West Seattle Blog...

WSB Forum » Open Discussion

(64 posts)

The rest of the story

Started 3 years ago by Garybert
Latest reply from datamuse

12 Next »

Garybert
Member Profile

Now I understand the survey call a few weeks ago.
The West Seattle Herald Editorial Page appears to be an all-out attack on the BLOG. Too bad you're not professional! Not to mention contributors are biased and unreliable. Why would anyone pay attention to neighbors in almost real time when they could wait a week to find out what's happening on their block? The WSB rocks.

Posted 3 years ago #
celeste17
Member Profile

I participated in a telephone survey about a year ago and I raved about the blog then. I don't think they knew much about your blog then but obviously they do now.

Posted 3 years ago #
JenV
Member Profile

If it weren't for the WSB, I would have NO idea what's happening here, since the "mainstream media" has for so long denied our existence. No matter how contentious things get on the forums, bottom line is West Seattle Blog is an invaluable source of LOCAL news that matters to us all, and has connected the community in so many ways. Can't say that about the Herald or that other West Seattle page that you can't ever find any info on. YAY WSB!!

Posted 3 years ago #
JimmyG
Member Profile

So I went to the WS Herald site and read the editorial.

The overall tone is quite defensive. And if everything is so ducky for them why are they redesigning their site for more updates and "greater interaction"?

And it seems they want it both ways when they on one hand diss the online ads that are tiny and "often ignored" yet I notice they have ads in a similar format to WSB.

Posted 3 years ago #
JenV
Member Profile

Man, that was really a bitchy piece. Here is the link to the bitch-fest...er, I mean EDITORIAL if anyone is interested.

http://www.westseattleherald.com/articles/2009/02/11/interact/editorial/editorial.txt

I hear a helicopter overhead right now. Guess I will wait until NEXT WEEK to have the Herald tell me what it was all about....sigh.

Posted 3 years ago #
JaimeGummer
Member Profile

Ha-ha-ha. If they put as much energy into the actual timely reporting of news as they did in writing desperate editorials about why the WSB is irrelevant they might not be the laughing stock also-ran that they are.

Posted 3 years ago #
GenHillOne
Member Profile

Wow, nice sour grapes, Herald. I do think that WSB would be one of the first to say there is room for everyone, but the Herald just slipped down a notch for me. Tacky editorial.

Right down to discounting a photo taken on a cell phone by someone who happens to be there...yeah, I'd rather miss the shot altogether while waiting for a "professional" camera to show up. Or if one DOES appear, wait a week for the paper to come out. Way to have your finger on the pulse WSH!

Posted 3 years ago #
karen
Member Profile

The few times that I have picked up a Herald recently, I flip through and see a bunch of stuff that I already read - in the WSB! Plus, I've gotten more indepth reporting and comments from people who know the subject. I've been able to ask questions or debate a point, not just read a couple of paragraphs. When I hear a helicopter or a bunch of police, the first place I check is here. WSB is the best!!

Posted 3 years ago #
charlabob
Member Profile

Thanks for the pointer -- I stopped reading the Herald long ago (even though they keep leaving it on our porch) -- so I would have missed this altogether. It's absolutely ridiculous and, worse, pathetic. Since they asked for comments, I'll be sure they get some :-)

Posted 3 years ago #
Keith
Member Profile

Wow. You'd think the Herald would see WSB as a challenge they should rise to meet. Instead, they stoop to an embarrassing low.

Even for an editorial, it's full of inaccuracies and ludicrous statements, among them that WSB is not written by a professional journalist. Five seconds of research is all it would take to disprove that insulting accusation.

Another accusation that caught my eye: "Online advertising is often simply ignored, especially small square ads with annoying animation or no useful value-driven offer." And what's jutting into the text of this editorial, almost exactly where this statement appears? A small, square, online ad with no useful value-driven offer!

I'm a voracious reader of WSB, but I still pick up the Herald for their take on things. Not any more.

