‘We’re being held for ransom’: Anger voiced by Gatewood Elementary parents told to raise $90,000 to keep a teacher

(1:44 PM UPDATE: SPS says in a statement that “Gatewood teaching staff will remain intact” because of the fundraising campaign – full statement is at the end of this story)

By Tracy Record
West Seattle Blog editor

They’re raising the money, but they’re angry about it.

While one group of Gatewood Elementary parents filled the chairs at School Board director Marty McLaren‘s regular community-conversation meeting last night, another led a fundraiser at a private home, toward their goal of raising $90,000 – described by some as “ransom” – to keep Seattle Public Schools from removing a teacher from their school.

Though they learned about the planned cut less than a week ago (here’s our original report), their fundraising campaign – including a hastily organized Saturday bake sale – has brought in $52,000.

That impressed McLaren, who opened last night’s meeting by saying, “I just want to acknowledge the extraordinary show of force that the Gatewood community has made … my sense is that many people from West Seattle proper have really invested in this. It’s really something.”

But also really something the parents can’t believe they have had to do.

“I am outraged,” declared one attendee. “I am just outraged that a major-city school district would try and pull a stunt like this … I cannot believe we are being asked to pay for a teacher salary. This is a major city, I cannot imagine this happening anywhere else in the country.” She drew applause.

“We’re being held for ransom for someone else’s mistake … and it feels precedent setting,” said another. “I don’t want a single dime of that money to go to the district that has a record of poor judgment and misuse … I feel it’s going to happen to another school.”

Before the meeting, the group that organized as “Friends of Gatewood” had received something of an update from the district, telling them they didn’t have to have the entire $90,000 in hand by today after all – provided they send in “a letter of commitment” today pledging the money, the imminent removal of a teacher from Gatewood would be put on hold. McLaren said she had met with deputy superintendent Michael Tolley and this area’s executive director of schools Israel Vela, and “both are very concerned, (saying that) the district would not want to do anything to disrupt the situation at Gatewood. Deadlines are secondary to resolving the problem successfully.”

That led one parent at the meeting to say, “If they already have decided to not move teachers (today), why not put this on hold while the root cause be found?”

That was the source of much anger and frustration during the meeting: Trying to figure out how the situation happened, what role school waitlists played in it – whether families enrolled at Gatewood were allowed to make last-minute switches, whether families were allowed at the last minute to add to Fairmount Park’s over-expectation enrollment – and what would be done to make sure anything similar can’t happen again, not just here, but anywhere in the district.

One thing heard over and over: If this was the result of a district mistake, why is Gatewood being forced to pay – literally – for it? Said one attendee: “My request is that the district solve the problem they caused.” Another: “Why isn’t there an option for district to take accountability for their actions?”

Over the past six days, different scenarios have been mentioned regarding how a teacher would be removed from Gatewood, which, however it happened, is said by the district to have 25 students fewer than expected. The one that was in circulation at the time of our first report last Thursday involved a first-grade teacher at Gatewood being moved to fourth grade, and a fourth-grade teacher being moved to Fairmount Park. The attendees last night included a man who identified himself as the husband of “the first-grade teacher in question, a master teacher (who) chose to take the Gatewood job” in the first place, “impressed by everything (about the school) she had heard. … To have this level of disruption and upset a month into it … has been eye-opening.” He, like others, expressed concern that “the district didn’t do anything to avoid this.”

Those in attendance sat in a circle, and each were offered the chance to voice their concerns, going around that circle. Several were on the brink of tears, and yet there also were moments of rueful laughter about what they had accomplished in less than a week, including spending Saturday standing on a streetcorner holding an emergency bake sale.

Some of the money to complete the district-requested $90,000 might come from the Gatewood PTA. One of its officers was at the meeting and expressed frustration and fear that its coffers might be virtually emptied for this – meaning the other things they raise money to fund, like so many parent groups at so many schools, might be in jeopardy. “I’m terrified to come to our membership and ask for something that will nearly bankrupt us.” The PTA wasn’t even able to have an emergency meeting to take a vote, as its rules require two weeks’ notice – more than the school community got regarding the teacher removal.

