FOLLOWUP: Councilmember Saka says he’s against adding 150 parking spaces on Alki Avenue

(WSB photos, Monday)

2:54 PM: As noted in our most-recent followups on parking changes ahead for Alki Avenue, SDOT not only reiterated the previously announced plan to convert the diagonal spaces on Duwamish Head to parallel, but introduced something new: Adding 150 parallel-parking spaces to the water side of Alki Avenue’s 1200 to 1700 blocks. The accompanying “fact sheet” said changes were being made “at the request of Councilmember Rob Saka”

And in a response to one of our followup questions, SDOT very clearly attributed the street changes to him:

(WSB question) 2. What other “engagement” is planned besides the survey and signage? Will there be a community meeting, for example?

(SDOT response, as previously published) We appreciate the community’s interest and input regarding Councilmember Rob Saka’s request to re-establish on-street parking on the waterside of Alki Avenue SW to offset some loss of parking at the Duwamish Head. We believe the current survey provides one effective way of gathering feedback from a diverse range of voices. To ensure adjacent stakeholders are aware, we are also putting up A-frame signs within the area and sending emails to community leaders. …

But in an email newsletter today, Councilmember Saka says he’s AGAINST the 150-space plan. Here’s the entirety of what he wrote:

Alki Parking Changes: I support Duwamish Head changes, but I oppose 150+ new spaces

I want to clarify my position regarding SDOT’s recently announced proposed parking changes at Alki, that was attributed to work being done by my office.

For background: During last year’s Council budget review, I supported converting diagonal to parallel parking at Duwamish Head in response to ongoing community concerns about nightly street racing and loud gatherings that have disturbed neighbors year-round. The Council appropriated $175,000 for this change. I strongly support this first aspect of the project pertaining to Duwamish Head reconfiguration only.

However, this week’s SDOT’s announcement referenced an additional out-of-scope project to add 150 new parking spaces along the waterside of Alki Avenue—which apparently was a revival of an unpopular proposal from 15+ years ago—and indicated my support for it.

To be clear: I unequivocally DO NOT support this proposal to install 150 new parking spots and I sincerely regret this confusion.

I had a productive meeting with SDOT this week where I reaffirmed my support for the Duwamish Head changes. I also expressed strong opposition to the second phase of the project to add 150 new spaces. We ultimately aligned on a shared goal of moving forward with mutual understandings and to ensure full transparency and tighter coordination in the future. I appreciate the department’s collaboration here, along with their efforts to bring to life my original intent of reconfiguring Duwamish Head parking only.

For further questions on the project details, please contact SDOT Customer Care at 206-684-ROAD (7623) or email 684-ROAD@Seattle.gov.

So – does this mean the 150 spaces are dead? Since the “productive meeting” paragraph doesn’t clearly say one way or another, we have requests out to both SDOT and Councilmember Saka (via the council communications office) asking for clarification.

4:17 PM: Here’s the reply from council spokesperson Brad Harwood:

He did not make the request, that’s the issue and the purpose for the newsletter blurb. SDOT’s announcement connecting him with the Alki spaces was in error. Internal discussions are occurring now with SDOT leadership on next steps. As for news of any cancellation, the department will make that announcement.

4:47 PM: And here’s SDOT’s response to us:

Phase 2 status is currently under review. Staff will review the input from the survey before deciding on the next steps for the project. This ensures community feedback is considered as the process moves forward. In the meantime, we intend to move forward on the conversion of the Duwamish Head angled parking spaces to parallel parking.

57 Replies to "FOLLOWUP: Councilmember Saka says he's against adding 150 parking spaces on Alki Avenue"

  • Marcus June 5, 2025 (3:20 pm)

    Thank you! That stretch is one of a kind for observing Puget Sound while driving. Would hate to see a bunch of parked cars. Keep it the way it is in that stretch.1

    • walkerws June 5, 2025 (3:43 pm)

      We should ban cars in general off of this stretch too. At least on weekends.

