TRANSPORTATION LEVY: Here’s what’s in the first-year plan for West Seattle

By Tracy Record
West Seattle Blog editor

SDOT is out with the plan for what it’s going to do with funding from the first year of the $1.55 billion Transportation Levy that Seattle voters passed in November.

After releasing the plan (read it here) this afternoon, SDOT managers – including director Greg Spotts, on his second-to-last day on the job – hosted a media briefing online. They gave an overview you can peruse in this slide deck; we went through the plan itself for every West Seattle reference we could find.

First, you should note that what’s in the plan is NOT everything SDOT will be doing this year. There are many projects that use non-levy funding. For example, District 1 City Councilmember Rob Saka‘s proposal to change the configuration of Delridge Way near a RapidRide H Line stop by the Refugee and Immigrant Family Center Preschool is not in it – but that doesn’t mean it’s not happening. We’ve been asking SDOT and Metro about that project’s status, and what they tell us is what SDOT managers said during today’s briefing – the two agencies are talking about what’s possible, although SDOT still believes that what’s there now – which includes a hardened raised median – is safe, because that’s what it was designed to be. Because they’re in early conversations, there’s no specific plan nor timeline yet, and they expect to consider “a universe of solutions.”

Now, back to what IS in the 2025 levy-spending plan for West Seattle – no details yet beyond these basic descriptions:

-The SW Brandon sidewalk, also something Councilmember Saka has mentioned repeatedly, from 26th to 30th, is mentioned as an “anticipated initial project”

-“Alki Traffic Calming,” described as planned for 60th, 61st, and 62nd between Admiral Way and Alki Avenue, with construction expected to start in 2025

-Two other “traffic calming” projects listed as expected to “start planning” in 2025 – 49th Ave SW and SW Graham St (scene of a deadly crash last year) and SW Henderson at Westcrest Park

-Sylvan Way SW (High Point Dr to Sylvan Heights Dr Mid-Block, noted as a “high-collision safety project”

-16th Ave SW–SW Brandon St (Trailhead) to SW Henderson St, noted as a “traffic-calming project”

-26th Ave SW–SW Barton St to SW Roxbury St, noted as a “traffic-calming project”

-SW Trenton St–35th Ave SW to Delridge Way SW, noted as a “traffic-calming project”

-“Safe Routes to School” projects for Highland Park, Lafayette, and West Seattle Elementaries, plus Madison Middle School and Pathfinder K-8

-Evaluation of potential paving projects (as previously reported) for 35th SW between SW Alaska and SW Morgan, Olson Pl SW/1st Ave S: 2nd Ave SW to SW Cloverdale, and/or Fauntleroy Way in The Triangle

-Asphalt spot paving for 35th Ave SW between SW 106th and SW 108th, SW Orchard between Delridge and Dumar

-Concrete spot paving for 16th SW between Myrtle and Holly, Delridge Way between Genesee and Dakota, SW Alaska between Fauntleroy Way and 38th

-“Transit spot improvements” including asphalt paving on SW Oregon between California and 44th (Routes 50 and 128)

-“Advance key connections to future Link light rail stations in coordination with partner agencies” on SW Alaska

-Start sidewalk design for SW Hudson St between Delridge and 26th

-Sidewalk repairs at California/Edmunds

-Curb ramps on 16th SW at South Seattle College, Brandon, Holden; at 36th/Andover; at 39th/Genesee; at 49th/Raymond; at 47th/Frontenac; at 55th/Manning; at 60th/Admiral

-Stairway repairs at 21st/Dakota

-Crossing improvements at Delridge/Alaska, 29th/Brandon, 9th/Henderson, 28th/Thistle; start designing improvements for Delridge/Cloverdale

-“Major signal maintenance” at 26th/Roxbury and California/Erskine/Edmunds (which is also slated for a pedestrian-accessibility improvement)

-Signal timing at 47th/Admiral (described as fiber-network expansion)

-Neighborhood greenway listed as “Alki Point Phase 2”

-Protected bike lane on Highland Park Way between West Marginal and Holden (“start design” this year – this is the “lane conversion” project that’s undergone much community discussion)

-Protected bike lane “upgrades” on Admiral Way between Spokane and Olga (the hill just north of the West Seattle Bridge) and on Andover between Delridge and Avalon

We asked about plans for communicating details of each project; SDOT says web info about projects will be available when they’re further along the path to construction. Meantime, this plan is scheduled to be discussed with the council’s Transportation Committee, which Councilmember Saka chairs, on February 18th. SDOT says it’ll have a spending plan to present at the start of each year of the levy’s eight-year life, and that an oversight committee will be appointed for this levy, as has been the case for others.

