Ken
umm What did you think was going to change with that last 13% by the Chair projecting a winner?
I really want to know.
The mechanism of calculating the potential change in a trend is fairly well known. However I am assuming the caucus process for the republicans was as open and transparent as the Dems side.
Perhaps I am assuming wrong.
Did they actually have a ballot to count? Rather than a name with a choice beside it on a sign in sheet?
Where are the 6.7% of precincts that even now it seems are not reporting?
http://www.wsrp.org/News/Read.aspx?ID=7042
Or is your complaint something along the lines of the “faithless elector” issue in the electorol college?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithless_elector
Or is it your contention that since the WA GOP
is splitting its delegate election between the caucus and the primary, that declaring a winner in the caucus will somehow contaminate the delegate selection process in the primary?
I am unfamiliar enough with the Republican caucus process it seems to figure out just what the complaint is from your letter.
Can you spell it out a bit better with some background?