Council passes tree-removal rules: 3 per lot per year (for many)

New tree-removal rules made it through the City Council today – read on for the official news release with details about the restrictions and the potential penalties:

SEATTLE – Moving to protect the verdant but rapidly disappearing tree canopy for which Seattle, hailed as the Emerald City, is known, the City Council voted today to establish new interim tree protections that will limit tree removal in areas zoned for single-family, lowrise, midrise and commercial structures.

“It’s critical that the City follow through on its goal of growing our tree canopy,” said Council President Richard Conlin, sponsor of the legislation. “Protecting mature trees from unnecessary removal will contribute to our ability to fight the effects of global warming, mitigate flooding and the toxic effects of storm water run-off, safeguard the habitat of the city’s urban wildlife, and keep Seattle an attractive, vibrant city long regarded for its natural beauty.”

Council Bill 116404 limits tree removal to no more than three trees of 6 inches or greater in diameter per lot in any one year period on single-family zoned lots that are at least 5,000 square feet, or on any sized lot in a lowrise, midrise or commercial zone. It also prohibits the removal of exceptional trees. Normal and routine pruning of trees, trees that are hazardous, and trees whose removal is required for construction of a new structure under an approved building or grading permit are exempt from the new limits.

The bill is intended to prevent clear-cutting of the city’s tree canopy. Trees have great ecological value: they reduce storm water runoff and pollution, absorb air pollutants and carbon dioxide, provide wildlife habitat and shade, stabilize soil, and enhance property values.

The ordinance expands on a proposal originally developed by the City’s Department of Planning and Development and provides greater interim protection to trees in single family zones until a more comprehensive Urban Forest Management Plan is completed and in place.

Councilmember Tim Burgess, Chair of the Public Safety, Human Services and Education Committee, said, “In developing this legislation, we spoke with many citizens and balanced the right of property owners to handle trees on their lots with our collective responsibility to manage urban development to keep our city a vital and desirable place to live.”

The new law also:

– Expands the definition of “exceptional tree” to include the phrase “group of trees”

– Establishes specific rules and regulations concerning how violations of the tree ordinance will be handled

– Establishes a formalized process for review and potential appeal of any violation, and

– Increases the minimum penalty for those that have been found in violation of the tree ordinance from $500 to $5,000.

1 Reply to "Council passes tree-removal rules: 3 per lot per year (for many)"

  • Angie February 24, 2009 (10:38 am)

    While I agree that something must be done to protect the tree canopy, as a West Seattle homeowner with several HUGE trees on my lot, I speak from experience that it takes a lot of time, effort, and sometimes money to keep trees around. During the big windstorm of 2006, a large pine tree fell on my house causing tens of thousands of dollars of damage. Most homeowners insurance policies do not cover tree removal except for parts of the tree that are physically on (or in my case, in) the house. The whole ordeal ended up costing me over $3500 out of pocket ($1000 deductible, plus $2500 for tree removal). Don’t get me wrong — I LOVE trees and part of the reason I purchased my house was because of the woodland feel in my area, but I think it would be a nice incentive for homeowners to get some sort of tax break or incentive to keep large trees on their lots. After all, we’re doing the right thing for the environment and the money it costs to maintain trees and keep them healthy would be easier to swallow if the City also put their money where their mouth is in regard to this issue.

Sorry, comment time is over.