Posted 3 years ago #
Sue
Member Profile

In all fairness, the WSH editorial does not mention WSB by name. Of course we assume that's what it's about, but they did not actually mention them by name.

I started subscribing to the Herald when I first moved to West Seattle 3 years ago. I loved having local news delivered to my home - stuff I couldn't get elsewhere. But over the past year or so I started realizing that a majority of what I read in the Herald was something I'd already read on WSB. Take, for instance, the cover of today's Herald that I just received: Article about Amanda Knox trial (yep, read on WSB), and an article about the death of Steve Bushaw (yep, read that here too). So the Herald has become much more irrelevant to me. I wanted to cancel it, but my husband wants to support them, so he pays for it. Plus my husband doesn't get the chance to sit and read WSB like I do.

I think the assumption is that a "blog" is something written by people who have nothing better to do. Perhaps WSB is an anomoly in that it is written by professional journalists. I could care less what the quality of a photo is, or that there are ads on the side. If the information is relevant and helpful to me, I'll keep coming back.

Posted 3 years ago #
Gina
Member Profile

The WSH is good for local obits. Otherwise it is last week's news, next week.

Posted 3 years ago #
ellenater
Member Profile

WSB is cutting edge and unlike any news source i've ever seen. It's a combo. of everything else. It uses the best features of old school news and combines it with the glory that is the internet. Several major decisions in my life have taken place do to the blog. In fact, I found my current house because of the blog. We started our knitting group(s) on this blog. And that doesn't even cover the instant yet responsible nature of the news. I think the Herald thing is hilarious. Most people don't know how to be creative and that;s just sad. Technology means everything has to change and fast! I love it. Things need to be shaken up. The TV news and lots of written news are not only completely out of touch with reality, they lack immediacy and are irrelevant. I can't even begin to fathom why they cover a lot of what they cover and how they don't even appear to be human while doing so. I love this blog and no thinly veiled critique is going to turn any fan away. This is cutting edge, man!...which brings me to the next lack of a point: The Stranger (which is considered the hippest zine in Seattle by many) doesn't ever give West Seattle the time of day. That just slays me. :)

I don't think i've ever read the Herald. And now that the PI is going down, I'll read WSB more than ever. The Times sucks, too!

Posted 3 years ago #
Diana
Member Profile

I've read and re-read the WSH editorial and also the comments here. It's all a very sad commentary. The editorial is a knee jerk reaction to changing times, and I think not well thought out or representative of what the paper is all about. Perhaps there will be some second thoughts on their part and some bandages put on the foot they just shot. Communities need a local paper and they deserve our support. WSB has contributed in countless ways to our neighborhood, and they too need our support. I subscribe to the paper and my company advertises in it, and both will continue. The audiences for readership are different and those differences should be respected. I urge the support for both venues as they each serve our community. Vitrol in comments serves no purpose. Hopefully lessons will be learned as we move forward in changing, and challenging times.

Posted 3 years ago #
WesCAddle
Member Profile

I love the West Seattle Herald, and will continue to subscribe. I must admit, this editorial is almost comical. I understand trying to defend your profession as a print journalist… but come on! (as Gob would say). Let’s examine:

“Professional journalists don't waste your time”

Unless you consider waiting a week to read a news story a waste of time. Let’s face it, today people want to know what is happening…RIGHT NOW. It is the state of our society…for better or for worse. Also, the editorial asks if we are seriously interested in “live blogged” events. I think most people, if they are truly interested in a particular subject, are very interested in up-to-date reporting. We are quite capable of looking at all the information and creating our own “summary” of the story, we are not idiots that need a “professional journalist” to summarize it down to a few sentences so we, the blabbering masses, can easily decipher it.

