34th District state legislators’ advice for Moms Demand Action

By Tracy Record
West Seattle Blog editor

“Even when we have a strong majority, it’s important to make your voices heard.”

That’s what State Sen. Joe Nguyen told the West Seattle chapter of Moms Demand Action as he and his fellow 34th District state legislators, Reps. Eileen Cody and Joe Fitzgibbon, spoke to the group this week.

Moms Demand Action is a national group focused on “public safety measures that can protect people from gun violence.” It began as a social-media group launched the day after the Sandy Hook massacre and now has chapters in every state. We decided to cover their meeting after hearing all three state legislators would be there.

Some of what they told the group was meant to deepen understanding how the Legislature works. Nguyen, elected just one year ago, explained that thousands of bills are introduced each session, but only hundreds of bills get passed – you have to fight to make sure your bill is seen as worthy of being discussed, let alone worthy of coming up for a vote.

Reviewing recent gun-related legislation, Nguyen mentioned some lower-profile bills such as SB 5205, regarding people found incompetent to stand trial. He also mentioned new laws from the past few yeas such as the availability of Extreme Risk Protection Orders. He said his priority is to figure out “how do we keep things from happening in the first place” – including suicide and domestic violence, and not only those involving firearms.

Continuing the explanation of how things work in Olympia, Rep. Cody observed that you don’t often hear about bills that pass unanimously. The controversial ones get talked to death, literally, if they are taken up too early – the rules permit “all sorts of moves people can do” to bog down such bills. She said she is hopeful that the proposal to ban high-capacity magazines will at least get discussed in caucus this year. (Cody co-sponsored a proposal that stalled last session.)

Rep. Fitzgibbon said he consideed last session “productive.” He was in high school when the Columbine massacre happened, and that alone made an impression, but, he lamented, mass shootings are so frequent today that people are living in “traumatizing” fear. “We have a great deal more work to do on this,” he declared, while warning that “no single law is ever going to be the law that stops gun violence in our community” – it’s a compilation of smaller actions.

Moms Demand Action had supported a bill requiring training for concealed-carry permit holders – SB 5174 – and it “made it pretty far” but, a group leader asked,, what more could they do to push for passage?

Fitzgibbon acknowledged that even Democratic legislators have had a lot of fear about gun issues dating back to election losses decades ago. But “I think that tide has shifted,” he observed.

Nguyen offered to meet later to discuss strategy for getting the bill through. “We’ll talk.” He then was asked, “What’s your learning curve been like?” He answered “There are about 35 steps where a bill can die,” and reiterated that it’s not even about the vote so much as “having the conversation.” It’s important that people “understand how the government works.” He said that kind of learning helped him “run bills” right from the start.

The legislators also discussed cases of people who went to court to get their guns back despite having histories of threats/hate speech. And that segued to discussion of eastern Washington Rep. Matt Shea, who is on the Judiciary Committee, which hears gun bills. “It’s very safe for us to talk about these things here but there are people in Washington state who are OK with white supremacists to open-carry and threaten people, and they get re-elected.”

Another question: What’s the best way to reach out to affect the most change? Cody said they count emails when there’s a deluge on specific issues, but if it’s something unique, an email or letter explaining is good too. Personal stories of how you’re affected by something are good, said Nguyen. Fitzgibbon said emails are better than phone calls – they have few staffers to answer (one per representative, two per senator).

But making progress means more than dealing with politicians, Fitzgibbon suggested … find ways of talking with people you disagree with. More understanding can lead to change.

One person in the audience offered that supporting political change outside the local area, sending contributions to opponents of people hampering progress, is one tactic. So are efforts like “Postcards to Voters,” a weekly event in West Seattle and many other areas.

Another person pushed back on the “understanding” in some circumstances – in some cases, meeting halfway against something “insane” does not make sense, they contended. Nguyen agreed but said you might find that you have more in common with members of another political party than you would guess. For example, he said he called the state treasurer – a Republican — earlier that day to talk.”You can be fiercely partisan in terms of your values and beliefs, but you should still have the conversation.” Another example: He said he’d talked to the downtown Chamber of Commerce about an income tax and found them receptive.