      • Teve Torbes June 5, 2025 (4:36 pm)

        People want to go to Alki on the weekend. It is an attraction. Businesses depend on these people. And by banning cars in any stretch it at the very least forces people to make alternate routes through the neighborhood streets creating accidents, pedestrian accidents and gridlock. Do you live near Alki?

        • Walkerws June 5, 2025 (4:39 pm)

          I live four miles from Alki and we should close it for exclusive pedestrian and bike use at least once a month 

          • Fast June 5, 2025 (5:32 pm)

            I live 5 or 6 miles away and agree, an entirely car free day (or more) would be awesome. And just as when this has been tried elsewhere, in Seattle and around the world, I guarantee the place would be packed and the businesses would see tons of customers – esp if they could get some seating spilling onto the street.

          • Alki resident June 5, 2025 (7:02 pm)

            They already have a car free day. Have for years.

          • WSB June 5, 2025 (7:56 pm)

            Not Alki. That stopped years ago. There are various events that partly close the street for a few hours (West Seattle 5K, Alki Beach Pride) but that’s it.

          • 1994 June 5, 2025 (9:54 pm)

            Bicycle Weekends courtesy of Seattle Parks & Rec happens at Lake Washington Blvd and the city should make it happen at Alki. Great opportunity for everyone to enjoy the road for a time limited part of the day.On scheduled weekends from May to September, a portion of Lake Washington Boulevard will be closed to motorized vehicles from 10 a.m. Saturday to 6 p.m.

        • Jort June 5, 2025 (9:26 pm)

          Did the person say “ban cars” or “ban people?”

      • Joe C June 5, 2025 (9:03 pm)

        And package deliveries, ride shares, food deliveries, mobile pet services, mobile human health services, etc will negatively impact the actual residents of Alki. Do you not know that Seattle’s economy is based on packages?

      • Mike H. June 6, 2025 (9:24 am)

        Just ban FREE street parking and you’ll solve the problems. Though we’re all too self centered to admit it. Why is a council member masquerading as a traffic engineer? 

  • walkerws June 5, 2025 (3:23 pm)

    In today’s edition of a broken clock is right twice a day – Saka’s right on this one, as much as I hate to admit it

  • Jenna S June 5, 2025 (3:34 pm)

    CM Saka’s stance on this is the right one. Hopefully SDOT agrees and cancels the addition of 150 parking spots.  

    • cwit June 6, 2025 (12:15 pm)

      Let’s be clear, ‘CM Saka’s CURRENT stance on this…’ because it seems like he’s changing his tune and not admitting that. 

      The Council Budget Action document from Nov. 2024 indicate he was the primary sponsor on it and it says in the document ‘… and to restore parallel-only parking to Alki Ave SW adjacent to this location’ (page 192). 

      Either he’s changing the story or misunderstood what he was the primary sponsor on from the get go.

      The document – https://seattle.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=13566589&GUID=6FFBD9D0-47FE-49EB-80F6-938FBD6E6FD3

  • Mark Schletty June 5, 2025 (3:37 pm)

    It didn’t take long for the wealthy condo owners to get to Saka. Can’t have any of their view even  minimally interrupted.  Just like with Constitution Avenue Saka  goes with the money.      

    • sw June 5, 2025 (3:54 pm)

      I am not a wealthy condo owner and I vehemently oppose adding 150 parking spaces through this stretch of Alki.  

    • wscommuter June 5, 2025 (4:31 pm)

      I’m agnostic about Saka and oppose this idea as well  … but per chance, do you have any facts or evidence that “the wealthy condo owners [got to] Saka”?  I’d love to hear your proof.   Or is this just ignorant conspiracy-peddling to fit your personal narrative, kind of like what Trump does all the time.  

    • M June 5, 2025 (5:18 pm)

      I am a condo owner on that stretch and i am not wealthy.  My condo is assessed below the median price of a house in Seattle. 

