What Mayor Murray said about ‘an extraordinary crisis’ – homelessness – in speech overshadowed by deadly gunfire at camp

“People living on our streets are living harsh and dreadful lives.”

Minutes before Mayor Murray said those words in his live speech to the city about the homelessness emergency – they had been underscored.

Five people were shot in the unauthorized freewayside encampment known as “The Jungle.” Two did not survive. No one’s been arrested yet.

While the attack – called “targeted” by Police Chief Kathleen O’Toole – suddenly overshadowed the mayor’s speech, you might want to watch it, with West Seattle taking another spotlight role in the homelessness crisis shortly, as an RV “safe lot” is readied in Highland Park.

(Updated) You can watch it on the Seattle Channel website by going here – or below:

We watched and listened for key points:

“This is what income inequality looks like … We are dealing with an extraordinary crisis. … Emergency responses alone are not the answer. … We must shift the focus to long-term solutions.” He said he will pursue “a new strategy based on outcomes … (to) shift more resources to (keep people) from ever becoming homeless.” Once people do become homeless, “we know very little about the people living in those tents.” Murray vowed to change that. And he said affordable housing is key to the solution; he promised citywide meetings and also a doubled housing levy, saying that “as a city there is nothing more important we can do this year than to pass this levy.”

He repeated throughout the speech that the federal government must do more, that our city already is spending almost $50 million a year and can’t solve it alone. To get the remaining 3,000 people into emergency shelter would require another $50 million, he said.

And finally, he challenged Seattleites to face the problem “without denigrating each other,” decrying how people have vilified and dehumanized homeless people: “In one tent on our streets you might find a family that lost their home in a personal financial crisis. Go to an encampment, you might find someone struggling with addiction. Go to another you might find someone committing crimes to feed their habit. Polarized one side fits all rhetoric we hear from both sides is unhelpful.”

He also said that the claims the city is doing nothing, or that it’s doing the wrong thing by sweeping encampments, are both wrong.

And – chillingly, knowing what had happened just before his speech, he spoke of people dying on the streets, living in “encampments where some have been murdered or raped.”

He mentioned the “safe lots” to be opened for people living in vehicles, one of which will be in West Seattle, on a Highland Park paved lot adjacent to a former unauthorized encampment closed more than two years ago. Tomorrow night, Deputy Mayor Hyeok Kim and City Councilmember Lisa Herbold will be among city reps at the Highland Park Action Committee meeting to talk about it and to listen; 7 pm at HP Improvement Club (12th SW/SW Holden).

ADDED WEDNESDAY MORNING: As noted in comments, tonight’s HPAC agenda – including questions for the city – can be seen here.

51 Replies to "What Mayor Murray said about 'an extraordinary crisis' - homelessness - in speech overshadowed by deadly gunfire at camp"

  • cj January 27, 2016 (6:24 am)

    He is right, but so are we.  The homeless are not all the same and we need a method to sort them out.

  • Kadoo January 27, 2016 (6:47 am)

    I don’t often agree with the mayor but this speech is worth listening to. 

  • JoB January 27, 2016 (6:51 am)

    He finally said the right things. Now we will see what he does.

  • last straw January 27, 2016 (6:51 am)

    Can anybody speak to whether HPAC has invited anybody from SPD to tonight’s meeting? Or any offers from them to attend (that’s a long shot, but wouldn’t it be nice?) Maybe something was said at the BW Captain’s meeting last night? The imminent onslaught of daily chaos in Highland Park should compel that.  Highland Park and the industrial businesses nearby that parking lot would appreciate them being there participating  in good faith and not from a distance, SPD.  Show up so a team can be built.  Without SPD, this meeting does not have much value.  

  • Cs in hp January 27, 2016 (7:24 am)

    Yes – SPD will be there. An agenda is posted on our HPAC website 

  • Cs in hp January 27, 2016 (7:30 am)

    Sorry- posted too soon,  the agenda with some questions we’ve posed of the mayor’s office is on http://www.hpic1919.org/HPAC if you want to see more about the meeting and how we plan on running it. 

