Mayor announces plan to end Seattle eviction moratorium

On the second anniversary of the first King County COVID cases, Seattle’s pandemic-related eviction moratorium will expire. So says this announcement sent by the mayor’s office:

Today, Seattle Mayor Bruce Harrell announced that residential and commercial eviction moratoria will expire at the end of the month of February. Mayor Harrell will issue an Executive Order extending the residential eviction moratorium from February 14 through February 28, after which the moratorium will not be renewed.

“With COVID cases steadily declining, the time has come for the City to move on from the broad approach of the eviction moratoria and instead drive more deliberate and focused efforts to support those most in need,” said Mayor Harrell. “In addition to distribution of all available emergency rental assistance, truly vulnerable tenants – those still suffering significant pandemic-related financial hardships – will continue to have enhanced eviction protections, while at the same time small landlords have needed clarity as they evaluate how to move forward.”

All residential tenants who demonstrate enduring financial hardship preventing them from paying rent will receive continued eviction protections for at least six months after the end of the moratorium, providing additional security for those most at risk through a specific legal defense created by ordinance. Seattle residents facing eviction are also afforded a right to legal counsel and additional eviction protections based on time of year. Landlords will be able to move forward with evictions proceedings for other purposes, such as those listed in the Just Cause Eviction Ordinance.

Mayor Harrell’s latest Executive Order comes after convening a work group of tenant advocates and small landlords, who through multiple meetings with Mayor Harrell provided input around impacts of the pandemic and the effects of the eviction moratorium informed by lived experience.

During the next two weeks, Mayor Harrell will review reports created by interdepartmental City teams defined in his previous Executive Order to evaluate data, improve existing efforts, and seek additional solutions.

As part of those efforts, Mayor Harrell has directed the Office of Housing to urgently distribute over $25 million in identified funding to support renters and small landlords, complementing funding being allocated by King County.

Mayor Harrell has also directed the City staff to develop a website to connect tenants and small landlords to available financial resources, information on rights and protections, and other critical updates needed as the moratoria ends.

“As we work together toward to a new normal, we know we’re not yet out of the woods of this pandemic,” said Mayor Harrell. “The City of Seattle will continue to take action to support those most in need – striving to protect the health and well-being of our residents, prevent homelessness and undue financial hardship, and build One Seattle with abundant opportunity for all and thriving, vibrant, connected communities.”

70 Replies to "Mayor announces plan to end Seattle eviction moratorium"

  • Alf February 11, 2022 (12:37 pm)

    Yes, it’s time

  • Derek February 11, 2022 (12:43 pm)

    This is a sad day for people who have been stripped of their jobs without any government safety net. Landlords always win and the renters get screwed over. American way.

    • bill February 11, 2022 (1:48 pm)

      Explain to us how small landlords saddled with non-paying tenants yet still required to pay taxes and mortgage have won.

    • Sue H February 11, 2022 (2:02 pm)

      How do “landlords always win”? Not all landlords are large and rich corporations – some are small, independent landlords who are your neighbors and rely on that money to pay the mortgage and repairs. And no, I’m not a landlord – I speak as someone who rented for over 25 years. I don’t think tenants should’ve been necessarily dumped on the street during a hardship in the middle of a pandemic, but they’re not always the only ones in a time of hardship.

    • Ken February 11, 2022 (4:28 pm)

      @ Derek – Why do you expect the government to provide a ‘safety net’?  Is there any valid reason why people shouldn’t provide for their own security in life?  There are literally thousands of job openings in this region and country for people who actually want to work.   The moratorium has gone on far too long now and it should have ended months ago. There have been no moratoriums for the landlords. They’re still expected to pay their mortgages, taxes, bills, etc while certain less-than-ethical individuals use the pandemic as an excuse to shirk their obligations in life.  By the way, the American Way, as originally intended, is to build a better life for yourself through decent and honorable work habits. No reason to think that reasoning is not valid today.

    • Marina February 11, 2022 (5:04 pm)

      Dude the past two years has been a government safety net. Landlords have been getting screwed from day one and everyone is hiring. It’s time to stop using unemployment as an excuse. 

