‘Indisputably tragic, but also insurmountably an apparent use of lawful force’: Investigators’ conclusion in West Seattle shooting death of Dr. Tammy Towers Parry

(October 1, 2024, WSB photo by Christopher Boffoli)

Almost a year has passed since the shooting that killed 57-year-old Dr. Tammy Towers Parry at her house south of The Junction, known for its large flag and QAnon sign. As The Seattle Times first reported this morning, investigators have concluded their review of the case, and decided that the process server who killed her would not be charged. According to the King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office memo, which we obtained this afternoon, the Seattle Police detective assigned to the case decided not to refer it to the KCPAO for charges, but requested they review the evidence for a second opinion. Here’s a verbatim excerpt from the resulting memo dated June 3 (note that NCD-RP means the person’s name has been redacted – also note that although the memo says October 2, 2024, the shooting was on October 1):

… The evidence here indicates that P NCD-RP and G NCD-RP approached Towers’ foreclosed-upon home in West Seattle on October 2, 2024 just after 1:00 pm, in broad daylight, to inform Towers that P NCD-RP had purchased the home at auction, and that she needed to vacate the premises. They had previously attempted to make contact with Towers, and had left a card on her front door. According to both P NCD-RP and G NCD-RP, who were separated just minutes after the shooting, and still gave consistent statements, Towers came to the door brandishing a shotgun. P NCD-RP and G NCD-RP immediately retreated, as P NCD-RP yelled that he was simply there to serve Towers with papers. Towers opened the door and walked onto the porch, said “I see you!”, and something to the effect of “I’m going to shoot you!” and ‘racked’ the shotgun. She pointed the shotgun first at P NCD-RP – who was backing away toward the street – and then at G NCD-RP, who had retreated to the side of the porch and was standing just over 6 feet away. C NCD-RP, who was carrying a handgun in a hip holster, with a valid CCP, drew his firearm and fired at Towers twice. Officers responded less than 3 minutes later, and found Towers on the porch with a loaded shotgun that had a round chambered.

In talking to Towers’ family during your follow-up investigation, you learned that Towers was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS) about 10 years prior to her death. Her father, a doctor, informed you that about 10% of MS patients develop brain lesions that cause delusions indistinguishable from those experienced by a person suffering from paranoid schizophrenia, and that he believed Towers was exhibiting the symptoms of this condition. In the last few years, Towers had grown increasingly paranoid and had cut off ties with her family. She had grown deeply distrustful of government, a fact that was borne out by your investigation into her troubling social media presence, her recent loss of her license to practice medicine, and a recent confrontation with local law enforcement in Montana. That confrontation stemmed from another property dispute; similar to her discontinuation of mortgage payments on her West Seattle home, she had ceased paying utilities on her Montana property, but did not believe the government had a right to cut off her utilities service.

For all of the above reasons, this case is indisputably tragic, but also insurmountably an apparent use of lawful force. On this evidence, our office would not file criminal charges against Mr. G in this matter. …

As we noted in this followup last year, Dr. Towers Parry was a longtime physician who gained notoriety in 2021 for a video indicating she was at the January 6 U.S. Capitol riot.

34 Replies to "'Indisputably tragic, but also insurmountably an apparent use of lawful force': Investigators' conclusion in West Seattle shooting death of Dr. Tammy Towers Parry"

  • Rhonda September 11, 2025 (4:47 pm)

    Ideally, evictions should always be served by multiple law enforcement officers, but that’s not always possible, which is why so many process servers arm themselves. 

    • 22blades September 11, 2025 (6:39 pm)

      I’ve done that work before & that ideal is not realistic. This was many decades ago & there wasn’t the manpower to accommodate these proceedings. Other circumstances additionally? Maybe.

    • Jort September 11, 2025 (7:46 pm)

      Hey, look, another problem whose solution is “more cops!” Funny how that always seems to be the answer…

      • Anne September 11, 2025 (11:16 pm)

        Oh Jort-good to see you’re back ranting again. 

      • Al King September 12, 2025 (5:51 am)

        Jort. You’re right!! More police IS the answer! 

