ELECTION 2025: Mayor proposes renewing/expanding city’s education levy

checkbox.jpgWhat started as a city levy to fund preschool (announced in West Seattle), and expanded to add other levels of education including free community-college tuition (a program with roots here), would grow again if it goes up for renewal this year and gets voter approval. Mayor Harrell announced the proposal today. From the official announcement:

… Some highlights of Mayor Harrell’s proposal include:

Child Care Expansion: More thandoubling access to affordable child care slots to 1,400 a year and providing direct payments to support the retention of 5,000 child care workers citywide.
Nationally Acclaimed Preschool Program: Expanding the Seattle Preschool Program to 3,100 seats, improving access for families across the city.
Youth Mental Health and Safety: Bolstering youth mental health services for Seattle students through new school-based health centers, expanded staffing, and telehealth support.
Seattle Promise: Free tuition and expenses for up to two years at Seattle Colleges, available to all Seattle public school graduates.
Apprenticeships and Workforce Development: Creating a new Path to Trades program to help graduates enter careers in skilled trades.

To renew the expiring FEPP levy, Mayor Harrell is proposing to levy a $1.3 billion property tax over six years, costing the median assessed value Seattle homeowner $0.61 per $1,000 assessed value, totaling about $654 a year. Research continually shows that investments in early learning and education have long-term economic, health, and social benefits for children and society.

The expired six-year levy, which passed with 68% approval in 2018, was described in our coverage that year as costing the median homeowner $249 a year. The mayor is sending it to the City Council, which will decide whether to send it to voters in November. That’s also when King County plans to ask voters to renew the Medic One/EMS levy; before then, the King County Parks Levy is up for a renewal/expansion vote in August, as we reported earlier this year.

51 Replies to "ELECTION 2025: Mayor proposes renewing/expanding city's education levy"

  • Alki Parent April 23, 2025 (3:15 pm)

    I’m 100% in favor of funding early childhood education.

    • Anne April 23, 2025 (6:28 pm)

      I am 100% against funding early childhood education by raising property taxes.  Find another way.

      • Sixbuck April 23, 2025 (8:08 pm)

        I’m with Anne. My wallet has already been picked dry. 

      • Derek April 23, 2025 (9:27 pm)

        You guys get mad when we try to tax the wealthy or Amazon….so?

        • Amy April 24, 2025 (2:19 am)

          Excuse me, who gets mad? And the opposite of taxing the wealthy/Amazon isn’t taxing the non-weathly.

  • Broke April 23, 2025 (4:00 pm)

    This is absurd. This is the time to be getting rid of taxes and not renewing levies, but not here. Tax revenues have risen wayyyy more than inflation in the last 10 years (they have doubled for the state) yet it’s never enough. The well is dry. I hope the people that vote for this when the council inevitably sends it to the voters aren’t also complaining about Seattle being a expensive city and housing prices. And when the “tax the rich” people chime in, understand the rich can’t pay for everything that people demand for the federal, state, county, and city. Seattle is falling into a government spending abyss by chasing some mythical utopia. 

    • k April 23, 2025 (5:21 pm)

      Billionaires literally CAN pay for all of those things.  

    • Nolan April 23, 2025 (5:52 pm)

      The rich can certainly pay for education.

    • Lauren April 23, 2025 (6:46 pm)

      I mean, “the rich” could literally pay for all this. (Probably the rich in Seattle alone.) We “tax the rich” people aren’t even saying they should do that. We’re saying they should pay their fair share. 

      • Bradley April 23, 2025 (7:35 pm)

        What exactly is their “fair share”?  Be specific. Dollars and cents. Justify what they’re not paying. Who are those people. Stop generalizing. If you’re just spit balling, it’s just an empty, overused slogan. 

        • Jake April 24, 2025 (12:02 pm)

          Fair share would be incremental tax brackets on income and capital gains. You should not have sales tax distributed equally among the poor and rich otherwise it only affects the poor. A start would be 5% tax on income greater than 250k, with brackets increasing 1 % each 200k until a final 13% for earners over 1 million. Do that and you never see property or sales tax levies go back up.

        • Lauren April 24, 2025 (8:26 pm)

          Never ceases to amaze me how quick people are to defend billionaires. 

      • Bradley April 23, 2025 (10:17 pm)

        Please please tell us who these rich scoundrels are. 

          • bradley April 24, 2025 (9:31 pm)

            So if you’ve been paying attention, Melinda is already giving millions away to non profits and other minority business interests. So has MacKenzie.   Bill has already pledged his wealth to The Giving  Pledge.  Balmer, not sure.  Seattle kicked out Bezos to their own demise.  The others are hardly over the top . It sounds more like easy targets with a $ number, but doesn’t really solve a long term spending issue, or a regressive tax.    “The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money”.

