FOLLOWUP: What the mayor wants to do to reduce public use of illegal drugs

Almost two months after the City Council rejected a proposal to match city law with the new state law about public drug use, Mayor Bruce Harrell is out with his plan. It’s the result of the committee he formed after that vote (the members are listed here). At the heart of it is city legislation that the mayor’s announcement says would:

-Codify state law and make public consumption of illegal drugs a gross misdemeanor in the city of Seattle.

-For the first time in the City’s history, designate diversion and treatment as the preferred approach to addressing substance use issues – connecting people with care and responding to a public health crisis with evidence-based health solutions.

-Define a new threat of harm standard – differentiating between drug use that threatens others versus the individual alone, recognizing the real and perceived danger of consumption of illegal drugs in public places, and aiming to support safe and welcoming neighborhoods by reducing public use.

The aim is not to jail drug users, according to Harrell, who is quoted in the announcement as saying, “Success will not – and cannot – be measured on how many people cycle through jail; instead, our focus is on improving connections to lifesaving treatment and expanding program options to better meet the needs of those with substance use issues.” So what would the mayor’s proposal mean for law enforcement? The announcement says he’ll issue an Executive Order next week “providing guidance to Seattle Police Department officers on how the law should be applied, further detailing threat of harm standards, and defining tools to collect and analyze data to measure success.”

45 Replies to "FOLLOWUP: What the mayor wants to do to reduce public use of illegal drugs"

  • flimflam July 31, 2023 (9:11 pm)

    I can’t believe this is even a discussion. Coddling drug use benefits exactly zero percent of the city’s population.

    • Mr J July 31, 2023 (9:35 pm)

      Right!?! They should just will themselves clean and into better economic situations with universal healthcare. I just willed myself a multimillionaire as I typed this. 

      • flimflam July 31, 2023 (9:49 pm)

        So being “economically challenged” turns you into a drug addict? Obviously you don’t intend to discuss this in good faith – again, who does it benefit to essentially legalize hard drug use? Especially in public?

        • Josh August 1, 2023 (12:58 am)

          I don’t know but being broke certainly doesn’t help you.  During the Vietnam war a significant percentage of our soldiers used heroin but after the war ended only those who returned to unstable and stressful conditions kept using.  Why are you so confused about this being a discussion? There is a pretty significant drug use issue in this country and the point of government is to protect the safety of the populace they serve and allow for safe exchange of goods, utilities, and services.  Trying to find the best way to do that might include a multifaceted and evidence based approach to an increase in public illicit drug use.  

        • Barton August 1, 2023 (11:23 am)

           Time and time again the point is made, including in this comments section, that homeless individuals may turn to drugs as a way to cope.  That seems like such a basic concept I can’t believe it is even being debated.

          From https://www.nationalhomeless.org/factsheets/addiction.pdf:

          “In many situations, however, substance abuse is a result of homelessness rather than a cause. People who are homeless often turn to drugs and alcohol to cope with their situations. They use substances in an attempt to attain temporary relief from their problems. In reality, however, substance dependence only exacerbates their problems and decreases their ability to achieve employment stability and get off the streets. Additionally, some people may view drug and alcohol use as necessary to be accepted among the homeless community (Didenko and Pankratz, 2007).” 

          • flimflam August 1, 2023 (2:46 pm)

            Barton, respectfully, you’re citing something from 2007 – way before fentanyl and “new” meth hit the scene.

    • onion August 1, 2023 (6:44 am)

      The funding part of the mayor’s plan is missing from the Blog’s summary, because without actual treatment programs in place everything else is hot air. From the Seattle Times coverage:Harrell’s proposal also beefs up the city’s investments into treatment and diversion, putting $27 million toward harm reduction, overdose response and post-overdose care — about $20 million will come from settlements from pharmaceutical companies involved in recent opioid lawsuits, and has “just recently started to flow” to the city.“Of the amount coming to Seattle, we anticipate just over $20 million will be available to invest in programming. The city will receive an average of $1.15 million per year over the next 18 years,” Jamie Housen, the mayor’s communications director, wrote Monday. “The mayor has prioritized dedicating these funds to programs that will address addiction and improve our treatment and service provision systems.”

      • WSB August 1, 2023 (8:38 am)

        I linked to the full announcement (as we always do). That includes the $ info. Lots of quotes and numbers in there.

