OK - I can't believe that I'm actually going to jump in on this one, but here goes......
House - believe it or not, I got your quote and its' implications. As a history teacher, I often discuss with my students what a master manipulator/politician Hitler was and that his rallies, colors, signage, uniforms, etc... were meant to generate extreme nationalism, which is based on emotion and is meant to manipulate the masses (in this case manipulate them into putting Nazis & Hitler into power - legally by the way).
I challenge my students to put themselves in 1930's Germany - where the Depression is roaring and German nationalism is in the toilet because of their defeat in WWI, reparations that Germany couldn't pay, and destruction of their infrastructure. I then ask my students if they were young Germans and were given fancy uniforms, pay, and made to feel like you are God's only chosen race - would they choose to be young Nazi's screaming their heads off at a Nazi rally? Most of them, in that context, said yes - they would be caught up in the emotion of the times and would have been right in the middle of the mix. That was the mastery of the Nazi's plan - pull people up by their emotions, not by their brains, and they will go along willingly. But the credit for most of that goes to Goebels, Hess and others advisors of Hitler, not necessarily to Hitler himself, whose ego-maniacal wishes were just uber-put into action by those closest to him.
HOWEVER, with that said, your attempt to analogize Obama's campaign with that of Hitler's is pathetic and definitely out of historical context (see above). Obama is not manipulating people emotionally by playing on their sense of extreme nationalism nor is he thumbing his nose at the rest of the world to justify the need for his power. In reality, the emotion that is displayed at Obama rallies is not generated by the Obama campaign staff - it's more of a populist movement that is excited at the prospect of something new and different after 8 years of torture and mismanagement at the hands of the Republicans. That's a totally different scenario than the manipulation of emotions sought by the Nazi party.
The fact that you can equate Hitler's demonstrations of extreme nationalism and manipulation of the German people to Obama's campaign is telling of your political philosophy in general. In the U.S. - both parties have for many years attempted to sway the masses with colors, symbols, music, signage, etc...... but that is a far cry from the nationalistic brainwashing that Hitler and his regime pushed on the German people prior to WWII.
As for WSB'rs that responded in horror - we vilify Hitler and his regime in history and for appropriate reasons. However, it is not necessary (IMO) to react so vehemently every time a quote from Hitler or reference to him is made. It is appropriate to examine what one leader has done and said so that we don't repeat horrible mistakes - but we also must accept that the tactics used by the Nazis were "brilliant" for their time and if you look at FDR rallies at the same time (Hitler & FDR came to power in the same year) you will see many similar elements and those elements continue in US campaigns today - on both sides!
So House - I'm not going to call you German names or equate you with Hitler, because I got the implication of your quote. I just vehemently disagree with your attempt to analogize Hitler's use of emotions/nationlism with Obama's emotional appeal to his base. Just not even close to the same thing.