FOLLOWUP: SDOT says it won’t add more parallel parking on Alki Avenue after all

(WSB photo, last month)

You might remember the uproar when SDOT announced in May that not only would it convert the Duwamish Head angled parking to parallel parking, it would likely add more than 100 new parallel spaces in the 1200 to 1700 blocks of Alki Avenue SW. At first SDOT attributed the proposed addition to City Councilmember Rob Saka – whose budget action last year set aside $175,000 for the angled-parking-to-parallel conversion as well as “to restore parallel-only parking to Alki Avenue SW adjacent to (the Duwamish Head) location” – but he then said he was not in favor of “restoring” that parking. SDOT proceeded with a survey and promised a final decision after that. The final decision is in today, and it’s “no additional parking.” The survey results were part of today’s announcement; SDOT says it received 882 responses, and since it wasn’t a yes/no survey, its summary does not have a count, but ultimately concludes that more people were against the parking expansion:

The West Seattle Parking Adjustments Survey results reveal a divided consensus among participants regarding the addition of parking to the water side of Alki Ave SW. A significant portion of respondents expressed concerns about the potential environmental impact and aesthetic disruption, emphasizing the need to preserve Alki’s natural beauty and pedestrian-friendliness. On the other hand, many saw the lack of parking as a hindrance to accessibility, particularly for visitors and families, which could negatively affect local businesses dependent on tourism and foot traffic. Overall, there were valid arguments on both sides, with more people opposing.

Bottom line, says SDOT, with that decision, that particular project is complete: “The proviso directing SDOT’s existing budget to implement changes is limited to parking adjustments, so nothing further is planned at this time.” (We’ll be asking them how much of the $175,000 remains, if it was supposed to go toward parking restoration too, and what it’ll go toward instead.)

26 Replies to "FOLLOWUP: SDOT says it won't add more parallel parking on Alki Avenue after all"

  • Rhonda July 10, 2025 (5:49 pm)

    One more of many reasons why I won’t be voting for Saka again.

    • Alki Jack July 10, 2025 (9:56 pm)

      One more reason he will be easily re-elected.

    • jollyroger July 10, 2025 (10:28 pm)

      This was not his idea. 

      • Rhonda July 10, 2025 (11:07 pm)

        It was Saka’s idea to change his mind and have us be short 100+ parking spaces in one of the most-visited places in the state, jollyroger. 

        • walkerws July 11, 2025 (9:01 am)

          Saka changing his mind on this was one of the few good things he’s done. A broken clock, etc.        

          • K July 11, 2025 (7:39 pm)

            According to Saka he didn’t change his mind, he never asked for the thing he personally put into the budget in the first place.

  • Sid July 10, 2025 (5:58 pm)

    Common sense prevailed. Lets keep Alki pedestrian and bicycle friendly.

  • T July 10, 2025 (6:26 pm)

    Good.

  • Stu July 10, 2025 (7:38 pm)

    Good.  That’s what happens when you put the cart before the horse because you didn’t take the temperaturer of your constituents before moving forward with an idea.

  • AlkiD July 10, 2025 (7:46 pm)

    Good!

  • Morgan July 10, 2025 (9:05 pm)

    Huzzah

  • Daniel July 10, 2025 (9:09 pm)

    I hadn’t heard about this, but still don’t understand what the point of converting the back in parking to parallel is.. all it accomplished is less parking AND more eyesore, makes zero sense. The space is already there now it’s just empty for no reason.

    • Neighbor July 11, 2025 (9:07 am)

      After driving through the curve where they converted the back-in parking, I felt like they may have done it to narrow the roadway and make it less desirable for street racing.

  • Vee July 10, 2025 (10:03 pm)

    Why is it an eyesoreAre the cars on the other side of the street or further up and down eyesoreThe whole thing is a waste of money and ridiculous,  should never have been changed in the 1stplace when you could park and look at water and viewEvery time I go by there I see people taking pictures and enjoying themselves, now less people and visitors and tourists canThe eye sore are those yellow barriers

  • Del July 11, 2025 (12:37 am)

    As a disabled person with limited mobility, lack of parking severely limits where I can comfortably go. I would be sad to lose parking and accessibility for myself and others that require close access via a vehicle to vantage points and other common areas to dine out, go shopping or watch the sunset.  There’s been countless times I’ve left locations because there was no parking available. I wish the city would do better to make it accessible for everyone. 

    • Leslie July 11, 2025 (8:14 am)

      Thank you for bringing up this point and I’m sorry that you have to deal with lack of accessible parking. When someone says this makes the area more bike/pedestrian friendly doesn’t that mean only for people who can access the area in this manner? Which is very limited. If anything there will be more cars clogging up the area looking and failing to find parking. Bc not everyone can afford to live right by the water and walk/bike to alki. Nor is everyone able to because of limited mobility or disability or other factors.

      • walkerws July 11, 2025 (9:02 am)

        This is why the parking there should be paid. Free parking creates problems.

    • Platypus July 11, 2025 (8:18 am)

      An alternative would be to make sure there are sufficient ADA spots to meet the needs of the community and convert a non-ADA into an ADA. 

      • K July 11, 2025 (9:54 am)

        Bingo. And increase transit. The disabled members of my family cannot drive, so having all modes incorporated since all disabilities are different is the way to go. 

      • k July 11, 2025 (10:22 am)

        This would be our preference, as well as more frequent transit.  I would also love to see Seattle Parks provide beach-friendly wheelchair rentals/loans so that people with mobility issues can enjoy the whole beach and even the surf, not just the sidewalk.

    • SoLongDelridge July 13, 2025 (12:21 am)

      Weaponizing disability to push for more car infrastructure. A tale as old as the automobile.

  • junctioneer July 11, 2025 (11:37 am)

    So, now the same amount of folks will be driving in, and they will just be parking further into the neighborhoods, and this is a good thing?

    • walkerws July 11, 2025 (2:08 pm)

      Unironically yes. The only thing that would be better is if non-residents had to pay to park, so that the market could regulate the parking needs given the spaces available.

  • What do I know July 11, 2025 (3:30 pm)

    From what I’ve seen, during the day at least, many these converted parking spots are empty, and they are located ~1.4 miles from Blue Moon Burger and ~.0.6 miles to Marination Ma Kai, so not super close to food or the beach. The parking by the beach during the day meanwhile is packed. Perhaps someone can speak to actual use of the converted parking spaces during the evening/night time rather than speculation. 

  • Lucy July 11, 2025 (7:26 pm)

    Over 50% of the time I see folks pulling into handicapped parking spots, they are able bodied younger folks using grandma’s placard and stuffing real disabled people out of needed spots.  Sit and watch someday, you be infuriated.  

    • Jay July 14, 2025 (10:22 am)

      This is not an okay take, it makes life hell for people with invisible disabilities. It’s a constant source of discrimination that prevents a lot of people from using amenities that they need. Never question someone using a handicap parking space, bathroom stall, or door button. 

Leave a Reply to Sid Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.