West Seattleites’ role in helping choose the next president

donkey5.jpgOur state’s Presidential Primary is exactly two months away (February 19). But its results will only count for roughly a fourth of our state’s voice in the presidential nomination process –elephant.jpg all state Democratic delegates, and 49% of the Republican delegates, will be chosen in a process starting at the statewide caucuses on February 9. Members of our area’s best-organized political group, the 34th District Democrats, already are working to get out the word about those meetings. For those who haven’t participated in caucuses before – or are wondering why the focus is on the caucuses and not the primary – we sent questions to 34th DD chair Ivan Weiss; the Q & A with his e-mailed replies is just ahead. (Disclaimer, we know there are 34th District Republicans out there somewhere too – we’ve just never heard from them! Can’t find any comprehensive info about GOP caucuses online, either.)

WSB Q: How does someone know where to go and when to participate in the caucus?

Ivan Weiss reply: All that information will be posted on the 34th District Democrats’ Web site at www.34dems.org, or you can contact your Democratic Precinct Committee Officer. If you don’t know what precinct you are in or who your PCO is, you can find it at
https://www.metrokc.gov/elections/pollingplace/voterlookup.aspx, or to find out who your PCO is, call Ivan Weiss at 206-463-4647 or Jackie Dupras at 206-935-9683, and we’ll connect you with your PCO and tell you where your caucus location is.


WSB: Do you have to be preregistered somehow?

IW: No. Just show up. But if you’d like to help, your PCO would love to hear from you before the caucus.

WSB: What should someone do to prepare to participate effectively?

IW: Have an idea who you’d like to be the Democratic nominee and why, and be prepared to persuade your neighbors.

WSB: How long will it take, what will happen during the caucus, and when it’s over, what will the result be – and how does that result help determine who winds up on the ballot in November?

IW: Sign-in begins at 1 PM; the precinct caucuses begin at 1:30 sharp. They can’t end before 2 PM. At worst they would be over by 3 PM. They will select delegates for each candidate from the Legislative District to go to the County Convention, then on to the State Convention. The state Convention will determine Washington’s delegates to the National Convention in Denver, which will select a nominee.

WSB: Why is the presidential focus on the caucuses in our state instead of the presidential primary? Why isn’t it better if we all just go to the precinct and vote?

IW: The Washington State Democratic Party is, to the extent that we can make it so, a party of grass-roots activists. That could be you, or your neighbors, or any Democrat who wants to help us create a better country and a better world. We like to think that takes a little bit more commitment than just mailing in a ballot. For some, that is all they are able to do. For others, we want them to know that our state party belongs to us, and not to the national campaigns, or their consultants, or their “media people” who would love to reduce national policy and politics to 30-second ads and pocket large paychecks while doing so. We, and not they, are the Democratic Party in this state, and for that reason, we caucus with our neighbors.

WSB: With so many states moving primaries earlier, won’t all the deciding be over by then anyway? If it seems like there’s a clear frontrunner, why should someone still go to their caucus?

IW: First, we don’t know and can’t be sure that everything will be “over by then,” and we can’t proceed under that assumption. Second, because the caucuses are also to mobilize active Democrats who care not only about what goes on in Washington DC, but also in this Washington. We have to mobilize to re-elect Governor Gregoire and our Representatives Jim McDermott and Adam Smith (part of the 34th is in Adam’s District), elect a Democratic Attorney General and Lands Commissioner, and maybe to provide one of those statewide
offices with the margin of victory in a close race by maximizing our turnout.


WSB: Anything else you want people to know? What about those who might feel like they just can’t be bothered — explain to them “here’s why you should take the time.”

IW: Because Edmund Burke’s words have never been more true: “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” Burke left out the women but certainly we do not.

Again, that’s Saturday afternoon, February 9th, caucuses for Washington state Democrats *and* Republicans. As for the 2/19 primary and how it relates to the caucuses, this state document explains.

17 Replies to "West Seattleites' role in helping choose the next president"

  • Kayleigh December 20, 2007 (4:14 am)

    I caucused at Fairmont Park for the last presidential election. I had a blast! I never knew my neighbors were so cool (though I suspected they were liberal.)

    Seriously, it was empowering and interesting and fun in a democracy-geek sort of way. I really recommend attending.

  • Ken Davis December 20, 2007 (5:37 am)

    I was there at Fairmont park last time as well. Amy Goodman kept a camera in my face for the whole two hours though I never saw a tape of it.

    Meeting your neighbors who care enough to dedicate a Saturday to democracy, is something everyone should experience.

    Check on the King Co elections page, or your voter registration card if you don’t know your precinct number, and check the list below to see if your precinct has a PCO. If not, think about becoming the PCO or at least learning how to run your precincts caucus. Caucus training will be offered on the 34th Dems page. If you see you have a PCO, offer to help notify your neighbors and organize carpools. Be prepared to push your favorite candidate and be prepared to listen to others do the same.
    Caucus locations will also be available on the web site as they are finalized.
    http://www.34dems.org/org_pcos.htm

    Note: I tried looking up the 34th district Republicans for an elderly neighbor a few months ago, and found that they don’t publish any info on who their PCO’s are or even where the monthly meetings are held. You must call the district chair to find out. If you base your whole party on fear and secrecy, it shows.

  • Tonya December 20, 2007 (7:55 am)

    A whole party bsed on fear and secrecey…um that statement could easily apply to both sides.

