WSB Forum » Politics

(97 posts)

What we're giving this year instead of Christmas presents.


  1. Department of Early Learning

    ¶ Reduce seasonal child care administration - $2.1 million

    Eliminates state funding through nonprofits to administer child care subsidies for seasonal agricultural workers. Maintains federal funds, which may not be used for undocumented children of season workers.

    ¶ Eliminate state funding for Child Care Resource and Referral program - $1.3 million

    Terminates state funding to provide child care resource information to parents. As federal funds are the predominant funding source, the state cut reduces services by 11 percent.

    ¶ Reduce administration - $950,000

     *************************************************************************************

    To be continued.

    Source: Proposed 2012 Supplemental Budget Highlights

    Office of the Governor
    November 2011

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  2. Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction

    ¶ Delay June 30, 2013, apportionment payment to July 1, 2013 - $340.0 million.

    Extra day moves payment to the next biennium.
     

    ¶ Reduce levy equalization payments - $151.9 million

    Cuts equalization funds to eligible districts.
     

    ¶ Reduce the kindergarten-through-12th grade school year by four days - $99.2 million *

    Shrinks the school year from 180 days to 176 days. This results in a reduction in annual salaries for school employees, by an equivalent of 2.2 percent, beginning in the 2012–13 school year.
     

    ¶ Shift bus depreciation payment from October to August - $49.0 million

    Delays state payments to school districts for bus replacement by 10 months.
     

    ¶ Eliminate or reduce small grants and projects - $8.8 million

    Terminates a number of [student achievement-oriented] grants and projects . . . principal and superintendent internships, career and technical education start-up grants, STEM Lighthouses and nonviolence training.
     

    ¶ Reduce national board certification bonuses - $8.6 million

    Cuts annual bonuses from $5,000 to $4,000 for 5,800 teachers certified by the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards, including additional bonuses for board-certified teachers working in challenging schools.
     

    ¶ Revise state attendance policy - $6.5 million

    Changes policy that considers a student withdrawn after he/she is absent unexcused for 20 consecutive days. Five, not 20 days will more accurately account for students who have dropped out of school and for whom the state continues to provide funding to the school district. Adds a school district enrollment count for June.
     

    ¶ Reduce staffing for small high schools - $4.4 million

    Shrinks staffing formula for high schools serving fewer than 300 full-time students from a minimum of nine full-time teachers to a minimum of eight.
     

    ¶ Reduce administration by 10 percent - $600,000

     
     
    *Indicates cut the Governor proposes to prevent with new income.

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  3. this breaks my heart too much to be able to make a reasonable reply :(

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  4. Our generosity knows no bounds.... :(

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  5. 2 Much Whine
    Member Profile

    2 Much Whine

    I think I just found an instance when it is ok to use the word "retarded" without getting scolded. Unfortunately this will get far fewer comments and generate far less outrage than a fish and chip place losing their lease. . . . .

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  6. I thank DBP for posting this here. It really brings home the fact that for a lot of people, this is terrible news.But for a lot of people HERE, it is something happening to someone else, so...it doesn't have that import....and that's a very sad thing, because it affects us all.

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  7. School for the Blind and Center for Childhood Deafness and Hearing Loss

    ¶ Reduce state support for the school and the center by 5 percent - $693,000

    Cuts administrative support and services for 65 students served by the School for the Blind and 115 served by the Center for Childhood Deafness and Hearing Loss.
     

    Higher Education  

    ¶ Reduce state support to colleges and universities - $160.1 million *

    Cuts support to the six public colleges and universities, and 34 community and technical colleges in the second year of the biennium.

    Support is reduced by: 17 percent at the University of Washington, Washington State University and Western Washington University; 16 percent at Eastern Washington University, Central Washington University and The Evergreen State College; and 13 percent at the community and technical colleges.

     
    ¶ Suspend State Work Study program - $8.1 million

    Cuts state aid to 7,600 students at public and private colleges and universities beginning fall term 2012. Federally funded Work Study is not affected.
     
     

    * Indicates cut the Governmor proposes to prevent with new revenue [e.g. sales tax increase].

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  8. and people will balk at that temporary sales tax increase. They don't like the cuts, but heaven forbid we raise the sales tax even temporarily. They just expect the revenue needed to keep these things running to grow on trees...

