FOLLOWUP: End of the line for one of West Seattle’s largest public art works, the Paragon, because of what artist calls ‘insane policy decision’?

(WSB photo taken this week)

By Tracy Record
West Seattle Blog editor

Last July, we told you about an uncertain future for the Paragon, the giant wooden bones-of-a-boat sculpture installed more than 20 years ago at what’s now known as həʔapus Village Park and Shoreline Habitat (formerly T-107 Park; map) along West Marginal Way near the Duwamish Tribe Longhouse.

The Paragon’s artist, Don Fels, sounded the alarm at the time, asking for public support to help save the Paragon, which he declared was in “mortal danger” after deteriorating amid what he said was long-running city neglect. When last we updated, the artist had hope it would be saved.

We hadn’t checked in on the situation recently; then we heard from Fels this week. He wrote:

I am writing to tell you and your loyal readers that after a year of a great deal of effort on my part- and many others like the WSeattle Bloggers [WSB readers] and Nucor Steel – ARTS, the so-called ‘public art’ department of the City of Seattle, intend to ‘deaccession‘ the Paragon sculpture along the Duwamish, at their Public Art Committee meeting next week, April 22nd. I’m very sorry to have not provided you with a more timely notice of this, but I was not given such notice myself. This means that once the committee approves the deaccession, the next step will be for the City’s Seattle Arts Commission to formally agree to destroy the sculpture at their May 13 meeting and then begin taking it to the dump.

I am an experienced public artist, and someone who to date has had an excellent relationship with the City of Seattle arts people. But no matter what I tried to do over an entire year, I couldn’t get them to offer any assistance whatsoever to rebuild the wooden boat atop the sculpture. The final straw came when they sent me a multi-page contract to sign wherein the City laid out numerous requirements that I would have to meet in order to rebuild the sculpture, all with donated monies and services, and though unpaid, I would have to assume any and all liabilities, and indemnify the City against any damages. Several well-versed persons in the arts and the law strongly urged me not to sign. I did not.

I attach a letter here that I sent to Gülgün Kayim, the Director of ARTS, informing her of my decision. I believe it is important that interested people send letters to them as well. To be honest, I don’t expect that hearing from the public will change their mindset, or that of their legal dept, but they do need to know that people care about such insane policy decisions.

People who wish to write should do so to: al*******@*****le.gov

I am grateful from the bottom of my heart for the outpouring of appreciation for the sculpture, and only wish I had been successful in saving it.

Here’s the letter Fels sent to director Kayim. Toward the end, he suggests that what has gone awry here could happen to other city-owned public art (in which we all have an interest, given – among many other things – the public funding that goes into it):

… ARTS has forced a legacy, beloved sculpture to be scrapped and made necessary spending a large expenditure of public money to make that happen. That is a long way from not allowing the ARTS conservator to inspect and/or maintain the sculpture every so often. I cannot be expected to make up for what has ARTS failed to do. Nor can my actions undo what ARTS has caused to happen. That is not the role of the artist, nor should it ever be. Clearly, ARTS needs a robust maintenance budget for its large public art collection. And without it, other artworks in the City of Seattle’s collection will meet the same fate at the Paragon. …

We asked Office of Arts and Culture spokesperson Otts Bolisay about the situation; he confirmed that partial demolition is proposed and the next step is a meeting this Tuesday:

We’ve worked with Mr. Fels on this since last year and, unfortunately, are unable to come to an agreement. Since it’s still a safety risk, we are moving forward with deaccessioning Paragon.

We’ll present a proposal to the Public Art Advisory Committee (PAAC) on Tuesday, 4/22 to remove the hazardous parts of the sculpture. But we’ll keep the steel armature in place for one year should Mr. Fels change his mind about replacing Paragon himself.

If PAAC recommends to the Seattle Arts Commission (SAC) that Paragon should be deaccessioned, SAC will review and vote on it Tuesday, 5/13.

Both meetings are open to the public and we encourage you to attend.

The Tuesday meeting is at 9 am online, and the attendance info is here (we are requesting the agenda document); the May 13 meeting is hybrid, 4 pm, with attendance info here. You can see the “armature” to which Bolisay refers, in this old photo provided by the artist:

(Photo courtesy Don Fels)

Fels was told the Tuesday discussion is scheduled at 10:20 am, to last 40 minutes – broken down by the city as follows:

Public Art team to present deaccession recommendation (10 minutes)
Artist and community response (10 minutes)
PAAC member questions or comments (15 minutes)
PAAC motion for recommendation (5 minutes)

We are seeking information on the city’s budget for the planned demolition/removal work, as Fels contends in his letter, “Asserting that there are no funds to rebuild the sculpture, ARTS will spend an equivalent amount in removing it.”

See the sculpture’s background here.

17 Replies to "FOLLOWUP: End of the line for one of West Seattle's largest public art works, the Paragon, because of what artist calls 'insane policy decision'?"

  • Sad to see it go April 18, 2025 (1:25 pm)

    So here’s hoping whatever follows will be relevant to the waterway and includes the Duwamish. Is there any update on the art that the city was going to pay Muckleshoot and Suqamish to do near the bridge?

  • local April 18, 2025 (2:08 pm)

    What a bummer, to say the least. Thank you for sharing what you went through and thank you for fighting so hard to try and save your lovely work. Shame on ARTS! They will be hearing from me, and hopefully many others. 

