West Seattle development: 3261 Avalon Way clears Design Review

From tonight’s meeting of the Southwest Design Review Board: One project on the agenda, 3261 SW Avalon Way, six stories and about 120 units, not too far east of 35th (in the image above, that’s the not-entirely-finished 35th/Avalon building at right). This was the second Design Review meeting for the project, and the meeting concluded with the board recommending approval, with conditions. As was the case in the previous review, they are still concerned about the neighbors on either side (West Seattle Stadium is downslope on the south side), since the building is proposed to take up most of the lot; the only member of the public to speak at the meeting was a resident of a neighboring meeting, concerned about the proximity. Traffic challenges were mentioned too; the building is proposed for two parking entrances off Avalon, and will have about one space for each unit. The project site spans five lots, four of which currently hold single-family homes.

4 Replies to "West Seattle development: 3261 Avalon Way clears Design Review"

  • redblack November 18, 2011 (5:29 am)

    what’s up with the (mastro?) building at 35th and avalon, SE corner? all activity there seems to have ceased.
    .
    will we have two more or less identical buildings sitting unfinished and empty within a block of each other?

  • LB November 18, 2011 (10:11 am)

    I’ve been wondering about that place myself. I noticed the construction debris dumpster on the south side hasn’t been there for at least a couple of weeks and interior work on the ground floor seems to have stopped altogether.

  • curious November 18, 2011 (2:23 pm)

    What does “about one (parking) space for each unit” mean?

    • WSB November 18, 2011 (3:19 pm)

      The design documents list about 117 units and about 117 parking spaces, if I recall correctly (and I can’t refer to them at this moment). However, the updated package was not made available by DPD online (even though I e-mailed them two days to say the one that was online was wrong, it was from the previous meeting). I guess approximately might have been a better word than about. – TR

Sorry, comment time is over.