Then, a question about making schools safer: Rep. Cody said more mental health help is important work being done there. What about tougher penalties? Rep. Fitzgibbon said they’re not sure that would be a deterrent. Restorative justice works, said one group leader, so they’ve worked for more funding on that.

The activists and legislators will meet again – Moms Demand Action plans a lobbying day in January.

WHAT’S NEXT: The Legislature is scheduled to convene in mid-January. Contact info for your legislators (the 34th District includes West Seattle, White Center, Vashon/Maury Islands, part of Burien) is linked to their names below:

-Sen. Joe Nguyen
-Rep. Eileen Cody
-Rep. Joe Fitzgibbon

Moms Demand Action-West Seattle is reachable via westseattle.momsdemandaction@gmail.com.

18 Replies to "34th District state legislators' advice for Moms Demand Action"

  • Sixbuck November 24, 2019 (10:32 pm)

    Another person pushed back on the “understanding” in some circumstances – in some cases, meeting halfway against something “insane” does not make sense,Try to understand that the person you are referring to as insane may believe, logically, that you, too, are insane. 

    • brian November 25, 2019 (10:14 am)

      Oh cool so nothing is real and nothing matters? Awesome, sign me up for more of this relativism it sounds really healthy.    

      • Sixbuck November 25, 2019 (4:13 pm)

        I think you missed and validated my point simultaneously. 

        • brian November 26, 2019 (9:46 am)

          Nah dude you don’t have a point. Stop trying.    

  • Question Authority November 25, 2019 (5:45 pm)

    The only training concealed carry permit holders need is more target practice at the gun range.  Anybody who seeks and holds that permit knows damn well what their responsibilities are and how to handle a firearm.  Why don’t they focus on all the guns being carried by youth and criminals that have no permit, nor care to get one.

    • Jethro Marx November 25, 2019 (7:42 pm)

      That’s not well-thought, Authority Questioner- I used to work in a gun shop and there are about as many jack@#$ gun owners as not. The question is rather, does the law address a real problem? I rather doubt it, but then I’m rather pessimistic about how well elected bodies function. If you think the issue is gun owners vs. non-owners, I have some bad news about which type of gun owner you are. The best thing groups like this can do is buyback guns from coincidental gun owners (those who have one tucked away in the back of a closet but won’t remember it until their kids find it.) I know that’s not much, but hey, hold a constitutional convention if you want more.

    • Bad take... November 25, 2019 (9:29 pm)

      Seriously bad take. Completely tone deaf. Did you notice the idiot who went to jail after pulling his gun on the line cutters at the Fauntleroy ferry? Nobody has any “responsibilities” to own or carry a firearm. It’s just something people “want”. It’s not a need or a responsibility and whatever permits are issued certainly don’t exalt anyone. 

      • Question Authority November 25, 2019 (10:45 pm)

        Your example at the ferry is one person in a group of tens of thousands, no group is flawless.  That’s using the same argument and odds that all dog owners pick up the poop.

      • Bradley November 25, 2019 (11:47 pm)

        There are nearly 700,000 concealed carry permit holders in Washington State. You’re focusing on the actions of one, projecting, and amplifying that EXTREMELY rare incident. Even police officers with hundreds of hours of training make poorer decisions than that inept individual. CPL holders in our State are some of the most responsible residents we have.

        • Bad takes... November 26, 2019 (10:24 am)

          Except for the fact that inept individuals who make mistakes can kill my children. Athletic trainers have to take annual training/continuing education courses to keep up. Asking people who feel the need to carry guns to annually certify their competence to do so doesn’t seem like a stretch. 

          • Bradley November 26, 2019 (5:51 pm)

            Washington gun owners over age 21 have a Federal and State Constitutional right to carry a firearm for self-defense. Athletic trainers do not have a Constitutional right to train individuals. I have several personal trainer certifications. Athletic trainers injure thousands of people every year, which is many thousands more people than all CPL holders in every state, combined.

          • Bad takes... November 26, 2019 (9:19 pm)

            Nobody is disputing your right to carry something that serves no purpose besides killing living things. The organization mentioned that they are working on legislation which would require you to complete training so you don’t injure yourself or someone else.