Anyone who thinks this is a “comfortable” school is wrong, said one parent. For one, Gatewood was affected in a big way by the last round of school closures, which district leaders have since admitted were a mistake: “We haven’t been in a comfortable place for so long. When (the Cooper Elementary program on Pigeon Point) was closed, we went from 250 students to 400. Either the district lied (when it made school-closure decisions) or they hired the worst statisticians ever.” She pointed out the portables that now take up playground space. Just creating room for more students wasn’t the only change; Gatewood’s ELL (English-language learners) program grew dramatically as well. And, as has been mentioned in earlier reports, the school has full inclusion for students with Emotional/Behavioral Disorder.

The suggestion of “comfort” because of financial status also is inaccurate, parents protested: “This is coming from our pockets, and our pockets aren’t that deep.” By the time the annual auction fundraiser – again, a staple these days for so many schools – comes around, someone suggested, the pockets will be empty.

Teachers also have contributed to the fundraising, and the aforementioned first-grade teacher’s husband said that left him shaking his head that he had just written a check to help his wife keep her current job.

The overall financial picture contributing to this seemed confusing at times, with McLaren saying that since Fairmount Park has more students than planned, it will get more money from the state, and is advertising a teaching position – leading some to ask, then why was it supposed to get a Gatewood teacher? (McLaren tried to explain that the Gatewood “one teacher too many” situation should be considered separately, but did not seem to get much traction.)

Those in attendance last night also included two Gatewood grandparents – a former teacher and her husband (who turned out to be a long-ago classmate of McLaren’s, in a moment that briefly broke the tension and emotion of the meeting). The former teacher said she had told ex-colleagues, “You won’t believe that this school has to do” to try to staveoff staff disruption.

Another attendee: “The district should meet us halfway.”

And yet another: “I really hope we’re not going to be asked to foot this bill.”

Before meeting’s end, asked what specifically she is going to do next, McLaren voiced empathy: “It seems like we should be able to come up with 90,000 dollars in an almost 600 million dollar budget,” and promised that she would be “back on the phone (today) … pushing hard for the district to cover this so you don’t have to … but everything I’ve heard so far is discouraging in that direction.” Looking at the bigger picture, she also promised, “I will be pushing hard to move the closing-enrollment date … moving it to August makes a lot of sense.”

In the meantime, the school’s families and staff have to move ahead with school day after school day, despite the unresolved questions. Curriculum Night is coming up, said one parent, a night when parents come to their child’s school to meet teachers and talk about what the classes will be working on, but: “Will this even BE my child’s teacher” once this is all over?

ONLINE DONATIONS: With time extended for the parents to finish raising the money, they have also set up an account online – follow this link to the GoFundMe page.

ADDED 1:45 PM: We’ve received this statement from the district:

Seattle Public Schools must remain fiscally responsible, following the direction of our own strategic plan: equitable distribution of resources that prioritize the needs of students. To meet this goal, it is our aim to assure funding follows students. It was with that goal we made the decision to move one full-time equivalent teacher from Gatewood Elementary to Fairmount Park Elementary.

Since receiving news of our decision, the Gatewood Elementary community has achieved an impressive feat of community involvement. As of today, the Gatewood community raised enough money to fund one full-time equivalent teacher at Gatewood.

The appropriate process was followed and paperwork to add a community-funded position to Gatewood for one year were submitted to the district today and are expected to be approved by Grants & Strategic Partnerships by the end of the day.

Moving forward, Gatewood teaching staff will remain intact and in place as they have been so far this year.

Fairmount Park Elementary will receive a full-time equivalent teacher, which the district hopes to see in place by the end of October if not sooner.

