ELECTION 2025: Another tax proposal that might be on your November ballot: ‘Seattle Shield’

(Added: Seattle Channel video of afternoon announcement event)
11:40 AM: Another tax measure might be on the way to your November ballot, and this time it’s not a property-tax levy – it involves business taxes.

This afternoon, it’ll be announced by Mayor Harrell and citywide City Councilmember Alexis Mercedes Rinck, who call it the “Seattle Shield.” Excerpted from their advance announcement:

Today, Mayor Bruce Harrell and Councilmember Alexis Mercedes Rinck (Position 8, Citywide) announced a new proposal to lower city taxes for approximately 90% of Seattle businesses that currently pay the Business & Occupation (B&O) tax and raise needed new progressive revenue to protect funding to essential services and programs threatened by the Trump administration. …

The City of Seattle currently faces a $251 million deficit across all fund balances, with further financial risk stemming from Trump administration threats to federal funding and economic uncertainty. This proposal would temporarily raise B&O rates to bring in $90 million in net revenues for the City annually with funding dedicated to backfilling essential human services threatened by the Trump administration and maintaining effective ongoing City programs. These include investments in housing vouchers and shelter, food and nutrition access, services for survivors of gender-based violence, and more. With current financial forecasts, this revenue would also allow the City to protect and maintain needed investments in affordable housing. …

How the proposal works:

In 2026, the B&O tax exemption would be increased from $100,000 to $2,000,000, exempting approximately 16,500 small and medium-sized businesses (76% of current taxpayers) from the B&O tax. The City would also create the new B&O deduction, allowing all businesses to only pay B&O taxes on gross receipts above $2 million.

To offset the reduced B&O tax revenues caused by the exemption and deduction, and to address the deficit and Trump administration threats, the B&O tax rate will increase in 2026 from 22 cents per $100 of taxable receipts to 34 cents per $100 for retail, wholesale, and manufacturing companies and from 43 cents per $100 to 65 cents per $100 for service companies.

For the median taxpayer business that has $5 million in gross receipts, they would only pay the B&O tax on $3 million in gross receipts after the $2 million B&O deduction. In this example, their City B&O obligation would go from $15,200 in 2025 to $13,972 in 2026, a decrease of over $1,200.

For a business with $12 million in gross receipts – in the highest quartile of taxpayers – their B&O obligation would go from $31,920 in 2025 to $39,587 in 2026, an increase of $7,667. Approximately 90% of small and medium-sized businesses would see their tax obligation reduced or would be exempted altogether from the tax.

These changes would be effective for four years, from 2026 though 2029, with a councilmanic option to renew them for four additional years from 2030 through 2033.

This would require City Council and voter approval. We’ve asked for the full text of the proposal and will add that when we get it, along with any additional information emerging from the 1 pm event at which this will be officially announced.

5:38 PM: Adding the video from that event atop this story. The full text of the proposal isn’t available yet, so that might have to wait for a followup story. Here’s the entire news release, meantime.

36 Replies to "ELECTION 2025: Another tax proposal that might be on your November ballot: 'Seattle Shield'"

  • Makes zero cents June 25, 2025 (11:51 am)
      • The only one who benefits is the businesses that will make under the $2 million in revenue but will still charge customers gratuity and other service fees. 

    They will reap the reward and still pass the price increase PLUS added fees to the paying customers. 

    • WS Urbanist June 25, 2025 (2:24 pm)

      I’m not sure where you’re getting this idea that this will raise prices. This proposal sounds like most small businesses won’t need to pay this tax anymore. If anything that should help keep prices lower since our local coffee shops, restaurants, and retailers would have less taxes to pay.

  • Lucy June 25, 2025 (12:20 pm)

    NO NEW TAXES!  Government needs to live within it’s means.  This is ridiculous.

    • Nolan June 25, 2025 (1:52 pm)

      The government defines currency, so its means are definitionally endless. You may want to brush up on your macroeconomics.

      • EVGuy June 25, 2025 (4:57 pm)

        Seattle government doesn’t define any currency, the federal government does, so Seattle’s government definitely does not have endless means. Otherwise, why would they bother floating this? They could just print more money. Brush up on your civics. 

    • Derp June 25, 2025 (1:58 pm)

      You really need to read the story and see that this could be a good thing for small business’s in Seattle. Too me,  it sounds like you are assuming who these taxes are for and who they will help

    • Lauren June 25, 2025 (2:40 pm)

      🙄 Read the article. This is not a new tax. 

    • Jake June 25, 2025 (3:13 pm)

      Does this go for endless tax dollars to war-hungry military too, Boeing, SpaceX, etc. etc.?

  • Jake June 25, 2025 (12:23 pm)

    I love it. Rinck is a godsend on this conservative council. Trump is cutting everything and we need protections in place. Voter approval good too, democracy in action. Can’t hate this.

  • Marty June 25, 2025 (12:33 pm)

    Seriously? More taxes?

    • Nolan June 25, 2025 (1:53 pm)

      How much more are you expecting to pay on your >$2m in gross income?

    • K June 25, 2025 (3:13 pm)

      So.eone didn’t read the story.  Of course we’ll see Meinert and his ilk complaining, but this will be a fantastic boon for small and medium-sized businesses!

    • Jay June 25, 2025 (4:09 pm)

      It’s a tax cut for small businesses, it’s just shifting taxes above a $2m threshold. And I don’t think you’re impacted by this tax, aren’t all the anti-transit organizations like SkyLink and Rethink the Link nonprofits with five-figure budgets? 