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  9. A sales tax increase will affect poor and middle-income citizens more than wealthy ones. It will affect every Washingtonian, including everyone who voted "No" to a state income tax on the theory that if they didn't defend rich people the government would come for them next.

    OK, anti-tax voters . . .

    You defended the rich, just like the Seattle Times and the Chamber of Commerce told you to. But now it seems that "the government" is coming for you anyway.

    —They're coming for your social programs.

    —They're coming for your parks, your schools, your colleges.

    —They're throwing open the prison doors, shutting down the treatment programs, pulling cops off the streets, laying off fire fighters.

    —They're coming for you at every business transaction and every cash register in the state.

    So I have a question for you, anti-tax voters . . .

            Where are those rich folks you defended now?
     

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  10. Oh, but DBP, isn't it enough just to have kept them from fleeing the state in horror at the prospect of having to pay ::shudder:: TAXES? Even if we can't actually see them in their gated communities, we know they're there...doesn't it give you a warm and fuzzy feeling?

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  11. DBP...being in the low income category, I'm torn here. If an extra temporary not even 1% tacked onto sales tax would save some of these programs, I can deal with it. So, while it might affected me more than the person making $100k per year, I suppose it's the small price that I can pay for maybe helping me and others in the long run?

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  12. kootchman
    Member Profile

    The state spends more than it collects. Budget accordingly. If these are the governors hand picked targets, she is in the tradition of Ron SIms... threaten to do the most grievous things before we look at things like the state aircraft fleet?. If ALL the citizens want these programs, then ALL the citizens will vote for the increased sales tax. Maybe we should try to stop our downward slide as a "favorable" place to do business? Index state employees to the general populace. We have all seen our average incomes drop the last three years... bet the salaries of the public employees haven't gone down..eh? Sorry, we adjusted our budgets accordingly, the state can do the same.

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  13. you know what, Kootch? It's sad, the whole thing...so, so sorry you're so damned selfish that you just want to keep everything for yourself. You and your beliefs are not what this country is about. The world does not revolve around business...and sometimes we can just feel bad about these things, and not bring partisan political beliefs into it. It's tough all around. Those state workers? If you look in the database, and compare 2007 salaries to 2010 salaries, some went up, some went down..and they have taken pay cuts, and they are furloughed days during the year. You would like to see more...yet you still support the tax breaks for all those rich guys, don't you..you know...those "job creators"...

    Have you complained to the Governor about the aircraft fleet? You're good at complaining, so I thought I'd ask. Constructive suggestions are always welcome..

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  14. and , Kootch...to be fair...here's the salary breakdown for WA State elected officials from 1987 to 2102...

    while you may think they are paid too much, please not that their salaries have not increased since before 2009 and will not increase next year.

    http://www.salaries.wa.gov/Salaryschedule19872005.htm

    http://www.salaries.wa.gov/salary.htm

    please note that the WA state constitution prevents the salaries of elected officials to be reduced..

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  15. and from an article there is this :

    "In Washington, a hiring freeze imposed by the governor in August 2008 caused the state’s workforce to decline by more than 1,400. In January 2009 the state replaced the freeze with a cap on the number of budgeted positions at each state agency; the state’s workforce is expected to fall by another 2,600 under the cap."

    link to article...( not finding anything more recent)

    http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=1214

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  16. now...what were you saying, Kootch?

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  17. kootchman
    Member Profile

    Please Jan... a labor union front piece, it not even amusing..never ask me to cite again if that is the extent of your research, a . I mean a CUT in pay. Not a preservation of the status quo. I want to see the state cut 14%, the actual unemployment rate of the private sector. And you ignore the most telling statistic... how much PRODUCTIVITY the private sector worker delivers... not how much they cost. I will gladly pay a PhD in the private sector a 600K salary IF they are generating 120M in revenues.

    In 2006 there were 62,516 employees, 2008 Gregoire went on her hire binge...66,714... today 2010, ...63,874.. hardly proportional to the loss of jobs and income of the private sector. They would have to shed another 8,000 jobs at least to make the same sacrifice. reflective of the fact that 75% of all state workers are employed in 5 counties, of which 4 are solidly Democratic.

