Park expansion ‘missing million,’ EV lot Q&A, and other hot topics @ Morgan Community Association’s second quarterly meeting of 2025

(Schematic for planned ‘skate dot’ at Morgan Junction Park site)

By Tracy Record
West Seattle Blog editor

11 years after the city bought the Morgan Junction Park expansion site – currently a fenced-off hole – the project’s budget has shrunk.

You might call it the case of the missing million (dollars), according to project advocates. And that’s where we’ll start our report on tonight’s quarterly meeting of the Morgan Community Association, facilitated at a new-to-MoCA venue – West Seattle Church of the Nazarene – by president Deb Barker.

MORGAN JUNCTION PARK EXPANSION MISSING MILLION?: MoCA learned about the downsized budget during Q&A with Seattle Parks‘ newest planner on the project. Jonathan Garner was a guest via Zoom, in the wake of recent news that the park’s opening date was delayed yet further. They need to “get back to filling the pit” – where contaminated soil was removed on the expansion site, formerly a dry cleaner and mini-mart – with a few conversations to have soon with SDOT for “a clearer understanding of the path forward and the timeline to resolve all the issues,” hopefully by September 1. The “SDOT issues” have to do with that department turning over to Parks what is Eddy Street right-of-way between the current park site and addition.

Meantime, Garner said, they’re changing the design to work with the “budget that we have.” This is a big deal for what’s been in the project spotlight for a couple years, getting a skateable area into the plan, a process led by the Morgan Junction All-Wheels Association, formed after local skaters of all ages created a guerrilla skating area on the long-vacant site. Garner said Parks is working with MJAWA – who had several reps at the meeting – to “find a path forward for the skate spot.” Why is it in question? he was asked, given all the work – including volunteering and donations – that had gone into getting it into the plan. Funding is the problem, Garner said. On one hand, he said, “We’re committed to taking the design work Grindline has done and bringing it into the park itself” – but he also said “we cannot confidently say that we can construct the skate spot … we are working on ways to find the funding,” which he said will require grants and fundraising. He said Parks “is committed to building the skate dot” … someday.

If the skate dot isn’t the top priority for new park features, what is? “Our priorities right now are to fill the hole and have greenspace open and available for the public to use.” Phase 2 is pathways and benches to make the space accessible, and “future phases will come on as funding is available.” That’s a big change from past plans, in which “filling the hole” and putting grass over it was nothing more than a bridge from cleanup to park. Along with the skate dot, the expanded park was supposed to have a play area, but Parks doesn’t have money for that either, said Garner.

Though Garner said he didn’t have information on the project’s original budget, MJAWA cited city reps having told them $2.2 million, back when funding was “restored” after a pandemic pause. Now, Garner said, the budget is $1.2 million. Asked what happened to the other million, Garner said he doesn’t know. Another attendee said, is there anything that can be done to encourage the city to provide more? Garner noted the city’s having budget trouble as it is, and they’re being very “cautious” because of the federal situation as well. “We know what we can put back and have (a space) for the community to use by the end of the year.” MJAWA noted the construction budget for the skate dot was $180.000. Garner suggested that wouldn’t be the full price, saying there are other costs to “fit it into the park,” bringing stormwater systems up to code, and more.

Garner also said they’re planning on a community meeting to show what they’re planning to do with the funding they have. An attendee said Seattle Parks shouldn’t bring their favored solution but should instead get early feedback and design from that. The new contract, Garner said, would involve site monitoring, design services “to redesign within the budget that we have,” and then construction management. MoCA hopes to bring him back for an update in July.

MORGAN JUNCTION EV CHARGING LOT UPDATE: Also from the long-delayed-project file, Lizzie Kay from Seattle City Light was a guest (via Zoom) for this update and Q&A. She went into some background on the project on an ex-substation lot between Morgan and Fauntleroy, which will have eight fast-charging stations, four Tesla-owned and -maintained (on the west side), four City Light-owned and maintained (on the east side), all open to the public.