“Print vs. Online Advertising”

I am not sure why the editorial thinks we, the reader, should be concerned about how much the newspaper makes from print advertising versus a blog and what they make using online advertising. It’s almost like they are trying to defend their exorbitant rates for taking out an ad in their paper. I assume he is talking about businesses using their paper for advertising, versus individuals taking out want ads. It is pretty obvious to everyone that with the advent of sites like Craigslist personal newspaper ads have become completely obsolete. If I need to rent out one of my houses, or sell my 6 month old cell phone, you can pretty much guarantee I will not be taking out a want ad in the West Seattle Herald or Seattle Times. Craigslist and eBay win at this game hands down.

“Things change and so do people”

This paragraph proclaims that less information is better. “Information bombing” as they call it will surly overwhelm our simple intellects and confuse our tiny brains.

“Past is prologue”

This seems to be a re-hash of the theme off “we as journalists know what is best for you, there is no need for you to be bombarded with too much information…you won’t be able to understand it.” I also like how he mentions radio as a source of instant news. Not sure what he is trying to prove here, other than the fact that if you want to get your news as soon as possible listen to the radio.

“Reports of our death are greatly exaggerated”

For this I am glad. There is a very real place for print media. Like I said in the beginning, I subscribe to the West Seattle Herald, and I enjoy the publication. I think there is plenty of room for print, radio, and online news. They each serve a different purpose. This editorial appears to be a slam from an old world technology against a new world technology. Like he said, “Things change and so do people.” Hopefully the West Seattle Herald heeds these words of advice and is able to change with the times, instead of being the cantankerous old man yelling at the playing outside his yard.

Posted 3 years ago #
MargL
Member Profile

I'm just trying to parse the point of the editorial... Are they bashing 'news' blogs in general? Are they saying "web is bad, newsprint is good"? I don't get it.
They do say they are relaunching their website to "bring ... more information and provide greater interaction" (uhm, like a neighborhood 'blog'?) Are they trying to develop their "vibrant community of readers"?
I wish them luck trying to copy the success of WSB and hope they're smart enough to implement some of the feedback they got thru the phone survey.
They could start with fixing the glaring 404 error I get when I click on the "Just In" news link on the top of their left navigation list.
The only time I look at the print version of the Herald is when I pick up a free copy in the lobby of my grandma's apartment building.

Posted 3 years ago #
cruiser
Member Profile

Ah now come on you lot, The Herald is great for wrapping up fish-n-chips:) Any other uses ya can think of?

Posted 3 years ago #
JoB
Member Profile

what a disappointment to reply to their editorial and wait a week or two to see if your comment is one they will print:(

probably not.

Posted 3 years ago #
ellenater
Member Profile

lol, cruiser. I prolly wasted too much time on my comment but that was sooooooo stupid. I need to get a bird so I can line it's cage.

Posted 3 years ago #
LisaM
Member Profile

Just a point on the advertising bit - I actually do click on the ads here in the WSB for several reasons:
*They are LOCAL businesses
*Instant access
*I read the WSB intro article and it usually leaves me wanting to know more
*Coupons! Loved the one for CLICK!

Posted 3 years ago #
AlkiRagdoll
Member Profile

I really enjoyed all of the comments here and they did make me think. I subscribe to the Herald, meaning I pay to read it. That had me think about it... other than donations, the WSB is not a pay to play (uh, read) .... Guess I will start a regular "donation" to the blog, as I really do get more out of the blog than the Herald -- and try to read it daily. Thanks again WSB.

Posted 3 years ago #
Patrick
Member Profile

Thank you for your comments.

Tracy and I will be addressing all this later this evening.

Posted 3 years ago #
flowerpetal
Member Profile

I've written here before that I used to subscribe to the Herald. That is, I subscribed until I found the WSB. I never got the news and info about WS that I wanted from the Herald and got exactly what I was looking for on WSB.
This reminds me that I should be donating to the "Tip Jar" what I would have been paying to WSH if the blog was not here.

Posted 3 years ago #
ellenater
Member Profile

Me too, LisaM. I made that point on my comment to The Herald, too. This is the ONLY place I click on advertising.