    When revenues are off.and you can't meet expenses. you have to cut. Ask any businessperson.

    http://www.dop.wa.gov/SiteCollectionDocuments/Publications/2010StateWorkforceReport.pdf

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  18. do you have nothing but a bottom line in your life? Look up salaries...and see if there are pay cuts. I looked. There is a site that lists state employees by name, and you can compare salaries for each one from 2007 and 2009 and 2010...and I'm betting 2011 will be out shortly. I am not going to go employee to employee to tell you what the differences are...as I said ..some went down, some stayed the same, some increased (and sometimes one hopes to get a raise in one's job, no? even in the public sector?) And...public sector pay for the most part is not equal to the same private sector pay, most times it's lower. I am not talking union here. I never mentioned union.And turnover? From your link there is this ".
    State Workforce Turnover
    Turnover due to layoff doubled in FY
    2010. In FY 2010, 479 people were
    separated as a result of layoff from state
    service, compared to 275 people in FY
    2009. Voluntary resignations continued
    to be fewer than the rate seen prior to
    budget and hiring restrictions. " But I will tell you what, Kootch. It's Christmas, it's a difficult holiday for many people. And I just gave myself a present...you're dismissed :D. Merry Christmas, dude !

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  19. DBP...my apologies...I didn't mean to get into any of this with you-know-who...so sorry. I'm done.

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  20. Kootch...
    your analogy suffers...

    we don't pay our public service employees to generate revenues..
    we pay them to generate services...

    what you are saying essentially is that unless some company's bottom line benefits, wages are a waste of taxpayer money.

    We have a fundamental disagreement on this one.

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  21. No, no....Mr. Kootchman says if we lay off more people, there will be less unemployment. Magically.

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  22. Children’s Administration

    ¶ Reduce use and rates of contracted services - $12.6 million

    Cuts the number of placements in group homes and reduces fees paid to child placement agencies.
     

    ¶ Increase client-to-social worker ratio - $8.6 million

    Changes the average ratio of social worker to children from 1:17 to 1:20. Affects only those social workers, associated supervisors and support staff employed in child welfare. Does not reduce the number or ratio of social workers in Child Protective Services.

     
    ¶ Eliminate child welfare programs - $6.9 million

    Terminates specialized child welfare programs such as receiving care centers, foster care assessment, continuum of care, sex abuse recognition training, children’s advocacy centers, adoption support recruitment and street youth. Eliminates state funding for educational coordinators. Approximately 5,700 children receive these services annually.

     
    ¶ Reduce selected services - $4.6 million

    Reduces the Pediatric Interim Care Center, foster parent child care and support services, receiving care services, evaluation and treatment, sexually aggressive youth services, family preservation training and the Responsible Living Skills program for adolescents.
     

    ¶ Eliminate family reconciliation services - $4.5 million

    Stops intake and referral services aimed at keeping families intact and promoting positive behaviors for about 525 families who seek assistance each year.
     

    ¶ Reduce foster care length-of-stay - $885,000

    Shortens the length of stay for 200 hard-to-place foster children through the use of permanency roundtable teams, which coordinate social workers, community professionals and family members to find permanent placements.
     

    ¶ Reduce state funds for domestic violence programs by 10 percent - $870,000

    Cuts funds for domestic violence shelters that serve about 16,700 individuals annually.
     
       

     ***********************************************************************************

    Sorry to be such a downer, folks. Hope to be done with this list by Christmas.

    If not, I'll take the day off . . .

    —DBP

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  23. angelescrest
    Member Profile

    angelescrest

    It is a crisis. Those of us on the front lines know. Definitely we need to add a penny or two of tax more to keep those programs listed above in place. If you disagree, the absolute desperation of many of our citizens has alluded you...and, perhaps you consider yourself lucky or "non-involved". It is quite desperate, even before the cuts. Ask a public school teacher, a social worker, a hospital ER employee...or visit a shelter or an "encampment".
    I shudder to read your postings, DBP, though I thank you for putting out the somber realities. Ugh.

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  24. angelescrest. I'm sure that Kootchman will have some sort of retort, perhaps saying something about "Obamacare", knocking Obama,knocking the way Cristine Gregoire has run things, decrying the public employees who don't do anything and take money home hand over fist. In reality, we know what's really true. We live it,not getting our info from right wing talking points...sigh..