The site will have landscaping (“some trees, native shrubs, some ground cover”) as well as additional lighting. She acknowledged the “many delays” and spoke about the biggest issues – “we essentially had to redesign the site for three different manufacturers” of charging equipment. The first manufacturer they were going to use went out of business; a later plan was hampered when their payment software “dropped” them. “We’re cautiously optimistic” that no further big changes will be needed, she said, and they’re trying to find ways to “streamline” the project. They’ve talked with other city departments to try to make that happen. They’ve also found a local manufacturer to produce the equipment. Once construction starts this fall, they hope it will last five or six months (though her slide said “4 or 5”), and that the station will be operational in April; they hope to go out to bid this July.

Questions: Will the landscaping have irrigation? Yes. What will the lighting be like? Not too bright, said Kay, and half as high as streetlights. No cover, for not just winter but also for hot days? No cover, affirmed SCL – it would have “dramatically expanded the scope of the project,” from cost to design time to permits to visual impact on neighbors. How is the exit onto Morgan going to work, given the challenges that intersection already faces? In short, they think it’ll be OK, but other questions led to president Barker suggesting they need more info on the traffic plan, especially with the addition of two multifamily buildings next door since this was first proposed. Why not permeable pavement? The drainage on the site wouldn’t have made it worthwhile. Do they think they’ll have enough bidders? Yes, said Kay; this is the largest project of its type that SCL has ever done. Have any permits been applied for? Yes. Will the charging prices be posted? On the chargers, yes, but “we’re not going to have a gas-station-style sign.” What hours will it be open? 24/7. Who’s responsible for maintenance? The city, for the property; Tesla, for its chargers.

Other topics were addressed more briefly:

POLICE UPDATE: Southwest Precinct second-in-command Operations Lt. Nate Shopay said “all forms of crime” are down in Morgan Junction, and motor-vehicle theft in particular has “tanked,” due to arrests as well as the precinct handing out almost 1,000 steering-wheel locks. No one in attendance had any concerns or questions for him, so this was a short report.

GATEWOOD ELEMENTARY: The Neighborhood Emergency Communications Hub’s twice-yearly meeting with Gatewood Elementary families is coming up, reported Cindi Barker – this is where they talk about a disaster plan and how neighbors would be able to collaborate with the school in case of catastrophe. … Gatewood’s lively Gator Fair (as reported here) is coming up May 31.

CITYWIDE DISASTER DRILL: Cindi Barker said the scenario for upcoming drills is “power outage during (World Cup) games.” June 7 and 22 are the drills; though neither is in West Seattle, local volunteers/coordinators will be involved – there are three ways you can get involved, including as an actor – pretending you’re, for example, you’re a stranded tourist. Interested in helping? Here’s how to contact the Hubs group.

ONE SEATTLE PLAN, WITH REZONING: MoCA has continued watching the proposals, after its informational meeting months ago (WSB coverage here). Deb Barker talked about the recent van tour with District 1 City Councilmember Rob Saka, showing him areas of concern in the wider neighborhood. She said that after the public hearing back on the ice-storm was cut short before the MoCA contingent got to voice their comments (after a five-hour wait)i, there’s now another public hearing planned May 19th. She also mentioned the Council “going through legislation” to align with the state mandates to allow “missing middle” legislation. Morgan is “keeping tabs on what the upzones would be like.”

NEW BIZ: The Fine Baking Company is the new “cake shop” – proprietor Chely Smithgall (above) told MoCA that “we like the area, it’s friendly, business is going well … every day we have new people … working through permits and other requirements was “a long process” taking more than a year but they finally made it. What are their most popular flavors? Funfetti, chocolate Oreo, churro, red velvet, Smithgall said. A meeting-goer said she’s tried just about everything and buys some to give to people she knows. She raved about the empanadas, the cupcakes, the cakes, “everything”! They’re open 10 am-5 pm Tuesdays-Saturdays at 6969 California SW.

