Seattle Public Schools’ new superintendent comes here on second-to-last stop of community-engagement tour

(Photos by Chi Krneta unless otherwise credited)

By Torin Record-Sand
Reporting for West Seattle Blog

Tuesday night brought new Seattle Public Schools superintendent, Ben Shuldiner, to West Seattle for the second to last meeting of his community engagement tour, a major opportunity to hear the voices of local SPS parents. The meeting was held at West Seattle elementary in High Point.

As a recent arrival in the district, Shuldiner is looking to get a better grasp of the district’s needs. In his own words, ā€œBuilding trust is central to the work ahead, and I believe the best ideas come from listening to you and learning from your experiences in our schools.ā€ The meeting series is meant to bridge that gap; especially key in times when budget-balancing has become a defining issue for the district.

(Photo by Torin Record-Sand)

Around 140 attendees were at the meeting, representing students and families from all schools across West Seattle, as well as members of West Seattle Elementary and general SPS staff. Superintendent Shuldiner was also accompanied by Bev Redmond, SPS chief of staff and public affairs, and school board president Gina Topp, the director of SPS District 6, which includes West Seattle, most of South Park, and Georgetown.

After a brief introduction by Redmond and Topp, Shuldiner quickly introduced the agenda for the evening. Much of the time was spent on small-group discussions at tables of approximately eight people each, with three simple questions: 1. What is going well? [for the district], 2. What is not going well?, and 3. What can SPS do to make things better? The audience was given 30 minutes to discuss, with around 10 minutes for each question, and then they were asked to choose a leader from their table to report back their consensus on each question to the whole of the audience.

On the side of the good, many in the audience highlighted the strength of teaching at schools throughout the district. ā€œWe have excellent teaching, and when the teaching is fantastic – it’s really fantastic.ā€ said one of the communiry discussion leaders. Others pointed to the district having strengths in diversity and culture, especially in terms of access to dual language instruction programs. Many also said they were happy with the quality of after-school programs.

The negative side of things was more varied. The most consistent theme was the possibility of further funding cuts for the district, and how they could impact schools, as well as how they’ve impacted schools in the past. Some said they felt the district had so far preferred to cut school staff rather than administrators, while others were worried about whether extracurricular funding would remain the same. A large portion of parents were also concerned about technology use in classrooms, saying that policies against phone or tablet use in schools had not gone far enough. Finally, there were concerns related towards racial justice: one woman in the audience, who self-identified as Latina, said that there was not a good path for the Latino community to be represented in district meetings with the ever-present threat of immigration authorities. Another individual pointed at Shuldiner’s comments in an email to parents from a few days ago as insensitive; in particular, his use of the phrase ā€œthe soft bigotry of low expectationsā€ referring to systemic issues BIPOC students encounter in the schools.

Suggestions from the community also featured a large amount of agreement. Many said they were happy with the interest the superintendent was showing in community outreach; and were hoping for even more opportunities for communication with the district. The technology issue was raised again, with many highlighting that they were hoping the district would make a stronger policy on both phones and tablets in schools, as well as the usage of AI. And, as also mentioned above, many hoped that if there were future cuts due to the budget deficit, these would be aimed more at administrators or district positions than staff members directly in the schools.

The superintendent’s tour concluded with an online sessioh tonight. Officials from the school district also said that, for anyone who was present at the West Seattle meeting, if they submitted comments via the digital form available to attendees, district staff will be working on taking in the feedback and making sure that every voice is heard.

11 Replies to "Seattle Public Schools' new superintendent comes here on second-to-last stop of community-engagement tour"

  • CaptainAdmiral April 3, 2026 (9:22 am)

    Out of curiosity, who is providing the students with the phones and tablets they are bringing into the schools? And why is it the school’s/district’s responsibility to manage said devices?

