WSB Forum » Politics

(5 posts)

Clucked over on I-1130


  1. Once again, I've got egg on my face.

    Remember Initiative 1130? That's the bill that would have outlawed battery cages for egg-laying hens in Washington. Well, in recent weeks, I've been touting the Initiative in this forum, trying to raise awareness and urging to people to sign petitions.

    The initiative gathered more than enough signatures to make it to the ballot. (Yay!) But then what happens? —Last week, the initiative's own sponsors announce they are dropping it in order to pursue legislation on the federal level. Turns out they didn't really want to pass the law at all. Nope. All they wanted was "leverage."

    From the Seattle Times article of July 7:

    The sponsors of a Washington initiative to give egg-laying hens better living conditions called it quits Thursday after reaching a national deal with commercial egg producers to pursue federal legislation.

    Wayne Pacelle, president and CEO of The Humane Society of the United States, [the initiative's prime sponsor] said I-1130 was used to pressure the egg industry to negotiate a national agreement.

    "We thought we could leverage the Washington circumstance into a national agreement to improve the lives for all 280 million laying hens," he said. "If you can leverage a single initiative into a national agreement, that's an opportunity you don't want to miss."

    Source: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2015540939_chickens08m.html

    If the Humane Society had told me that what they really wanted was not a new law to protect hens in Washington but merely "leverage" in some national negotiation strategy they were pursuing, I wouldn't have wasted my time. This was a deceitful tactic on their part, to say the least. It's probably not even gonna work, since they seem to be more intent on throwing away leverage than building it.

    Ten years down the road, I expect conditions for chickens nationally will be as bad as they ever were. Meanwhile, Washington will have wasted the best opportunity we had to reduce animal cruelty here, in this state.

    This is the second time I've been burned on an initiative signature drive like this. In the future, I'm not going to get involved with any such effort until I've met with the sponsors personally in order to asses their character and intentions.

    And to the Humane Society of the US, I say: May the next egg you encounter be directly to the forehead.

    Sunny side down.

    –David Preston

    Posted 10 months ago #         
  2. SarahScoot
    Member Profile

    SarahScoot

    I'd be irritated too, DP, though I hope their (the Humane Society's) strategy does work in the end. I did giggle at this Freudian slip, though:
    "...until I've met with the sponsors personally in order to asses their character and intentions."

    Posted 10 months ago #         
  3. But the signature-gathering DID raise awareness, and if it leads to a nation-wide standard supported by the egg industry, how is that a loss? It seems to me that a victory won through cooperation with your opponents is a win for everybody.

    Posted 10 months ago #         
  4. EmmyJane
    Member Profile

    EmmyJane

    How sad that we have to pass laws for chickens to have enough room to extend their wings, or move at all. Anything to benefit humans and to make a buck!

    Posted 10 months ago #         
  5. If the Humane Society of the U.S. moves forward aggressively on this, then I'll tip my hat to them, but my recent experience with this kind of political horse-trading has not been good.

    A concrete change in the Washington state law was like the proverbial "bird in hand" — in this case, a chicken — while a promise from the national egg industry to change their ways is like two birds in a bush. Or maybe a bird and a half. Not a good swap, methinks.

    The national egg industry has political clout like you can't believe, and in any future talks on cage reform, they'll be leveraging support from states that are much more conservative than us when it comes to animal rights. You know . . . places like Iowa, Montana, and Georgia.

    [Sigh]

    KBear, I agree with you in principle. But as Sun Tzu said, it's best to avoid battle with your opponent until you can fight from a position of strength. A win on I-1130 would have been the best course, because the new cages wouldn't have been mandated until 2017, which would have given the national egg industry ample time to change cage sizes nationwide. And if Big Egg ultimately decided to do nothing about the cruelty problem nationwide, well then, at least we'd still have more humane cages here in Washington.

    ***************************************************************************************

    And as for you, Ms. Scoot . . .

       
     

    Posted 10 months ago #         

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.

All contents copyright 2012, A Drink of Water and a Story Interactive. Here's how to contact us.
No photo reuse without permission.
Entries and comments feeds. ^Top^