CITY COUNCIL: Saka zeroes in on Vision Zero, plus, hear how it went when he and president Hollingsworth met the media

On a day when our part of the city yielded three crashes of note, District 1 City Councilmember Rob Saka called for an audit of SDOT‘s “Vision Zero safety initiative. That’s one of two City Council notes we have tonight. Saka’s call for an audit was announced in an emailed news release one day before the committee he chairs, Transportation, Waterfront, and Seattle Center, gets a Vision Zero briefing. That’s on the agenda for Thursday’s 9:30 am committee meeting; in the news release about the audit, Saka is quoted as saying, ““Vision Zero is about saving lives, and while we are seeing some real progress, the fact remains that too many people are still dying and suffering serious injuries on our streets. This audit will help us take a hard look at what’s working, what’s not, and where we need to sharpen our approach to prevent further tragedies on our roads.” SDOT presented its latest review of Vision Zero during this council briefing three months ago.

Meantime, Saka was one of two councilmembers who showed up this past Monday for a new monthly media availability in which the council’s communication team sends invites to reporters to come to City Hall for open Q&A with councilmembers. We couldn’t go to the first one but decided to go downtown for this one; it’s voluntary for them to participate, and only two signed on this time – Council President Joy Hollingsworth and Councilmember Saka. The half-dozen or so of us newspeople who showed up sat in a conference room facing each of the participants in turn, for about 20 minutes apiece. Hollingsworth went first; we recorded audio of both just in case anyone might be interested in what happened in unrestricted Q&A with councilmembers (spoiler alert, nothing revelatory).

Hollingsworth was asked about the latest budget forecast, encampment policy, neighborhood foot policing as recently announced for two neighborhoods, potentially auditing the Human Services Department (she said she’d “welcome an audit in any department”), the mayor’s call for more density in the Comprehensive Plan, the library levy, and construction costs (observing that those affect people building backyard ADUs as well as professional builders and saying “I think we should look at everybody as a developer”). Here’s the unedited audio:

Next, Councilmember Saka, who was asked about some of the same topics – neighborhood policing (“West Seattle could benefit from a similar program”) and the Comprehensive Plan, as well as whether anything should be done to rein in rising rents.

We asked about last weekend’s gunfire incidents, with bullets through home windows in two West Seattle neighborhoods;
he said he’s “aware” of them, noted he meets regularly with SPD Chief Shon Barnes, said we “need to get creative in prevention” and touted some money he secured in last year’s budget for a late-night teen program in High Point (one of the neighborhoods where there was weekend gunfire). Later in his Q&A, we asked about the east-of-35th encampment sweep, having just learned about it; Saka said he’d been calling for “remediation” of that area (his operations director Erik Schmidt, who was in the room, told us afterward that they’d just learned about the sweep plans that morning). Here’s unedited audio of the Q&A with Councilmember Saka:

Councilmembers have several committee meetings most weeks, plus full-group meetings at 2 pm Mondays and Tuesdays – all the agendas can be found here.

17 Replies to "CITY COUNCIL: Saka zeroes in on Vision Zero, plus, hear how it went when he and president Hollingsworth met the media"

  • Vision Zero is the problem April 16, 2026 (5:55 am)

    I hope this “audit” is the first step in repealing this wasteful, misguided, unrealistic “framework” that SDOT uses to justify inventing projects and making roads worse. Here’s to the end of Vision Zero and its replacement with a practical approach grounded in reality and in the wishes of the voters of Seattle. 

    • K April 16, 2026 (9:10 am)

      Vision Zero isn’t specific to Seattle.  It’s working well in many other cities.  Deaths have gone down in Seattle.

      I know there is a subset of people who are determined to prove Seattleites are too incompetent to benefit from programs and policies that work literally everywhere else, but luckily SDOT is driven by data rather than feelings.

      Wish I could say the same for Saka.

    • Jort April 16, 2026 (1:02 pm)

      Vision Zero, when done effectively, saves lives and prevents injuries. Sometimes that means that drivers have to go slower than they’re used to. Does that make the road “worse?” What do you think is worse: people dying? Or a commute taking 45 seconds longer? Help me understand. 

    • Brook April 16, 2026 (1:57 pm)

      except, Vision Zero is in the wishes of the voters of Seattle. source: elections in the past 10 years where people consistently elected leaders who continued the Vision Zero program

  • Jort April 16, 2026 (8:48 am)

    I mean, you can “audit” Vision Zero all you want, but the reason why Vision Zero has struggled to reduce deaths and serious injuries is not one of the great unknowable mysteries of our time. It struggles because Vision Zero tells you to do things that are incredibly unpopular, politically. Things like road reconfigurations that slow down cars. Things like diverters that cut down on speeding through traffic. Dare I say, even things like center-lane curb dividers, which so animated one West Seattle resident that he decided to run for office as a city councilperson! If Rob and the council are looking for a way to save money on this audit, might I consider buying a large mirror that faces the council members’ podiums and drawing a big arrow pointing to them, with text saying, “Audit finding: it’s you.”  

    • Mcat April 16, 2026 (12:29 pm)

       Agree with you, Jort.

    • 1994 April 16, 2026 (10:01 pm)

      Ya but Vision Zero has been implemented. Is it working? VZ can’t control drivers 100% while on the road. It ain’t gonna be down to zero.  However while I am out driving most drivers are safe in my observations.

      • Foop April 16, 2026 (10:41 pm)

        You must be on your phone. I never not see at least one driver driving dangerously or distracted no matter how short the drive, walk, or ride.

      • E April 17, 2026 (11:28 am)

        What about when you’re out and not in a car? My anecdotal report on driver behavior is that it is atrocious and incredibly unsafe. Just read the comments from past blog posts here and view the actions of drivers who resent NTOR.

        BTW, I ❤️ Jort!

  • DavisWS April 16, 2026 (8:53 am)

    Thank you Councilmember Saka for being proactive in areas such as auditing the vision zero plan and cleaning up the homeless encampment that has had so much violence over the past couple of months. It’s nice to have leadership that is proactive in areas that affect us. You’re a good man, please keep up the good work.

    • Derek April 16, 2026 (9:32 am)

      Sarcasm? 

      • Foop April 16, 2026 (11:27 am)

        So proactive that multiple people have to die before anything is done. Also I don’t think Saka has anything to do with those encampments. Won’t stop him from taking a victory lap on it.

        • k April 16, 2026 (12:22 pm)

          This guy posts some pro-Saka campaign slogans in every article that mentions him, even when it doesn’t even make sense.  I figured he either works for him, or is actually Rob Saka.  Either way, just move on.

  • Los Bopper Grande April 16, 2026 (9:15 am)

    Saka has been one of the primary sticks in the mud preventing the city from improving streets, and has been spending large sums making West Seattle roads less safe.  What a clown.

  • Derek April 16, 2026 (9:32 am)

    I support Vision Zero. The one good thing Harrell ever did. 

Sorry, comment time is over.