      • The King June 25, 2025 (5:37 pm)

        Everyone will be impacted by this tax shift. Your cupcakes or small coffee shop lattes might be cheaper, the owner may just rightfully try to get ahead. The impact will be at the grocery store, bigger chain fast foods, car prices, etc. Bigger businesses will not eat an increase this substantial, yet locals will scream “greedy corporations” when prices inevitably spike. If this passes, which I’m guessing it will by an 80-20 yes vote 

        • Jethro Marx June 25, 2025 (6:37 pm)

          You and Jay seem to be on opposite sides of this issue but share a weirdly snooty grievance vibe. Thanks for looking out for the big chains though, they need all the help they can get from us common folk.

        • k June 25, 2025 (7:49 pm)

          The pandemic and recent political discussions about eggs taught us that the big grocery stores will price their goods at the highest rate they can get away with, regardless of the actual cost of doing business.  People made the exact same argument about fast food when higher minimum wages were enacted and guess what?  Big Macs cost the same here as other cities where minimum wage is still $7.25.  Bigger businesses will always price things at the most their customers are willing to pay.  Sometimes that means gouging the customers, sometimes it means changes to business models (more kiosks, fewer employees, cancelling or downsizing corporate retreats) but history does not support your assumption that higher corporate taxes automatically mean higher consumer prices.  

    • Pete June 25, 2025 (4:22 pm)

      Definitely bothered to actually read the story 

  • Lauren June 25, 2025 (2:39 pm)

    I’m no Harrell fan, but at first read, this actually seems pretty good. 

    • Nolan June 25, 2025 (10:14 pm)

      I think he sees the writing on the wall: being the DSA’s errand boy is starting to become a liability.

      At the risk of reading too much into it, I think Rinck might’ve found a way to leverage his political vulnerability into a win-win outcome.

  • Ronald Brandyson June 25, 2025 (4:10 pm)

    I refuse to read an entire page of text. TAXES?!?!?!

  • Conan June 25, 2025 (4:49 pm)

    I hate Trump, but the fear-mongering from the left is getting old.  If Seattle wants to raise revenue because of the budget shortfalls (aka, overspending), just leave it at that.  No need to also blame Trump without specific data showing how his policies are hurting Seattle taxpayers/residents (unless that’s the only way they think voters will approve the tax increase).  People should be required to pass a logic and reasoning test before being allowed to vote.

    • k June 25, 2025 (5:02 pm)

      The services are listed in the article.  It takes 10 seconds to Google the names of the actual programs that have been cut.  When cuts have already been made to some programs, statements about cutting others are credible threats, not fear-mongering.  It only appears as fear-mongering to those who choose to remain willfully ignorant of what has literally actually happened in the last five months.

    • O’Brian June 25, 2025 (5:23 pm)

      Hear hear! I also hate trump but mentioning his possible cuts to evoke emotional support seems borderline deceptive. If his cuts are truly motivating this tax change, it would seem appropriate to make this change contingent on Trumps cuts manifesting. If not, call it for what it is and just say that this will help the city close it’s deficit 

  • brandon June 25, 2025 (4:52 pm)

    City (and State and County) Economists need more input and a bigger voice with the Budget Makers.

  • Johnny Stulic June 25, 2025 (6:41 pm)

    Tax hikes like this and many more to follow in the future would be a lot easier to swallow if they were followed by laws and policies making sure that none of our money and services are used for supporting the ever increasing hordes of red state voters who imposed the TFG administration (and what passes as policies under their rule) on everyone because they really wanted their trailer park racially clean, oh, pardon me, I meant the lower price of eggs. Unfortunately, since this is Seattle, the world capital of performative compassion, we’ll once again gladly tax ourselves to death in order to house, feed, and in every possible way subsidize hundreds of thousands of those who hate sanctuary cities and their liberals but apparently not their money. 

    • k June 25, 2025 (9:38 pm)

      There’s no way to punish idiot adults without also (and often disproportionately) punishing their children.  So, yes, I will continue to vote for subsidizing people who continually vote against their own interest in hopes that their children will make it to adulthood and not starve to death, and to reach adulthood with some semblance of a chance to be a responsible human thanks to education subsidies.

      • Johnny Stulic June 25, 2025 (10:26 pm)

        And this right here is why a lot of voters, who would normally vote D on all tickets, either stay home or even check R. Low information electorate is large, but not nearly sufficient to vote in the fascists without the help of the “progressives” who are always eager to throw money at those who’d throw a grenade back if they could.

        • Nolan June 25, 2025 (10:51 pm)

          Please elaborate. It isn’t clear what you’re trying to say.

          • SoLongDelridge June 25, 2025 (11:21 pm)

            I don’t they know what they are trying to say.

        • Jake June 26, 2025 (11:16 am)

          This is just a farce. Mamdani won in the biggest city in the US. The days of  fear mongering that progressives are scary is over.

  • Catherine June 25, 2025 (7:41 pm)

    NO NEW TAXES! This is ridiculous. 

    • posice June 25, 2025 (8:53 pm)

      Well, good thing this is LOWERING CITY TAXES to approximately 90% of businesses in the city that pay the B&O tax.

    • Lauren June 25, 2025 (9:51 pm)

      👏 this 👏 is 👏 not 👏 a 👏 new 👏 tax 👏

  • Tired of the BS June 26, 2025 (1:07 pm)

    Shell game

  • Tired of the BS June 28, 2025 (2:20 pm)

    This is for the WSB staff, the title would have been more apropos (and a chuckle) if it was “November bailout” vs ballot…  Thanks for what you do…

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.