VIDEO: 2-year street closure, and other key points from briefing on Fauntleroy Creek’s next culvert project

By Tracy Record
West Seattle Blog editor

If you live, work, shop, study, or travel through Fauntleroy, you should be paying attention to the upcoming project to replace and expand the Fauntleroy Creek culvert beneath 45th SW.

So far, the Fauntleroy Community Association fears, not enough people are, despite the inevitability that, as FCA president Frank Immel observed last night, “it’s going to be a real mess in the community.”

Above is our recording of last night’s hour-long meeting with the latest information about the project, presented by Seattle Public Utilities, hosted by the FCA as the first half of its regular monthly board meeting. Anticipating stronger community interest, FCA moved the meeting to a big room at The Hall at Fauntleroy and set out dozens of chairs – but only a handful were filled.

Here’s the slide deck used for the briefing (plus a few pages at the end regarding the California culvert, on which work will start no sooner than 2028, after 45th is complete). Briefing toplines:

SPU hopes to start work next year, after completing design this year. The project will convert a two-foot-wide pipe carrying the creek below 45th north of Wildwood [map], on the north edge of the Endolyne mini-business district, to a 14-foot-wide culvert carrying a “natural stream channel” so that salmon will have “the same view” they have in the open creek. As SPU’s project manager Jonathan Brown observed, the creek has great salmon habitat, but the current culverts – primarily at 45th and at California near the schoolhouse and church – are barriers preventing spawners from going upstream. (The California culvert is also scheduled for expansion/replacement, but not until after the 45th project.)

It’s not just a matter of size, Brown explained – the 45th culvert is almost a century old. So repairing it instead of replacing it is not an option.

Design consultant Tracey Belding spoke too. She said that along with replacing and upsizing the culvert, and improving habitat, the project also will improve maintenance access for SPU crews, and accommodate possible future increases in creek flow resulting from climate change. (The team reminded everyone that this isn’t a project the city is doing because of an idea somebody had – enabling fish passage is a federal mandate.)

The design points shown to the FCA board and attendees also showed restoration of habitat adjacent to the creek, replacing invasive vegetation with native plants. Evaluating the vegetation, including trees, in the area is necessary for “complex decisions” – Belding said they don’t want to do “too much tinkering with the ecosystem” and that they don’t just want plants to “survive” the project, they want them to “thrive.”

So what about those who live, work, study, and travel through the area? How will they not just survive, but thrive? 45th will be closed as a through street for up to two years between Wildwood Place and Director Street, the project team acknowledged. When they do that, they expect one-way Director to temporarily become two-way; they said SDOT wants to install an all-way stop at California/Director, too. (One attendee suggested that would be better as a signal, to reduce the chance of drivers ignoring it.)Back on 45th, they will likely have some kind of pedestrian bridge over the excavation. And the creek will have to have a bypass during construction.

They’ll be working year round rather than just during the “fish window” – otherwise it would take more like three years than two, the project team said. Early work could happen before the end of this year, such as power-line relocation. Also mentioned, they still have a plan for a “gathering spot” along 45th but it’ll be “much smaller than in previous renderings,” featuring specialty pavement with a stream theme, boulders and plantings, educational signage, and a streetlight.

Concerns were raised about other areas – the parking lot behind Fauntleroy Schoolhouse and the possibility this will overlap with Fauntleroy ferry-dock-replacement work (it probably will).

In response to a question, SPU said they would aim for a full community meeting this “July or August.” An attendee voiced concerns that in the meantime, people in the affected area “are not being heard.” Meanwhile, you can check in on the project website here.

8 Replies to "VIDEO: 2-year street closure, and other key points from briefing on Fauntleroy Creek's next culvert project"

  • JustSarah June 11, 2025 (9:26 pm)

    But what are the alternatives? Understood it will be inconvenient, but is there another option that somehow meets the need without a lot of inconvenience? 

  • C June 11, 2025 (10:39 pm)

    For those of us that live on that block, will we have local residential access with our vehicles still?

  • Judy P. June 12, 2025 (11:23 am)

    While much of what was presented Tuesday evening was a review of information already shared with the community, it provided a taste of just how disruptive the 45th project will be.   I encourage a full house for the July/August community meeting when the city must provide much more detail about project design and installation.  If we are to endure construction impacts for at least two years, then live for decades with the finished product, our voices must be heard.

    • JustSarah June 12, 2025 (11:16 pm)

      Did you see my comment above? Is there a proposed alternative that solves the problem but isn’t inconvenient? I live in the neighborhood, but am confused as to what the “call to action” is here. 

      • WSB June 13, 2025 (8:05 pm)

        The call to action is “pay attention and be informed because this will be disruptive.” Sorry if my story wasn’t clear on that.

  • Niko June 12, 2025 (9:23 pm)

    So in other words this project is going to be a massively disruptive mess that will have little to no benefit especially given that the salmon already have to be helped along significantly and hardly spawn up or down the creek at all and the ones that are “released” get caught in a net and then taken down to the ocean. I haven’t seen salmon fry down in Fauntleroy Creek in years with all those logs and things built up

  • 1994 June 12, 2025 (10:40 pm)

    How much creek will be made open for the salmon, 1/2 of a mile, 3/4 of a mile? Some of these culvert projects don’t provide much of an increase in access for fish. 

  • Judy P. June 13, 2025 (10:34 am)

    In response to question above, the creek culvert at 45th has partially collapsed twice.  With that history, the city must replace it and state law mandates that the replacement be fish passable.  The law is clear and stems directly from tribal treaty rights.  In my experience, recognizing this fact is the single greatest hurdle to public understanding about why the replacement culvert must be so wide (up to 14′ diameter) and, as a result, be such a disruptive project.  Experience when we’ve had large numbers of spawners has convinced me that some just might venture farther upstream than is currently possible.Regarding seeing salmon in the creek, take a look now at the big bridge in Fauntleroy Park and you’ll likely see fry still there from May releases involving just over 900 students and 300 supporting adults.  Multiply what you see there many times and you’ll have an idea of the volume of “home hatch” fry in the lower creek from last fall’s spawning.  Then come in the cold and wet of November to our open creek during spawning season and you’ll have more questions answered.  And if you have time to get into the weeds, check out the many annual and study reports at http://www.fauntleroywatershed.org.

Sorry, comment time is over.