        • Lauren April 24, 2025 (7:41 am)

          Jeff Bezos. Bill Gates. Steve Ballmer. Just to name the (obvious) few. 

          • wscommuter April 24, 2025 (2:23 pm)

            None of whom live in Seattle.   I understand the emotional appeal of “taxing the rich” … but until we amend the state constitution to allow for an income tax (which I’m not holding my breath to see it happen), this is just pie-in-the-sky ranting.  

          • Lauren April 24, 2025 (8:25 pm)

            No, but they live in Washington state, and education is dreadfully underfunded at the state level. This isn’t pie-in-the-sky dreaming. It’s an entirely achievable thing. 

          • Bradley April 24, 2025 (8:39 pm)

            A common refrain from many progressive lawmakers is that the rich don’t pay their fair share of taxes. “Fair share” is, of course, subjective. But a new Treasury studyprovides data showing that the rich not only pay more than the middle class, they pay more than one-third of their annual income in federal taxes and more than 45 percent when state and local taxes are included.Indeed, the total tax burden on the super-wealthy, especially those with large stakes in global businesses, is upwards of 60 percent of their annual income because of the taxes they pay abroad.https://taxfoundation.org/blog/super-rich-pay-effective-tax-rates/

          • bradley April 24, 2025 (11:22 pm)

            Are the schools really underfunded Lauren?  I just did a quick payroll scan, there are over 100 Superintendents and Asst. Supers who are making in excess of $276,000 (yes, over 100!).    One at $545k (Chehalis), five over $400k, 18 more over $350k.  Seems like there is plenty of money in salaries sloshing around.   I gave up after I counted over 100 about $267,000.  Jake (from above) would be pleased so many Admins would hit his $250k threshold to pay an extra 5% income tax.  So maybe it is a spending issue that needs to allocate resources downstream.https://fiscal.wa.gov/K12/K12Salaries

          • Nolan April 25, 2025 (11:28 am)

            Unlike people who actually earn their money, the super-rich don’t need 40% of their income to survive. If their effective tax rate was 98%, the worst thing that would happen to them is that they’d have to scale back on yachts and/or private jets.

  • Frustrated voter again April 23, 2025 (4:01 pm)

    Of course the mayor wants to double the levy.  This is beyond ridiculous.  I’m voting NO until I see a reasonable approach to Seattle budgeting.  And yes, I’m still raw that SPS couldn’t find a single school to close even though there’s a significant decrease in enrollment and a huge budget gap.  When will anyone make a tough decision that doesn’t include increasing taxes????

    • flimflam April 24, 2025 (2:17 pm)

      I agree with you, it is frustrating – especially because Seattle voters approve any and every property tax levy. Seriously, can you think of any that haven’t passed?

  • THOMAS April 23, 2025 (4:03 pm)

    no more taxes on our properties find another way such raising taxes on weed,alcohol and cigarettes because the elderly can not afford to pay all these tax increases on their properties

    • walkerws April 24, 2025 (10:20 am)

      We need a state income tax desperately

      • E April 24, 2025 (1:28 pm)

        We need state income tax to fund critical programs/educationThe programs proposed for this levy are hugely critical. Seattle Promise alone is incredibly valuable to many families – 2 years of free college allows so many families to actually afford to send their kid to college and drives down student loan debt. Childcare allows parents to work – etc.I know taxes suck and we should tax billionaires, but this levy is too important not to vote yes 

  • Actually Mike April 23, 2025 (4:15 pm)

    Man. Yeah, of course I want to support early childhood education too–but a levy for this and a levy for that, pretty soon you’re talking real money. Find a way to get the wealthy wealthy pay a little more and give some of us on the other end of the distribution a break.

  • Kay April 23, 2025 (5:02 pm)

    Heck no to raising property taxes. They’re already too dang high.

    • Derek April 23, 2025 (9:28 pm)

      Well we need the money since education is important. So where is it going to come from? Best thing to do is tax corporations and the wealthy, who are bleeding the city dry for labor without paying for the labor force’s social needs.

    • walkerws April 24, 2025 (10:21 am)

      I know. We need state income tax.

      • Kyle April 24, 2025 (12:01 pm)

        Please call your reps to submit an amendment for vote to the state constitution.

  • Barb April 23, 2025 (7:39 pm)

    People are being priced out of Seattle. find other ways than taxes.

  • Bradley April 23, 2025 (8:10 pm)

    Wait until the Legislature finishes their budget. Piling on. 