MORGAN JUNCTION COMMUNITY FESTIVAL UPDATE: A committee of six is working on the June 14 plan – they have the entertainment lineup finalized and will be reaching out to vendors. They’ve begun their marketing plan, snagged a couple of sponsors already, and they’re getting ready to apply for permits – they can use help with that, and with the festival planning in particular. They’re waiting for word on a Small Sparks grant from the city to help fund the entertainment. They’re also going to benefit from a West Seattle Thriftway (WSB sponsor) barbecue.

SPD COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICERS: Helene and Jamie introduced themselves, starting off by talking about their recent Resource Fair (WSB coverage here)(=, which drew about 50 vendors/organizations – more than twice as many as planned – and around 250 participants, “really successful.” They explained Community Service Officers as “resource connectors” – unarmed civilian personnel who don’t enforce laws. Part of their job is exactly what they were here doing tonight – talking with and learning from neighborhood groups (they had also been to the Village Green-West Seattle [WSB sponsor] meeting earlier). “We do a lot of community.” They also support patrol officers dealing with people who might need housing, elder care, rehab, other needs uncovered in situations that sworn police handle. They can help look for missing persons, provide food and hygiene needs, transport people home from crash scenes, get people to safe places …community engagement … CSO coverage is 7:30 am-10:30 pm, seven days a week …. the CSOs serve both the South and Southwest precincts since they share a radio channel. But those assigned in this area start and end their days at the SW Precinct. They’re generally not directly dispatched – you don’t call 911 and ask for a CSO, it’ll be up to the calltaker/dispatcher to decide who to send to a call.

NEXT TIME: SDOT should have design info about Fauntleroy/Rose pedestrian improvements after an internal meeting April 21. … The next MoCA meeting will be July 17.

29 Replies to "Park expansion 'missing million,' EV lot Q&A, and other hot topics @ Morgan Community Association's second quarterly meeting of 2025"

  • WestSeattleResident April 17, 2025 (12:00 am)

    Ok, so how much do we have to pony up for the skate dot to get built?  Feels like there was a perfectly good space that the community was willing to do their own labor & materials on that now we have to rely on a bunch of overhead to get it done.  Is there a fund where I can have certainty that if I give it $10 all $10 goes to building the skate dot and not one single cent gets diverted elsewhere?  I’m happy to open my wallet as much as I possibly can and I think there are other community members who feel the same.

    • bolo April 17, 2025 (11:42 am)

      Might the skate park project be able to save money by not filling in the pit? Just plaster the surface? Remembering that a large part of skate culture was founded on skating in emptied backyard pools.

      See “Dogtown and Z-Boys.”

    • Nollie April 17, 2025 (1:44 pm)

      I’m 72, don’t skate,
      but I’m also willing to contribute.
      The Seattle Parks Department seems to have no shame (though I do pity the hapless Park employee replacement, Jonathan Garner being thrown under the trucks and getting grinded).
      If only the anti-pickleball ladies could be enlisted to work their magic ways with Seattle Parks?

    • Jradz April 17, 2025 (5:43 pm)

      I can certainly appreciate this feeling. The issue being that parks won’t commit to spending any monies delivered by MJAWA to the skate dot features. IF we can get, in writing, an agreement that they will spend the money on this part of the park, MJAWA will immediately start fund raising and making merch to drum up $… until they come to the table, in good faith, then I don’t trust a single word they say. AP Diaz is hiding behind a wall, unwilling to engage with the public, and has his lackies, that can’t reasonably agree to anything, out here with shrugged shoulders unwilling to even tell us where $1,000,000 USD disappeared to… 

  • Brian April 17, 2025 (6:15 am)

    It’d be a real shame if the community had already built something in that spot and the city willfully bulldozed it for no reason. That’d be a wild thing if it hap– hold up I’m getting an update right now. 