33 Replies to "TRANSPORTATION LEVY: Here's what's in the first-year plan for West Seattle"

  • Russell January 31, 2025 (7:07 pm)

    Hopefully Saka’s given up on the curb, I doubt it however.

  • bolo January 31, 2025 (7:32 pm)

    “49th Ave SW and SW Graham St (scene of a deadly crash last year)…”

    That should be 48th Ave SW and SW Graham St, no?

    • Adam January 31, 2025 (9:34 pm)

      I also can’t find where High Point Dr links up with Sylvan Way, but maybe it’s an Apple Maps issue

  • Frog January 31, 2025 (8:31 pm)

    Not sure why they want to spend money to “upgrade” the bike lane on Admiral way between Spokane and Olga, since it’s very rarely used.  I pass by there fairly often, and see a cyclist maybe twice a year.  Also, not sure how they can “calm” 60th and 62nd in Alki, considering that these are essentially one-lane streets already.

    • Foop January 31, 2025 (10:00 pm)

      When I lived in admiral that was my daily commute. It’s a heck of a hill but there’s no other way to get up to admiral that is better. More protected bike lanes will get more people out of their cars. Just because you don’t see them doesn’t mean they aren’t there.

    • Gaff January 31, 2025 (11:12 pm)

      As a biker, I constantly go out of my way to avoid dangerous streets. Adding safe bike lanes will make it possible for more bikers to use the streets we need to get around.

    • Nolan February 1, 2025 (3:25 pm)

      If the roadways looked like Seattle’s bike lane map, you wouldn’t see very many cars driving on them either.

  • SaveCurby January 31, 2025 (9:06 pm)

    There are some great projects on here. The Brandon street sidewalks are especially heartening. Though I can’t help but think about how much more good could be done if Rob Saka wasn’t wasting 2 million of our dollars on his misguided pet project to remove the safety curb on Delridge. Such an awful and selfish waste of our precious transportation dollars. 

  • Adam January 31, 2025 (9:37 pm)

    As soon as I hit “publish”, I found I was wrong. It’s an Adam issue. There’s a strange intersection in HP where HP Dr becomes Graham, and Raymond becomes HP Dr. 

  • 1994 January 31, 2025 (9:41 pm)

    26th Ave SW–SW Barton St to SW Roxbury St, noted as a “traffic-calming project”…….this is has already been calmed with the frequent rapid ride buses using this short stretch of 26th…..how much more calming can be done? I avoid this stretch due to the rapid ride buses.

    • Bbron February 1, 2025 (2:51 am)

      how did the buses calm traffic here? maybe if you lived and walked around here you’d understand why this project is welcomed by the area’s pedestrians.

    • Hidalgo February 1, 2025 (8:55 am)

      Probably speed bumps. This area loves those things. 

  • Seattlite January 31, 2025 (11:03 pm)

    I might have missed it, but is there a pledge to voters that there will be 100% transparency of the $1.55 BILLION expenditures and on-going budget changes?  What I expect is a detailed accounting of ALL spending, ALL change orders, etc.  Is that too much to ask?

    • WSB January 31, 2025 (11:06 pm)

      That’s what this is about. If you want them to account for granular spending like office supplies etc., you might have to PDR for that.

    • 98126res February 2, 2025 (11:33 am)

      Agree! Now is the time for 100% transparency about timing and costs. It’s essential for trust and due Taxpayers paying for this. Project communications and websites can be unnecessarily confusing and frustrating.

  • JP January 31, 2025 (11:11 pm)

    How many of these projects require some kind of Federal funds that the Trump administration, which Rob Saka says he’ll collaborate with (https://ronpdavis.substack.com/p/rob-saka-collaborative-with-trump), will be withholding from us for not acquiescing to his fascist demands?Is Rob Saka collaborating with the Trump regime to get rid of a curb he doesn’t like? SAVE CURBY! 

    • WSB January 31, 2025 (11:16 pm)

      ‘Curby’ might have been installed with federal $ as some contributed to RapidRide, but the project that might include its removal is currently only listed as $2 million CITY dollars. Not part of this levy, again, but I’m sure that if we hadn’t mentioned it, it’d be the first thing someone asked about. – TR

      • 98126res February 2, 2025 (11:37 am)

        $2 MILLION to remove a curb?  Must be quite a curb! 

        • WSB February 2, 2025 (12:00 pm)

          That’s the money the council, at CM Saka’s request, earmarked. Whether it will cost that, and what the scope of the project will be, SDOT insists it does not yet know.

