CRIME WATCH FOLLOWUP: Why apartment-shooting suspect probably won’t face felony charges

(Reader photo, last Thursday night)

Five days after 36-year-old Aren Oleson was arrested after allegedly firing a gun repeatedly in his South Admiral apartment, investigators say he’s facing misdemeanor charges rather than felony charges.

He was originally suspected of unlawful firearm possession, a felony, but prosecutors say SPD determined that Oleson had had his firearms rights restored (he had been described by SPD as a convicted felon but we still don’t have details of his record), so the six guns found in his apartment apparently were not illegally owned after all. And since no one was injured by the gunfire, police and county prosecutors determined the case was not a matter of felony assault. However, the City Attorney’s Office, according to the jail docket and court file, has charged Oleson with 10 misdemeanors, including obstructing a public officer, possession of a controlled substance, property damage, multiple counts of reckless endangerment, and aiming or discharging a firearm. A spokesperson for the King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office says that felony charges could still be considered if additional evidence is found that leads the SPD investigating detective to refer the case. Meantime, the two officers are still talking about the case and, according to the KCPAO spokesperson, “working on what steps they could take for public safety with all available options under the law.” Oleson remains in jail in lieu of $150,000 bail.

13 Replies to "CRIME WATCH FOLLOWUP: Why apartment-shooting suspect probably won't face felony charges"

  • DRW August 5, 2025 (4:45 pm)

    Wild, Wild, West Seattle.

  • bill August 5, 2025 (7:53 pm)

    So it’s ok to shoot toward people as long as you don’t really mean to hit them. Got it.

    • WSB August 5, 2025 (8:09 pm)

      It’s not “OK” – he’s charged with six counts of reckless endangerment and four other crimes – but certainly those wouldn’t carry as high a potential sentence as felonies.

  • A August 5, 2025 (7:58 pm)

    Absolutely ridiculous.  This pathetic excuse for a man terrorized this neighborhood that night. I live a block away and experienced this, and it was frightening enough from this distance. Every resident of that apartment building should consider bringing civil action against this monster. In addition to criminal charges, which apparently will be severely lacking, his neighbors should see about filing protective orders or other civil actions for the terror he brought upon them, even if that means seeking pro bono resources or advice to do so.  This insane gun nut needs to have the consequences of his rampage follow him around for the rest of his life, even if the state isn’t going to find a way to give him serious felony jail time. Also, how do we know when this would-be and likely future murderer may return to our neighborhood?

  • Smh Seattle August 5, 2025 (8:30 pm)

    Possession of a controlled substance, AND 6 firearms? I’ve never heard of anyone with priors getting off without a decade minimum having that combo in the 3 other states I’ve lived in (2 purple and 1 blue). Dude was (probably) high, firing off rounds, and being a danger to society, but it’s not worth charging him as a felon… Insanity that people here keep putting up with this. 

  • Kevin J August 5, 2025 (9:20 pm)

    Absolutely insane not to charge him with Felony endangerment.  I own a gun and the guy who did this should be in jail and he should never be able to own a gun again.  Good God.  In a conservative gun rights state they would throw the book at him.  

    • wscommuter August 6, 2025 (7:06 am)

      There is no such thing as “Felony endangerment”.  Perhaps that’s why he isn’t charged that way. However, he is charged with reckless endangerment, which is an actual law.   

  • Tired of the BS August 5, 2025 (9:30 pm)

    Just more of the same…

  • Mellow Kitty August 6, 2025 (7:26 am)

    Guns have more rights than the citizens. It’s been that way for ages. As soon as someone says, hey, maybe civilians shouldn’t have access to military weapons, people lose their collective minds and cry oppression. As soon as someone mentions common sense gun laws, people lose their collective minds and scream about their constitutional rights. Peanut butter is more regulated than guns right now. That’s reality. 

    • Rob August 6, 2025 (3:17 pm)

      I can tell you have never gone through the process of purchasing and registering a firearm. It’s clear. 

      • Mellow Kitty August 7, 2025 (7:29 am)

        Must not be too hard. This guy has 6 legally purchased guns. 

      • PotKettleBlack August 7, 2025 (10:11 am)

        Hey Rob. I actually wanted to experience this for my self, so I did go through the process of purchasing and registering a firearm. I can tell everyone first hand that it was WAY too easy and WAY too fast. The hb1143 safety certificate is a complete joke. The course is 1% about safety and 99% pro-gun lobby propaganda. In reality it’s a series of check boxes on a website. A person technically doesn’t even need to know how to read to complete the course. The in-store paperwork was the same. In total There’s about 7 minutes of “paperwork” to do that is mainly slowed down by how well the seller knows how to use an ipad.  Coming home with a high powered, high capacity bolt action rifle was a million times easier than adopting a kitten.  The idea that our gun laws are slow, or difficult, or intrusive is a complete lie.

Sorry, comment time is over.