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  25. kootchman
    Member Profile

    Exactly it is a crisis. The state needs to act like it. And the crisis is derived from? Not having enough revenue. That means (shock), the taxpayer is short. The so called "frontline" is the mass of citizens that have to provide the gravy, the taxes. The private sector has made sacrifices the state has not even come close to. Gregoire went on a hiring binge, exploding the state payroll in 2008. It's come to earth time. Balance the budget. Do what the taxpayers do...angelcrest..funny how the military lexicon creeps in.... the frontline is where the economic health of the state is made...in the market. The rear echelon is the state and local governments that live off that efficiency and the surplus it generates. The state needs to revert to essential only services...just as the taxpayers are reverting to the "essentials" only. Raise taxes in these times? Cut disposable income?

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  26.  

    "At this festive season of the year, Mr. Scrooge," said the gentleman, taking up a pen, "it is more than usually desirable that we should make some slight provision for the Poor and Destitute, who suffer greatly at the present time. Many thousands are in want of common necessaries; hundreds of thousands are in want of common comforts, sir."

    "Are there no prisons?" asked Scrooge.

    "Plenty of prisons," said the gentleman, laying down the pen again.

    "And the Union workhouses?" demanded Scrooge. "Are they still in operation?"

    "They are. Still," returned the gentleman, "I wish I could say they were not."

    "The Treadmill and the Poor Law are in full vigour, then?" said Scrooge.

    "Both very busy, sir."

    "Oh! I was afraid, from what you said at first, that something had occurred to stop them in their useful course," said Scrooge. "I'm very glad to hear it."

    "Under the impression that they scarcely furnish Christian cheer of mind or body to the multitude," returned the gentleman, "a few of us are endeavouring to raise a fund to buy the Poor some meat and drink and means of warmth. We choose this time, because it is a time, of all others, when Want is keenly felt, and Abundance rejoices. What shall I put you down for?"

    "Nothing!" Scrooge replied.

    "You wish to be anonymous?"

    "I wish to be left alone," said Scrooge. "Since you ask me what I wish, gentlemen, that is my answer. I don't make merry myself at Christmas and I can't afford to make idle people merry. I help to support the establishments I have mentioned — they cost enough; and those who are badly off must go there."

    "Many can't go there; and many would rather die."

    "If they would rather die," said Scrooge, "they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population. Besides — excuse me — I don't know that."

    "But you might know it," observed the gentleman.

    "It's not my business," Scrooge returned. "It's enough for a man to understand his own business, and not to interfere with other people's. Mine occupies me constantly. Good afternoon, gentlemen!"

    Seeing clearly that it would be useless to pursue their point, the gentlemen withdrew. Scrooge returned to his labours with an improved opinion of himself, and in a more facetious temper than was usual with him.

     
             

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  27. kootchman
    Member Profile


    Posted 5 months ago #         
  28. angelescrest
    Member Profile

    angelescrest

    Raise taxes in these times: absolutely. We need to take care of each other. I am a taxpayer, a single mom, a teacher: raise those friggin' taxes!!! I'm sick of seeing my students hungry, homeless, cold! Nickelsville is humbling. I've given up some salary (and according to DBP's data, more cuts are a comin'), and I would gladly give more so others can have the basics.

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  29. I am with you angelecrest

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  30. Most of us don't mind giving more so that others can have basics...
    we ind giving more so that our major corporations can lower their taxes :(

    there IS enough money to go around
    but only if we start prioritizing citizens first

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  31. kootchman
    Member Profile

    We get to vote on it. You may yet get your chance to give more. Do you think the voters trust the state to raise taxes "temporarily" ?
    Remember this"

    "Legislature promised voters in 1995 that any levies used to pay for Safeco would go away when the new field was paid for. "

    "House Bill 1997 expired last Friday when it failed to gain enough signatures to move out of the Senate Ways and Means Committee."

    They are trying another end run to keep it in place. No trust. If they raise em' you can bet they will be permanent. A Gregoire Christmas... tax increases.

    Christmas shopping? Mac MacBook Pro, 17" ? $2499 ... give yourself a great Christmas present.. save $250 and buy it from CDW online... When you hit 10% for the big ticket items... you are in NY, IL, MA territory... too much.