  • last straw January 27, 2016 (7:43 am)

    ok. thx.

  • LarryB January 27, 2016 (7:45 am)

    Much better, but I really wish Murray would stop lashing out at people who are complaining about the problem. We’re all going to have to contribute towards fixing this problem somehow, and for most of us it’ll be a financial contribution. If the mayor talked more about how and why this spending will help, and less about how a minority of residents are painting all homeless people with the same broad brush, more progress would be made more quickly.

  • last straw January 27, 2016 (7:57 am)

    CS in HP,I am not clear what level of SPD will be attendance.   CPT or brass? Can you speak to that?  Thanks again.

  • T Rex January 27, 2016 (8:07 am)

     “This is what income inequality looks like.”  This term is being used a lot these days, not just with homelessness. People better wise up when you local and federal governments start using this phrase over and over. It’s called SOCIALISM people. And if they get their way, YOUR money will be taken from you, not theirs of course because they are after all “our leaders”. The RV Park will happen and just like any other place these people land it will be trashed, bad people will follow them, there will be violence, the cops will be called and then they will be relocated. As I have stated before, I work in this area and this has been going on for years. Nothing new here. Our mayor just wants some attention right now to make him look good. When it fails he will not be seen or heard from. What a flipping joke.  

    • Joe January 27, 2016 (9:35 am)

      Agreed!

    • Seattlite January 27, 2016 (11:17 am)

       “The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money [to spend].”  Margaret Thatcher

  • Cs in hp January 27, 2016 (8:14 am)

    I am 99% sure that Captain Pierre Davis will be there, along with our Community Police Officer Ron Smith. I will confirm that and let you know for sure. 

  • last straw January 27, 2016 (8:15 am)

    Very good.  Thanks for that and all your work.

  • Marty2 January 27, 2016 (8:54 am)

     At least our Mayor finally admitted our current efforts are
    not working.  I don’t have a problem with
    providing temporary regulated RV/campsites, but they are a just that, a
    temporary solution.  What concerns me
    more is what about all the unregulated sites? 
    As we saw with the “Nickelsville” site a few years ago, even though this
    site was regulated and had rules of conduct there were people who chose not to use
    it (or couldn’t follow the rules), they then settled in nearby areas
    instead.  I believe these unregulated
    sites caused most of the problems in the adjacent neighborhoods, so how will
    the City control the spread of these sites? 
    It’s a complex issue that hopefully the City can address with more
    permanent solutions.

  • seaBruce January 27, 2016 (8:54 am)

    Safe lots are good for vehicle campers. Years ago, I tried to suggest using the closed Charlestown Cafe for this purpose, but it went nowhere. Don’t think it will do anything for tent campers. Can we solve this by just giving them all homes without any preconditions, like they do in Utah, because it is cheaper?

  • Joe January 27, 2016 (9:26 am)

    Mayor says no crome in regulated camps. BS!End Freeattle mentality and you’ll fix half of the issues. Other states need to take care of their own homeless vs giving them a bus ticket or not providing resources. 

  • What? January 27, 2016 (9:29 am)

    How in the world does it cost $50 million to house the remaining 3,000 people in an emergency shelter?  $16,000 per person?   That must be one heck of an emergency shelter.

    • Rick January 27, 2016 (9:50 am)

      Admin. costs. AKA salaries and retirements.

    • Brian January 27, 2016 (11:04 am)

      Sounds like you’ve already done a cost breakdown of everything involved with housing someone who has no support network so I don’t know why we pay people a living wage to manage the homeless crisis. We could just have you doing it in your free time between Sudokus at your meaningless job.

      • Kimmy January 27, 2016 (11:44 am)

        My word, Brian. I hope your day gets better.

  • clulessinws January 27, 2016 (9:38 am)

    Such a crisis. Yeah, the Mayor declares one the jets off to DC. Maybe you should have stayed in Seattle Mr Mayor.