  • bill April 23, 2025 (9:17 pm)

    It’s rare for voters to be so farsighted. I commend the opponents for opposing schools since we will need to pay for many more prisons.

  • anonyme April 24, 2025 (6:46 am)

    The levy model has gotten completely out of control, as has the fund-everything-with-property-taxes one.  It’s time repeal the ban and introduce an income tax that simultaneously reduces sales tax, which unfairly punishes median and lower income citizens.

  • neighbor April 24, 2025 (7:33 am)

    Voting yes on this because these are all investments we very much need. And while I agree that property tax levies aren’t ideal for a several reasons, they are the primary mechanism we have. As for the “tax the rich” argument, this does require the wealthiest to pay the most simply because their properties are worth the most. Frankly, anyone who owns property in Seattle would be defined as rich anywhere else in the world, even if we don’t feel like it. Seniors, please look into the senior exemptions that are available for you.

  • Sarah April 24, 2025 (7:44 am)

    Happy to support early childhood education and Youth Mental Health and Safety. I applaud Bruce for this move!

  • raybro April 24, 2025 (8:41 am)

    Bill, this is not about opposing schools, parks and other services.  It’s about limits.  It’s about accountability.  It’s about managing the resource you have and not just asking for more.  That, unfortunately, requires making some tough choices on occasion.  It puts an very large burden on retired folks living on fixed incomes.  Having worked for all their lives, being taxed out of their homes is a legitimate issue, especially at a time when local governments (city, county, and state) continue to push for additional property tax increases.  Furthermore, as someone else mentioned, property taxes have increased considerably faster than inflation in the last 10 years, and what benefits have we received for all that money?  I would argue, not nearly enough.  It’s time to stop rubber stamping additional money for “good causes”,  and demand some accountability from our representatives. 

    • walkerws April 24, 2025 (10:20 am)

      Sounds like you support a progressive state income tax. Glad to have you joining us on that.

  • Jake April 24, 2025 (8:52 am)

    Mayor is so desperate for approval rating. Katie Wilson is going to run away with it! Vote Katie!

  • AK April 24, 2025 (9:46 am)

    NO!! No more property taxes. Figure out some other way to fund peoples kids. I will be voting no on all tax increases that come up! This piggy bank is dry!!

  • Citizen Joe April 24, 2025 (10:42 am)

    We need to raise taxes on capital gains and crypto. Tax the rich in Seattle and Washington state. That’s the price of using our educated citizens and children for your labor force. They need to pay their more than fair share.

  • Admiral-2009 April 24, 2025 (12:09 pm)

    As a parent who paid for daycare, I understand it is a big expense.  Property taxes are already too high and I believe the cost of daycare is the responsibility of the parents to pay not taxpayers.  

    • k April 24, 2025 (1:15 pm)

      Our daycare is $2400 a month.  No low income parent can afford that and they can’t go to work without child care.  We can barely afford that and we are making close to the area median income.  Everybody blames the parents when kids are unsupervised or get into trouble, and then are the first in line to complain about supports that allow families to provide the kind of environment that helps keep kids engage in productive activities, and with their communities.

      • Bradley April 25, 2025 (6:41 pm)

        Well I hope you’re saving for college already because that will knock your socks off. 

  • New Deal April 24, 2025 (12:23 pm)

    I’ve extended my haircuts form 8wk to 16wk, let my hair go grey, stopped eating out, shop for clothes only at Marshalls or Goodwill, travel only to visit family.  While none of these things are major sacrifices, all of those savings to my budget will get lost in this plan.  What are we supposed to do?  How do we get ahead or stay the same?  Geesh, please stop voting yes on these levies.  A new income stream needs to be tapped. 

    • Sparky April 25, 2025 (10:54 am)

      New Deal, I am with you. I avoid restaurants, coffee shops and try to avoid downtown Seattle if possible. One person’s “investment” in the community is another person’s pay cut.
      P.S. Exercise, cooking at home and reading books is a joy.

  • Ex-Westwood Resident April 24, 2025 (5:09 pm)

    The issue is that the City, County and State fund the “wants” first, then when it comes time to fund the “needs” there is nothing left so the go for property, sales tax increases “claiming” that there is no funding for schools, police, fire…etc.

    Property Tax increases should ONLY be voted on by property owners.

    Three/four years ago I re-fied my house to lower the payments. Went from 4.5% interest to 2% interest. This year the payment went OVER what I was paying with the 4.5 interest because of ALL the property tax increases.

    Here is a cut in education that would save MILLION$$$. Cut ALL ADMINISTRATORS 50%, NOT teachers, but Admins. The SSD is TOP heavy. 

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.