49 Replies to "'We're being held for ransom': Anger voiced by Gatewood Elementary parents told to raise $90,000 to keep a teacher"

  • seaview October 8, 2014 (10:37 am)

    Seattle Public Schools should be ashamed of themselves. Year after year they never fail to disappoint. I tried to get behind them but when they closed school 8 years ago it was like “WHAT?” and it still continues…a fresh start with Fairmount & its already mucked up by IDIOTS.

  • marty October 8, 2014 (10:58 am)

    This tactic isn’t new, it has been used for years. They take away something from the school district and then force new tax increases on us in the form of an emergency levy. All of this and the student achievement results are poor…

  • cj October 8, 2014 (11:10 am)

    Right to the point.

  • MJD October 8, 2014 (11:22 am)

    The Seattle district is as dysfunctional now as it was over 15 years ago when my kids were attending public schools! Which is why they won’t get my vote for anymore levies. What should be done is parents demanding some accountability for the money they spend. After reading the times article about special-education director, Zakiyyah McWilliams,home on paid leave while her department is being investigated and audited I would bet there are other departments in the same boat! Federal money is being withheld because of her mismanagement. Makes you wonder who else needs to be put under a microscope and examined more closely. I am thankful my kids are out but worry for my grandkids!

  • GW+FP mom October 8, 2014 (11:29 am)

    Thank you WS Blog for such broad and deep coverage. Amazing to have our own “small town paper” here in the middle of this grand city.

    I would love nothing more than to convert the $$ that our family has donated to the Friends of Gatewood into a formal GW and FPE PTA donation to help offset what the District doesn’t provide (known entities). That list should NOT include the salary and benefits package for a NEEDED teaching position.

    Thank you to Natasha, Nicole and Laura for your outstanding coordination and leadership in this drive.
    Mom of a GW and an FP student

  • forgotmyname October 8, 2014 (11:40 am)

    Wait, Marty – ‘they force new tax increases on us’, but when they make a decision in the interest of NOT having to force tax increases on us – we should be outraged? I’m not following any of this at all – on one hand the SPS is wrong for not hiring enough teachers because they can only afford so many and don’t want to pass the cost on to taxpayers, but on the other they’re wrong for not spending money they don’t have and passing the cost on to taxpayers. Sounds like ‘wah the children’ emotions, not practicality or concern for the taxpayer are running this show…

  • OC October 8, 2014 (11:46 am)

    Thank you for following up with the district and asking the cutoff date be moved to August. It seems that it would help avoid some of this from happening in the first place.

  • AH Resident October 8, 2014 (11:54 am)

    Tracy: Where are the Union Reps in dealing with this problem? I can hardly believe, how SPS is
    “bargaining” here. Are there important facts missing?

  • WS Dad October 8, 2014 (12:04 pm)

    I am curious about the West Seattle PTA’s. How much is being asked by your PTA for its budget? Ours is $240,000.00, or $380 per student. Whats yours?

  • magic8Ball October 8, 2014 (12:24 pm)

    Slippery Slope! If you pay now they will just keep coming back for more. All of the “Good” Teachers will be ransomed back to your school. Gatewood will be a psedo private school. The next step will be to charge extra to attend the “in demand” teachers classes. The Seattle School District needs to replace all of the analysts that consistantly can’t plan for population shifts. Example is a big new 100 unit apartment building should bring in more students, but the district doesn’t seem to analysize building trends it seems.

  • I care October 8, 2014 (12:34 pm)

    Kudos for GW but meanwhile kids at my school have 34 in a classroom!

    It feels like FP is being held hostage. My two cents, I appreciate GW trying to prevent disruption but it seems to be at the expense of the students at FP.

    I am not tring to fight between us, but I feel like current overstuffed classrooms trump the possible shifting of classrooms.

