WSB Forum » Open Discussion

(105 posts)

Tonight: W.S. Preaching Pastor Mark on Nightline, ABC - link


  1. Did any of you watch on Nat Geo "The Human Family Tree".? It was fascinating. Using real science, DNA testing, they trace all of humanity back to Africa. Not caring to be an Anthropologist, I nevertheless found the explanations on the way people "evolved" very informative and full of common sense. The migration of the human race was and is extraordinary.

    It also did another thing. It shows how completely senseless racism is. Northern continental people needed their skin to lighten up so that Vitamin D could be manufactured from the sun. Dark pigment in a northern climate would inhibit it.

    CC - keep the faith. According to some all Christians must be right-wing zealots. Most people are not so narrow minded Thank God!
    JoB - keep the faith, but you know I like capitalism not corporatism.
    Walker - I do not believe I am a bully but there are macro and micro views. I do not care if you like religions or not. Your opinion is important. If I decide to take on your "facts" or you take on my "facts" then I commend you. All I can say is don't believe all of the propoganda from both or multiple sides.

    Posted 2 years ago #         
  2. Hello Walker. Evolution is the best theory that explains where humans and other species came from. Natural selection has been proven frequently. I believe this science.

    On the other hand ... So far what has not been explained is the beginning of life. Someday I hope to know.
    A self proclaimed atheist Richard Dawkins writes that the genetic code is truly digital. There is an elegance to our DNA and he showed that the DNA molecule is an algorithym in codes. Also, evolution does not explain consciousness. I found an excellent article on this by Steven Pinker in Time. His conclusion thus far on page 7 was extremely interesting.

    http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1580394-1,00.html

    Evolution explains a lot but not everything. That is not to say I am going to say Intelligent Design is a proven fact. It is not. It is a theory only. Evolution comes from science. We also find from science that what we thought was fact sometimes becomes myth. Science is in itself evolving.

    Posted 2 years ago #         
  3. As for post 42
    Right Wing Christians. Please expand your definitions. There are many kinds of congregations. I must admit, i would not care to attend a church that promotes Liberation Theology nor Racism or violence. Violence is not prescribed by any normal church whether conservative or liberal.

    I think Andrea's post of your statement about Jesus is right on.

    I also once posted the numbers of attacks on abortion clinics. They are not following normal christian or societal values. These people are breaking the law and have killed, damaged and maimed. They are not the norm and there have been and are too many extremists. Abortion is legal but 35+ million deaths is repugnant and sad also.

    OK City. McVeigh and Nicholls. President Clinton blamed talk radio but he was also shifting the focus away from the illegal attack on the Branch Davidian complex. McVeigh once noted that he was seeking retribution for what the government did at Waco. There is evidence that there were middle eastern influences on that attack but McVeigh was put to death so we will never know. What kind of ...ers... is that? It is ironic how that bomb was almost a near replica of the first WTC bomb. I am not defending Koresh's group. At least with the Breakaway LDS sect last year they did a much better job of dealing with a religious group. McVeigh was anti government. He seemed right wing and was definitely anti government. Most sensible people would reject his philosophy. Problem is there are a lot of people on both sides who are not sensible nor compassionate. What a horrible deed and unfortunately there will be more senseless acts and that saddens me.

    Eric Rudolph fits the mold of a right wing extremist too. No doubt about it. Incomprehensible why these people did what they did. I am against followers of groups like the Aryan nations. Most people are.

    Fred Phelps group is a bunch of unfortunately highly educated and in my opinion completely idiotic morons who abuse the right of free speech and have lost the meaning of tolerance. We have no disagreement.

    You wrote (that driscoll...) "He is creating the people that will force creationism into science classes, abortion clinics to close out of fear, prevent same sex couples from marrying, take books out of libraries that they think you shouldn't read, he is creating people that will tell your daughters they are the property of their husbands, and yes he is part of the general air that is creating the next Timothy McVeigh."

    That is your opinion. You disagree with him or them and I am using your words. They probably disagree with you. I don't know if your statement about their beliefs is true. They might believe that you are wrong. Each side has a right to their own view. Do you want to censor theirs? Disagreement is fine, censoring is not.

    You might be surprised to know that I will be voting to approve the legislatures proposition. I believe in equal rights for everyone (except JoB - you know I am teasing JoB). But to say it has nothing to do with Gay Marriage is a crock. This is where the Progressive movement plays with the truth. Regardless, I have gay relatives and friends. They should not be denied fair rights. I also understand that the opposition has their own view. That is why we vote, educate, learn and grow. Time will tell what will happen. I cannot stand President Obama's mostly progressive big government agenda but I will always respect that he is our President.

    So if the religious right is going to create Tim McVeigh's, what is the other side going to create that is evil? If you want, I can come up with a huge list of left (and right) wing idiots but why? Don't we want what is best for all of us? I would prefer to get along.

    I mean no malice toward you. Written communication cannot convey how happy to irritated or mad somebody is. Your posts are passionate. Take Care, Rich

    Posted 2 years ago #         
  4. cclarue
    Member Profile

    HMC Rich, Thank you.

    Posted 2 years ago #         
  5. Rich..

    i shudder to think what kind of idiots are being created everywhere that children are not taught to question everything they are taught.

    as for Ref71.. although it will give gay couples legal access to the rights of married couples it will also give the same rights to heterosexual couples who can not marry without penalty... and to any other two individuals who choose to make a life partnership for any reason.

    As long as those in the medical profession can deny access to a loved one who is ill because they are neither a family member or a spouse, this referendum is necessary.

    As long as the family of your deceased partner can attempt to seize your assets upon their death, or deny you access to your loved one's funeral, this referendum is necessary.

    and that's just the short list...

    Unfortunately, a bill granting gays the right to marry wouldn't solve the lack of rights in the many complicated living arrangements that now exist... and that ref 71 addresses.

    If gay marriage comes to a vote I will support that as wholeheartedly as i support ref 71, but for very different reasons. I will support that because i believe that gays have as much right to both the legal protections and sanctity of marriage as us straights... they can't do more damage to marriage and the American family than our current wave of serial marriages has already done.

    Maybe it's time we all started taking our commitments more seriously.

    Posted 2 years ago #         

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.

All contents copyright 2012, A Drink of Water and a Story Interactive. Here's how to contact us.
No photo reuse without permission.
Entries and comments feeds. ^Top^