      • Big 5 Guy September 12, 2025 (8:07 pm)

        Yes, Jort, police are absolutely the answer instead of private process servers with guns. Police are highly trained and equipped to handle tense situations and are held to a much higher accountability standard than process servers. 

  • Not disputably tragic September 11, 2025 (6:33 pm)

    If the family members were equipped to understand how bad her condition was, they should have gone through the process to have her weapons revoked. This could have been avoided. Instead tax dollars had to be wasted on this investigation as opposed to actual wrongful shooting incidents by spd. 

    • Absolutely tragic September 11, 2025 (9:49 pm)

      It says she cut off ties with the family. Everything about the story is tragic. Have some empathy for everyone involved. 

  • Seattlite September 11, 2025 (7:48 pm)

    Question:  Is it routine for process servers to be armed?    Question:  Is it routine for process servers after seeing that a resident has a gun to continue with serving the papers?  Question:  If P and G = two men, who was “C NCD-RP, who was carrying a handgun in a hip holster, with a valid CCP, drew his firearm and fired at Towers twice.” 

    • WSB September 11, 2025 (8:34 pm)

      That would be a typo in the memo, as was the date.

      • Seattlite September 11, 2025 (8:59 pm)

        Thank you.

  • Dysfunction September 11, 2025 (7:59 pm)

    Yeah, well how many shooting incidents by SPD have there been since this that should have been investigated?  And by your own logic, how about family members and friends of gangbangers knowing they have weapons before they shoot someone? 

  • T REX September 11, 2025 (9:46 pm)

    Dysfunction, great statement.  And so true. All of you need to see beyond the QANON sign and look at what more than likely happened to her and find some kind of compassion in your heart. So disappointing to see some of these comments.,

    • Seattlite September 11, 2025 (10:49 pm)

      T REX…I 100% agree with you.  It seems that a portion of Americans are unable to show empathy or sympathy for someone whose life was taken in a needless, violent manner.  We are seeing that today with people cheering about Charlie Kirk’s assassination.   Different opinions on politics, religions or life in general should not lead to a person’s death.

      • bill September 12, 2025 (12:06 am)

        It is unfortunate that this woman was killed, but if the family has been out of touch with her for years how can they assert she never would have fired? It seems she had become such an entirely different person they could not maintain any communication, so how can they claim insight into her state of mind? She said, “I am going to shoot you,” and she pointed her shotgun. At that point, if you are not behind armor plate, a de-escalation chat is not possible.

      • Derek September 12, 2025 (3:38 am)

        Re: Kirk, weird, I saw a lot of you behaving differently about west Seattle’s own Ayşenur Eygi’s death.

      • K September 12, 2025 (5:36 am)

        To be fair, they’re handling Charlie Kirk’s death the way Charlie Kirk would have handled it.  Google his thoughts on empathy some time. Bill, it sounds like they’re talking about the person they knew, not the person she’d become.

      • Scarlett September 12, 2025 (7:31 am)

        That’s gaslighting, Seattleite.  Many of Kirk’s prominent detractors have denounced his horrific assassination and have bent over backwards to see the good in the man, apparently a decent guy off-stage.  I will say this about Kirk:  He plunked down his table at hostile universities and engaged face-to-face with often hostile students, which took a lot of personal courage.  The MAGA swill who jumped on his death to promote themselves,  or their book, or their organization, etc etc are vile and disgusting.    

      • Pete September 12, 2025 (8:00 am)

        I don’t wish death on anyone, but please can we not sanitize that man. He was a racist. He was a corrosive, bullying, progandist. 

        • T Rex September 12, 2025 (1:27 pm)

          WOW Pete, just wow. 

      • WS Res September 12, 2025 (8:54 am)

        What are you reacting to? Where in the comments here is someone showing inadequate sympathy, in your opinion? 

      • Scarlett September 12, 2025 (11:11 am)

        You are literally making stuff up, Seattleite.  It’s one thing to speculate about people – I do it all the time about alleged “conservatives”  like you – but it’s another to twist someone’s actual words into something of malicious intent.  