    Even then, FP will have classroom shifts that are just as dramatic as those at GW

  • Today's Trivia Taster October 8, 2014 (12:41 pm)

    Not to pile on, but… Here’s another factoid to underscore the collective incompetence of SPS. The new Schmitz Park @ Genesee school will likely be over capacity when the doors finally open.

  • Paul October 8, 2014 (12:51 pm)

    Very well written and to the point.

    Why and how can such a thing happen? Where is the teacher Union on this issue. They should be protecting their own here.

    Remember that this school has 41% lunch assistants. The pockets are not that deep. Our school is run by passion and heart. The teachers and parents really care about the students.

    When a teacher or a school needs something they ask and we figure out a way to get what they need. The school has gone from a very troubled school to a hidden gem. The teacher that have made there way to the school have really made a difference.

    SPS messed up with their planning many times over the last couple of years. They really need to step up and be accountable for their action.

  • DEF October 8, 2014 (1:23 pm)

    @Paul – Re: your teacher union question. I’m not 100% sure, but I believe the hiring issue was actually forced in the first place by some classrooms at FP being “over contract,” i.e. too many students per teacher as defined by the teachers’ collective bargaining agreement. It’s one of many areas where the needs of teachers and students line up very nicely. If not for the contract, the district would be able to let classroom sizes inflate and inflate with no guardrails. (While I don’t know for sure, I also have heard that there’s a way for a teacher to agree to accept more pay for having more-than-the-allowed-for students, but if that’s true then it appears that whoever may have been given that choice declined in favor of getting another teacher hired/placed at FP.) Bottom line is, even if the union isn’t visible in this controversy, it’s absolutely playing a role. And IMHO, it’s a constructive role.

  • Olli the Optimist October 8, 2014 (1:27 pm)

    I think should be mentioned, albeit of small consolation – it is so awesome to see all of the parents and neighborhoods really coming together to stand up and raise $! I just wanted to offer my appreciation.
    .

  • dsa October 8, 2014 (1:36 pm)

    “saying that since Fairmount Park has more students than planned, it will get more money from the state, and is advertising a teaching position – leading some to ask, then why was it”
    .
    Unless FP is going to get two teachers, I don’t think the is a separate issue the way issue the way McLaren says it is.

  • Guy October 8, 2014 (1:36 pm)

    What a waste of time, energy, and money. There are kids who can’t afford a lunch and you self entitled parents are try to spend money on this? Sad!

  • just keep swimming October 8, 2014 (2:03 pm)

    @Icare you may have missed the fact that the EBD children count for TWO students. So while the SPS is counting heads they should actually be counting considering the issues facing the teachers. We had 29 actual heads in our kindergarten class last year (which is over contract) + we had at least 5 EBD students. Bringing the actual total of our kindergarten class to 34 students! So FP parents and GW parents are in the same exact boat. Its called the TOO MANY STUDENTS boat. Please vote on your Nov. 4th ballot for initiative 1351 to reduce class sizes. http://ourvoicewashingtonea.org/

  • Tom Stoner October 8, 2014 (2:09 pm)

    After thinking about what I heard at the meeting last night, I would like to point out that the parents and kids are the school district’s customers. The district needs supportive customers, especially of the caliber of the Gatewood parents. It would be in the district’s best interest to formulate a solution that preserves that support. I hope the right people can recognize this.

  • kayo October 8, 2014 (2:17 pm)

    I am not a Gatewood or Fairmount parent, but the reason I donated to Gatewood’s cause and support what the community is trying to accomplish is because if this is happening at their school, it could easily happen at my kid’s school. Good for them for standing up for the rest of us who might find ourselves in their shoes in the future. Also, because this mess is part of the ripple effect of the school closures and then reopenings along with the change from choice to neighborhood schools, the district really should find room in their budget for the necessary “cleanup” especially if it is such a small part of the overall district budget. I am so happy that the district has decided to allow Gatewood to keep their teacher. I also hope Fairmount Park gets the capacity relief they need and deserve and quickly. This should also serve as a reminder that we need to continue to lobby our state representatives to figure out how to fix the illegal underfunding of schools that exists today. This type of situation should not fall on the backs of parents and teachers who really can’t afford it.