    • Brandon April 3, 2026 (3:36 pm)

      There’s a universal, K-12 1:1 device program in the schools. The schools are giving tablets to the students, starting with kindergartners. I’m a parent who has consciously avoided giving my kid an ipad, and now I have to worry they are being handed one as soon as they go to kindergarten. Much of curriculum is on these devices, and the evidence is that learning in this way is not effective for retention. Also, older kids find ways around the controls and use them for whatever they want. There’s a growing contingent of people who want to get rid of the 1:1 program entirely and go back to dedicated computer lab time.  While that’s not likely to happen tomorrow, having a policy and setting limits for the amount of time spent on the screen-based curriculum would be a move in the positive direction.

      • SPED Parent April 3, 2026 (6:26 pm)

        But the policy needs to be written in a way that doesn’t unfairly burden kids with learning differences.  Our child got their first tablet at the recommendation of their occupational therapist, before they even started preschool.  Screen time isn’t inherently bad, and there are kids who really benefit from these devices.  The grown-ups need to find the right way of incorporating technology into the schools, instead of just throwing it out because some parents don’t like the present iteration.

  • HTB April 3, 2026 (12:23 pm)

    Really? Someone’s #1 concern is the phrase “soft bigotry of low expectations” – really?

    • Frog April 3, 2026 (1:51 pm)

      That “soft bigotry” phrase was first coined by speech writers for George W. Bush, and has become a bit of a cliche.  It’s not often heard in Seattle, for good reason.  It’s very insulting to staff, and not really accurate from anything I have seen.   I was surprised to see it in Shuldiner’s weekend email, even with the qualifier “pervading some places.”   He was obviously taking a veiled shot at someone, but because it was veiled, it could be perceived as a shot at everyone.  One of Shuldiner’s quirks is that his list of favorite cliches is very different from Seattle’s, and it could get him in trouble.  The lady at the meeting really laid into him, and I think he deserved it.

  • SPS parent April 3, 2026 (1:09 pm)

    The new Superintendent’s approach to community engagement is sincere, honest and a refreshing change from the previous SPS leaders.  Overheard from other parents at the meeting: At the last Superintendent meeting about school closures [Fall of 2024, under Supt. Brent Jones] they [SPS] asked us to write down comments but when it was time to share, they cherry picked only the positive ones and ignored the vast majority of the comments that were against school closures.  I wasn’t at the school closure meetings from 2024 but this one did NOT seem like that.  As Mr. Shuldiner said to the audience, “don’t sugarcoat anything.”

    • 3cents April 4, 2026 (10:41 am)

      I was at the 2024 meetings. I went to at least 5 ā€˜engagement’ sessions and school board meetings. They were exactly as mentioned above.I agree the March 2026 meeting felt different than last year. I think the new superintendent has a lot of issues to navigate, but I think he will handle it better than Jones. Also- if your kid is irresponsible with a tablet, that sounds like something you need to figure out on a 1-1 level with them. iPads, computers and similar technology are used in almost every industry. Learning to be proficient on them is job training and life skills. Some families might not have the funds for a home computer or iPad. Providing kids with exposure to technology at school is important. Without the 1990s school computer lab and Mavis Beacon typing classes, at lot of us would have been put at a disadvantage. iPads and class laptops are that for this generation of kids. 

  • Parent & Educator April 4, 2026 (3:27 pm)

    He loves the camera. He is rude and condescending when the camera goes off.

    • Corvid April 4, 2026 (8:24 pm)

      That’s not my experience talking with him on multiple occasions.  He was consistently genuine and personable, and answered questions directly each time, not the usual bureaucratic SPS word-salad, and definitely not the Seattle passive-aggressive style.

      • Parent & Educator April 5, 2026 (5:08 pm)

        I am happy to hear this. I hope this extends to staff at some point. Maybe he has been nervous? It hasn’t been good. Your comment gives me hope!

    • Parent April 5, 2026 (7:54 pm)

      I started out critical of the central district staff and have become a supporter of the new Superintendent after he recently and coincidentally encountered a group of parents at a cafe and spent an hour talking candidly with us (no cameras present). I’m eager to see what changes he can bring to the school district!

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.