    • AN February 11, 2022 (6:12 pm)

      How is weeks and weeks of unemployment insurance for two years not a government safety net?

    • StopCuttingDownTrees February 11, 2022 (6:28 pm)

      As a landlord of a small rental, you have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. Many tenants in the region have higher annual incomes than their landlords.

    • Pedro February 11, 2022 (6:48 pm)

      Unemployment levels are at near record lows and jobs abound. People have had two years of a free pass with lots of handout. So no, I’m not really feeling too sorry for anyone other than the small landlords on this issue. 

    • Rumbles February 11, 2022 (7:37 pm)

      You, Derek, have obviously never been a landlord.

      The landlord often gets screwed, to the tune of thousands and thousands of dollars in damages, caused by tenants with no respect for someone else’s property.

      To be sure, many tenants are great.  But one bad one can create a real nightmare with no worry of reimbursing damages.  

      • February 11, 2022 (9:23 pm)

        Thank you to all who have taken the time and energy to explain the realities of life for small landlords to Derek.

    • 1994 February 11, 2022 (11:42 pm)

      Derek – do some quick and light research please:https://esd.wa.gov/labormarketinfo/facts-and-figures-reportUnemployment rates 12/2021)1Statewide: 12/2021: 4.5%1Statewide: 12/2020: 4.7%2Highest county rate: 12/2021: 7.0% (Ferry)2Lowest county rate: 12/2021: 2.7% (Asotin)

    • rocket February 12, 2022 (3:06 am)

      Plus if you havent been able to find gainful employment since June of 2020 there are grants to pursue for rent relief.  Many landlords are greedy corporate monsters but so many are people, especially immigrants who have made this place a better place, who are averse to plan their retirement on the stock market and use small time property management to fill a need in the community and provide for their retirement.  Its not all bourgeois bosses holding down the proletariat all the time.  There is a middle ground. 

    • momosmom February 12, 2022 (7:35 am)

      Thank you Mayor for ending this moratorium! Like others have said “there is no reason to use the excuse you are out of work” with so many companies desperately needing people, get back to work, yes it may not be what you want or what you think you should be paid (for now) but get your feet planted back on the ground, get some money back into your accounts and pay those landlords (and bills) big or small because they’ve been struggling too. (I am not a landlord)  Earlier last week someone told me not to be so mean in the way my comment that was directed to Derek and then they called me a “troll”… IMO I think Derek is the troll.

    • Joan February 12, 2022 (9:13 am)

      Derek, as a landlord, I would really like to be able to evict the person who is constantly smoking meth on the property and getting into screaming matches with their significant other. I could care less if residents need time to catch up on back rent but we are all at the end of the rope with this crap. Two weeks until I have the means to take action against someone else ho uses toxic illegal drugs in a building with kids and elderly people and engages in domestic violence on my property – can’t wait! 

      • K February 12, 2022 (10:56 am)

        The moratorium was only for evictions due to non-payment.  You’ve been allowed to evict for other causes all along.  

        • westSeattle February 12, 2022 (3:33 pm)

          K & WS RES: Next time fact check the eviction rules for Seattle during the eviction moratorium  before you post since you are very wrong. Landlords can only evict for health & safety only and it a very high bar.  Take a look at the news story (link below) where one renter in South Park had garbage piled high in the yard and there were rats everywhere, and child protective services were involved.  The landlord still could not evict them.   The city kept on fining the landlord. https://komonews.com/news/local/squalor-at-south-seattle-house-prompts-concern-anxiety-in-neighborhood

        • Colleen Mills February 16, 2022 (12:38 pm)

          I wish it were true you were able to evict all along, unfortunately it is not.  We own a small commercial building and one of our tenants screams daily at his significant other.  He is not open for business and has not paid rent for two years.  He entered another office space and accused them of stealing from him.  The receptionist is young and English is a second language.  He was scared.  We have an attorney and we’re told we are unable to evict till moratorium ends.  Consulted more than one attorney. 

