oops! guess i'm not quite done. can't let you get away with that one, hoffanimal.
i fully support cyclists and cycle-friendly roadways. got a road diet? cool! tax me. i'll gladly pay for more bike paths, bicycle lanes, and traffic-calming measures. you want to change laws regarding bikes on city streets? i'm your guy at the ballot box.
but i can't let you get away with telling me that staying home to avoid being hurt or killed is the same as not taking undue risks. that's just fallacious and inflammatory. in other words, i'll gladly walk across any intersection to get to a party - but not without looking both ways, even when i have every right to step out into a crosswalk that bisects a 35 mph arterial and expect traffic to stop.
yeah, the cars are required by law to stop. but will they? are you willing to bet your life on it? how about your kid's?
look. crossing the street shouldn't carry a bigger risk than skydiving. but it does. and that's a fact that you can't wish away.
and i'm sorry, but that kind of prudence isn't even a close cousin to paranoia. it's wisdom and self-preservation.
but if you want to eschew that prudence and instead shriek about passive/aggressive fear-mongering, be my guest. i'll gladly be the witness who calls 911 and renders aid rather than risk my skin to get from point A to point B just because it's my right.





















































