  • TheKing January 27, 2016 (9:46 am)

    Middle class hard earned cash doesn’t fix everything. The mayor needs to learn to prioritize like the rest of us. That goes for the rest of the state politicians. You elected puppets have too many big ideas going into your little minds. 

  • Max January 27, 2016 (10:09 am)

    Now this is my opinion, I am not saying I am correct. Washington State makes it to easy to get free stuff, you offer free things to people who do not want to work they will come and a lot of those types of people are the ones who most likely cause the problems. I do feel very bad for the Men, Women and Children that try to survive but can’t. What needs to happen is sort out the worthless from the people that try and survive. I went many years myself not able to work and did not depend on tax payers to take care of me. Even though I was able to receive food assistance I went for almost 3 years, finding ways to make it. Selling belonging, mowing lawns or what ever it took and spending my grocery money wisely, only would buy food on sale and bought nothing fancy. When I needed to apply for food assistance the amount of money they said I get was too much. I told the lady I don’t need that much money to eat and she was shocked and never heard anything like that. It is time to stop giving free stuff to people who refuse to work and just want to live off our system and use the millions we will save to help the homeless that have fallen on bad luck and are willing to work and make a life for themselves. Bottom line, Stop giving free stuff to people who do not deserve it.

    • Brian January 27, 2016 (11:06 am)

      Right out of the gate you hit the nail on the head: This is your opinion and it’s definitely not correct.    

      • Max January 27, 2016 (11:57 am)

        Like I said it is my opinion Brian, and you can have yours. 

    • Mickymse January 27, 2016 (4:08 pm)

      Thanks for sharing, Max… but where do you think the money came from for your food assistance? And if it is such a great “free ride” to live out on the streets or in a tent here, then why did you struggle so hard not to end up there? Instead of complaining about those who are struggling to find work that pays well, trying to keep their children in school, wrestling with addiction, or going without mental health care, perhaps you should count yourself lucky that you didn’t lose everything and have a little more sympathy for those who weren’t able to beat the struggle.

  • KBear January 27, 2016 (10:12 am)

    I only wish the government would take some of these commenters’ money away and give it to the homeless. More Socialism, please!

  • K. Davis January 27, 2016 (10:22 am)

    It is interesting reading the small-minded rants here from the frightened and bitter folks on the right (@TRex, @TheKing, etc.).  The clue is always the belittling and name-calling of politicians and the protests about “goverment taking MY money.”  It helps with sorting out how to understand the nasty comments. There is no easy “one-size-fits-all” solution to homelessness and the sad truth is that we’ll never solve it entirely.  Indeed, there will always be mentally ill and poly-substance addicted folks who defy easy help.  But part of the truth is also that there are  – too many – well-intentioned, good people  who are homeless for reasons having to do with economic hardship and circumstances beyond their control.   And I do see a role for government – and MY tax dollars – to be involved in helping alleviate some of that suffering.   Likewise, I see a role for government – and MY tax dollars – in helping the mentally ill and addicted.   And yeah – I have a problem with the mean-spirited who think that cutting off funding to help these folks is a “solution” because it will drive them out to become someone else’s problem.  I vote … and I’ll vote to spend money to help the lowest of my fellow citizens.  Blaming the homeless

  • last straw January 27, 2016 (10:24 am)

    Max -if what you write is truth, then you would be excellent as a volunteer to help them transition.  Be an inspiration and give them real world tips and hope that they might have lost.  They are just like you. Think about that.  

    • Max January 27, 2016 (12:06 pm)

      Thanks for you opinion last straw, I do volunteer at a food bank and feel I do my part in helping those in need. My problem is with the ones that take advantage of our system and want to be homeless and don’t want to work, when they have offers to work. Believe me I feel for those who try to get their life together and have a hard time. I have a heart and it is not uncommon for me to shed tears as I help at the food bank when I see the things I see.

