. Here’s our full video of the event:

Though it was a full house at WSR, those were just two dozen out of hundreds of thousands – Hutchins’ slide deck included the projection that by mid-century, the city of Seattle’s population could hit 1 million. That’s why city, county, and state leaders have been changing zoning to accommodate more housing. And the city has just launched its next round.

Hutchins touched on many points in his presentation – including how replacement of older residential units with newer, denser buildings increases housing affordability, even if it’s the classic case of one older $750,000 house getting replaced with three smaller new homes selling for that or more. (His term for what happens: “Vacancy chains.”) He showed a multitude of examples of types of housing now allowed on some if not all single-family sites, including a phrase you might have heard, “stacked flats.” (Those buildings could hold up to 11 units and four stories, in certain cases, Hutchins said, or even 16 one-bedroom “deed-restricted, for-sale” units.)

He also explained why rezoning only means what can be done on a site, not what will, and discussed reasons why redevelopment hasn’t happened as quickly as it could have. According to Hutchins, one factor in Seattle is the Mandatory Housing Affordability component, requiring a builder either to include “affordable” housing in their project, or pay a fee that the city would apply toward funding it somewhere else. That fee currently must be paid before construction, Hutchins says, and that’s a dealbreaker for some builders who would be better able to afford the fee if it was collected afterward, when the units are sold.

In the meantime, a lot of building is being done with homeowners in the role of “developer” – Hutchins and Broveleit said “backyard cottages” are a surprisingly sizable percentage of home sales right now. With most lots now able to be developed into at least four units, Hutchins said this will “open the door to a new kind of competition among architects – who’s going to design the best backyard duplex.” He showed an example of a duplex that could be home to multiple generations of the same family.

And it’s not only about housing; he noted that corner stores and child-care businesses. Overall, “you’re going to see all kinds of variants” of projects because of the way the code (zoning) was written.

Bottom line, toward the end of the hour-and-a-half event, was a declaration that “density and affordability doesn’t have to be scary – (you have to) get people talking to each other.”

WHAT’S NEXT: This was a community-led event, not official, but plenty of official proceedings are coming up. Most importantly: The dates are set for consideration of the next phase of city rezoning, the Centers and Corridors proposals, as the council meets as the Select Committee on the Comprehensive Plan:

March 19 – 2:00 PM meeting
April 6 – Public Hearing 9:30 AM
May 29 – Public Hearing 9:30 AM
June 4 – 1:00 PM
June 18 – 1:00 PM

The Centers and Corridors proposal was unveiled a month ago.

39 Replies to "VIDEO: Rezoning 'doesn't have to be scary' - event at West Seattle Realty explains why"

  • Planner 1234 February 25, 2026 (12:44 pm)

    With the responses like “they should’ve known” and complete lack of response by the city, why do I feel like I am Arthur Dent in Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy?  The Vogons are running the city planning commission.

  • Admiral Westy February 25, 2026 (1:07 pm)

    As someone impacted by this rezoning, I am curious to know what this does to property values. Let me be clear: This is NOT a post about the politics or ethics or anything else.  I fully respect everyone’s opinions on that.  I have my own as well. This is purely a practical question so I can better understand my future and plan accordingly.  I posted this question on Reddit some months ago and it immediately exploded into a vitriolic politic debate.

    • k February 25, 2026 (4:48 pm)

      Upzoning generally improves property values, because you are allowed to do more with the property.  Most of the appreciation my home has had in the last 10 years has come from the two big jumps when zoning changes were made.

      • raywest February 26, 2026 (3:39 pm)

        I’m located just south of the Alaska Junction. For the past few years, I’ve been inundated by callers (developers) interested in my house, giving me all kinds of reasons, except the truth, about why they want to buy it (to demolish it).  One caller claimed he wanted me to sell so his “clients” could move here to be closer to their family, and it would be “great favor.” As if they couldn’t check Zillow.com for available homes, and why would I owe strangers a “favor”?  Another person tried to persuade me to sell so I could leave money for my children! (I don’t have any.) These pushy callers claim they will offer a “fair market” price based on a home’s current condition, meaning they want it for cheap.  I make it clear I know the zoning laws have changed, why they want it, that the condition is irrelevant, and that property values are going up. People need to be aware why they are getting these calls and know their home’s true value.

        • k February 26, 2026 (5:19 pm)

          At least half of those solicitations are scams and not anyone looking to buy at all, so please don’t give them any info while you rebuff!  I would recommend just asking to be taken off the call list and hang up, or just hang up without saying anything.