Posted 3 years ago #
Patrick
Member Profile

Few things are as abused as the wisdom found in a religious tract or something said by the Founding Fathers.

Allow me to torture the latter.

Buried in the Federalist Papers is an interesting discussion about the freedom of the press. It revolved not around the abstract notion of "the press" but rather the physical object itself. The idea was that the greatest number should have access to the instrument necessary to disseminate information if the public was to truly be well informed. I have always kept that in the back of my mind right next to the phrase which was found on the cover of The Last Whole Earth Catalog, "Access to tools." Coming forward to the current day, we now have the ability, thanks to the tools technology has provided, to disseminate information faster and at the same time reach more people than the Founding Fathers could have ever imagined. In that sense we have honored their thoughts on the matter more so than any other generation.

What they certainly would have been surprised about is that these tools have allowed this to become a conversation, an exchange, or even a collaboration, if you will. Again, because of equal access to the tools necessary we can interact with you. We need look no further than the recent storm. As such, this is the changing nature of journalism. No longer are we locked into either top-down or trickle-up models. If anything this page can be seen as a flat, geometric plane, a horizontal model resembling an old big-city train station where people come, go, stop to pick up information necessary to their journey, and go on.

One thing the new model is not is a zero-sum game.

In this form there is no end of space nor limits of time, therefore there are no limits on the amount of information that can be had. That's why we've been able to include so much of the information you have given us. It's why you are now part of a larger process of gather information and distributing it. That process in turn is the future of news.

With that in mind I would like to move on from this topic. What I'd like to do instead is to let you know that in the near future there will be a town-hall style meeting about the future of journalism in Seattle. The meeting is an outgrowth of the P-I's decision to put the paper up for sale. Rather than discuss the pros and cons of the two news sources in West Seattle I would like to ask that you come to the meeting and talk about how you are part of the how information, in this case news, is gathered and distributed. To talk openly about how you the reader and we the journalists are now part of a two-way process.

This invitation is extended to our detractors as well.

If you need the time and place of the meeting please go here -

http://www.nonewsisbadnews.org/

Posted 3 years ago #
CB
Member Profile

There is one point about the WS Herald that people are forgetting. All of us are on-line ALOT (judging by the repeat posters I see). But when I have to do community outreach for events or issue notification, there is still a sizable population in West Seattle that is not online for their news. That is one service the Herald provides - communication to people who have not made the transition to computers (and probably never will) for their information about what's going on in their community. So I read both and send information to both, just for that reason.

Posted 3 years ago #
celeste17
Member Profile

Patrick the web site lists the room where the meeting will be held but it doesn't list where the meeting will be held. No name of a building nor an address. Can you elaborate?

Posted 3 years ago #
WSB
Member Profile

Celeste - Sorry about that. I gave him the URL, as I have been involved in a bit in some of the planning discussions for that event. Bertha Landes Room at Seattle City Hall, 7 pm February 26th.

Posted 3 years ago #
WSB
Member Profile

Now, my formal comment here, picking up the relay from my co-publisher:

We got a thoughtful note from a longtime reader tonight flagging this thread. S/he believed it violated the WSB Forum rule stipulating that you must complain directly to a business, and say what step/s you took to do that, before posting a rant about that business here, and as a result, s/he suggested that we close or delete this thread.

I am not sure that is an entirely accurate assessment of this thread - what do YOU think? -- so at this point we are not going to take that action, but we want to thank the person who e-mailed us for bringing up an important point:

Whether you agree or disagree with what was written, please be sure to let the writer know about it. I would hope that if we wrote something here about anything or anyone, and you wanted to say something about it, you would say it to us, and not just go to that person/entity's website and post about it there.

As for the specifics of what was written, two things (we could say many, but we hadn't intended to say anything at all until this thread forced our hand):

1. Sue at #11 makes a good point. WSB is not mentioned by name. And in fact, the editorial also appears in the same company's Ballard paper. That community also happens to be served by a growing, successful online neighborhood-news operation that, like WSB, is edited and published by a husband-wife team of professional journalists, collaborating with their community: MyBallard.com.