    • Jort August 1, 2023 (7:55 am)

      Why do other countries around the world with less punitive approaches to drug use have fewer overdoses and other negative addiction-related outcomes? What is special and unique about America — specifically, America and Seattle — that requires the use of jail and punishment only to solve this problem? I’m curious.

      • AC August 1, 2023 (2:51 pm)

        Counterpoint: Japan

      • WW Resident August 1, 2023 (4:37 pm)

        Jort, why don’t you ask why the less punitive approaches taken here in Seattle these past few years have clearly not worked? I’m curious

      • WW Resident August 1, 2023 (9:11 pm)

        Jort how come you’re not asking why the less punitive approach Seattle has taken these last few years aren’t working and are making things worse? I’m curious

        • RICK_WS August 2, 2023 (9:12 am)

          Excellent question!

  • Jay July 31, 2023 (9:24 pm)

    It’s not much of an issue in West Seattle, but I’d love it if they’d make safe use/injection sites in Belltown. Getting those folks off the street would be a massive improvement. I watch people smoking crack and meth right outside my office window all day long. Plenty of empty businesses. Put it near 2nd and Bell. Add them in every problem area and make outdoor drug use illegal. Being around public consumption is really bad and I hate the smell of meth in particular. And vomit from fentanyl users, having to move them out of the way to go through doors.

    • Josh August 1, 2023 (12:59 am)

      They are mostly smoking fentanyl and if not that meth.  Crack is expensive and hard to come by compared to the other two, plus less addictive.

      • Jay August 1, 2023 (9:28 am)

        At 1st and Bell most people are smoking rocks with the signature cleaning product stink. Fentanyl doesn’t really have a strong smell when smoked, I think that’s more south of Bell. We’ve got mostly active addicts here going wild after they smoke, I think fentanyl smokers are more the sleepers/zombies. The Honduran cartel that was selling fentanyl on Bell for a few years left a couple months ago.

    • Kimchi August 1, 2023 (7:18 am)

      Not exactly sure what part of west Seattle you live in but you can see people smoking drugs on the street in West Seattle 

    • WS Res August 1, 2023 (9:23 am)

      Vote accordingly! The current mayor is against safe use sites, even though we desperately need them.

  • StupidInSeattle July 31, 2023 (9:39 pm)

    Telling police officers how the law should be applied???  Mayor, it should be applied to everyone the same  as written by the statute, not selectively and with favouritism to a few.  All laws must be enforced in this way to all otherwise you have bias and injustice.

    • Jort August 1, 2023 (7:53 am)

      The speed limit in the city of Seattle is 25 miles per hour. You’re violating the law every time you drive faster than 25 miles per hour. Nobody gets tickets for it. You know why? Because the law is being applied “selectively” and “with favoritism to a few.” And when one suggests blanket traffic enforcement through automated ticket cameras, we hear about a “totalitarian state.” 

      • WW Resident August 1, 2023 (9:09 pm)

        No Jort, no one is getting tickets because the traffic section of the SPD is decimated and there’s barely any traffic officers to enforce traffic laws. It’s only selective in the fact that SPD has to pick  and choose when and where to deploy traffic. You’re equating this with an entire group of people essentially being exempted from laws due to who/what they are. But nice to see you trying to shimmy in another car hating rant with an apple and oranges analogy

        • RICK_WS August 2, 2023 (9:16 am)

          Precisely!

  • Rhonda July 31, 2023 (9:55 pm)

    Jail is immediate cessation of drug use and the beginning of treatment. It’s nearly impossible to treat drug addiction on an outpatient basis when all drugs are available on the streets 24/7. This is why they don’t serve booze and cocaine at the Betty Ford Clinic.

    • K August 1, 2023 (6:49 am)

      This is not correct.  There are almost more drugs in jail than on the streets.  

      • Rhonda August 2, 2023 (12:54 am)

        I’ve actually worked in our state prisons and King County jails. The amount of chemical contraband seized is absolutely minuscule compared to the streets.

        • K August 2, 2023 (6:54 am)

          Exactly.  It’s not confiscated in the jails, it’s widely used, distributed, and available.  If I have time to fish it out, I’ll link you the article showing drug use and availability didn’t slow down at all during COVID.  Pretty fascinating read, given the assumption that drugs get into the jail via visitors.

    • Blbl August 1, 2023 (9:20 am)

      Anything you can get on the streets, you can get just as easily in jail. People don’t get clean in jail.