          • Ray West February 27, 2026 (12:59 pm)

            Those scam calls are pretty obvious as it’s usually an overseas caller who speaks poor English, sound as if they are reading from a script, and other callers working the phones can be heard in the background. Hang up quick.

        • Jill Loblaw February 27, 2026 (10:45 pm)

          We are constantly receiving offers from developers as well. Quite frankly it humors me because they want to offer “fair” value for our home and property. They honestly think we’re ignorant as to what they intend to do with our home. Sorry not sorry but we are staying put for as long as we can. Save your breath if you’re going to argue with me as I will not respond.

    • Michael February 25, 2026 (5:55 pm)

      It generally improves the value of the land versus the value of the property. When you can do more with the land it has more inherent upside. This won’t mean much for those who want an aging single family home to keep going up in value since frankly it will do the opposite (but those are generally money traps here anyway if sold, the value involves offloading a ton of burden on new buyers). It’s a culture shift for most American homeowners who see value in the property versus the land.

    • Frog February 25, 2026 (7:51 pm)

      Upzoning causes the value of your property to tend towards the redevelopment “scrape” value of your lot.  The value of your house tends toward zero, especially if you are in a very dense zone such as neighborhood center or urban center.  (For example, see county records for 4451 42ND AVE SW or 4447 42ND AVE SW).  If you have a small, dumpy, older house, your property value might increase, because the redevelopment value of your lot is higher than the previous value of your house as a single family property.   If you have a larger, renovated or recently constructed McModern type house, you stand to lose six figures in value, because most of your value was in the house, not the lot.  Your house was worth more in a single family setting than the scrape value of your lot.  Think of it this way — how would the value of your house change if you had 50- or 60-foot apartment buildings right on your property line?  It would be less, of course.

    • matt February 25, 2026 (8:34 pm)

      When 75% of the parcels get an upzone, there is no direct increase in the land value component of individual property’s taxes.  However, if you are worried about property tax increases, there are larger, more direct reasons, like the voter-approved transportation, school, parks and housing levies.

    • Kyle February 26, 2026 (6:44 pm)

      Your property value mostly stays the same, unless you have a run down house that just got upzoned where finding a buyer to rehab the existing house was difficult. In general if you live next door to a run down house, or an elderly neighbor, if the family wants to sell after they pass you’ll likely live next to a construction site for a year or so while the developer builds the max profitable units allowed.

  • genxgrump February 25, 2026 (4:22 pm)

    The couple that bought the beautiful mid century house from the lovely 90 year old lady that lived there for 60 years just built a massive “backyard cottage.” It’s bigger than the original house in front of it, houses two entire families, has no parking, destroyed several trees, ruined the park nearby, devastated the backyard tranquility of their next door neighbors and to top it off, is painted a ugly bright blue. Now, keep in mind this couple doesn’t even live in Seattle. In fact, they don’t even live in the US. Nope, he’s a rich oil guy (I talked to him) from Calgary and they are thrilled about this new investment property they’ve got on our shores and right here in our West Seattle community. Meanwhile, there are three homes within a two block radius of mine that have been sitting vacant for over 2 years. What are we even doing here people? 

    • K February 25, 2026 (6:12 pm)

      What’s your point?  My grandfather is a retired cop and built a backyard cottage bigger than his home, no parking, et cetera et cetera.  it’s his property.  He built with the intent to have people live there, but has some severe hoarding issues, so it was just filled with junk and no one ever lived there.  That was several years ago.  Neighbors got a break from the junk piles in his yard though.  He stayed good friends with everyone on his block, even when he had to move because he ran out of space to sleep in the main house. 

      Regarding the nearby available homes, you can’t force people to rent out properties under reasonable conditions, or at all (see: Harvey Rowe).  Again, their property, not yours.

    • ryan February 25, 2026 (7:24 pm)

      sorry to hear about the “tranquility” of your neighbors’ backyards, genxgrump. lol. that said, I don’t think you have to be a rich canadian to paint your house a color your neighbors wouldn’t have chosen themselves. 

      • genxgrump February 26, 2026 (7:44 am)

        Amazing that with all the other issues I mentioned about our park, parking, our trees, our privacy being ruined you focus on the the house color. Awful choice, yes. But building the thing in general and wrecking a nice street in WS while living in Calgary is much worse. 