We are proud to be friends and collaborators with My Ballard's Cory and Kate Bergman, whose site was inspired by this one (or so Cory has said). The main difference is that they do not publish the same volume of original coverage you find here, mostly because Cory and Kate also both still have other jobs, but their coverage too is of high quality and high interest. Their site started to offer advertising a few months ago, so it too is a business, but we have the humbling honor of being the first online-only neighborhood-news operation in Seattle to be operating "in the black," as a fulltime business.

(A side clarification about advertising, by the way: Ours is not sold on "clicks." We are glad to hear that the ad placement is useful in terms of helping direct you to businesses, and we link WSB ads to the businesses' websites, since most businesses do have sites. But the model here is in fact the same one from which our print-journalism counterparts derive revenue: Display. An ad on WSB is seen. Seen 700,000 times a month, in fact.)

#2 - Last but not least, I want to echo what Patrick wrote. There is a very important discussion going on right now about the future of news. We have been privileged to be part of it in several ways; we are frequently contacted by academics who are looking to sites like WSB as potential templates for other journalists to follow, as the jobs in the large media organizations - the type in which I worked for years - start to fall away. We are hopeful that in the months and years to come, many more neighborhoods across the U.S. will have their own independently operated community-news websites; new ones are appearing almost daily, and there are some that preceded ours, such as Baristanet in New Jersey, now in its sixth year.

I had the opportunity to address a City Council committee two weeks ago, talking primarily about neighborhood-news sites and their role in the current and future news landscape. As CB points out, not everyone is online. One of the issues I mentioned to the City Council was the importance of addressing technology access. The paper delivery model is going to go away. Not in five minutes, maybe not even in five years, but it carries a great production and delivery cost, in terms of resources and manpower. Note the last section of the editorial you are discussing here.

What I said to the City Council two weeks ago was: This isn't about saving newspapers. This is about saving journalism. Others have refined it further to, about saving journalists. We are honored that you have found a place in your lives to support what two professional journalists are doing -- with your collaboration, and with sponsors' support -- here, in the form of WSB. We hope you are also supporting the other sources that provide information you find valuable, whatever and wherever those sources may be.

Again, for now we will keep this open, but we ask that it not be a "rant" or "bash" thread, but an open discussion, if anyone more wants to discuss the subject. Thank you!

Posted 3 years ago #
Garden_nymph
Member Profile

If the ONLY thing the Herald has over the blog is obits, would it be wrong to suggest that they be added to The Blog? Recently we have collectively mourned the loss of a fellow forum contributor,the young man who took his life on Alki as well as the victim of the shooting on California. (I apologize if I missed anyone.) The WSB is an amazing and living creation that is accurate and up to date. Thanks for all the hard work you have put in to this fantastic resource!

Posted 3 years ago #
Garden_nymph
Member Profile

Cruiser, I think the WSH is Great... to wad up and put in a box when sending fragile items in the mail!

It sounds to me like there is no clear differentiation between a mere blog, unmonitored comments on random subjects, and the UBER Blog, news resource we have here. I think a new term should be created to make the distinction clear. Let's brainstorm and come up with a few.

Posted 3 years ago #
WSB
Member Profile

Garden_nymph, this is why we have frequently explained, when participating in other discussions about the business off this site, WSB is NOT "a blog." It's an independent, journalist-run, neighborhood news site.

The word blog has too much baggage. We don't support using "blog" as a standalone noun, nor do we support using "blog" as a verb in any format. "Blog" is a publishing format, and that's all. The only reason we have "blog" in the name is frankly ... we didn't know any better when we started, and we did start this site as something more of a classic "blog," opinion and observation, NOT news, information, and discussion. So why not change the name? we are asked. Eventually we probably will. For now, for better or worse, this is how we are known, and what we are called is not as important as what we do, and how it serves you.