    • Sid June 5, 2025 (5:22 pm)

      I don’t own a condo either and was opposed to this idea. It’s actually the nicest stretch of Alki where you don’t have to dodge car doors  or people getting out of their cars and can just enjoy riding your bike or your run. Honestly wish they extend that to the whole street but that’s unlikely to happen.

    • Michelle June 6, 2025 (8:12 am)

      I’m not a wealthy owner and I still oppose this! The traffic getting in and out would be horrific and for those of us who walk along the Alki promenade daily it would effect the enjoyment. More cars invites more littering, alcoholic drinking  that turns i to drunk driving, noise from all the loud cars all of which makes for an Unenjoyable walk for families. 

  • M June 5, 2025 (4:26 pm)

    Thank you Rob.  As you noted, we’ve been through this before!

  • DeadEnder June 5, 2025 (4:31 pm)

    If the City allows them to build a condo with less parking than buyers would prefer, it is not the City’s revenue burden. I live nearby, and have so rarely seen residents on that stretch of ‘their’ street.If they want parking, make them build it at their cost.

  • Rhonda June 5, 2025 (5:01 pm)

    Well, I won’t be voting for Saka again, either.

  • North Admiral Cyclist June 5, 2025 (5:12 pm)

    Much of the 150 “new” parking spaces SDOT talked about installing, previously existed along Alki Ave years ago.  That parking went away about 20 years ago when the condos started to cast a shadow over the few remaining single family homes that used to line the avenue.  The problem used to be “cruising” and street “parties”.  Although I’m sure there are “wealthy condo owners” today that don’t want parking in front of their condos, just as important, there are many that would like to see fewer cars along Alki, not more.  I’m down there several days a week on the bike trail, and in sheer numbers there are often a lot more people using the public spaces along Aki Ave on the pedestrian path and bike path than there are people occupying cars the street – even though the cars are given the lions share of the public right of way.   Give the people what they have shown they want – freedom from noisy, air polluting cars and trucks.

  • Bill on Duwamish Head June 5, 2025 (5:26 pm)

    Please, enough with the rich and entitled condo owners on this stretch. I started working when I was 15 years old and made it to retirement at 67. I have been getting up as early as 2:30am to get to work by 4am. Not a rich lifestyle, but a working person lifestyle. If the shenanigans that go on down here, parties and trash, racing and revving engines, exhaust system and car/bike stereo systems that make it so we cannot hear our music, tv, or conversations happened all the time in your front yard, I believe you would be upset like the homeowners and renters along Harbor and Alki Ave. 

  • Annoyed West Seattleite June 5, 2025 (5:53 pm)

    I won’t be voting for Saka either, but I would like more parking.  Since when is he the deciding factor?  The beach should not only be for young, able bodied people.

  • Admiral-2009 June 5, 2025 (6:20 pm)

    DeadEnder the Condos are in the Alki Parking Overlay District that requires minimum parking be provided with no variances to allow fewer stalls.  And the builders of the Condos likely understand their market and buyer requirements!

  • Julia June 5, 2025 (6:52 pm)

    How about 40 more spaces? Make up for the loss after removing the angled spots.

    • bill June 5, 2025 (8:37 pm)

      Only ten (10) spaces are being removed when the angle parking is converted to parallel. 

  • Workdowntown June 5, 2025 (7:20 pm)

    Man, born in WS 72 years ago. Loved Alki and being able to park and walk. So glad I’m not there anymore. Seriously where are people supposed to park??

  • Ray West June 5, 2025 (8:01 pm)

    Isn’t this supposed to be a scenic view drive area? More parked cars just obliterate the beauty of Puget Sound. I don’t live near Alki Beach, so I’m not speaking as a homeowner along this area. However, I want to be able to drive the entire length and have as much of an unobstructed view as possible of the water, mountains, vessels, marine life, etc. This has already been cut off on Beach Drive near the lighthouse. Alki Point isn’t just about parking and sitting on the beach. This is the first place I take out-of-town visitors when giving them a tour of the city.