            You don’t think that’s necessary. A lot of people don’t trust you, or anyone carrying guns around. You wouldn’t be welcome in my house or around my children with your gun. You have the right to own it & I have the right to distrust your motives and support the idea of additional training for you. 

          • B.W. November 27, 2019 (11:01 am)

            Do you think criminals will take that class?

  • Mj November 25, 2019 (10:26 pm)

    The gun issue like to many issues in this Country is too polarized.  Background checks and waiting periods are to me low hanging fruit.  

  • Ex-Westwood Resident November 26, 2019 (11:04 am)

    Here’s an idea;

    How about we hear something like this from the “gun grabbers;”

    In an effort to reduce Gun Violence, we are proposing the following;

    1. A CWP holder, or “ILLEGAL CARRY” (Person without a CWP is caught with a firearm) commits a crime with a gun, 5 years will added to their sentence, along with 1 month for EVERY round of ammunition they is carrying.

    2. A “Illegal Carry” (person WITHOUT a CWP) who commits a crime with a gun will have 10 YEARS added to their sentence and six months added for EACH round of ammunition they are carrying

    3. A person who is NOT ALLOWED by LAW to own or posses a Firearm will be sentenced to 10 years for EACH firearm and SIX months for EACH round of ammunition, if found in possession of a firearm/s. DOUBLE the sentence, i.e. 20 years and 1 year, if they commit a crime with it.

    The sentences are NOT eligible for “Plea” arrangements and are MANDATORY, the age of the perpetrator will NOT be taken into consideration, i.e. 13 year-old commits Armed Robbery, assault…etc., WILL be tried as an ADULT and WILL have the aforementioned sentences added to their crimes.

    Instead of making it harder for LAW ABIDING citizens to exercise their CONSITIUTIONAL RIGHT

    • Jethro Marx November 26, 2019 (11:22 pm)

      I guess your reverence for our constitution does not extend to spelling it correctly, or perhaps more importantly, reading it. Do not suppose you have made a case that you are a responsible gun owner. Your schedule of punishments may not be cruel, but it is certainly unusual. I’m no fan of the constitution en masse, but it has its good points, and I think prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment is one. A 13 year-old ought not hold up a 7-11 with a BB gun, but should they go to jail for life if 50 “rounds” are in the BB chamber? Can we guarantee the law will apply equally to all people? We have never managed that one.

      • Ex-Westwood Resident November 27, 2019 (2:08 pm)

        At least this beats ANYTHING the “gun grabbers” have come up with.
        EVERY thing they have proposed does NOTHING to prevent gun violence or crime.
        In fact, it promotes it by making RESPONSILBLE gun owners, felons.
        Try doing something about the majority of the problem; gun violence committed by those NOT ALLOWED POSSESSION of a firearm by law.
        Here is a bit of data for you and other anti- 2nd Amendment zealots; Rifles, of ALL kinds killed 245 people last year. Constipation killed OVER 2400. According to data from the FBI and CDC.
        Anyone who thinks a “BB Gun” is a “Firearm” needs to go back to school.
        How does the sentences constitute “Cruel and Unusual Punishment?”
        It doesn’t surprise me that you aren’t a fan of the Constitution (spelled right this time for your benefit) en masse.
        Let me guess;
        you approve of the 1st, as long as they are saying with what you agree with,
        you DISPISE the second,
        probably don’t understand the third,
        support the fourth, as long as it is a law you agree with. Same for the fifth, sixth and seventh,
        you think $1.00 is excessive bail,
        the ninth…you reserve those rights ONLY for those you agree with, andthe tenth???
        That is the WORST OF ALL, even over the second, as it hinders the Federal Gov’t’s powers (if you understand what it says and implies).
        As for me reading the Constitution…believe me, I have read more times than you have, AND have SWORN to up hold it seven times. How about you;
        By the way, your screen name fits you. Say “Hi” to Jed and Harpo for me.

      • Just Saying November 27, 2019 (7:06 pm)

        A BB gun isn’t a firearm, though.

Sorry, comment time is over.