TRAFFIC/TRANSIT TODAY: Monday updates, including protest at Terminal 5

(SCROLL DOWN for updates)

(Four WS-relevant views; more cams on the WSB Traffic page)
6:03 AM: We’re starting the morning with the usual traffic watch, including updates on how/whether the anti-drilling protest – previewed here – is affecting things, until/unless it becomes big enough to break out into a separate story. (It’s not scheduled to start until 7 am.) Updates to come.

6:37 AM: We dropped off our crew about 15 minutes ago. No commute/low bridge effects so far. Only a few dozen people in view (and as expected, a full contingent of regional media). Police are at the gathering point and while headed eastbound, we saw bicycle officers heading from the Chelan Café vicinity northwest toward the T-5 entrance. Again, if you’re noticing helicopter(s), at this point it’s TV, related to this. Our crew, by the way, has learned the plan – subject to change – is to march over the low bridge toward T-5 starting around 7:30. (In our tweeted photo above, note the portable barricades; during the December 2011 Occupy protest there, police blocked the road with them at one point.)

7:02 AM: The aerial view just shown on KING matches what our crew reports from the ground – about 100 people so far. No other traffic trouble spots so far – sunny morning, so don’t forget your shades.

7:11 AM: Until/unless major traffic effects start, we’re just posting photos to our Twitter feed – go here if interested. Bicycle riders should note that this is having some effects on the path there.

7:20 AM: March is about to begin. From our crew at scene: Police plan to close WESTBOUND LOW BRIDGE while it proceeds so it can move more quickly. EASTBOUND LOW BRIDGE TO REMAIN OPEN. Per scanner, police estimate about 500 demonstrators.

7:27 AM: Entire bridge closed after all (LOW bridge) while protesters head for T-5. Will update when that changes. Here’s a “live” SDOT camera showing the low bridge:

7:43 AM: Per scanner, police are reopening the low bridge now that the protesters have all crossed. Again, this is not affecting the high bridge or other routes. You can check the Chelan/Marginal camera in our top grouping to see what’s happening at the west end of the low bridge.

7:51 AM: Protest march now at Terminal 5, which is NOT on a major traffic route. SDOT confirms low bridge is open again:

8 AM: No traffic effects currently unless you are trying to get onto T-5, which hasn’t been busy since it was officially closed last July.

8:06 AM: Adding photo of demonstrators milling at T-5.

What happens next, we don’t know yet – police are there, and also standing by in case the group decides to march back across the low bridge, though that was NOT in the plan published in advance – there had been an intent voiced to shut T-5 down all day if they could. Meantime, the commute overall remains normal – no incidents in/from this area.

8:21 AM: Looking ahead to tomorrow – remember that Seattle Public Schools will be closed Tuesday for the one-day teacher walkout to protest legislative lack of action on school funding. Teachers are planning morning gatherings at WSHS and Chief Sealth; more on all this in a separate story later.

9:20 AM: Back from picking up our crew and also checking out T-5 from a different angle:

No word of any arrests in connection with the protest but police remain deployed and alert; one drove over to check us out while we were peering through the barb-wire-topped T-5 fence at the end of the driveway into Jack Block Park. We’ll continue to monitor this through the day and will have a separate story later with some of the morning’s scenes, but otherwise, we’re on to other news.

31 Replies to "TRAFFIC/TRANSIT TODAY: Monday updates, including protest at Terminal 5"

  • philbob May 18, 2015 (7:20 am)

    Ah cm sawant… the same one who just took a airplane trip (highly carbon intensive) to go on a speaking tour for socialist alternative.

  • JDog May 18, 2015 (7:54 am)

    Oh sure, no one can be anti-drilling in the arctic if they took a plane once. They’re totally like, on par with each other. *eye roll*

  • sam-c May 18, 2015 (8:01 am)

    These helicopters will run out of gas, soon, I hope? Wish they would go land. So annoying.

  • WS Wanderer May 18, 2015 (8:04 am)

    2+ hours now with the helicopter. I wonder how much fuel it’s using. And am now considering going out to protest the noise pollution.