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  32. Chemical Dependency

    ¶ Eliminate Disability Lifeline and ADATSA treatment - $15.6 million

    Terminates the Disability Lifeline and ADATSA (Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment and Services Act) medical programs, affecting 15,000 low-income clients who receive chemical dependency services such as assessment, opiate substitution treatment, detoxification and crisis response.

    Disability Lifeline provides medical coverage for low-income adults who are unable to work due to a temporary disability. ADATSA provides shelter and/or medical benefits, treatment and occasional cash support.
     

    ¶ Reduce chemical dependency services - $5.9 million

    Reduces outpatient and detoxification chemical dependency services for 5,000 low-income clients without young children. Services include assessment, opiate substitution treatment, detoxification and crisis response.
     

    ¶ Eliminate long-term residential and recovery house services - $2.7 million

    Ends funding for long-term residential services in excess of 90 days. Ends funding for five recovery houses, which serve 299 clients per year after they have finished residential treatment program.
     

    ¶ Close Pioneer Center East - $2.1 million

    Halts funding for this Spokane chemical dependency treatment facility that annually serves 283 acute-care clients, some of whom are ordered by the court to receive intensive inpatient treatment.
     

    ¶ Convert funding to county block grant - $2.1 million

    Distributes chemical dependency state funds directly to counties to maximize efficiency.

     
     
     

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  33. kootch..
    i notice we don't get to vote about whether business gets tax breaks..
    just whether we are willing to tax ourselves more

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  34. yeah, JoB, I noticed that myself...why is that?

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  35. HunterG
    Member Profile

    HunterG

    Why, oh why did I choose to incarnate on an unevolved, capitalistic planet where the rich are given everything for nothing and those who are not have to work tirelessly to just *make* it.

    Cutting here and there from programs that do good are not going to solve the greater problem - its pennies in a bucket - to be completely frank and R-rated (sorry TR) we are pretty much f*cked unless the "haves" see the responsibility they have. Greed is a powerful force and all the money in the world will not save them / or anyone from being judged in the end - you will be seen as what you are and treated accordingly.

    I foresee changes coming. I hope so at least.

    (On my soapbox) May the wrath of those who are downtrodden, those who are tired who may never live a life where they can retire - those who are sick and profited from because they are sick, those who will have to work until the day they die just to keep the lights on stand up, be seen and heard! The Bourgeoisie has nothing against us - as long as we stand together and say we are done...no more.

    Higher thought and action is possible and only when enough say no, will change happen. I have an issue supporting a government (by paying my taxes like a good little American) that doesn't look out for the little guy and for one, have had enough. I am done paying for the rich getting richer and seeing hungry, malnourished and undereducated kids.

    So what's the answer? Stop paying your taxes? Continued support of a group who seems to think that they are "in charge"?

    The only power anyone EVER has is the power you give to them, and what can be given can be taken away like a breeze passing through. We are only here for blink of time and are gone, why do we complain without action - you are better off chasing your tail or sticking your head in the sand and waiting for it to be over.

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  36. Hunter G...

    is there room on that soapbox for me?

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  37. kootchman
    Member Profile

    What rhetorical nonsense. The "rich" generally are there because they have worked their asses off. Since most "rich" Americans are small business owners... they are not 40 hour per week folks, 80 hours is not uncommon. They assume risk, not a sense of entitlement.

    But you do bring up a good point. There will never be government reform UNTIL they get the only message they understand.. choke off the money supply. Don't pay your taxes? Hell half don't pay them now....but I do support your impulse. Don't pay a dime. I have an issue too with a government that ONLY supports a voting lobby and enriches itself with perks and benefits the taxed will never see.

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  38. kootch...

    small business owners are not rich...

    nor do they receive the tax breaks that huge corporate businesses enjoy..

    they actually pay taxes

    unlike the huge corporations who consider paying lobbying firms more than they pay in taxes a good investment.

    please stop talking as though one equaled the other.

