WSB Forum » Politics

(16 posts)

Seattle Times Recommends Obama for President


  1. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorialsopinion/2008190671_obamaed21.html

    "• The economy: The Good Ship America is listing in turbulent waters. Sinking mortgage and banking institutions are wreaking havoc at home and abroad. The problem is in the private sector, but it has been made worse by a federal policy favoring big corporations. The Bush administration has not regulated these companies effectively or done what it takes to curb their wants.

    Obama understands this better than McCain and makes clear he would do more to correct it. Obama's assistance to the middle class in the form of tax cuts and college-tuition breaks is a centerpiece of his campaign.

    • Energy: The energy crisis is zapping our economic well-being. What does McCain want to do? "Drill, baby, drill," to quote the mindless chant at the Republican National Convention. That is not an energy policy. It is a cheap, shortsighted slogan.

    Obama has a coherent plan that includes some drilling, as a stopgap, but he looks to a mix of renewable resources. He is more likely to move America off its dependence on foreign oil. McCain has been in office for 26 years and done little to change this dynamic.

    • The Iraq war: Many Americans will cast their vote on this one issue alone. Past performance is the best indicator of future conduct. Obama opposed the war, McCain supported it full-bore. Obama has a plan for moving the troops out; McCain seeks "victory," whatever that actually means. The net effect will be more time and money wasted in a country that did not participate in 9/11.

    Afghanistan harbors the key culprits, and the situation there is worse than it has been in eight years. Afghanistan is where our bigger effort should be, as Obama has articulated.

    • Education: Obama is more practical than ideological on education. He wants merit pay for good teachers and extra training or firing for lousy ones. He wants to double federal funding for charter schools, but not in a way that cuts into the heart of public schools. Obama recently gave a major speech on education. McCain is too low-key on an important issue.

    On numerous other issues, from media consolidation to health care, Obama has the stronger take. He makes up for a thin résumé with integrity, judgment and fresh ideas. Obama can get America moving forward again."

    Posted 3 years ago #         
  2. ellenater
    Member Profile

    ellenater

    gObama!

    ..thanks for posting WS Mom.

    Posted 3 years ago #         
  3. I have to say i am liking the times more each day:)

    Posted 3 years ago #         
  4. So who is surprised? This town is so democratic our official aninaml oughta be the donkey. Why, even mention of the word "Republican", especially in this forum, results in a call to call to arms and the storming of the castle gates!

    Posted 3 years ago #         
  5. Yes, but the Times if the far more conservative of the two papers and often supports Republican candidates. I will bet money this will not be the last conservative paper in this state to endorse Obama.

    Posted 3 years ago #         
  6. Anonymous
    Member Profile

    Zenguy - I can't even contemplate The Seattle Times and "conservative" in the same sentence. Incomprehensible. Lol....

    Posted 3 years ago #         
  7. Ooo... yeah. I dunno about conservative. However they are fair and I see their endorsement as carrying quite a bit of weight. However, they would have had a hard time justifying a McCain endorsement to us in Hippieville (which I love dearly, btw). I think there would have been an audible gasp.

    Posted 3 years ago #         
  8. Horray for the Times and all that, but I have a hard time believing that any newspaper endorsement is going to make that much difference. Most people have made their choice and we're all fighting over a very small group of "undecided" voters.

    Posted 3 years ago #         
  9. villagegreen
    Member Profile

    villagegreen

    The Seattle Times offices are located in Redmond (I'm pretty sure). Not quite the hotbed of liberalism that some seem to assume. The Times has endorsed many Republicans, including Dave Reichert. As for the Presidential endorsement, it is so clear who the better choice is this election that they really had no option but to endorese Obama.

    Posted 3 years ago #         
  10. The point is not that they endorsed him.. it's why they endorsed him...

    Posted 3 years ago #         
  11. villagegreen
    Member Profile

    villagegreen

    Them newspapers are for the 'elitists'. I get my news from the t.v. Right before I cheer on my favorite performers on America's Got Talent.

    Posted 3 years ago #         
  12. villagegreen- is that on right before "Ow!My Balls!" ?? ;)

    (for those of you who haven't seen Idiocracy- go do it now!)

    Posted 3 years ago #         
  13. Wait a minute, JenV - are you saying there really is actually a show called "Ow! My Balls!" ???? That is too much!

    Posted 3 years ago #         
  14. It was a bit of an 11th hour endorsements... I would have expected more of those pansies now that I think of it!

    Posted 3 years ago #         
  15. villagegreen
    Member Profile

    villagegreen

    JenV - I haven't actually seen Idiocracy yet. My brother keeps telling me I have to see it, so I'll bump it up in the queue.

    add - "Ow! My Balls!" doesn't exist yet, but with "Wipeout," "American Gladiators," and "The Moment of Truth" actually pulling in ratings it can't be too far away!

    Posted 3 years ago #         
  16. Don't forget Hole in the Wall. I thought they were joking...

    Posted 3 years ago #         

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.

All contents copyright 2012, A Drink of Water and a Story Interactive. Here's how to contact us.
No photo reuse without permission.
Entries and comments feeds. ^Top^