        • Seattlite September 13, 2025 (8:48 am)

          Scarlett…Methinks you are the one who is gaslighting.  Even Seattle’s local news outlets are reporting on social media’s hate speech regarding Charlie Kirk’s tragic, needless death.  There have also been people in media who have been fired for their incorrect and inflammatory remarks regarding Charlie Kirk.  Also, a well-known newspaper had to retract and apologize for their egregious lies regarding Charlie Kirk.  Why do you not want to research and find facts?  

      • PotKettleBlack September 12, 2025 (11:55 am)

        Charlie Kirk was not killed for his political beliefs. Politics is about collecting and spending tax dollars. White supremacy and a return to slavery IS NOT a political view, it’s a crime. Forced pregnancy and the subjugation of women for the purpose of breeding IS NOT a political view, it’s a crime. Charlie Kirk was killed because he was a racist religious extremist whose views would make the Taliban blush. He was a monster who ran a highly lucrative business hurting other people.

      • Lagartija Nick September 12, 2025 (5:28 pm)

        @Seattleite, Kirk wanted death for the LGBTQ community. That’s not “a difference of opinion” and there is no compromise to be had with that. 

        • Seattlite September 13, 2025 (8:54 am)

          Lagartija Nick…I notice that you did not quote Charlie Kirk’s words or give a source to find Charlie Kirk’s statement because he never said that.  

    • No. September 12, 2025 (11:34 am)

      Let’s rephrase your idea:

        • All of you people need to understand why someone would be tempted to follow racist, misogynist propaganda because it’s so tempting. 

        People who aren’t racist, who don’t hate people because of their color, gender or sexuality don’t need to be understanding of someone who thinks someone else shouldn’t exist because of things they don’t choose

        1. It’s claimed that this person said “I see you and I’m going to (hurt you)” but you think we should be understanding. Hate seemed to be in her heart for a while now. If she had hurt someone instead of her getting hurt would you tell the victim’s family to be understanding their loved one was hurt by a nazi? “Just understand, nazis have feelings too”.
    • AL September 12, 2025 (8:51 am)

      What is wrong with you people?  Why can’t you just say this is a tragic event and a beautiful life was lost. You all have way too much time on your hands and a very skewed sense of morals and values.  Agree with TREX & Seattlite – thank you for pointing that out.

      • walkerws September 12, 2025 (12:21 pm)

        A life was lost, and that is tragic. “Beautiful” is an unnecessary and unproved editorialization.

      • Churro Strength September 12, 2025 (4:27 pm)

        A beautiful life?!?!? Are you kidding? No, you can’t erase the truth. Charlie Kirk, was a racist. He was a misogynist. He was a man, who dedicated his brief life to spreading a message of hate towards anyone who was different. Charlie Kirk said empathy was damaging. Kirk was a gun violence apologist. He literally said that he was ok with people dying, children dying, from gun violence, in order to preserve his 2nd amendment rights. I don’t support what happened to Charlie Kirk, but he supported it. A beautiful life? By what standards? Death does not negate the truth of who he was.

        • T Rex September 13, 2025 (7:48 am)

          Wow,  I actually feel sorry for you. And sorry that is all you saw in this man. What is even more amazing was listening to the young adults he spoke to, most of them will have some big challenges when they get out of school. They have no idea what lies ahead. Their reality and  view of the world is what they see on TikTok and what they did not learn from their parents.  

    • Glad to see all of you want empathy for Nazis but have the opposite idea for Palestinian supporters who don’t want genocide September 12, 2025 (12:38 pm)
        1. Empathy for me, genocide for thee. Lmao you all really are here crying about empathy but go back to the Palestinian protest post here and there were hundreds of comments spewing hate to the protestors. You weren’t asking for empathy then. Hypocrites. 
      1. AL September 13, 2025 (8:55 am)

        @churro. If you read the actual post about the person that died then you would realize I was talking about her. You must be so filled with hate you aren’t able to see past your own rage.  Get over yourself.  There was nothing in my post about Mr. Kirk or Palestine. You need to check yourself.  

      Sorry, comment time is over.