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  39. btw kootch...

    that half don't pay taxes now slam you slid under the radar...

    half is a vastly inflated figure for the number of Americans who do not currently pay federal income taxes.. though i will have to admit that current unemployment does temporarily inflate that number

    but it is NOT an accurate reflection of the total tax burden on those who don't make enough to pay federal taxes...

    their actual tax burden is somewhat equal to those in the top tax brackets...

    it's the middle class who feel the weight of the highest actual tax burden.

    you know.. those of us with jobs

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  40. 365Stairs
    Member Profile

    365Stairs

    DBP - they had to leave a little something for the new WSU coach....$2.25 million a year.*

    Highest paid state employee by far...

    If that ain't political football...not sure what is...

    Pun intended.

    *Yes, I know not all this comes from the state coffers...but the point of priorities had to be made.

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  41. kootchman
    Member Profile

    Wrong you are JoB.... the highest proportion of millionaires in this country are owners of companies with less than 50 people.

    Most self-made millionaires today live in North America. 84% of them have one thing in common. That one thing is that they are entrepreneurs. (The other 16% of self-made millionaires typically come through investing, including real estate.) These entrepreneurs can be divided into several sub categories. For this article I will focus on three.

    read the article kiddo.... here's where they come from:

    Innovator – Innovators take an existing idea, service, product or business model and innovate it into something more effective

    Goods and service provider – Goods and service providers generally do not invent or innovate at all. they simply out perform their competitors.

    Inventor – Inventors recognize a need for a solution to a specific need in the marketplace. They then devise a way to provide that solution.

    Hate to burst your bubble.... but ..

    from Forbes:

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/beltway/2011/07/27/why-do-some-people-pay-no-federal-income-tax/

    http://douglasvermeeren.wordpress.com/

    http://www.moneyunder30.com/the-10-habits-of-self-made-millionaires

    Yea I know local taxes are a tax burden... but damn... YOU all voted for the very same programs that are eating you alive. If you have six kids, have low skill sets, reasonably you are going to have less disposable income. You cannot tax into existence Nirvana.

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  42. Developmental Disabilities and Long-Term Care

    ¶ Reduce community residential provider rates - $11.6 million

    Cuts rates by approximately 6.5 percent for developmental disability community residential providers, who serve 3,800 clients each month. Support ranges from a few hours per month to around-the-clock, one-on-one assistance each day.
     

    ¶ Eliminate state-only employment and day services - $9.2 million

    Terminates supported employment services, such as job coaching, for 488 clients with developmental disabilities who have not been placed in a Medicaid waiver program. This reduction will affect the ability of these individuals to obtain job training and placement services.
     

    ¶ Reduce home care agency reimbursement rates - $8.8 million *

    Cuts reimbursement rates for home care agency providers from $19.72 to $18.72 per hour. Home care agencies assist more than 12,000 clients per month with activities such as bathing, dressing, eating, meal preparation and housework in the client’s home.
     

    ¶ Suspend Individual and Family Service program - $8.4 million *

    Suspends services to nearly 1,000 families for respite care, therapies and other activities which help them keep loved ones with developmental disabilities in their homes.
     

    ¶ Reduce eligibility for services - $8.3 million *

    Requires clients with developmental disabilities and long-term care clients receiving personal care services to meet the same level-of-care standard as nursing facility clients. This eligibility change will result in 1,300 of the least acute long-term care and developmental disability clients losing personal care services. In addition, eligibility for developmental disability institution and Medicaid waiver services is restricted, which will cause approximately 330 clients to lose services.
     

    ¶ Close one residential habilitation center

    Closes the Rainier School residential habilitation center through the use of federal grants and one-time funding to transition approximately 350 clients to community-based settings or other residential habilitation centers.
     

    ¶ Eliminate Adult Day Health program - $4.1 million *

    Eliminates services to nearly 1,000 individuals with developmental disabilities or in long-term care who now receive assistance through adult day health centers with medication management, cognitive and physical therapies, and group interactions.
     

    ¶ Reduce instructional and support hours by 2 percent - $2.3 million

    Cuts community residential services to 3,800 individuals in supported living placements. Services are built around the person’s needs and may include assistance with maintaining the home, paying bills,preparing meals and personal tasks.
     

    ¶ Eliminate rate add-on for assisted living - $1.9 million

    Stops the rate add-on given to assisted living providers to take more Medicaid clients. Assisted living facilities serve more than 4,500 individuals per month.
     