  • iggy January 27, 2016 (10:36 am)

    It’s a two-way street.  I want to help the homeless, but I also think the city needs to step up and enforce public safety.  Case in point.  I was at the Westwood Village Rapid Ride stop around 2:00 yesterday afternoon.  There was a man passed out/sprawled out on the sidewalk right in front of the bus benches (is this Metro property?).  There was food and his personal belongings all around him on the sidewalk.   He and his stuff were literally blocking the bus stop.  There were Metro drivers standing in front of their layover buses, who I know could clearly see him.   I went into B&N assuming it had been called in.  Twenty minutes later I came out to get the RR, and the man was still there.  Couldn’t tell if he was asleep, passed out, or dead.  People were walking around him.  A new group of Metro drivers still standing around.  When we got on our RR, we asked the driver if it had been called in for an Aid Car or SPD response.  He just shrugged.    I feel increasingly unsafe at the RR stop.    I didn’t have a working cell phone with me, so why I didn’t call 911.   This is not an isolated incident at the Westwood Village bus stops with people doing drugs, passed out, littering and loitering, etc.     So, Mr. Mayor, I will support you, but you need to do a better job supporting us.

  • clulessinws January 27, 2016 (10:41 am)

    God help us. Seattle is in a world of hurt and has been. 

  • wetone January 27, 2016 (11:05 am)

    Really would like to know where the mayor got some of his numbers ? but one that really jumped out was Mayor Murray’s “3000” homeless children in Seattle, where are they ? there’s a big difference between not living with biological parents and homeless…Shameful using numbers as this to push agenda.  I agree we have a major problem here in Seattle that will be hard to change, but I see much of it created by our city leaders and know they are going to come after tax payers of Seattle once again to remedy the problem they created. They have done little to address problems as they have grown. Mayor Murray can not keep raising taxes or soon there will be more homeless along with many middle class and poor forced to move from Seattle as cost skyrocket to live here. Can’t have controlled/affordable  rent, or poor and middle class owning residents in Seattle the way Mayor Murray and Dow Constantine keep raising taxes. Between all the new levy’s/taxes  passed recently and in the works  (car tabs, gas, road, school, transit, transportation) were is money going ? how about all the money from  marijuana trade ? Many people don’t have wages increasing at rate of taxes, slipping backwards. Mayor Murray and Dow Constantine’s business plans are very flawed and will lead to much worse things in the near future if they don’t change direction soon. Don’t know anyone that has lived in Seattle area a long time feeling positive about Seattle in many ways. It worries me that many homeless have gotten use to their way of living here from city enabling and now they are being moved around and under microscope things will get worse before better.    :(  

  • Pile-o-Rox January 27, 2016 (11:53 am)

    The reality is that we need a two headed solution – one to help those who are truly trying to change their lives and one to punish and remove those who are unwilling to do so. It is really that simple. You want to stay in a sanctioned area and/or a pass on trespass laws and whatever else you can be charged with for squatting,? Great – you need to enroll and participate in jobs and addiction programs, and at least show effort (if not real progress).   You don’t enroll or participate in those programs, you will be charged and removed (and if you have a warrant or record, we’ll be happy to extradite you back to your home jurisdiction).There are the homeless, and then there are the bums. And yes, even though I am a die hard liberal, I have no problem sorting them out and treating them in a different manner.     

  • IMHO January 27, 2016 (11:57 am)

    For information regarding school-age children experiencing ‘housing insecurity’ in Washington state, refer to the public scholl’s superintendent’s report. At least everyone seems to agree that ending homelessness is a good thing, regardless of which side of the fence you are on!

  • Rick January 27, 2016 (12:20 pm)

    If you worked for it, you didn’t earn it. If you didn’t work for it,you’re entitled.  “O”

  • Cs in hp January 27, 2016 (12:25 pm)

    Just confirmed that Captain Davis will indeed be at the HPAC meeting tonight.

  • Kmac January 27, 2016 (12:58 pm)

    ” Doubled up with friends or relatives because you can’t find or afford housing”.  I wonder how the 3000 number changes when you take out those living with friends or relatives.    