We support describing blog-format sites with language relating to the kind of writing that is done on the sites: Are they personal diaries? Advocacy sites? Or in our case - a neighborhood-news site or community-news site, pure and simple.

Some of our fellow neighborhood-news site operators in Seattle disagree with us and think the term "blog" will lose its stigma, fwiw.

Posted 3 years ago #
FullTilt
Member Profile

I have a friend that works for this paper. They are about to downsize even further, both in staff and in physical size. After selling off their actual printing presses a few years back, they are being forced to go to a digest "zine" sized edition of their paper. The Robinson news group is in its death throes.

As difficult as this is to say for someone that needs all the publicity he can get, Robinson News is run by illiterates and amateur hacks. I sent them a press release before I opened my business. They were the first to write about it, but they misspelled our names and business name and got the dates wrong. The thing is, they had a press release with all this spelled out. Sure, the article was written by a college intern initially, but it went through TWO editors! Even Mozilla tells me Ice Cream is two words.

I love print. I carry zines just because they take more thought to produce than a website, but Robinson just makes West Seattle / White Center look like the inarticulate, backwards place that the rest of the area thinks were are. They are an embarrassment, and should just stop. I would love to see a good neighborhood newspaper produced here. The Herald is not that paper.

Posted 3 years ago #
Zenguy
Member Profile

I still read the Herald on Wednesdays, the problem is I only read it on Wednesdays. I read the blog most days, because there is always stuff going on.

I too found the editorial like sour grapes, regardless of who it was about. Several people have posted comments about the editorial, which seems like it meets the 'contact before complaining' requirement.

Posted 3 years ago #
Irukandji
Member Profile

I've been a subscriber to WSH for many years. This week the delivery boys were going through the neighborhood tossing F-bombs back and forth at each other. That, combined with the editorial rant, have led me to choose to drop my subscription. No employee of WSB has ever behaved unprofessionally in my interactions with them.

Yes yes, kids will be kids, but if what's come around this week is symptomatic to Robinson Newspapers, I don't want it.

Posted 3 years ago #
flowerpetal
Member Profile

Dare I ask what an F-bomb is? You can PM me Irukandji if its not appropriate for here!

Posted 3 years ago #
Gina
Member Profile

I chose not to renew my subscription after a front page story highlighting the business and life of the man that killed the pedestrian in the crosswalk at 47th and Admiral. There were some other reasons, but that was the capper.

Yes, I did register my disapproval with the West Seattle Herald, through their online site.

Posted 3 years ago #
RS
Member Profile

This has been an incredibly enlightening thread. I hadn't realized that WS had a print newspaper. I also learned this week that people still have landline phones, Hershey still makes the "Whatchamacallit" bar, and one can still die of plague. Fascinating.

Posted 3 years ago #
villagegreen
Member Profile

I make my living designing websites and sit in front of a computer all day, every day. I read the WSB and forum posts daily and frequently. I love it.

And yet, there's nothing better as far as I'm concerned as walking into a coffee shop Thursday morning for a 12oz. Americano and picking up the new issue of The Stranger. There's just something satifying about holding the damn thing in my hands instead of scrolling and clicking on links. Maybe I'm old, but there's just something more human about turning a page than clicking a link. In this same vein, the idea of Amazon's Kindle 2 ebook reader is about as exciting to me as Segways were when those embarrasments were released however long ago. Can you seriously look at someone riding one without thinking 'douchebag' in the back of your mind?

So, the bottom line for me is, if the Herald wasn't an amateur hour newspaper, I'd be all for supporting its print version. I have to believe there's room for all types of news formats. But this could just be an old person talking.