      • WS Res February 12, 2022 (11:01 am)

        You can already do that if they’re violating others’ right of quiet enjoyment, committing crimes, etc. The moratorium has not prevented that.

        • Joan February 12, 2022 (5:26 pm)

          All Seattle landlord attorney firms are recommending against any noticing, as it remains a misdemeanor to serve them right now, unless there was an assault between two residents of different households or direct threats to people/property with weapons. On top of that, new legislation requires we have proof of this beyond hearsay; security footage of the incident happening, substantiating police reports or neighbors who are willing to provide their information on the 10 day, testify in court and will show up if subpoenaed. Drug dealing, DV, guest problems, harassing neighbors, extremely bad housekeeping, pest infestation, constant parties, six people living in a studio – basically if no one was injured, it won’t stand up in court. Tenant attorneys and advocates have pretty free reign right now, so anyone who comes in with an eviction suit during the moratorium is going to have them all fighting extra hard to prevent eviction. 

  • GeneseeFivePoints February 11, 2022 (12:53 pm)

    Enforcement of rules, laws and societal norms? Kudos Mr. Mayor…. Now go get us some concrete! 

  • SEADOG February 11, 2022 (1:11 pm)

    It’s about time. Small landlords should not have been forced the carry the burden alone for so long. There were so many heartbreaking stories of small landlords suffering because of tenants who were clearly taken advantage of the situation. The eviction moratorium prevented evictions for things besides payment which was just ridiculous. 

    • Poor in WS February 11, 2022 (5:34 pm)

      Don’t have multiple homes if you can’t cover the costs without someone renting. It’s not on renters to foot your bad financial decision. 

      • K February 11, 2022 (8:36 pm)

        But it IS on renters to pay their rent. 

        • Derek February 12, 2022 (12:20 am)

          No, not when there’s a pandemic and a government that does jack to help its citizens. A $2000 check a couple times aint nothing. 

          • February 12, 2022 (6:24 am)

            Don’t forget, people who collected unemployment also received $300 a WEEK in enhanced unemployment benefits through the CARES ACT, plus their stimulus checks. Oh, and offered free COVID testing and vaccines. That’s what the government did.

          • Tar N Feather February 12, 2022 (6:55 am)

            You are an absolute lunatic if you think the govt has done nothing during all this time.Last I know there are plenty of businesses still needing employees as well.

          • Roms February 12, 2022 (6:09 pm)

            You’re exhausting, Derek. So misinformed, yet you keep on. The checks you refer to are one-offs from the Feds. Unemployment is provided by the State. And don’t forget the Feds added money to what the State was providing.

  • Wseattleite February 11, 2022 (1:40 pm)

    Time to pay the piper.  

  • Marcus February 11, 2022 (2:10 pm)

    I do not agree with Derek’s opinion.  At some point in time people need to become as self sufficient as possible.  That does not mean society needs to be mean and uncaring.  I see help wanted signs all over the place and I also see that many goods and services are not being performed.  Dominos is paying people to pick up their own pizza because there are not enough people to deliver.  The jobs are there.  Now for the people who cannot work or cannot really function in society then Yes, the government needs to step in and help.  However that help should be conditional.  Time to get back to work for those who are able.

  • JunctionResident February 11, 2022 (2:52 pm)

    About time

  • Sillygoose February 11, 2022 (2:52 pm)

    Thank you, Mayor!!!  With literally thousands of jobs available why should the landlords keep paying a mortgage for tenants that are unwilling to support themselves?   Seriously Derek a government safety net?  How about you provide your own safety net! 

    • Poor in WS February 11, 2022 (5:35 pm)

      I have two jobs and can barely afford rent and am being displaced because of this. No one here is poor it sounds like.

      • K February 11, 2022 (8:43 pm)

        You just claimed that if landlords can’t afford their properties during times they don’t have renters, they shouldn’t have them in the first place.  By that same logic, if you can’t afford to pay rent with two jobs, should you not live somewhere more affordable?

        • KM February 12, 2022 (12:21 pm)

          K — Doesn’t everyone deserve to live affordably in the community they work in, with one job? Your lack of compassion is disgusting. The inequity in this city is disgusting. Workers deserve better.

