VIDEO: City and county leaders come to West Seattle to plead for full state funding of a ‘gold standard’ encampment-resolution program

(WSB photo, September 2023, tour of Myers Way encampment with then-Gov. Inslee)

By Tracy Record
West Seattle Blog editor

Three Seattle City Councilmembers and three King County Councilmembers came to West Seattle this afternoon with a message intended for an audience in Olympia:

They gathered at Arrowhead Gardens to implore state leaders to fully fund the Right-Of-Way Encampment Resolution Program (explanation and stats here), which paid for the much-publicized 2023 cleanup across the street in the Myers Way woods, as well as others including one beneath the First Avenue South Bridge. They want the state to fully fund the program’s $75 million cost, instead of the proposed $45 million, which they say would only cover the cost of maintaining housing for the hundreds of people the program has taken off the streets so far.

Speaker after speaker emphasized that this is a program that works – and it’s not cheap, because it takes outreach workers a lot of time to develop relationships with clients and get them to “come inside.” First speaker, Carolanne Sanders Lundgren of Purpose.Dignity.Action, observed that “relationship is our special sauce.” Those who followed her included King County Councilmembers Teresa Mosqueda, Girmay Zahilay, and Claudia Balducci (the latter two are also running for County Executive) and Seattle City Councilmembers Alexis Mercedes Rinck, Cathy Moore, and Dan Strauss. Here are the speakers in their entirety:

Mosqueda stressed that local leaders “need to have the antidote to what’s happening on a national level … (where) chaos is raining down on us,” and this program is “the gold standard … The way we get people inside is by maintaining those trusted relationships.” She said 91 percent of the people living in encampments taken on by the program left the streets, and that three-fourths of them “stayed housed.”

“This is not just another government initiative,” insisted County Council Chair Zahilay. “It’s one of the most effective programs in the nation.” Yes, he acknowledged, there’s a budget crisis at every level of government, “but when we’re talking about an effective program (that has) built trust and saved lives … let’s fund what works.”

One of the non-governmental speakers was Diane Radischat, president of the Arrowhead Gardens resident group. She talked about how difficult it was to initially get help for the campers in the woods across the street – where even now a new tent has popped up, with RVs nearby too – but “we cannot afford to give up on them … do we just think everyone will be fine? The state can’t just say no.”

If the ROW ERP program winds down, warned Balducci, “people will go (back) into the revolving door.” She said the program is “the win win win we all want … we cannot accept the (results) of failing to fund this program.”

“I hear from people who don’t want to see people go away, they want to see people get housed,”said Councilmember Mercedes Rinck.

Her council colleague Moore, who chairs the Housing and Human Services Committee, then explained that this is actually the second time the Legislature proposed reduced funding for the program, but the first time, they found other money to cover the gap – this time, they’re out of options. “If this budget is not restored, the. program will effectively end this summer, but we still have time to fix this problem – we can’t afford to slide backward.”

The third Seattle councilmember to speak, Strauss, agreed, saying hundreds of people have been brought inside and families reunited: “We have to keep this program running.”

A King County Regional Homelessness Authority rep with whom we spoke after the briefing said they’re working at a site in Ballard now but already making plans to ramp down in case the funding can’t be restored.

We asked organizers what they want constituents to do. The reply: Contact Gov. Ferguson, your local legislators (in our area that’s Sen. Emily Alvarado and Reps. Joe Fitzgibbon and Brianna Thomas), and three leaders in particular: Senator June Robinson, Representative Timm Ormsby, and Senator Jamie Pedersen. The budget goes to a final vote by April 27 – this Sunday.

13 Replies to "VIDEO: City and county leaders come to West Seattle to plead for full state funding of a 'gold standard' encampment-resolution program"

  • zippy April 22, 2025 (7:55 pm)

    HaHaHa….that’s the answer throw gold at them! it just gets  better and better! how about we just have a new levy and raise our property tax’s to pay for more study’s and maybe that will make everyone feel warm and fuzzy.