Posted 3 years ago #
cjboffoli
Member Profile

It's like there are two houses. One is an old Victorian. And the other just across the street is a gleaming new Modern. The Victorian has seen better days. It is falling apart and the foundation is crumbling. The people who visit it are using walkers and canes and their numbers are declining. But across the street it is one big party. Young, vibrant. The lights are always on and it seems like they're constantly building new additions to accommodate all of the guests. The owners of the Victorian are beside themselves. But rather than pick up a hammer and fix their termite-ridden abode they seem more content to just pick up rocks and throw them across the street, trying to smash the windows of the Modern house. But all the throws are wild and don't ever hit anything. And all the folks in the Modern house can do is to stand at the window aghast at the sad, pathetic old fools who waste their energy trying futilely to impugn what they wish they could be but so aren't.

Posted 3 years ago #
rykrite
Member Profile

I'm actually startled by the tone taken in the editorial. It is an excellent example of the problems inherent to the WS Herald - inaccuracies, misstatements, and not terribly useful or persuasive. To the contrary, the editorial persuaded me to do what I had not yet been able to do: I'm dropping my subscription.

The ONE reason that I held on to my subscription was to support a local business that I worried would be suffering in difficult times. The comments that they are doing well made me realize that they don't need me. Well - that settles it then. I'm up for renewal tomorrow and will not renew.

A local paper COULD have information valuable to me. It could have a calendar of events meaningful to me that I could put on my fridge. It could provide a new, enlightening perspective. It could contain columns that hold my interest. THEN I would pay for it.

(WSB: Note here, my husband loves the bicycling column in the WSH. Will you ever do columns? Is there a place for that here? It's the one thing he will miss from the paper, but it's not worth the subscription price.)

I read all my news online now. I read the Seattle Times (never did like the PI), The New York Times, and the West Seattle Blog regularly. Well, there are occassions I buy the NYT Sunday Edition because it IS fun to spread it all over the table and drink a whole pot of coffee while reading....

Posted 3 years ago #
rykrite
Member Profile

PS I did post a comment along these lines on the WSH website.

Posted 3 years ago #
JoB
Member Profile

I sat down and read the Herald cover to cover last night because the on-line discussion started here made me wonder about what the differences were in the two West Seattle local news sources... the West Seattle Herald and the West Seattle Blog.

Comparing the two is like comparing apples and oranges. What thy have in common is a listing of local events and advertising and basic reporting.

The West Seattle Herald does a lot of editorializing.. both in it's in depth articles and in it's editorial pages. You get a good sense of the editor's analysis of local news events and how he thinks they relate to one another.

And they do include a formal domestic notices section (weddings, births, deaths) and formal legal notices.

The West Seattle Blog does a lot of news reporting... you know what is happening in your neighborhood when it happens.. and often in time to affect the outcome. There are very few editorials. The editors of the West Seattle Blog seldom tell you what they think.. either in editorials or in the reporting of news items. They don't tell us how to think about the news.. they ask what we think and actively solicit comments. In fact, they often participate in the discussion in the forum following a news event.

They do not have a formal notices tab, tho informal notices are encouraged in the forum section.

yes.. i do know that it is impossible for any reporter to completely withhold their personal bias and/or context about any story.. but WSB does an admirable job of staying as close to reporting the news as possible on their main page.

There is a place for the kind of journalism the West Seattle Herald does.. and i would hate to see it disappear... The fact that it is printed on paper and readily available to those who have no internet access is not it's only strength. Many people do prefer to have their news filtered through an editorial view they trust. The West Seattle Herald fills that need well.

It goes without saying that those of us who participate in the collaboration that is the West Seattle Blog do not have that need.. or if they do.. find it fulfilled by the sometimes rousing exchanges of opinion in the forum section.

I think there is room for both formats.. the question is whether there is enough advertising revenue for both formats... and i suspect question is that is what really triggered the editorial in the Herald.

Moving the West Seattle Herald to an online format will help with their costs... but several questions remain.

One is whether a legal public notice can be delivered in an online only format... and if not, will paper subscription revenue cover the printing and distribution costs of even an abbreviated paper format? If not, should the paper format be subsidized by local government?

another is how an online format will handle non-business ads? The revenue from ads placed by individuals has decreased sharply with the popularity of online sites that post free ads.