  • West Sea Neighbor May 18, 2015 (8:09 am)

    At 6:30 am when I rode through by bike there was a smattering of people about, many of whom were hanging out in the middle of the bike path, making it difficult to navigate. I imagine that it will get quite crowded as more people show up.

    • WSB May 18, 2015 (8:14 am)

      They’ve all moved on to T-5 so that spot should be clear unless there’s residual police on standby. Once the commute is over, we’ll update separately if there is a march back that way, though so far the endgame isn’t clear.

  • Raina May 18, 2015 (8:19 am)

    Yes, please no more helicopter.

  • I love cars May 18, 2015 (8:38 am)

    4 WSP Cruisers on shoulder of westbound high bridge.2 SPD near harbor ave exit.

  • I love cars May 18, 2015 (8:41 am)

    Choppers go home!

  • Timeslid May 18, 2015 (8:41 am)

    No more helicopters in the sky this is getting ridiculous! I was in the sky for a better story I don’t think so. West Seattle blog your ground coverage Is the best.

  • Jeff May 18, 2015 (8:43 am)

    Bike path was clear at 7:15, but the road was blocked then. I was surprised by the number of people really. If they had wanted to, they could have blocked the high bridge.

  • I love cars May 18, 2015 (8:45 am)

    What can wsp do from the high bridge?

  • wseakell May 18, 2015 (9:03 am)

    Don’t these people work!? If not, they should put this energy to finding a productive job!

  • Mr. B May 18, 2015 (9:21 am)

    These folks remind me of the May Day Protesters who chant their anti-corporate slogans while smoking cigarettes. Sigh.

  • dis May 18, 2015 (9:30 am)

    The BEST and maybe the ONLY way to shut down Shell Oil is to terminate demand for its product.

  • Lesley May 18, 2015 (9:41 am)

    Good job to the protestors today! I don’t really see any reason why anyone should be upset with them (except Shell CEO’s).

  • HelperMonkey May 18, 2015 (10:00 am)

    quite honestly those of you saying “anyone using any petroleum-based products in the course of this protest is a hypocrite” sound about as intelligent as the faux-news heads saying “it’s snowing in the mountains! this proves there’s no climate change!”

    • WSB May 18, 2015 (10:21 am)

      Just found via Twitter, a livestream of what’s happening at the protest. We are no longer there but are monitoring via tweets and scanner and ready to go back if warranted. http://www.ustream.tv/channel/kpfastream

  • Pat Nealson May 18, 2015 (10:05 am)

    Well, I left my home in the Admiral District at 6:35 AM this morning to head to my job in the University District, per usual, and thanks to the oil drilling protestors, ended up having to head south over the 1st South Bridge and finally got to work at 9 AM (11 miles away from home, given a direct route). I’m a fisheries biologist and I appreciate environmental sensitivity, but one could argue that these protestors are doing more harm than good, with respect to fossil fuel consumption and the improvement of our world.

  • Yardvark May 18, 2015 (10:06 am)

    Thank you, WSB, for providing the absolute best coverage in town, all without even owning a helicopter. With all your on-the-ground coverage and citizen input, I can’t help but think that WSB is probably one of the most fuel efficient news teams in the country. Plus, you are infinitely less annoying. Keep up the great work.

  • Citizen Sane May 18, 2015 (10:23 am)

    After the Saturday protest, which seemed to go quite well and didn’t cause any major inconvenience, can someone explain to me why the ‘Shell NO!’ crowd chose to piss away any goodwill they had garnered by choosing to stage a protest at T5 right at the beginning of the Monday morning commute? Can someone tell me why this couldn’t be done between 11 and 1, when the traffic impact would be not as severe? Can someone tell me why they chose a venue that would tie up traffic at all?
    .
    While I understand their concerns, I honestly think their decision on the timing and the location of today’s protest was self-indulgent and counterproductive, much like the incredibly obnoxious ‘Black Lives Matter’ protesters who thought it would be a clever idea to advance their cause by barging into Alki restaurants, yelling, chanting, and just in general making asses of themselves.
    .
    Not impressed with them today. If they were trying to win supporters to their cause, I’d rate this move a big FAIL.