  • Eden December 20, 2007 (8:26 am)

    I missed the caucus last time and have had to put up with listening to my friends and family talk about how much fun it was, what an amazing inspiring event, etc, etc ad nauseum for the last four years. You can bet I’ll be there this time.

  • JumboJim December 20, 2007 (11:11 am)

    Yeah Tonya, except that theory doesn’t fit the facts in this case. The Republicans *don’t publish* their info.

  • Joe December 20, 2007 (12:10 pm)

    “The Republicans *don’t publish* their info.”

    It’s Bush’s fault.

  • The House December 20, 2007 (11:03 pm)

    Ken, you silly little Democrat. There’s nothing to be afraid of. 9/11 didn’t really happen, did it? If it actually did happen, it was probably George Bush’s fault, right?? Dozens of people haven’t really committed suicide bombings around the world in the name of a “peacful” religion, have they? It’s all Hollywood, right? Everything is just fine and dandy as long as the government feeds the homeless and takes care of all of our social problems, right? Those gosh darn Republican are only trying to “pretend” that there is a problem to scare all of us into hiding.

    What color is the sky in your world, Ken? Purple?

  • Jan December 20, 2007 (11:58 pm)

    House…you’re way off base here…and your condescending attitude is showing….and I say that in the nicest way…you believe what you want to believe, others will do the same…you are not…I repeat…NOT…the only intelligent person on here…tiresome, at the very least…

    good cheer for the holidays…:)

  • The House December 21, 2007 (9:06 pm)

    What’s tiresome, Jan is the fact that you enjoy pointing fingers at me. Ken said it’s a party based on “fear and secrecy” and I replied. If you’re going to point out me being condescending at least have the descency to point out that he was as well. Unfortunately, you don’t realize that b/c you agree with him.

    I don’t imagine many Republicans read this blog based on it’s content and the majority of posts (although I’d encourage them to do so). Consider me a “check and balance” for all you libs!

    Hillary for King County Sewer Commissioner in 2008!

  • Jan December 21, 2007 (9:42 pm)

    Hi, House…I don’t consider myself a “lib” as you put it…and I’m not a “conservative” either (are those opposites?) I’m somewhere in the middle, I suppose… Do I agree with Ken? Maybe, maybe not.Politics and politicians are their own breed, whether Dems, Reps, or Libertarians, or Independents…kinda hard to trust any of them these days, in my opinion.I like straightforward, honest people, and I don’t think we have a whole lot of them on either side running for Prez. It’s all a damned game. But, yes, you’re right, I do like giving you “s**t” about things…hey, somebody has to…right? ;-)

  • Ken Davis December 22, 2007 (7:27 am)

    Damn I missed this exchange.

    Ah well. I feel sorry for those of you who use fear to make decisions. You will notice I use my real name and my phone number and address are available via whois to any computer literate person on the planet.

    Your local Dems post details of members, meetings and upcoming events and even post the details of disagreements and contentious haggling over endorsements and bylaws.

    The republicans will not even post the location of their meeting.

    Fear of brown people, fear of non christians, fear of the “other” is the hallmark of the Republican party nationwide and in this state.

    Fear of those of us who refuse to live in fear can apparently be added to the list.

    Prove otherwise if you can.

  • CO Transplant December 22, 2007 (3:32 pm)

    Apparently I fear brown people, non-Christians, the “other”, and people who refuse to live in fear.
    This is news to me, but I’m glad Ken Davis is kind enough to point it out. If it weren’t for Ken Davis’ posts, I wouldn’t have realized what a wretched person I am.

  • The House December 22, 2007 (8:33 pm)

    Despite my better judgement, I will respond Ken.
    1) You cannot say that Republicans (Conservatives) make decisions based on fear. Fear is an emotion and Liberals are historically more emotional than Conservatives.
    2) I do not fear using my real name. The House is what I’ve been known as for almost 2 years on this board. I chose a handle 2 years ago simply because it was what most of the other folks on the board used at that time. The other reason I don’t use my real name is because in todays society your employer could easily use your statements and thoughts against you. If I used my real name, when someone Googled me not only would my statements come up, but work related things would come up. I chose to separate the two since they do not and should not have any relation.

    3) If you search the Republican site many meeting places are posted, just not the West Seattle one. I seriously doubt they are hiding from you.

    4) Fearing “brown people, non-christians and of the other”?? I’m not sure what you’re referring to. This is another typical tactic of liberals….NAME CALLING (you’re inferring that Republicans are racist and religious zealots). This statement is a genrealization similar to if I were to call all liberals stupid. Even though I may disagree with the majority of liberals, I can recognize that many of them are very intelligent (wink Jan) we simply believe in different policy.

  • Ken Davis December 23, 2007 (6:33 am)

    Perhaps I will let a noted and apparently prescient conservative explain:

    November 26, 2004
    An Era of End-Timers and Neo-Cons
    Whatever Happened to Conservatives?

    http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts11262004.html
    By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS

    [article text excised by WSB – follow the link Ken provided to read the article – links are OK and even quotes but not an entire article from someone else – that takes away their traffic/livelihood – thanks!]

  • Jan December 23, 2007 (1:08 pm)

    interesting article, Ken…thanks…

  • The House December 23, 2007 (7:16 pm)

    One mans opinion. He also thinks that 9/11 was covered up.

  • Jan December 24, 2007 (2:18 pm)

    yes, House, one man’s opinion…just like yours, just like mine (well, woman’s opinion – lol)…it’s all opinion…makes the world go around :)

Sorry, comment time is over.