    • CAM April 17, 2025 (9:49 am)

      It wasn’t bulldozed for no reason. The site was not being built on because there were toxic chemicals in the soil from its prior usage and they had not yet been remediated. But I’m happy to see that years later we are still arguing in favor of exposing children to chemicals we know cause them harm. 

      • Brian April 17, 2025 (3:10 pm)

        Nobody was digging in the soil, smart guy. 

        • CAM April 17, 2025 (3:51 pm)

          I am fairly intelligent. Intelligent enough to research an issue to educate myself further. https://www.epa.gov/ust/frequent-questions-about-underground-storage-tanks

          • Jradz April 17, 2025 (5:22 pm)

            I’m with Brian… if you were actually educated on the matter you would know the only real danger at this site was for the chemicals leaching into the ground water. That was the concern, but please tell us more about what you think was going on… also let us know… Were you involved in communications with parks? Involved in the voting for what should go in at this location? Were you involved in working on the skate features? Did you build planter boxes or sweep the empty lot twice weekly for the benefit of the community? I’m guessing no… I’m guessing you’re new to this matter, don’t have your facts straight, and are talking out of yer tookus… 🤷‍♂️

    • geologist April 18, 2025 (10:25 am)

      JRADZ and Brian you both are also uneducated as well. Dry cleaning solvents and their breakdown products can and do penetrate concrete (a porous media) and affect both the soil and groundwater beneath the slab. All media (concrete, soil and groundwater) need to be dealt with during a cleanup like this. It is a bummer that the cleanup was more extensive and cost more, but it was the absolute right thing to do. 

      • Jradz April 19, 2025 (4:46 pm)

        Not arguing that fact… however, at this site there was no concern for airborne materials causing harm. If you read the history of this site you’ll see that the only concern was the chemicals leaching into the ground water. 

  • KT April 17, 2025 (6:40 am)

    So typical of Seattle.  And yet your property taxes go up year after year after year …..

    • Anne April 17, 2025 (9:47 am)

      Gee I wonder how that happens? 

  • Rob April 17, 2025 (7:29 am)

    How dare the city include Tesla  Co. In the new charging station.  

  • CAM April 17, 2025 (7:35 am)

    In the midst of everything happening right now the city is contracting with Tesla to expand their footprint? 

  • JP April 17, 2025 (8:23 am)

    I genuinely question the wisdom and ethics of adding anything Tesla-branded to the neighborhood right now. Clearly supporting Musk is problematic for a vast number of reasons, but aren’t there concerns about vandalism?

  • Kyle April 17, 2025 (9:28 am)

    Honestly feel bad for the MJAWA. Their kids will be off to college by the time Parks stops this run around. They should go to the Parks District and look at their funding plan. 

    • Jradz April 17, 2025 (5:34 pm)

      Thanks, Kyle… MJAWA has offered to fund raise and try to come up with funds to complete the skate dot, but parks is unwilling to commit that if we deliver the money, that it will actually be used to build what they had already agreed to. Shameful, at best… Shameless at worst.

  • WS4LIFE April 17, 2025 (11:41 am)

    They should just turn it into a pickle ball court.

  • DC April 17, 2025 (1:09 pm)

    We seriously need to end Seattle’s landbanking program. It’s not the best use of tax dollars to buy land that sits as a derelict dumping ground for decades. Hundreds of West Seattleites could have been housed over the last decade just on these landbanked plots. 

    • Jradz April 17, 2025 (5:25 pm)

      Or at least the community could enjoy the benefits of their money rather than watching Seattle parks piss away… ONE MILLION DOLLARS. 

  • Nitro April 17, 2025 (4:38 pm)

    Why not use that land for the park for affordable housing instead?  A lot of apartments could fit on that plot and it’s right on the transit line with amenities (grocery, gas, restaurants) surrounding it. I get that a skate park would be nice, but I hear much wailing about the lack of affordable housing in the city. If the city owns the land then they could truly make the apartments affordable (and not pay  the fee that most developers pay to get out of building affordable housing). Maybe use some of the money collected with those fees to help fund building an apartment building on that spot?  

