FOLLOWUP & TRAFFIC ALERT: What’s being done to clean up thousands of gallons of spilled fuel, post-tanker crash

That image was taken a short time ago from the SDOT camera on the east side of the Spokane/Chelan/West Marginal/Delridge intersection, the area blocked off for almost 12 hours after a double-tanker truck went sideways and spilled gasoline. The cleanup continues, and that’s led to the lane closure shown on the camera – so you’re advised to keep avoiding the westbound routes through that intersection. Meantime, we have information from Seattle Public Utilities regarding pollution concerns and what the crew’s doing there; we contacted SPU spokesperson Andy Ryan to ask about it. He provided these details:

The truck leaked an estimated 2,800 to 3,200 gallons of gasoline into the City’s storm drain system, which empties into the Duwamish River. At this point, the fuel has not made it into the river—although we anticipate that some fuel is likely to enter the river.

The transportation company responsible for the spill is paying for contractors to remove the fuel from the storm drain system, and transfer it to storage tanks. Seattle Public Utilities is overseeing the cleanup.
Seattle Fire has sprayed Novacool fire retardant foam in the area to reduce the chance of fire. SFD got the foam as part of a $247,000 grant from Washington Ecology. Novacool is said to be of lower toxicity than other fire retardants, and it breaks down faster to decrease the risk of oxygen depletion in receiving water.

SPU is monitoring safety issues, ensuring there is not an explosive environment in the drainage system, and closing a lane of traffic to facilitate cleanup. Cleanup efforts are expected to take about 36 hours. The cleanup will be performed by vacuum trucks specially designed for the removal of gasoline.

… Because of the potential explosion/fire risk, this material [foam and gas] cannot be boomed and contained at the outfall. There is a large oil/water/separator (OWS) between most of the spill and the outfall that was built and installed specifically for this purpose. As of right now there are several inches of fuel in the OWS and the cleanup contractor (NRC) hired by the trucking company is working on keeping that material pumped down. We are cautiously optimistic that the OWS will prevent most of the material from entering the waterway. This area is tidal, and is beginning to go out so there will be more indication of the level of material bypassing the OWS as the afternoon goes on. At this time, we cannot estimate the volume of material that will be unrecoverable.

The worst-case scenario is fish kills in the area. Gasoline will typically dissipate relatively quickly when exposed to the atmosphere. This would be aided if sunny weather, but unfortunately it does not look like there is sunshine in the forecast. Department of Ecology is taking responsibility for monitoring from the outfall and has a boat from NRC on standby in the event spill material bypasses the OWS.

SPU Spill Response and Safety is onsite to monitor the clean-up activities of NRC and is developing a schedule for SPU to staff the site until the cleanup is complete. As of now, NRC has the appropriate resources onsite to effect clean-up. Early estimates indicate the cleanup process could take 24-36 hours. A debriefing and review of the incident after the clean-up is done will indicate if further action (enforcement) by SPU Source Control & Pollution Prevention is warranted.

As reported in our previous coverage, SPD’s Traffic Collision Investigation Squad is looking into the cause of the crash, with early indications that the trailer went sideways as the truck made a sharp turn. No injuries were reported.

22 Replies to "FOLLOWUP & TRAFFIC ALERT: What's being done to clean up thousands of gallons of spilled fuel, post-tanker crash"

  • SwEngineer August 2, 2018 (5:45 pm)

    This shows the importance of why stormwater utilities need to know their  system. One unknown diversion away from ows facilites could damage a stream and divert fuel into the natural drainage courses rendering reclamation of spilled materials useless. I’ve seen it happen and I hope they are able to vactor as much fuel as possible. the Duwamish can’t catch a break. 

  • MJ August 2, 2018 (5:59 pm)

    It’s good to see the responsible party step to the plate and pay for the clean up for accident.  

    • Mike August 2, 2018 (8:40 pm)

      It’s that or be fined into oblivion.  They know the risks and are insured to help mitigate these costs.

  • Jort August 2, 2018 (7:10 pm)

    Look at these incredible consequences of our toxic car culture. Yet another reason to work every day on reducing our dependence on planet-destroying automobiles. No bicycle is capable of this kind of ecological terror.

    • The King August 2, 2018 (8:38 pm)

      An MIT study showed to manufacture an average bicycle produces 530 pounds of greenhouse gases. Think about that the next time you see those green and orange bikes strewn about the city

      • Jort August 2, 2018 (11:30 pm)

        Wait — are you ACTUALLY making an equivalence between the actual carbon impacts of fuel-burning automobile vs. a bicycle? Seriously? 

      • Nolan August 3, 2018 (9:15 am)

        Wow, 530 pounds is a lot. That’s almost as much as burning 27 gallons of gas, which is clearly more than the average car owner will ever use.

        • keven ruf August 3, 2018 (3:38 pm)

          Only irony will survive this internet flame war.

        • David Quimby August 4, 2018 (12:11 am)

          [in a week!]