  • Rob February 1, 2025 (6:39 am)

    If anything paint the lines in the road brighter as to see them better at night  when raining 

  • Brandon & Fauntleroy February 1, 2025 (7:07 am)

    Does the WSB know how to get suggestions in for this? I’ve sent so many requests to the City to request a “marked crosswalk” of some kind across Fauntleroy at Brandon and heard nothing. So many families and sports groups use Fairmount Park Field for sports and have to cross that very busy street at Brandon to access it (only parking is in the neighborhood across Fauntleroy). Cars don’t really know to slow down there because it’s hard to see that there is a cross street only on one side. 

  • Brandon & Fauntleroy February 1, 2025 (7:07 am)

    Does the WSB know how to get suggestions in for this? I’ve sent so many requests to the City to request a “marked crosswalk” of some kind across Fauntleroy at Brandon and heard nothing. So many families and sports groups use Fairmount Park Field for sports and have to cross that very busy street at Brandon to access it (only parking is in the neighborhood across Fauntleroy). Cars don’t really know to slow down there because it’s hard to see that there is a cross street only on one side. 

    • Darren February 1, 2025 (7:27 pm)

      You can use Find it fix it for general questions or safe routes to school. Or contact similar the through the city website. Call 206 684 road. I filed a safe routes concern in early October 2024. Never heard anything back. Followed up but nothing. Same with filing other concerns through FIFI. Might be best to call.

  • Meeee February 1, 2025 (9:07 am)

    Saka is still going to kill Curby!                                                                                                                                                            He’s just gotten better at burying it somewhere in the budget, but I have faith WSB will ferret out where Saka has hidden his self-dealing project.                                                                                                                                               PS my Curby T-shirt arrived last week and it is awesome!

  • AH February 1, 2025 (9:47 am)

    Is there another solution other than speed bumps. If the speed limit is 25,  bumps make me go even slower. It seems bumps are for places like parking lots and places where the speed limit is 15mph or less. If I am allowed 25mph, I would like to be able to do that comfortably. Maybe it is too much to ask these days. It seems bumps at alki did not stop a car that crashed and lit up on fire. Maybe increase DUI penalties and enforcement. Seriously asking if there is an alternative to speed bumps. They are super annoying for bicycles as well.

    • Bbron February 1, 2025 (11:13 am)

      Narrowing streets, adding medians. you can’t rely on enforcement; it’s too costly, it’ll miss the vast majority of violations, and is retroactive for safety rather than proactive. you need passive elements to reduce speeds cause there isn’t any other way to get drivers to obey rules on streets that make it comfortable to be reckless; drivers have to be forced into caring by making it uncomfortable to drive recklessly.

  • JustSarah February 1, 2025 (12:18 pm)

    Except for Saka’s pet project curb removal, I have no issue with any of these.

    I know it’s not part of this levy, but has SDOT provided any updates on the long-promised crosswalk improvement at Fauntleroy & Rose?

    • Frogger February 1, 2025 (1:36 pm)

      I hope so! That bus stop crossing feels like an accident waiting to happen! 

  • Kyle February 1, 2025 (1:09 pm)

    Honestly, can we just fund sidewalks everywhere please. Many of these traffic calming project areas are already one single file lane, have speed humps, etc.

  • Kyle February 1, 2025 (1:13 pm)

    Has SDOT said anymore about the lane reductions they proposed on Highland Parkway? It shows still in the plan but they have gone dark. I’m almost afraid to ask because then they’ll start moving on it again. Please keep the lane capacity.

  • WS5 February 1, 2025 (11:36 pm)

    Thanks for the SAFE SCHOOL road closures making that neighborhood streets around it dangerous.  46th is like a highway after school drop off, and the kids on bikes are dodging cars.  Tell parents to slow down.

  • Look Both Ways February 2, 2025 (10:57 am)

    Agree w/ Kyle’s comments. The Highland Parkway ‘as is’ access is critical; particularly for emergency response, commercial and southern commutes. And there is no “traffic-calming project” needed on 16th between Brandon & Holden — there’s already 6 sets of speed bumps within 7/10th’s of a mile (where scant pedestrians cross anyway, except @ Myrtle for school); and another set at the mile mark just after So SEA College. Unless they are referring to issues south of Holden, there’s no justification north of there on 16th SW (yet it mentions all the way to Brandon). It even mentions curb ramps on Brandon / 16th SW…which, umm….already exist. Look forward to their detailed plans, and how we can request funds be applied more responsibly to many alt projects listed.

  • Citizen Joe February 3, 2025 (2:32 pm)

    Unfortunately I don’t see new cross walk lights on Morgan and 34th St as part of the plan. The lights are needed to protect pedestrians crossing Morgan. I’ll have to talk to Saka again…

Sorry, comment time is over.