    ¶ Reduce Senior Citizens Services Act funding by 20 percent - $1.6 million *

    Cuts funding to the Area Agencies on Aging, which provide case management services and other services, such as Meals on Wheels, to elderly individuals to help them remain in their homes.
     
       

    Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Get away from me, you who are accursed, into the eternal fire that has been prepared for the devil and his angels! Here’s why: I was hungry, and you gave me nothing to eat. I was thirsty, and you gave me nothing to drink. I was a stranger, and you didn't welcome me. I was naked, and you didn't clothe me. I was sick and in prison, and you didn't visit me.’

    Then they will reply, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or as a stranger or naked or sick or in prison and didn't help you?’

    Then he will say to them, ‘I tell you with certainty, since you didn’t do it for one of the least important of these, you didn’t do it for me.’

     
       
     
    * Indicates cut the Governor proposes to prevent with new revenue (e.g., a sales tax increase).

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  43. HunterG
    Member Profile

    HunterG

    You may think it is nonsense, and yes, I am a romantic but I know many that agree with me.

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  44. Economic Services

    ¶ Reduce state funding for subsidized child care by 12 percent - $50.0 million

    Limits the number of low-income children whose families can receive subsidized child care by 4,000. Currently 33,000 low-income families receive subsidized child care while parents work.
     

    ¶ Reduce TANF time limit to 48 months - $17.5 million

    Limits maximum time a family can receive a TANF grant from 60 to 48 months, which eliminates eligibility for nearly 2,000 families.
     

    ¶ Eliminate State Food Assistance program - $13.9 million

    Halts food assistance to an estimated 11,400 individuals each month who are not eligible for federal food assistance or who have not provided documentation of citizenship.
     

    ¶ Eliminate Disability Lifeline medical program costs - $8.7 million

    Eliminates the need to cover costs for incapacity examinations associated with the Disability Lifeline medical program due to termination of the program.
     

    ¶ Reduce TANF grant amounts by 2 percent - $7.2 million

    Shrinks the average monthly grant for a family of three to $468. This grant was cut by 15 percent during the past year.
     

    ¶ Eliminate State Family Assistance program - $6.0 million

    Stops cash assistance to 1,200 families who do not meet federal TANF eligibility criteria. The average monthly payment is $240.
     

    ¶ Reduce refugee and limited English proficiency services by 15 percent - $1.7 million

    Reduces services that assist about 735 legal immigrants in achieving English proficiency.
     

    ¶ Reduce naturalization services by 47 percent - $1.1 million

    Decreases naturalization services to legal immigrants attempting to become U.S. citizens. The program serves about 4,400 individuals annually.
     

    ¶ Restrict replacement of electronic benefits transfer cards - $752,000

    Limits the replacement of lost EBTs in Community Service Offices, except in case of emergency, effective July 1, 2012. Cards are used for cash and food for low-income clients.
     

         

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  45. elikapeka
    Member Profile

    This is just unbelievably sad. I guess years of Tim Eyman running the government through paid initiatives is finally playing out. It's so, so sad.

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  46. kootchman
    Member Profile

    Time Eyeman or WEA.. take your pick. At least with Tim Eyeman we get to read the intent..and vote on it.... most of the government is run underwater, in stealth mode, filling the Christmas stocking of every special interest group who delivers a vote to our current regime. One is more more democratic than the other. We will have to vote on this increase..and that is a hell of lot fairer than executive fiat. Why do you object so much to the democratic process? I wonder who spend more toi influence taxes? Unions or Eyeman?

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  47. kootchman
    Member Profile

    BTY.. this was a fraud cutting measure... serial offenders who "lose" their cards... it's hardly a cut. Caught by KING 5 news.

    ¶ Restrict replacement of electronic benefits transfer cards - $752,000

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  48. kootchman..

    you make me tired
    you don't make a good argument
    you just make me tired

    Posted 5 months ago #         
  49. Tim Eyman is an ass, and sheeple will vote for less money out of their pocket every time, whether it's a good idea or not. Sheeple are simply selfish, and don't educate themselves on the issues a lot of the time. They hear soundbites, and think they have the answers...sigh...

    Posted 5 months ago #         

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.

All contents copyright 2012, A Drink of Water and a Story Interactive. Here's how to contact us.
No photo reuse without permission.
Entries and comments feeds. ^Top^