October 9, 2011 at 3:22 pm
#736683
redblack
Participant
i think smitty’s right. but for a different reason:
money.
willard romney has more of it than anyone else on the slate.
what i want to know is if/when republicans are going to get angry about pay-to-play in elections and media selection of their candidates.
seriously. i’m pretty sure the founding fathers didn’t intend for the guy with the most money to take the election.
cripes. it’s more like a cattle auction.
[ don’t worry, jan. i won’t let kootch beat up my fist with his face in this thread. :) ]