School-money crisis: Budget ax falling at individual schools

Principals in Seattle Public Schools have to turn in their budgets today for next school year. And it’s not likely that any of them will provide a rosy picture, since the district is dealing with an eight-digit shortfall. Just one example: Chief Sealth High School principal John Boyd called a meeting this week to let Sealth families know what was ahead for their school, since his budget falls $634,000 short of what is needed, as he put it in a conversation with us this afternoon, “to fully staff the building the way it’s staffed now.” We are working to find out what’s happening at other West Seattle public schools, but for starters, read on to see what else we heard from Boyd – and the PTSA’s separate call for a show of statewide concern:

This past Monday, Boyd said, he had to break the news to the individual employees who — unless something changes dramatically — will not have jobs next year.

Talking with WSB this afternoon, he called it a “perfect storm” involving various factors – Enrollment dropped with the move to the temporary building this year (district “demographic reports” say CSHS enrollment was 919 last year and 887 this year), and that left Sealth somewhat overstaffed. Then, the district financial shortfall; and, some “special grant money is no longer available.”

End result: 10 positions must be cut at Sealth, “about half teaching, half support,” Boyd explained.

He stresses that “we can make these cuts and still offer the full program,” while adding, “If we had to do this two years in a row, I might not say that.”

He’s had to cut a few people before, “but never 10 people,” describing that as “cut(ting) into the meat and bone a little bit.”

Some electives, business classes and art classes will not be offered as a result; drama will be an afterschool program instead of being offered during the day, when these cuts take effect in the fall, although Boyd says there’s a glimmer of hope: “We’re hoping some new monies become available through the (federal) stimulus plan.” And he stresses Sealth is far from alone: “The state is woefully short; I’m told that percentagewise, we may have deeper fiscal issues than California. And in Oregon, they’re looking at shortening the school year.”

We asked about Proyecto Saber, the subject of an impassioned plea at last week’s School Board meeting; Boyd says part of its funding comes from the district and part from CSHS, and it’s not being cut at Sealth.

Before concluding our conversation, we asked what more he thinks people should know about the situation: “Just to reiterate, these are painful cuts for people, (but) we were overstaffed .. we know it’s going to impact us some, class sizes will go up some, we’re going to have to pack our classes a bit more, everybody will be in that stuation … but we really will be able to run our full program.” That includes the growing International Baccalaureate (IB) program, although he says it may lose “one or two electives.”

After individual schools submit their budgets today, a few weeks of district number-crunching should reveal the final picture about what lies ahead for next school year. And a reminder that it’s not just a local-level issue comes from the Sealth PTSA, which has sent out an online-petition link from the statewide PTA, including this preface:

Next week, state lawmakers will release a budget proposal that will make cuts in our public education system in order to close a historic budget shortfall. Kids in our public schools will feel the real impacts of these cuts. Our lawmakers need to know that we are paying attention and will hold them responsible for investing in our children’s future. Please sign the online version of the Washington Kids Can’t Wait Petition to help us pass 10,000 signatures by Friday, April 3rd. The petition asks lawmakers to: protect funding for Washington’s children and schools and redefine basic education to pay for what our children need to succeed in college, job training, work and life. (This petition is endorsed by the Washington State PTA.)

The petition can be found here.

20 Replies to "School-money crisis: Budget ax falling at individual schools"

  • E March 27, 2009 (3:53 pm)

    I don’t get it. How can you be “overstaffed” if cutting positions means more over-crowding in classrooms and cutting courses and programs?

  • mickeymouse March 27, 2009 (4:17 pm)

    WOW, too bad the principal at West Seattle High does not do the same and communicate with his families.

  • WSB March 27, 2009 (4:25 pm)

    Are you a WSHS parent? I don’t know whether they have had such a meeting or not – as mentioned in our story, John Boyd said budgets were due today, so some schools may not have finished crunching all their numbers; the inquiry I have out right now is to the district, to ask if information on potential cuts at ALL schools is available somewhere central, otherwise we’re going to have to contact all of West Seattle’s dozen or so schools individually to ask (which we’ll do if the “central info available?” answer is “no”) – TR

  • Misty March 27, 2009 (4:46 pm)

    I wish WSB would get with the district and find out specifically how many positions will be lost in West Seattle as well as district-wide. Looking at an overall picture would be quite informative.

  • WSB March 27, 2009 (4:48 pm)

    That’s exactly what I have the inquiry out about, as mentioned in the preceding comment – at this hour I may not be able to get the info before Monday but will publish a second followup whenever that’s available – TR

  • GenHillOne March 27, 2009 (5:10 pm)

    E, it sounds like the cuts are just that deep. Ten doesn’t sound like a lot, but if those 5 teachers have 5 classes (6th would be planning), that’s a pretty big chunk of students affected.

    Thank you for pointing out that Sealth will not be the only school impacted. Sadly, there will be more.

    I know someone probably knows this, but off the top of my head, isn’t Washington (not Seattle, but Washington) number 42 or 43 out of 50 states when it comes to K-12 spending? Dismal.