    • datamuse August 1, 2023 (10:59 am)

      Jail is immediate cessation of drug use and the beginning of treatment

      Citation needed

  • AC July 31, 2023 (11:07 pm)

    Honestly this sounds fine to me. Explicitly differentiating the need to deal with public drug use that is negatively affecting thousands of people in a more straightforward and yes, sometimes less rehabilitative way, from other drug use in situations that would benefit from a lighter touch in the long run. Nuance! *Shakes fist*

    • Josh August 1, 2023 (1:01 am)

      I agree.  This statement appears to be a reasonable approach.  Now putting it into meaningful action will take money, let’s see how that goes.

  • WSDUDEMAN August 1, 2023 (12:47 am)

    Sounds like more ‘Seattle Compassion’ is coming our way to help deal with all the drug addicts. I laugh how all the politicians pretend to always want to direct these individuals towards this mythical treatment.

    • Kt August 1, 2023 (4:39 am)

      This country will always have a drug, mental health, homeless, violence problem since we have no universal health care and unlimited access to guns too.

  • Marcus August 1, 2023 (4:50 am)

    Jail, detox, treatment.  Get the picture?

  • anonyme August 1, 2023 (6:16 am)

    Sounds reasonable except for one or two things.  First, doesn’t the addict have to agree to treatment?  What happens if they don’t?  And second, do the facilities exist to fulfill this mandate? What about those who fail multiple, taxpayer-funded rehab attempts?  I do agree that it’s time we consider the health and safety of law-abiding citizens to be at least equal to that of addicts.  Enforcing laws that prohibit public consumption is a start.  I love what Rhonda said about jail being “an immediate cessation of drug use and the beginning of treatment”.   Spot on.

  • Alki resident August 1, 2023 (6:51 am)

    Well, what can we expect with the Herbold-Lewis team on the committee? Same crap different day. The drug addicts are constantly being offered treatment. They don’t want it. Diversion doesn’t work. Most don’t show up in the first place and almost none finish the program. According to the Seattle Times TWO people have completed it. The program, which has no accountability, is an abject failure. I’m sure Herbold, Lewis, Harrell, and those who voted against adopting the law in the first place know this. It’s been reported on. So nothing will change until we get these people out! 

  • Kyle August 1, 2023 (7:08 am)

    Some of these commenters just don’t get it. This is way better than the current status quo and they’re still not happy. This is great news and will actually provide clarity to Seattle police officers and actionable enforcement. This is much better than the lawlessness of the past few years and seems like a measured compromise on the failed try to go the other extreme that couldn’t pass the council. Thank you to the mayor for doing something and not getting stuck on the ideological extremes that would have resulted in inaction.

    • Anne August 1, 2023 (10:09 am)

      It is not “ way better” It’s just another feel good proposal Seattle government excels at. 

    • wssz August 2, 2023 (4:18 am)

      Kyle: I agree 100% with your comment. 

  • Jeepney August 1, 2023 (7:09 am)

    How about holding the drug dealers accountable?

  • Rick August 1, 2023 (7:45 am)

    Heck, just make all drugs legal. No crimes committed.  Problem solved. We’re going that direction anyway.

  • B August 1, 2023 (10:52 am)

    Without a comprehensive plan I doubt that much benefit will come of this.  To give myself an idea of what a comprehensive plan would look like, I made one myself.  I’m sure it is far from perfect, but it at least gives me an idea of the number of different facets to this problem.  In a perfect world, the pharmaceutical companies that are in large part responsible for the addiction crisis in America, would pay for the lions share of a plan like this.  Here is my attaempt at a commprehensive plan:

  • Gina August 1, 2023 (6:50 pm)

    This only encourages drug use to move indoors.  

  • Rob August 2, 2023 (7:21 am)

    This is fun to read these comments.  This city is an always will be under a single party rule. An I would bet all of us on this form have a D when we vote. So our preferred party screws things up then our same party says we can fix it. This has been going on here for over 40 years. Remember the definition of insanity is voting the same way an expecting a different resolution 

  • AA Anon August 2, 2023 (2:54 pm)

    Hey there- Unfortunately I have a family member who is missing.  Hooked on drugs.  While I’m not negating that addicts may have become addicts due to economic downturns, I WANT my loved one to get arrested.  Many families want another shot to try and get their loved ones into treatment.As of now, we are terrified for “the call”, and wished we could get the 1 call from jail.Many addicts attribute serving multiple jail times as a life saving avenue towards finally becoming clean.  Safe injection sites are terrifying to me.  Fentanyl is incredibly addictive.Great.  Now I’m depressed.

Sorry, comment time is over.