  • HooRah June 5, 2025 (9:46 pm)

    For those of you who want to turn Saka’s ill-fated parking expansion into a culture war, consider this; there are only 16 condos between the 1200 and 1700 block of Alki Avenue, and the rest of the buildings are some two dozen town homes, houses, and apartment buildings. In fact, by my count, MORE couples and families live in homes, town homes and apartments along this stretch of Alki than in condos. And even among the condos, the occupants are divided between owners and renters.

    • North Delridge June 5, 2025 (10:40 pm)

      it’s not culture war, it’s that this man is SO incredibly unprincipled, he’ll spend millions of taxpayer dollars to fix his pet driving issue and maybe he’ll fix a friend’s, too.

  • Against the 150 stalls June 5, 2025 (10:07 pm)

    What a weird reversal, but it’s the right move. We do not need these parking spots, it will create more problems than it solves.Hopefully SDOT does the right thing and leaves this stretch of Alki alone!

  • Mary June 6, 2025 (12:17 am)

    Please the road is not wide enough to have parking along the stretch from the 1200 to 1700 block and still allow emergency vehicles to get through. It may be officially wide enough but with the constant congestion every summer, on weekends, on holidays and any sunny day year round it would be a nightmare for everyone not just  condo owners. With so many drunks speeding down Alki Ave at night – more parked cars will just mean more cars hit, property damage and danger to people out there walking dogs at night. Parking along there is a bad idea. It was 15 years ago and it is an even worse idea now.

  • Kathy June 6, 2025 (12:21 am)

    I believe SDOT when they say on the flyer that it was requested by Saka. Now he denies it. However it happened, it’s the right decision not to spend city budget making it more attractive for people to bring their cars to Alki. The businesses and the parks are not hurting for visitors and there is plenty of free parking already.

  • Foop June 6, 2025 (12:29 am)

    In this one instance Saka is doing the right thing. BUT: he wrote the provisio to restore parking there in the first place so something smells here in his statement. I don’t trust the man.

  • Arch Stanton June 6, 2025 (4:37 am)

    Do any of you wanting more parking even live close by?? I live on Alki Ave. the heart of it. Every single day, there are racers, loud obnoxious cars and motorcycles, both with engine noise pollution, stereos blasting obscene music, and smog. There’s burnouts. There’s people going 60 where crosswalks are. This is one of the biggest pedestrian use areas outside of the downtown waterside piers. We don’t need more people driving up from Federal Way to litter and sling their cars around dangerously. BAN CARS ON ALKI.

  • Matt June 6, 2025 (7:22 am)

    It is hard for any of us to admit that we were wrong, (or that we simply changed our position).   I wanted to eliminate parking years ago for a variety of reasons — but with aging family members, I now realize that having parking along Alki is the only way my family is going to get to enjoy Seattle’s most beautiful view together.
    I cannot say why Saka changed stances and think it is disingenuous (at best) not to tell us why, but it’s scarier to think that he didn’t even read his proviso (SDOT-005-A-1) before he got it adopted. ———-  

    This Council Budget Action (CBA) would impose a proviso on $175,000 of appropriations in the Seattle Department of Transportation’s (SDOT’s)
    budget to convert angled on-street parking on Harbor Ave SW at Duwamish Head to parallel parking, and to restore parallel parking to Alki Ave SW adjacent to this location. ————
     Inf 2592 – Balancing Package

  • Ferns June 6, 2025 (7:30 am)

    I oppose converting diagonal spots to parallel. This will slow down traffic during the day and cause accidents as people wait for spots to empty and have to more carefully maneuver in to the parallel spots, far fewer available. It’s going create traffic backups and pollution, but not solve any street racing issues. Diagonal parking is easier to use! But I oppose 150 beachfront parking spots even more. 

  • Charlie June 6, 2025 (7:53 am)

    Will someone please explain how conversion of angle parking to parallel parking will in any way address the problem of street racing and loud noise.  