    • Lauren April 22, 2025 (8:46 pm)

      If you’d read the article, you’d see this isn’t just “warm and fuzzy.” It’s a highly effective program that actually offers a solution rather than sweeping “the problem” further down the road. 

      • Frog April 22, 2025 (9:20 pm)

        Highly expensive for sure, but not sure about highly effective.  If $45 million is needed to keep “hundreds” of people housed, assuming hundreds = less than 1,000, that comes to at least $50,000 per person per year.  Is that forever?  And does the permanent maintenance expense keep growing year over year?  Or is the program ever effective at getting people off the public tab?  It would be nice to know what is the ultimate steady state expense for this program, assuming it ever stops growing.

        • Neighbor April 22, 2025 (11:22 pm)

          FROG, I’m not sure “off the public tab” shoud even be a goal.  As a WA taxpayer I’ll settle for “off the street”.  I would like to know more about the accountability of this program but if it is getting people permanent housing I can stomach $50,000.00.

      • nwpolitico April 22, 2025 (9:41 pm)

        The article simply reports that certain electeds think it’s a highly effective program. In reality, the program spends over $1 million per exit from homelessness. State property is popular for illegal camping precisely because this program blows lots of taxpayer money on a small number of encampments.

        https://fixhomelessness.org/2023/inslee-defends-spending-1mil-per-person-for-exit-from-homelessness/

        • Neighbor April 22, 2025 (11:20 pm)

          That seems like a very dishonest way of reporting the numbers NWPOLITICO.  Yes, it’s over $1,000,000.00 if you only count the people who have “successfully exited homelessness” but that’s not everything the program does.  Doesn’t pass the sniff test to start with such a misleading claim.  I’d be more impressed with an actual analysis of the costs and benefits.

  • Lauren April 22, 2025 (8:44 pm)

    Here’s contact info for our local legislators: https://app.leg.wa.gov/districtfinder/displaydistrict/34

  • WS Person April 22, 2025 (11:12 pm)

    $75M or $45M to fund housing for “hundreds of people” is a joke of a waste of tax payer money. 

  • John Kimball April 23, 2025 (8:50 am)

    Decades of “toss more money at the homelessness problem”, and it has grown.  Oh, yeah that’s right…it’ll be different this time.

  • Resident_104 April 23, 2025 (10:52 am)

    I love the idea that not paying for this program reduces public expenses. How much do police cost to remove people from encampments? How much does booking and transportation to the county jail cost? How much does 3 months in count jail cost? If you think the State+County+City are not also paying for those things, you might not be thinking deeply about the problem. For reference, 3 months in county jail is the equivalent cost of 1 year in housing. https://www.thirddoorcoalition.org/

    • Johnny Stulic April 23, 2025 (7:04 pm)

      There is always a third option that so far has not been seriously considered, but by the time the TFG administration is done raping the country, the sheer number of homeless and drug addicted people flocking to the few west and east coast cities will simply become overwhelming and unsustainable. The inflection point is coming and it won’t be pretty.
      Anti-vagrancy laws can be (re)implemented and anyone without a residence can be asked nicely to leave the city and go back to the MAGA state where (s)he came from and in which (s)he had more than likely voted for TFG and other politicians over the years. People of Seattle are under no obligation to pay for their life choices.

  • 22blades April 24, 2025 (2:55 pm)

    “Gold” Standard is an unfortunate label & shows the self promoting tone of this as opposed to earnest problem solving. “Look at me!”

  • anonyme April 24, 2025 (3:41 pm)

    Agree with Blades.  What is “gold standard” that hasn’t already been done, spending millions of dollars only to see both the bureaucracy – and the problem – explode?  I think we should try the opposite approach.  Instead of paying a small army to develop relationships, let’s try cutting services and making Seattle not such a tantalizing place for criminals to set up camp.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.