That WS fashion feature thing: The legs have it

legs.jpgTo recap, a couple WSB readers suggested a West Seattle fashion feature a la Pike/Pine; we asked the folks at Clementine — with whom we have corresponded on matters from Junction beautification to the Art Walk, to help us kick it off. It’s wide open to any and all contributors, from West Seattle’s other fine fashion retailers, to any other reader out there who snaps a cool look (either gender) somewhere in WS; our inbox is a-waiting. We all gotta get some relief from death, destruction, business battles, etc., now ‘n’ then. Meantime, at right we have a second contribution, this one sent along by Clementine’s Kelly Rae Cunningham, a dryly humorous artist who titled her note “if WS wasn’t ready for [the first fashion photo] they won’t be ready for this look.”

Share This

16 Replies to "That WS fashion feature thing: The legs have it"

  • comment-avatar
    The Velvet Bulldog October 4, 2007 (11:50 pm)

    I love it, but I’d never wear it. (Mainly because I’d fall right off those heels…)

  • comment-avatar
    Erik October 4, 2007 (11:58 pm)

    I liked the last pair of shoes better, but I’m a dude.

  • comment-avatar
    OP October 5, 2007 (12:02 am)

    Hi, “Flashdance” called, they want their look back.

  • comment-avatar
    hello insomnia October 5, 2007 (6:50 am)

    I think 1985 was ready for that look.

  • comment-avatar October 5, 2007 (7:45 am)

    Like, totally! I’m going to cut all the necks out of my sweatshirts, too. Although, I must say the pictured leg warmers are much cuter than those in my high school days.

  • comment-avatar
    Christopher Boffoli October 5, 2007 (7:49 am)

    Somewhere in Wyoming there is a rave that is missing some leg warmers.

  • comment-avatar
    Melissa October 5, 2007 (8:15 am)

    Oooh. I, for one, love the colors and contrast of the stockings and leggings. Lovely.

  • comment-avatar
    donald October 5, 2007 (8:40 am)

    it would be better if i could see farther up.

  • comment-avatar
    praying man-tis i October 5, 2007 (9:04 am)

    Actually, you’re looking at your own level down there, Donald. There’s something wrong with a man when he’s interested in what a mannequin has going on.

  • comment-avatar
    flipjack October 5, 2007 (10:19 am)

    no no, leave ’em on baby.

  • comment-avatar
    donald October 5, 2007 (10:50 am)

    oh i didnt realize it was a mannequin because i can’t see farther up.

  • comment-avatar
    Aidan Hadley October 5, 2007 (10:50 am)

    Donald: Don’t sweat the puritanical police. I was thinking the same thing. Damn those mannequins. They’re more anatomically correct than I am.

  • comment-avatar
    donald October 5, 2007 (11:24 am)

    time to head down to the Short Stop I’m afraid…

  • comment-avatar
    add October 5, 2007 (12:10 pm)

    LOL on these comments!!

  • comment-avatar
    praying man-tis i October 5, 2007 (1:29 pm)

    Puritanical, huh? Do tell. What exactly do you know about me, Aidan? :-) Would it kill you to know that I’m actually a sick West Seattlelite with a sense of humor? I suppose since you’ve already judged me. I’ll have to move to Broadway where I’ll be accepted for who I am.

  • comment-avatar
    LyndaB October 5, 2007 (10:22 pm)

    Speaking of mannequins…Check out ‘Lars and the Real Girl’ when it comes out in theaters. It’s hilarious and stars a mannequin. :) I loved it!

Sorry, comment time is over.

WP-Backgrounds by InoPlugs Web Design and Juwelier Schönmann