          • Roms February 12, 2022 (6:14 pm)

            KM, are you one of the very few people who don’t look to maximize gains? If you are a homeowner, would you be willing to sell your house for well below today’s crazy values to help “workers?” Don’t you think these same people may sell at a high price then?

        • L February 12, 2022 (10:04 pm)

          What K is trying to say is if you can’t make it work here, you don’t deserve to be here. And if you don’t deserve to be here, we don’t want you here… except if you’re doing “essential” work, which you’re welcome to do during business hours, but please leave after that.

  • they February 11, 2022 (2:55 pm)

    Wait…Wait…Wait…Why is this a story, I thought Seattle city council banned evictions from October through March long before we ever heard the word covid…   

  • Em February 11, 2022 (3:22 pm)

    Even though I’ve been severely afflicted by the pandemic and it’s policy shifts, I’m great full that a moratorium was in place if only to protect the honest that really have been affected and may have been. Home equity grew 10’s of thousands of dollars and houses in this market have sold for over asking price. Programs to pay out assistance have been dreadfully slow for some and that hit the pockets of all parties involved. The city knew it was culpable for its staggered and fractured response on how to distribute assistance. Knowing that, the city has to protect itself from lawsuits and has to make sure every opportunity and dollar to help folks has not been mishandled. I feel terrible that I’ve not been able to pay or earn this last year, I tried. Anyway, I’m for the people and the do-gooders. If you are a home owner with ruffled feathers because your rental equation has suffered over the past two years, well that’s how investments go. Up and down. Maybe land lording or land hoarding isn’t for you. At least most owners property values increased more than what they lost in rental income.  If you have a tenant with a medical or mental condition, please work with them, not against them. If we fight for good and each other, we can make this a better place. 

    • PG February 11, 2022 (3:45 pm)

      I don’t understand how putting this burden (for over two years) just on landlords is fair or equitable.  Obviously you have no sympathy for landlords, but the outcome of this will be a reduction in small landlords, and a rise in corporate ownership of rental properties, which probably doesn’t benefit anyone (except the corporation)

    • Tale of the Coin February 11, 2022 (4:11 pm)

      There are two sides to every coin.  Those landlords whose property values have increased, then have to pay increased taxes &  insurance all without any income.  Ruffled feathers eh, this from someone who regrets not paying for their rent.  And no, mom and pop small landlords are not always flush to cover others claiming hardship.  And when the moratorium ends, those landlords can’t expect back rent any time soon, if ever.

    • Wseattleite February 11, 2022 (5:24 pm)

      EM, I am curious how you are planning to pay back the rent which you owe?  If you do not have to or intend to, you received a free ride whilst those who have saved and purchased their homes have not.  Increased house prices only drive up taxes unless one wants to lose their home through a sale.  Many homeowners do not wish to become homeless.  I can understand why you think this was a great program, but it was not to many many of your neighbors.

    • AN February 11, 2022 (6:17 pm)

      As I understand it from a friend who owns a property management company with 1,500+ homes under their care, when current landlords sell their homes, the people who buy them then move into them and live there. Therefore, supply of available rental homes dwindles and the rent on the homes that remain goes up, because simple supply-and-demand economics. If being a landlord becomes an unattractive proposition, there is no housing to rent. Then what? Where do you imagine living as a renter?

      • N February 11, 2022 (8:23 pm)

        Rental home supply will be a real issue, last report had a 14% reduction in rental homes as landlords sell. And that’s only homes registered as rentals with the city, the actual number I likely higher. That’s a big reduction.

    • SEADOG February 11, 2022 (7:13 pm)

      There is a big difference between investments going “up and down,” and having your property rights violated. During this moratorium, landlords had no ability to enforce their leases — for things totally unrelated to non-payment.  They also had no recourse to challenge tenants who they knew (i.e. had proof) were taking advantage of it.  This was a shocking abuse of power. I’m glad we have a mayor who understands that.