    • M.B. February 26, 2026 (7:42 am)

      What did they do to ruin the park? Did they rip out play equipment? Flood it? Or did they just add two homes worth of people?

      • Sarah February 26, 2026 (8:35 am)

        Yes, I’d love to know more about this part.

      • CatLady February 26, 2026 (8:41 am)

        I’m wondering the same thing! Like, do they live right next to the park and the construction did something to it? Because otherwise it just comes off as incredibly exclusionary. And lol at “devastated the backyard tranquility” of the next door neighbor. I mean yeah, two families are going be louder than one little old lady, but that’s just called coexisting with people?! I hope those families know they have every right to be there, regardless of cold-shoulder neighbors. 

  • HS February 25, 2026 (4:52 pm)

    Thank you so much for the video! I had planned on attending but was unable to do so. I REALLY appreciate the presentation and video.

    • CJ February 26, 2026 (7:54 am)

      When a developer opts out of including affordable units in their project and instead pays a fee to the City to do so who tracks how and where those fees are used to build affordable units elsewhere? Is there a publicity available accounting of the fees collected and units built?

  • GH February 25, 2026 (5:33 pm)
    • Is there a list of the areas under the corridors section of the plan? I’ve seen the maps of the centers, but am curious about the corridors.  From parsing the maps the city has published I can parse out most of it, but I am curious if there’s an authoritative/official list. 
  • Frog February 25, 2026 (8:47 pm)

    Upzoning isn’t scary to real estate agents who stand to make millions in commissions as property is sold for redevelopment.  It’s positively delightful.  But it will be stressful for single family home owners who will lose their quality of life and have to face moving out, not necessarily on a timetable they would choose.

    • k February 26, 2026 (7:54 am)

      Real estate agents make that money whether the sale is a backyard cottage, a SFH in Normandy Park, or an apartment near the Junction.  Upzoning doesn’t change how much money they make, just where they’re making it.  What DOES impact their bottom line is the availability of homes to be sold, which takes us back to the affordability crisis.  Yes, they benefit from greater availability of housing for more people, just as those first-time homebuyers benefit, just as we all benefit from home ownership being in reach for more people.

      Not all homeowners see getting new neighbors as losing quality of life, either.  That’s a you thing, not a given.  Your neighbors survived your arrival.  It will be okay if new people move in too.

    • Sarah February 26, 2026 (8:37 am)

      If you own your property, no one is forcing you to make any changes. 

      • Look Both Ways February 26, 2026 (10:39 am)

        If you own your property, and zoning / city changes affect your taxes, parking, services and general neighborhood quality of life…then yes, changes are being forced upon you. That’s not to say some upzoning changes may be justified, but your statement is false.

    • Jake February 26, 2026 (10:38 am)

      What quality of life is being lost by someone else’s upzoning? What?

      • Frog February 26, 2026 (12:41 pm)

        Your question is disingenuous, bordering on trolling, but just to state the obvious:  In a single family neighborhood, your back yard is surrounded by your neighbors’ yards, with relative quiet, privacy, and a view of greenery.  After a developer puts a row of 40-foot townhouses five feet from your property line (or a 60-foot building right on your property line, depending on your new zoning) your sunlight and privacy are gone, your garden is abandoned to shade-tolerant weeds, and your days are spent gazing on ugly box buildings instead of trees.  Not to mention the big increase in noise and traffic.  That’s fine if you are a city guy who thinks quiet, privacy, and home gardens are annoyingly bourgeois.  But it’s that quality of life that drew people to single-family neighborhoods in the first place.  

        • Jake February 26, 2026 (12:51 pm)

          Seattle is a major city last I checked. SFH zoning is not what brought people here. Tech jobs and the mountains/geography did. Did not know you were entitled to what other people do with their properties. There is no HOA either. More noise and traffic means a city bustling and sounds like a major increase in quality of life to me. Upzoning means more housing and density which means businesses can thrive and be open longer and have more per capita. Your property value also goes way up. Upzoning is an INCREASE in quality of life to me.

          • WS Person February 26, 2026 (1:52 pm)

            West Seattle, while in city limits, is hardly a dense urban zone. It’s a city residential neighborhood. If someone moving to Seattle is wanting to live in a high density area, they’ll live in the concrete jungle. 

        • k February 26, 2026 (1:29 pm)

          So now we know Frog lives in one of the nice neighborhood, lol.  No mention of an alley behind the house, or hearing train whistles mid-day.