    • Andrew April 17, 2025 (10:17 pm)

      Yo, they can’t even make a small concrete pad with a few embankments and ledges (part of its intended and fought for uses). You think they can erect a whole building?! Now that’s rich haha.have you seen the hole they dug and just left? The city has no money, and it’s thriving with rich people and all of us dummies that keep forking out tax money that they can’t seem to keep track of. It’s an effing joke! But hey, I’m happy the electric cars will have spots to plug in. Yippy skippy.

  • Jradz April 17, 2025 (5:13 pm)

    Would love for parks to hold themselves accountable, and tell the community where, exactly, they pissed away a MILLION dollars that was ear marked and bound for our community! Where’s the culpability? I definitely will NOT be voting for a single parks levy or funding initiative moving forward. They want to serve West Seattle another NOTHING BURGER and waste hard working people’s time and money… It makes it all the worse when Jonathan was sputtering and stammering trying to defend the position of them giving us NOTHING that we voted for, and NOTHING but a sh-tty patch of grass where a beautiful park was supposed to be welcoming people BY THIS SUMMER. This project was supposed to be a focal point for MJ… something to drive business and increase revenue to the local businesses. Who’s going to drive into MJ for a patch of grass? Not a single soul… Hey parks, are you embarrassed…? If I were you, I’d feel like crap, and be fully embarrassed at how you screwed over a community that’s been waiting for you to develop this land FOR 10 YEARS. At least the skaters were doing something productive and building community… you’re just rerouting the unhoused back into the same location. Boo! #abjectFAILURE

  • JG April 17, 2025 (6:30 pm)

    Wait, so the derelict spot was activated by the local community, which found overwhelming support for a skate dot (basically handing Parks a blueprint for an actual active space they want and that doesn’t exist in their flat, underutilized, and uninspiring green space design currently), and they’r still just “meh” on the whole thing?!? West Seattle is amazing, and it’s a bummer living so close to the it for it to just be the forgotten Junction of the 3. Can’t even pick up a pizza from Zeke’s and have a table to sit at in the park. Would love for Parks to get some positive light shined on them, but it’s tough when the community just keeps getting more of the same from them. Taping off the soft ground a the park “so the grass can regrow” that no one uses doesn’t seem very hopeful. The community deserves better. 

  • Victoria Radick April 17, 2025 (6:34 pm)

    Agree !!!  There is NO worthwhile investment in our community or for our kids. This is unbelievable! My son has been instrumental in sponsoring this effort. The group who had the vision to transform this “dead” space to constructive space for the entertainment and recreation needs of our kids. They have met EVERY request the City has made and the City keeps moving the goal posts. Another example of the Inexcusable incompetence of our City wasting our tax dollars. SHAME, SHAME! 

  • bobcat April 17, 2025 (6:37 pm)

    Can you just give them a sandbox to build their own stuff again?  Also, the walkway going thru the park will cause some congestion. 

  • Seaview parent April 18, 2025 (1:10 am)

    Seattle Parks, appreciate the transparency into another delay on a decade-long eyesore.Let’s just do everyone a favor and open up the following options:– Enable MJ Community Association to raise money for either a dog park or suitable playground equipment on the north site. (Work parties + community funding just like we do on school properties).- Allow MJAWA to add tasteful, easy all-wheels features to the south site utilizing volunteers from one of the best skatepark building communities in the world.I guarantee the community will have both of these done in 2-3 months at zero cost to the city budget, and it will be the most vibrant corner of California Ave outside of Easy Street.

  • flimflam April 18, 2025 (7:29 am)

    Wow – the space was already “activated” by local skaters but the city decided to destroy what they’d built in favor of spending multiple millions on a new spot, same location? I mean, was it simply ego? “only the city knows how to do this properly!”

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.