    • westSeattle February 11, 2022 (7:16 pm)

      EM – as a small landlord, we have always kept the rent way lower than market value. It was an investment for retirement and we kept the rent low to be fair to our renters.  It was never about gouging people. You seem to think that what has happened to landlords was “how investments go”.   We know “how investments go” and always set aside for unplanned problems – such as a roof needing replacement or sewer line repair.  But planning for a government takeover of our private property in violation of the Constitution and the violation of contracts law is something nobody expects in a democratic country and we didn’t do that.  Why do you think I should have to house people for free for two years?  You as a taxpayer, should have shared in the burden.   By the way, the US Supreme decided that in NY it was unconstitutional for renters to self-certify that they couldn’t pay rent and the landlords couldn’t take them to court.  The Seattle  City Council is clearly breaking the law. And please don’t tell me there was government aid for landlords to pay the rent – lots of strings attached including only partial payment and not being able to evict a renter afterwards, even if they were a dead beat renter. If the government can do this to landlords, you should expect other groups are next. Maybe you will be in the next group?

      • rocket February 12, 2022 (3:18 am)

        If the Mayor is the one who has the power to end the moratorium how is it the Councils fault it remains in place? This is kind of a procedural point for my own understanding.  Also are there not funds (I am aware they have been painfully slow moving) for both renters AND landlords to access so isnt the argument that landlords will never see a penny of this lost income a bit of a canard?

  • snowskier February 11, 2022 (3:24 pm)

    A couple of weeks to get affairs in order or work out things with the landlord seems fair.  I really hope that Harrell sticks to his word and this things ends when promised.  Many of the small landlords have basically had to run a business for the past two years without any income stream.  That’s a tough business model for success.

  • Terri February 11, 2022 (4:15 pm)

    Commenters today: “Woo hoo … about time … suck it, freeloaders!”

    Commenters when their favorite local business closes: “omg how could this happen … I’m devastated … greedy landlords!”

    • Adam February 11, 2022 (5:30 pm)

      If I were to venture a guess, those are different readers’ comments. 

    • Roms February 11, 2022 (7:16 pm)

      It’s two different things. The first one is about allowing landlords to evict tenants who, among other things, don’t pay. The second is about landlords jacking up prices, not local businesses not paying their rent and getting evicted for that. (To prevent the second from happening to an extreme, rent control is needed.) So, people are not crazy when complaining about both.

      • Terri February 14, 2022 (7:30 am)

        It’s not different, tho, in the context of this eviction moratorium, which covered both personal housing and commercial property during a specific time period for a specific reason. The common thread in these comments is that everyone who isn’t paying home rent now is freeloading, while every business that goes under is somehow the victim of greed. But both can and do involve both non-paying tenants AND landlords who jack up prices … sometimes both. It’s human nature to cry when it’s one of our favorite restaurants or stores because that hurts US. I just wish we showed the same interest and understanding for our neighbors who are going to lose their homes … because that hurts us, too, whether we want to acknowledge it or not.

  • CarDriver February 11, 2022 (4:41 pm)

    Great idea here! All those complaining about “greedy landlords”. Pool your money and buy an apartment building. Then, announce tenants will live RENT FREE. It’s a win win! Tenants will live free, and you the landlords can show you’re not greedy. 

  • rb February 11, 2022 (4:49 pm)

    Thank you Mr Mayor. While the self proclaimed economists will cry sad tears, this is actually good news for everyone. Now that being a landlord is actually a fairer practice, more housing inventory will be released to the market and prices may drop a bit.  

  • K February 11, 2022 (4:51 pm)

    The pandemic was very successful in pitting landlords vs tenants against each other. Unfortunately nobody in power bothered to bring a solution by addressing banks and financial industries during this mess. Neighbors are fighting against one another about local policies and banking CEOs and private equity managers get their bonuses. Too much of our economy is propped up by housing, which is a human right. Good system!

    • WS Guy February 11, 2022 (8:08 pm)

      I don’t understand “housing is a human right”.  Someone would have to be obligated to provide it, which would violate their human rights.