    • Mike August 2, 2018 (8:54 pm)

      Your bike is made from metal (mined) and possibly carbon fiber (toxic gasses and resins) and , has rubber tires and grips, uses lube made from petroleum based materials for bearings and the chain, was most likely produced in Taiwan and shipped here on a crude oil burning container ship.  If you have an e-Bike it gets even worse, you have an explosive device on your bike which has Lithium-ion batteries made from graphene and lithium, which are also mined.  Your bike was transported to the warehouse via a 4mpg big rig, then put on a 10mpg box truck where it finally arrived at the bike shop to be assembled.  From there you may or may not have driven (15-40mpg) or taken a bus (8mpg) to the bike shop to get your bike.  That fuel that leaked out, it’s also used to transport your bike before you bought it, possibly after too.  It’s not car culture, we as an entire civilization are utilizing petroleum in most everything, every day.  Most of the products you use and definitely packaging for any sanitary item are using petroleum based products.  But keep thinking just riding a bike saves the world, I ride my bike to work too, logged over 1400 miles this past year on my bike, about 3,000 miles on our cars, 650 gallons of heating oil in our house and a few thousand miles of jet fuel on flights from SeaTac.

      • Sam-c August 2, 2018 (9:58 pm)

        Thanks for the elaboration Mike. However, some people will never consider they are a factor, as long as they don’t have one of those evil cars.

      • Jim August 2, 2018 (10:43 pm)

        Mike,That’s a remarkably well-reasoned response. Please step away from the internets. That doesn’t belong here. Thanks.

      • Nolan August 3, 2018 (9:16 am)

        Nice, now do one of these spiels for a car so we can compare more fairly.

      • Jon August 3, 2018 (1:25 pm)

        I like you. :)Sometimes, I think that posts like the one you responded to are created by a Big Tech AI, collecting data on testing communal patience.

  • momosmom August 2, 2018 (8:32 pm)

    @Jort you say no bicycle is capable of this kind of damage…yes you are correct but we do need these big tankers to deliver fuel, unless of course a bicycle can get your groceries to the stores and all other things we purchase. Just think about that.

  • 1994 August 2, 2018 (10:30 pm)

    Jort – didn’t SDOT arrange for a gasoline engine shuttle van for the bike riders the last time the low bridge was closed for an extended time?The world as we know it has toxic car culture, toxic bus culture, toxic jet plane  culture, toxic plastic bags….. Sadly this is our reality but I want you to know that  I work really hard to minimize my use of these things. 

  • Jody August 3, 2018 (10:35 am)

    If it takes 530 lbs of CO2 to manufacture a bike that is about 26 gallons of gas. An average american driver  uses about 40 gallons per month.  Therefore, for less than one months worth of gas I had a bike manufactured (in Seattle) that I have ridden for a dozen years or about 36,000 miles. At 30 mpg that is 1,200 gallons of gas or 24,000 lbs of CO2 not going into the atmosphere. Of course this is ignoring the amount of CO2 used to manufacture a car so the actual amount of CO2 saved is higher. Is the point that I shouldn’t feel virtuous commuting by bike?  

  • singularname August 3, 2018 (3:05 pm)

    No you shouldn’t–feel virtuous, that is. As I don’t feel that way hauling full households or small tents of stuff for friends and their friends and their friends’ friends, neighbors, neighbor’s friends, strangers friends meet, and … . And there’s rides to the airport for all of the above. Even my most ecologically vocal neighbors will still ask for airport rides–I schmoof them to the rail, which incidentally, i use). Dump runs also. For all the above. Given my age, I estimate I’ve used my truck (and time and muscle and way more often than not cash) 400ish times for about an equal split between nonvehicle and nontruck owners. “Why” they need my truck always comes up (and i never ask first) and, with RARE exceptions, the craparoo that comes out of their mouths is always … Never need a truck, Only need a bike, Too expensive, and my all-time favorite, I don’t believe in cars. … I actually have no beef with bikes or a bike takeover. I just simply find them waaaay uncomfortable, since kidhood. (People don’t get that reason but there it is … .) … 

  • keven ruf August 3, 2018 (3:34 pm)

    Defend you dying car culture.   Rail against logic and fact.  And most of all, do it anonymously on the internet!

    • Jethro Marx August 3, 2018 (7:43 pm)

      The culture, such as it is, belongs to us all. The point some are trying to awkwardly make is that the reduced reliance on cars as a primary means of transportation comes carried on the backs of a culture dominated by the internal combustion engine. We are at a strange point in history where being “car-free” is something of a privileged lifestyle. So while car culture may be toxic, in a certain sense, remember, Jort and others, that toxicity is a matter of dose rather than a binary position. Your calculations of carbon footprints obviate the entire system of petroleum dependence that made your bike possible. So, make your own transportation choices, but don’t rank the virtue of your neighbor’s choice in a pretentious and inane way.

    • Canton August 4, 2018 (7:54 am)

      “Rail against logic and fact”. Kinda like the housing affordability crisis huh? Alas, the irony survives.

  • MJ August 4, 2018 (11:56 am)

    The oil based society we live in is in the beginning phase of being replaced.  Depending on what study 2030 is likely to be peak oil and the transition will hasten after that.  Maintaining the requirement of higher fuel efficiency standards is critical as we start the transition to an electictified society powered by renewables and base load via nuclear, unless there is a better alternative that to my knowledge does not currently exist.

Sorry, comment time is over.