    • Al June 6, 2025 (10:47 am)

      It’s real simple, the goal is to reduce accessibility. If fewer can park, fewer will come, and if fewer come, the locals who don’t need to drive will have a nicer experience. Alki is to be enjoyed by the wealthy, not by riffraff visitors who cannot afford to live near the water. 

      • Kyle June 7, 2025 (7:00 pm)

        This is true. I’m not taking my 3 young kids on an hour plus bus ride with a transfer one way to visit Alki. Had people on the other thread telling me my 3 year old should have an electric bike lol. Accessible parking for my family’s minivan is needed at this stage of life. Otherwise, we’ll take our family elsewhere. I understand people being upset about folks who drink, play loud music, etc. at the beach. Believe me, I want those people held accountable too. However, let’s maybe have more enforcement than punishing people like me who want to take their family to the beach.

        • Cwit June 7, 2025 (9:18 pm)

          No, no one on the other thread actually told you that. 

        • Kathy June 7, 2025 (10:40 pm)

          Kyle & Al, there were thousands of visitors in Alki today. The city doesn’t owe any of us unlimited free parking. Many of them parked in our neighborhood which is their privilege, and then hauled their kids and equipment down to the beach. Some kids were hauling their own stuff in little rolling suitcases. It was heartwarming to see so many able to enjoy our neighborhood peacefully on such a beautiful day. Accessible parking is by permit only for people who have mobility challenges. Maybe we need more of that along Alki Avenue.

  • Jake June 6, 2025 (8:11 am)

    Saka playing both sides… good grief

  • HooRah June 6, 2025 (9:07 am)

    So far, not a peep from SDOT. Suggest they retrieve their signboards along Alki and call it a day. Or declare victory and bring back the same proposal next year.

  • Mike H. June 6, 2025 (9:19 am)

    Saka mandates this change in a budget maneuver and then disavows it.Please, West Seattle, think about who you are voting for next time.  Wasn’t the “traffic divider as a border wall” enough to realize that Saka thinks way too highly of himself and his superior knowledge? 

  • nothend June 6, 2025 (11:57 am)

    I believe that there will be a lot fewer posts advocating for the no parking restriction to remain on the north side of Alki if you got rid of all the illegal parking on the parking strip and the phoney parking for residents only signs on the south side.  

    • Kathy June 6, 2025 (10:44 pm)

      I got a ticket for this a long time ago on Admiral Way. Should have had a photo like this to fight the charge.

  • Alkite June 6, 2025 (3:21 pm)

    Am I wrong in that it seems that the Parking Project signs have been removed along Alki?  Or am I just dreaming?

    • WSB June 6, 2025 (3:22 pm)

      Someone sent me a photo of an SDOT truck full of them. I have had a question out to SDOT for an hour-plus asking why.

      • Karin June 7, 2025 (11:49 am)

        I can confirm the signs along our stretch of Alki Ave. (1500 block) are gone. It’s strange they would have removed the signs already, given the response window was supposed to go to June 22. I wonder if SDOT pulled the signs to limit any additional responses, given up on this idea completely, or to regroup to pursue a more transparent way to collect community feedback, such as appropriate notice, public meetings, etc. in the future. Hoping they’ve decided to pull the proposal completely. Eager to hear what WSB finds out!

  • Lauren June 6, 2025 (9:33 pm)

    Is this the new Lincoln Park pickleball courts? Getting my popcorn!

  • Morgan June 7, 2025 (5:18 pm)

    Don’t fix what wasn’t broken. Urban vista of water without cars is something everyone can enjoy…including visitors by water taxi. Don’t contest with cars—repeal the 150 stalls! 

  • Mike June 8, 2025 (9:34 am)

    I dont care about parking but would like the city to prioritize separation of pedestrians and bikers/scooters/etc on this stretch. This is a very dangerous section. The dedicated bike path should extend at least to the water taxi. If there is space left, sure put in some parallel parking. We may have sacrifice a bit if the green strip between path and seawall to a winding pedestrian path but that would be worth it.

Leave a Reply to HooRah Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.