  • Melissa April 18, 2025 (2:22 pm)

    Ugh. Between this and the Westlake Center art removal, it feels like the city is putting expediency over the public good.

  • Del Griffith April 18, 2025 (2:34 pm)

    If it’s really a safety risk, hard to argue with the city. It’s a tough budgeting environment before you even get to the risk of injury and lawsuits. And Seattle is a tough place for artists these days too.

    • Kt April 18, 2025 (5:40 pm)

      Agreed. City not willing to risk a lawsuit if someone were to be injured after the danger was identified.  On a positive note, nice to know that someone is inspecting for dangers.  I appreciate that part

  • John April 18, 2025 (2:42 pm)

      I’m surprised that the city parks department is involved.  It’s a Port of Seattle Park.  Perhaps   the Port of Seattle has legal agreements with the city about such issues.   

  • Joe April 18, 2025 (3:43 pm)

    The city should just remove all the wooden parts and leave the metal skeleton. For them to take the entire thing to the dump seems very Trumpy like they are trying to take it out on the artist. 

  • sc April 18, 2025 (4:38 pm)

    The artist chose a material that, although traditional and lovely, was guaranteed to rot. And so, in the natural course of nature, it proceeded to accomplish this in fine style, on time and on budget. So here we are, watching Mother Nature win, once again. Some other woods that resist rot better than cedar are black locust, teak and redwood. But none of them grow naturally right around here.So the artist chose a local material guaranteed to have a natural demise when left out in the weather, giving us a gift of ephemeral beauty to enjoy for a while. He preferred that tradeoff, and so here we are.

    • Alan April 18, 2025 (5:54 pm)

      The city also knew what they signed up for when they approved an installation made of this renewable biodegradable material 20 years ago. They should’ve just written the guy a check and maintained whatever prior agreements were in place regarding indemnity. Refusing to maintain public art installations makes the city look like a poor steward of the commons and a bad-faith negotiator. It’s not like the guy’s asking for a million bucks for steel and concrete.

      • HS April 19, 2025 (5:53 am)

        Agreed. It’s a real disappointment. It was poor planning to not negotiate material appropriate for the site or artist maintenance. We all lose out now.

  • K April 18, 2025 (6:17 pm)

    Has Rob Saka weighed in on how the city has handled this local treasure?

  • Mike April 18, 2025 (6:33 pm)

    Wouldn’t happen in Magnolia.

  • WestSeattleVoter April 19, 2025 (5:52 am)

    When wood was the primary construction material for commercial boats, which this sculpture is based on, vessels had an expected useful life of about 20 years before they were scrapped. Maybe we should see the piece’s dismantling as reflective of its industrial environment.

  • jw April 19, 2025 (10:24 am)

    You mentioned Rob Saka, unless it is for his agenda he will not help you. Yes this West Seattle, he also has Georgetown and Sodo areas. No improvements that I see happening there. He is unresponsive to emails and when he does he just passes them off to another department and they never get back to you.  Why did you vote this guy in?  Looks like he shows up at events for the Photo Shoot and of course he gets his name mention that he was there. As for the Artwork.  Always took a glance as I drove by.  Shame that it’s life is at it’s end.  What has the Art Dept thought about placing some sort of Art in that area.   It’s like you take down a Tree you plant 2 more in it’s place.

  • WS Person April 19, 2025 (1:24 pm)

    While I know they’re different budgets, they should have used the money they spent on that worthless curb outcrop across the street for rehabbing this art installation. 

  • Don Fels April 19, 2025 (10:16 pm)

    Thank you for your comments and support. The wooden section of the sculpture was designed and engineered to  reflect the long history of wooden boats on the site, and to be easily cared for and out of harm’s way (35ft in the air). The choice of wood was neither casual nor capricious- it is there to tell the story of the place, and all those, starting with the Duwamish People, who have been run from it.  Sadly and ironically, the sculpture is being demolished, just as were the homes and boatbuilding sheds of the immigrant fishers who lived and worked there, and whose history the sculpture recounts.A maintenance plan was submitted and agreed to when it was installed,  calling for periodic pressure-washing and resealing of the wood. ARTS did this ONCE in 20 years, and instead of doing so again, continually turned down requests from their own conservator allowing her to do just that. The Port planted trees around the sculpture, and didn’t prune them, ultimately allowing carpenter ants to get to the wood.Wood is a renewable resource as all of us know who live in old wood houses. With a modicum of care it can last a very long time, The Paragon is a 3/5 scale version of the SS Paragon built in Ballard 100 years ago of the same material and which until  a very few years ago, was a working halibut schooner in Alaska- certainly a much more difficult environment than next to the Duwamish. Several of its sister boats are still working- but they have been MAINTAINED. ARTS stopped maintaining the Paragon sculpture shortly after it was installed. I tried, over several years to have them do so over several years, with no success. They will spend as much or more to destroy the sculpture as it would cost to restore the wooden section. Yet they offered me absolutely  NO support- monetary, logistic, or moral- to restore it. Now they are saying that if I wish to fund, organize and carry out a rebuilding on my own, I am ‘free’ to do so……..

  • Highwater April 21, 2025 (12:39 pm)

    I’ve always loved this piece of art in the city. For years I stopped by to enjoy my morning coffee under this sculpture before heading to work. I’m sad to see it at risk but having just sold my house in West Seattle after 25 years I guess time moves on. Thank you, Mr. Fels for your contributions to good life in this city.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.