  • Born-N-Raised March 27, 2009 (5:12 pm)

    Chief Sealth is lucky to have John Boyd as their principal. Especially in times like these.

  • WSB March 27, 2009 (5:18 pm)

    For starters, I have heard from a Sanislo Elementary parent who says that school principal Debbie Nelsen wrote in this week’s newsletter that they’re losing some instructional assistant time:

    >>>”Budget Update–last week the staff and I finalized our budget. In last week’s newsletter I shared our allocated core staffing and noted that we had $148,718 remaining. With those funds we chose to retain our full time reading teacher, and 1.5 of our current 1.9 Instructional Assistants. We also allocated funds to support a partial extra half day of both instrumental music and library, and our current kindergarten tutor. Though we were disappointed to lost some I.A. time, overall we were pleased with the buying power we had within the budget.”<<<

  • Julie March 27, 2009 (6:43 pm)

    “Overstaffed” just means their staffing this year is slightly better than the inadequate staffing that’s district standard. I’d guess their “overstaffed” is still well under what a school would have were the state truly committed to excellence in education.

    Of course, I’ll sign the petition. But I fear the Olympia faction that has a knee-jerk reaction against spending money will not listen, and the faction that will listen is trying to accomplish the same thing anyway. I don’t know how we change this dialog.

  • Lisa K. March 27, 2009 (9:15 pm)

    I very much agree with Julie. I am saddened by what is considered “standard” for public education–our elementary school has over 300 students, and yet the district seems to think that rooms with over 25 wiggly kids are decent educational environments. We don’t get a full time librarian/technology teacher, no full time P.E. (this isn’t a luxury–kids learn better when they get regular exercise, and we’ll all be paying for the obesity epidemic), don’t even get me started on science, music and art. We fight every year to get $$ for instructional aides whose work goes far to reduce class size throughout the day and reach kids who need extra help, on and on. How many folks out there realize that our state doesn’t even fund full day kindergarten?! I like to consider myself well-informed and I was shocked to learn that fact when my child entered public school. For a “progressive” state, our support for public education on a legislative level is disheartening. And unfortunately, few people outside the teachers’ unions and educational system seem to be willing to fight a good fight for our kids.

  • Misty March 27, 2009 (10:36 pm)

    Madison Middle School is also losing some positions. I’m not sure how it will shake out after the money from the federal government.

  • AIE March 28, 2009 (2:55 pm)

    I am on the BLT of an SPS school, and one huge budget factor that has not gotten a lot of attention is that SPS teachers got a fairly large raise for this year. The teacher’s union got it into the last contact that by the last year of the contact, they would get a raise that put them in the mean of surronding districts.. (And yes, I mean got in. The SPS negociator was dying of cancer at the time and to me, it seems like the union took huge advantage to slip in a lot of things) The purpose was a reasonable one, make sure SPS can offer competative salaries in hopes of keeping teachers. But it failed to take into account that the surronding surburban district have much different tax revenue to work with. When the Bellevue teachers went on strike, they got a pay increase that dramatically drove up the increase SPS had to give it teachers. Means that this year not only is there less money from the state to work with, it flat out costs more to pay for teachers.

  • WSB March 28, 2009 (4:29 pm)

    Since “fairly large” is a subjective description, I went to look up some information. Anyone interested in more on the subject, here is the news release from last fall:
    http://www.seattleschools.org/area/news/0809/sea_sps_release.pdf

  • GLK March 28, 2009 (7:19 pm)

    10% is fairly large by my standards.

  • ssparent March 29, 2009 (12:45 am)

    wow…..i sure don’t get 10%….

  • WSB March 29, 2009 (2:03 am)

    Got another note about school cuts, while I continue trying to get overall info from the district (or else start calling individual principals on Monday) … This source says Schmitz Park Elementary is losing 40% of its librarian position.

  • seattlegal March 29, 2009 (8:49 am)

    Ah, yes, but remember 10% of squat, is still less than 5% of a normal salary. Here is the current Seattle School District certificated teacher salary schedule. http://www.seattleschools.org/area/hr/sal/cert.pdf

  • GLK March 29, 2009 (10:07 am)

    TR- It is spring break, good luck trying to reach individual schools.

  • WSB March 29, 2009 (10:55 am)

    Oops, good point, I even wrote an item about that on Friday. The district HQ shouldn’t be totally vacated, though, so I’ll keep trying with them. Thanks again to those who sent notes about what had been announced at their individual schools. The greater point in this is what the state PTA points out (as have many others) regarding education funding, and while it’s one thing if the district says “we’re xx millions short,” that is abstract until you hear about effects at various schools as they decide how to deal with X less dollars – TR

  • AIE March 29, 2009 (12:00 pm)

    Seattlegal, most “normal” salaries are for year-round jobs. Teachers do not work year round, get 4 paid weeks off days during thier 10 months of employement, and get a lot of thier benifits paid for by the school district. I think that when people look at the salary scale, they tend to forget that it is for working a whole lot less than the average person and while still getting some pretty great benifits. Regardless, my point is that 10% per teacher in one year is a huge increase to absorb, not even considering that there is less money coming it.

Sorry, comment time is over.