          But seriously, no one has rights to their view in Seattle.  No one.  No one gets to stop the people across the street from building two stories where there was one, in order to protect their view.  No one is allowed to stop development of an empty lot to protect a view.  No one is allowed to clearcut city trees to protect a view.  No one–including you, Frog–has rights to their view in this city.  Regardless of zoning.

          If you choose to stop weeding your garden because you’re mad about losing your view, that’s your choice.  No one is going to stop you from giving up gardening, because it’s your property, not theirs.  Quiet and privacy are features of rural areas, not cities.  If your neighbors have chosen to distance themselves from you all this time, enabling you to live a secluded life while in the city, that’s their choice, but has nothing to do with zoning.  Neighbors are not the problem.  Inflexibility is.

        • Sarah February 26, 2026 (2:35 pm)

          Frog, I actually have a lot of shade in my yard due to big trees on one side and a newer “ugly box” SFH on another. There are lots of lovely native plants that thrive in shade. Fringecup, sword fern, Pacific bleeding heart, piggyback plant, giant chain fern… LMK if you need some tips, or check out King Conservation District’s site for resources. 

          It says a lot about you that you reacted in anger after simply being asked how rezoning would reduce your quality of life. Many of us don’t see it that way at all, and in fact look forward to all that having more neighbors offers: an increased tax base to support public schools, more small businesses… Lots of quality of life improvements.

  • Lauren February 25, 2026 (9:03 pm)

      He showed an example of a duplex that could be home to multiple generations of the same family.” love this

  • 22blades February 26, 2026 (7:04 am)

    The “housing shortage” is a business model.  The “affordability” shortage is a crisis. As long as the business model of inducing density from neighborhoods continues, the only winners are your friendly neighborhood REIT, developer & Private Equity Firm & by extension, a revenue stream for the city.. Federal bills to Restricting PEFs from gobbling up neighborhoods will be a first step to housing affordability & equality. I have owned both single family houses & condos. The expectation of ownership & privacy from a higher density residential structure is a completely broken “promise”, The mere fact that you have a seminar about rezonong fears speaks volumes about how this is a marketing effort as opposed to a genuine source of help. 

    • wetone February 26, 2026 (9:09 am)

      Well said and couldn’t agree more as my thoughts were the same when I saw heading on post. Seattle worked with these groups implementing new zoning changes, and have little to do with affordable housing for those buying or renting. Even the way city was/is  DADU’s as a good investment. The cost involved to build a legal unit along with added cost of taxes and maintenance make them a very long term investment, demanding higher rent to pay cost. Now if built for a family  living situation that could make sense for some.

  • anonyme February 26, 2026 (8:07 am)

    Completely agree with Frog and 22 Blades.  Rezoning is yet another gift to realtors and developers at the expense of homeowners, many of whom scrimped and saved to buy a private home away from crowds, development, and transient housing.  The portrayal of these folks as greedy land barons is not only disgusting and untrue, it serves the purposes of the real land barons quite well, as many will be forced out of the homes they worked so hard for.  A better start would be to ban the existence of Air BNB’s, etc, which are now being offered huge bonuses to make even more property available for the World Cup – further exacerbating the housing problem.  The pro-housing folks have confused their villains and are making the situation worse, not better.  The idea that a city is obligated to expand without limits depending on how many people want to live/move there is insane and self-limiting.

  • Jake February 26, 2026 (8:38 am)

    I will be building a huge backyard cottage in my backyard soon. It will be where my mother and law lives. Love the upzoning.

    • Frog February 27, 2026 (4:21 pm)

      Backyard cottages have been allowed in Seattle since pre-pandemic.  For several years, it was allowed to build one ADU and one DADU per lot, so you seen lots of new-build three-packs with two of the units having a nominal connection.  What’s new this year is that you can build six townhouses or a three-story apartment building on the typical formerly single family lot.  Irony is, I wonder if your backyard cottage DADU will hold its value after your neighbors sell out and you are surrounded by much bigger buildings.

      • Sarah February 27, 2026 (8:06 pm)

        Oh noooo! My property value might not increase as swiftly as it would have otherwise?! While people elbow each other to just get housing they can kind of afford? WON’T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN?!

  • mcat February 26, 2026 (10:48 am)

    A lot of the 900 sq ft dumpy houses in WS worth $1M need to be upzoned and redeveloped

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.