  • skeeter May 18, 2015 (10:26 am)

    Pat – I don’t know if bicycling is an option for you. I realize not everyone can make it work. But it could have saved you a boatload of time this morning! 2 hours and 25 minutes to go 11 miles is insane!

  • shipwrecked_and_comatose May 18, 2015 (10:31 am)

    @ I love cars: due to budget constraints, the WSP “Justice From Above” rapid response rappel team has been cut from 16 officers to 8. Rest assured, though, that if you commit a crime under any sort of large, fixed structure, you’ll get what’s coming to you…and fast!

  • Stefen May 18, 2015 (10:50 am)

    Pat Nealson just laid the smack down.

    based on pics posted on twitter it looks like these knuckleheads basically just decided to set up an impromptu street fair, what with the band and dancing and all.

  • G May 18, 2015 (11:06 am)

    Unfortunately, the environmental movement (and I consider myself an environmentalist) is afflicted with serial hyperbole on almost all fronts and even respected scientific organizations have succumbed to it, with the culprit invariably being humankind – of course. This is why the co-founder of Greenpeace cut ties with his organization.

  • Lesley May 18, 2015 (11:14 am)

    I’m confused why this would have impacted anyone’s commute more than a normal low-bridge raise during commute times. The protestors crossed the low bridge and then it was open to traffic again. Perhaps you did not need to detour south? Is there something I missed about the impact on the commute? Besides, if I worked in the U-district and lived in West Seattle, I would budget at least an hour to commute in the morning, even if it’s only 10 miles. There are always issues.

    As for the timing, it was because the goal was to prevent operations at the T5 terminal for the day, so it was to be there before the workers arrived. And it succeeded. Workers were turned away and went home for the day.

  • Ben May 18, 2015 (11:36 am)

    Seattle will never have a shortage of people without jobs.

  • Lesley May 18, 2015 (11:37 am)

    I’m sorry for your long commute, Pat, but I think maybe you made a mistake by going South and caused the delay yourself. The protestors did not even gather until 7am and according to this WSB post, the low bridge was only closed from 7:27am to 7:43am, long after you could’ve been out of the Admiral District and over either the low or the high bridge.

  • Lesley May 18, 2015 (11:44 am)

    I don’t know much about this topic, G, but I assume you are referring to Patrick Moore when you say the “founder” of Greenpeace, so I thought I’d look it up. Here is what Greenpeace has to say about it:
    http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/about/history/Patrick-Moore-background-information/

  • 33Pete May 18, 2015 (12:19 pm)

    I am a conservation minded, long-time west Seattle resident that is sympathetic to, but not necessarily in agreement with, the protestors.

    I strongly believe in coordinated action to get the U.S. and the rest of the world off of fossil fuels, I just don’t think protesting a Shell service station (pun intended) in Seattle is the way to do it. Not by a long shot.

    Regardless, the protestors I saw up close on Saturday (at Seacrest Park, Jack Block Park and by the WS Bridge) were peaceful, respectful, nice, and very family and kid friendly. I honestly can’t see how anyone has a bone to pick with them, even if you are on the opposite side of the political spectrum.

    The protesters from this morning were equally peaceful, nice, and family and kid friendly. However, on the “respectful” side of things, I can understand people being turned off by the inconvenience of a longer commute, and by the blocking the entrance to the port. Quite frankly, I have always taken issue with protestors who go beyond delivering a message and delve into the area of blocking ingress or egress to an establishment.

    In sum, by and large, this was a very peaceful group of wonderful, committed people; I just wish they would have continued with a protest aimed at communication and awareness raising, rather than delving into the area of obstructionism.

  • Neighbor May 18, 2015 (5:47 pm)

    TR: are you relaxing your standards on the name calling? Just asking because I’ve noticed it’s becoming more common.

Sorry, comment time is over.