  • Seattlite January 27, 2016 (2:58 pm)

     “Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” – Winston Churchill

  • heather January 27, 2016 (3:11 pm)

    How about a state incentive for homeowners to supply affordable housing for a fixed period of time in selected areas? I would be interested in remodeling my garage into a 1 bdrm as a stepping stone back into society. The cost that prohibits me from doing so is primarily a $12k plumbing quote to hook up sewer and water. I would be willing to create “affordable housing” for a set term in exchange. Why not consider this option in areas that are already zoned for mother-in-law units?

  • Robert January 27, 2016 (3:27 pm)

    when you advertise free stuff,free drivers license free housing,, then you get all the homeless/adicts/lay-abouts coming from california and other points that don’t give free rides,, then you end up like this.everybody looses.that is all but the political hacks ,they have more chances to grab a few bucks that are loose..then promise the world and deliver zip…

  • Born on Alki 59 January 27, 2016 (3:52 pm)

     “And he said affordable housing is key to the solution; he promised citywide meetings and also a doubled housing levy, saying that “as a city there is nothing more important we can do this year than to pass this levy.”A doubled housing levy to support affordable housing all in one sentence………why do I envision a book titled “Socialism for Dummies” in his office ?

  • Whitesail January 27, 2016 (5:54 pm)

    It is simplistic to state that “this is what income inequality looks like.” It is simplistic and naive to believe that increasing “affordable housing” or a levy will do anything to solve or even mitigate the complex issues surrounding homelessness. The poster above who stated that a two headed (or multi tiered) solution is needed, is correct. Some individuals will be chronically homeless no matter how much taxpayer $$ are thrown at them. Primarily this has to do with individual choices. ALL housed individuals must live within some set of societal “rules”. Homeowners must pay a mortgage, taxes and insurance. Renters must adhere to the terms of a lease, pay rent on time, and abide with noise, pet and other regulations of the community. Those in supported housing must meet similar guidelines of meeting with caseworkers, remaining free of illegal substance use, etc. Even the tent encampments or safe RV parks will have rules. First hand experience volunteering with serving the homeless population has shown me that there will be those unwilling to abide by rules of any kind. These folks choose the homeless lifestyle even when presented with options and supports to help them out of homelessness. A realistic, multi tiered approach is needed. Ultimately individuals must take some responsibility for their choices. A stable, safe RV or tent space and affiliated supports is important for those willing to accept the necessary constraints inherent in stable housing. I support the Mayor’s action regarding the safe space. Those unwilling to accept any type of rule or constraint are in need of a different tier of service. I don’t know what the answer is for this population and there simply may not be one. “More money” – from hard working taxpayers – is not the answer.

  • flimflam January 27, 2016 (6:06 pm)

    right. throwing more money at the issue has certainly proven to be a failure, so lets throw more money at it. these property tax levies have to stop – especially for social engineering.

  • rob January 27, 2016 (6:12 pm)

    here in leis the problem this city has been run by the same party for 50 years and counting. As for the problems this  city     has and how it is run is what the people of seattle want.  Year after year the people of Seattle elect the same party and the same machine to run the city. So heres to the people of seattle you made your bed so you got to sleep in it. 

  • JoeWS January 27, 2016 (7:12 pm)

    Its called Free-attle for a reason. 

  • Elle Nell January 27, 2016 (10:50 pm)

    Clulessinws- u hit the nail on the head..Socialism is a political ideology and movement[1] which has proposed a set of social and economic measures, policies[2] and systems characterised by social ownership and democratic control of the means of production.[3][4][5][6][7][8] Social ownership may refer to public ownershipcooperative ownershipcitizen ownership of equity, or any combination of these.[9] Although there are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them,[10]social ownership is the common element shared by its various forms.[7][11][12]

  • Elle Nell January 27, 2016 (10:58 pm)

    BTW, Rob.. We LoVe this city and that is why most folks come here.. They are attracted to what we have done with care and consideration to and for each other as well as the city… So be careful with pointing fingers. We do not run from problems, we solve them.. Get on board! 

  • JKB January 27, 2016 (11:07 pm)

    So the mayor says “$50m wasn’t enough; we need to add another $50M”.  Per year.  For 3000 people.Sometimes I’m actually speechless.

Sorry, comment time is over.