Reply To: I am totally oposed to Kavanaugh on the Supreme court but……

#931159

JoB
Participant

HMCRich
can you explain to me how the qualifiers sexual abuser and perjury master pertain to a discussion on the deficit?

Or.. how those two same qualifiers don’t better describe our current commander in chief who doesn’t care if a woman is a willing participant or not and has been caught red handed paying his paramours off…

has he perjured himself yet? well.. that remains to be seen doesn’t it. We know he lies continuously.. we can count them.. and someone has.

and FYI. I get that you don’t like them but Maxine Walters and Patty Murray aren’t old white men.. not by a stretch.

as for those sexual misconduct payoffs.. i suspect you aren’t going to hear much about them as long as the representatives who profited from them are in power… If they were perpetrated by mostly democrats as you insinuate we would already have full disclosure… after all the hands controlling the cookie jar are Republican.

We the people didn’t elect Trump. No really. The Electoral College elected Trump.. and even that took more than a bit of voter disenfranchisement and gerrymandering.

and no.. winner takes all isn’t exactly the motto the United States is built on…
show me where the preamble to the Constitution says that..

“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

now.. back to our regularly scheduled programming…