Are the days of producing revenue from classifieds over? The decrease in the number of ads has led to an increase in the price per classified ad in news print.. which leads to a larger decrease in ads.. it's a vicious circle.

If classifieds no longer fund part of the revenue for a news source.. How do you generate enough revenue to keep funding infrastructure (print or online) as you grow?

On the surface, it would seem that those questions aren't really any of our business.. after all.. these are businesses we are talking about.

But, insuring that we have access to a free press is the basis of our democracy.. and that makes the question of how a news site is funded of paramount importance to us as individuals.

The lock step myopic entertainment news we now have from the major television and many print sources sources is a good example of why we need small independent news sources that can and will explore news beyond that which is handed to them in the form of news releases.

I think this topic may well be one of the most important issues of our time.

Posted 3 years ago #
MargL
Member Profile

I wonder if the WS Herald would be facing this lawsuit if they were just a 'blog' http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/seattle911/archives/161848.asp

Posted 3 years ago #
JoB
Member Profile

MargL..

i think they would since the content of the lawsuit has more to do with editorial choices and style than with the medium in which it was published.

Defamation of character is defamation of character.. whether it occurs in traditional print, audio, video or on-line format.

You have a lot more license if the subject is a public figure and if your format is comedy but the law still applies...

The PI article didn't say if he was suing under italian law or US law... i think US law gives more latitude in the definition of a public figure.

LOL... either way.. he was way out of line to call the prosecutor in the Amanda Knox case mentally unstable... no matter how well that played in the local paper.

it is possible that newsgroup won't be around for long. i suspect even settling that one will be very expensive....

Posted 3 years ago #
charlabob
Member Profile

I doubt it, JoB -- first of all, the public prosecutor is a public figure and second of all, defamation of character is very hard to prove, even in a culture you understand. (Actually, I've seen many references to him as "mentally unstable," I was starting to think it was his title :-)

Maybe filing suit against the WSH is proof of his mental instability. I mean, Deep Pockets?????

Posted 3 years ago #
ellenater
Member Profile

This is such a great discussion. That is why I love this...um, lbog.
..."nor do we support using the word, 'blog' as a verb in any the format". lmao, TR.

Love the Victorian vs. Modern analogy. I very much enjoy sitting on my lawnchair on the sidewalk as the dirtclods fly by. :)

But seriously, I am of a generation where I had to consciously decide whether or not I was going to hop on the technology bandwagon. A lot of my friends are not savvy at all. My brother does not even have a webpage for his business, despite my best efforts. I dragged my mom kicking and screaming into the computer age. Now she is stalking me on facebook. :(

My sister-in-law, who is college aged, NEVER reads a newspaper. But she is an online wizard. Wikipedia is almost a daily part of our existence. I'm not saying online is everything, I still enjoy books: But only for pleasure and rarely for current information.

Ok, back to the lawnchair. Will someone bring me a glass of wine and some chocolate please?

Posted 3 years ago #
WSB
Member Profile

El, you should be able to get both in copious quantities at tonight's Art Walk. Seriously, everyone, the weather's nice, get out 6-9 pm and visit the 40-plus West Seattle establishments that are participating. The map is linked from the home page "happening today/tonight" item, or click the West Seattle Art Walk category in the list to the right of this very blurb and the two recent items with the map will come up. The Kenney in particular seems to be offering quite the spread, according to a postcard we got!

Posted 3 years ago #
JenV
Member Profile

wait- they have wine at the art walk? where the hell have I been?

Posted 3 years ago #
JoB
Member Profile

charla..

you might be right about the frivolous nature of the lawsuit.. but it is still expensive...

the larger issue is the propensity to shoot the messenger (in this case the Italian prosecutor) instead of reporting the news.. the strength or weaknesses of the case.

While you know i am all for editorialized comment.. i am not in favor of substituting weak arguments filled with slurs and innuendos for reasoned informed commentary.

Posted 3 years ago #