      • Roms February 12, 2022 (6:21 pm)

        Why would it be “someone” who provides housing? Couldn’t it be “something,” like for example the government? That then would not violate human rights as you say (I have to admit I really don’t get your logic, but it’s easy to disprove you anyway.)

      • Also K February 14, 2022 (8:42 am)

        New York’s constitution declares housing a human right.  As a result, you don’t see people sleeping on the streets there.  They built enough shelter beds that their homeless population (which is significant) has an indoor place to sleep.  If they run out of shelter beds, the city pays to put homeless people up in hotels until the bed spaces open.  Yes, “someone” provides that in the form of taxes, just like “someone” provides roads, schools, and beds in the local jail.  There is a societal cost to us all no matter what.  Sharing the burden of existing in an equitable community is not a violation of one’s human rights.  

  • Mj February 11, 2022 (5:28 pm)

    Derek – I see help wanted signs all over the City.  Work opportunity’s are bountiful, thus it is way past time to end the moratorium.  No more excuses not to pay rent.

    • Tar N Feather February 12, 2022 (7:09 am)

      I know a 19 yr old kid that just got s 25$/ hr job here near the junction.  Really, those crying will create any excuse not to take risk and better themselves.

      • WS Res February 12, 2022 (7:07 pm)

        So how much rent can one afford on $25 an hour if you 1) get full-time hours and 2) have no other debts?  Let’s ask a rent calculator.

        • bolo February 12, 2022 (7:58 pm)

          How about a roommate? Would that help? I hope so, but then, there are some leases that prohibit it.

        • TB February 12, 2022 (10:19 pm)

          That doesn’t even get you an income restricted studio in 98116.

    • Derek February 12, 2022 (8:47 am)

      And what are these jobs “all over town” paying? Enough to cover rent, bills, children?

  • Jort February 11, 2022 (10:17 pm)

    There are zero — zero as in zero — completely safe, risk-free financial “investments.” Sometimes you get to make passive income off your land, sometimes you don’t. Deal with it. 

    • Auntie February 12, 2022 (5:47 pm)

      A property value increase (or, less likely, decrease) is not realized until the home is sold. So having one’s property value increase does nothing toward paying the mortgage, property taxes and utilities. It’s an invisible asset until you sell the property.

    • WS Resident February 13, 2022 (12:24 am)

      Since there are zero guaranteed investments, Then you should be fine with letting individuals manage their investment and evict tenants and get a tenant that will pay. Landlord can bear the risk of no one renting from them. And the tenant can bear the risk of getting evicted if they don’t pay their rent. Seems pretty fair. 

  • Seek_Peace February 12, 2022 (11:30 am)

    Here is another example of how Land Lords are taking a hit and how some property owners are getting the same if they’ve lost a job or had their business shut down via Government mandate; City utility bills to the tune of $21.5 Million dollars have gone unpaid.  Those bills are the responsibility of the property owner, not the tenant.   That unpaid money will not be forgiven by City Light and there is no government money to cover that cost, as there is for tenants to cover past due rent.

  • AM February 12, 2022 (5:05 pm)

    Thank you Mayor!   There are so many jobs out there- perhaps, these folks that want to sit in their rent free home might go out and actually get a job.   No more enabling.  Seattle needs to stop enabling people. Why should landlords be on the hook for other people’s  deciding not to pay rent.   That doesn’t seem fair.  I think these landlord who were forced to do this for so long have been more than fair.  Derek- I think you need to rethink your “American Way”.  Should these landlords just not collect their rent forever or until you see fit?  

  • Jd February 17, 2022 (9:43 pm)

    To live off that “safety net” is more difficult than it sounds.   My roommate and I are on the same lease which disqualifies me from any rental aid due to her income.  We don’t not share finances but because we are on the same lease there is nothing I can do.  I plan to pay my back rent to the best of my ability,  it’s my landlords money and I owe him.  This situation isn’t simple, and I’ve had to make insane choices with how to spend my money.  I spent my last few dollars recently on dog food instead of filling my prescription.  Times are tough and to get a job instantly cuts 70% of my aid (Snap/Unemployment).  Nothing on the horizon makes me think this situation is going to get better.

Sorry, comment time is over.