Yes, Ken, but who WAS the real Jesus anyway?
Was He a pacifist?
"There will always be wars and rumors of wars . . ."
—Matthew 24:6-7
Was He anti-gubmint?
"Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's . . ."
—Mark 12:17
Was He pro-poor (in the sense of being against social classes)?
While He was in Bethany at the home of Simon the leper, and reclining at the table, there came a woman with an alabaster vial of very costly perfume of pure nard; and she broke the vial and poured it over His head. But some were indignantly remarking to one another, “Why has this perfume been wasted? “For this perfume might have been sold for over three hundred denarii, and the money given to the poor.” And they were scolding her. But Jesus said, “Let her alone; why do you bother her? She has done a good deed to Me. “For you always have the poor with you, and whenever you wish you can do good to them; but you do not always have Me."
—Mark 14:3-7
I'm not contradicting you here, Ken. I agree with McLaren's basic sentiment; the gospels do largely portray Jesus as a friend to the poor.
But ironically, He was also an enemy to the poor, to the extent that the gospels discourage poor people from taking action here on Earth to end poverty.
Also, technically Jesus was wrong when He claimed that the poor will always be (have always been) with us. The poor weren't with us, in fact, until we invented personal property and social classes. Most of human existence occurred before there was any such concept as "poverty" in the sense Jesus meant it.
—To which some people might respond: Well, that was before civilization, so it's the same diff.
—But to me, the fact that there was a time when humans existed more-or-less happily, in an essentially classless society, is important, because it demonstrates that we could, if we wanted, live happily in such a society again.
Sure, we'd have to do a little retooling . . . starting with our imaginations.