So said one Option 2 (shared campus) opponent, right after the school board vote. You’ll see that clip at the end of this post. First, let’s backtrack:
(video unavailable due to blip.tv shutdown)
There, you see the opponents of the Denny-Sealth shared campus who stood silently throughout much of tonight’s Seattle School Board meeting (WSB liveblog archived here), until and during board members’ 5-2 vote in favor of the project — here’s the roll call:
(video unavailable due to blip.tv shutdown)
Ahead: More clips including West Seattle’s board rep Steve Sundquist explaining his support for Option 2 and board member Harium Martin-Morris explaining why he opposed it, plus public comments before the vote (including one FOR the shared campus), and that “it’s not over” vow:
First, here’s how Sundquist explained his pro-2 vote, after reiterating he believes it’s a matter of fiscal responsibility and agreeing the public outreach/engagement was insufficient, while recapping some other points of the controversy leading up to the vote:
(video unavailable due to blip.tv shutdown)
Mary Bass and Harium Martin-Morris were the two board members voting against Option 2; Martin-Morris said it didn’t meet “the bar” he set for his decisionmaking, while campaigning last year — that anything he supports must help students learn and help teachers teach:
(video unavailable due to blip.tv shutdown)
Of the dozen-plus members of the public who spoke about the Denny-Sealth controversy at the start of the meeting, only one was in favor of Option 2, Denny parent Gavin Layton, who — after sharing his reasoning — also criticized the district’s level of communication/outreach:
(video unavailable due to blip.tv shutdown)
Among the anti-Option 2 speakers were Chief Sealth students Alyson Hitch and Duron Jones (you’ll see his short, to-the-point speech in this clip right after hers concludes; the WSB post he refers to is here):
(video unavailable due to blip.tv shutdown)
Also among the Option 2 opponents speaking to the board were Sealth staffers such as Delfino Munoz, who urged the board — pre-vote — to consider what would be read into their action, as well as the direct effects of the action itself:
(video unavailable due to blip.tv shutdown)
We also talked with Munoz after the vote, to ask him, “Now what?”
(video unavailable due to blip.tv shutdown)
As for what’s next from the district’s standpoint — administrators had said that if the shared campus wasn’t scrapped, the project would go out to bid this spring; how the “extra $10 million” approved tonight for Sealth will be spent, has yet to be decided (we talked about it with Sealth principal John Boyd in our interview yesterday; read it here). The district presentation shown tonight (see it here) says work would begin this fall, with Sealth students spending two years at Boren on Delridge; Denny students would move into their new school on the Sealth campus in three years.
Regarding community discussion — there’s bound to be some at the next meeting of the Westwood Neighborhood Council, which stepped in last summer to take the lead in organizing community discussion of the Denny-Sealth proposal, after the district’s acknowledged ball-dropping. (Our archived coverage dates back to that first WNC meeting on Denny-Sealth, and a bit earlier.) The WNC meets at Southwest Library on March 11; read more on its website.
| 9 COMMENTS