  • pagefive October 8, 2014 (3:21 pm)

    I’m having a VERY difficult time understanding how SPS can fork out $83-114K each to fund not one but two Senior Project Engineers, a SharePoint Developer, etc – positions that I would argue offer no direct benefit to our children – yet they are unable to cough up $90K (which is actually an overestimate) for a teacher? Get your priorities right, SPS. And hold them accountable for god’s sake, Seattle School Board!

  • Mark47n October 8, 2014 (3:27 pm)

    @ Tom Stoner: I find your quote “…caliber of Gatewood Parents” to be interesting. Is this because they have the time and resources to raise the money? What do you intend by that statement? It could easily be misconstrued to mean Gatewood parents are better than other parents. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt that you don’t intend that but clarification would be great.

    I also don’t get the false outrage. There are more teachers than are required given the enrollment so one teacher goes to another school. If you want to keep the teacher than outside funding for a full-time extra teacher is needed and is considered a luxury. We talk so often about how schools, and other public entities, waste funding (in our own, so often flawed, opinions)but cry “foul!” when it affects you. Keep in mind that I’m not defending SPS so much as pointing out the double standard.

  • heather October 8, 2014 (4:14 pm)

    Mark47n,I believe in the first post regarding this issue that someone mentioned what sounded like a numbers shuffle. As the normal flex of classroom sizes (families move, kids move from one class to another) occurs over the first 2 months, the ACTUAL numbers at Gatewood, after the proposed teacher move, would have resulted in one teacher short. Instead of hiring, since the school year has already started, the remaining teachers would absorb additional students – putting each class at 2-3 students over the max # of kids per teacher. At least, that’s what I understood from reading the previous posts.

  • Peter October 8, 2014 (4:29 pm)

    So what happens to a school with more enrollment than expected if people won’t allow a teacher to be moved from a school with less enrollment than expected? It seems to me being flexible enough to allocate resources where they’re most needed is the most efficient way to operate.

  • Calm Her Down October 8, 2014 (4:32 pm)

    @Mark47n, I think he/she was referring to the devoted nature of the parents, not the fiscal ability of our community.
    .
    Regarding your point about the false outrage, please try to imagine yourself as either a parent or child in either the 1st or 4th grades. I’m sure you’re going to say that kids are flexible and they’ll barely remember this or whatever, but as a father of a student caught up in this I’d like to disrespectfully disagree. Put yourself in the shoes of those impacted. It’s unfair to shuffle teachers around because the school district can’t handle addition/subtraction of 3-digit numbers.

  • Calm Her Down October 8, 2014 (4:34 pm)

    @Peter, imagine yourself in the shoes of the parents and children of the two grades involved. This is impacting about 1/6 of the school. However much or little you’re concerned about budgets and taxes or whatever, have some consideration for our families.

  • The point October 8, 2014 (5:07 pm)

    SPS allowed FP to over-enroll and that is what caused the discrepancy. Gatewood kids (on the FP waitlist) moved to FP after school had already started. Those that want to find fault with the Gatewood community need to get this thru their head. This community just played the hand they were dealt to keep their school together. None of this had to happen if SPS does their job in the first place!

  • AHMom October 8, 2014 (5:20 pm)

    The other thing to consider in all of this is that the GW teacher may be let go next year if GW enrollment #’s stay same or reduce. Going to FP could keep her employed in WS. Just a thought because we faced that with one of our K teachers and it has been a concern for the past couple of years when numbers were going down. Hopefully, not the case.

  • LT October 8, 2014 (5:22 pm)

    I’m a former teacher who taught in well off schools and very not well off schools. Although I applaud the GW community for stepping up to save their teacher, I have a very heavy heart for so many schools whose communities don’t have the resources to do this. With all the good intent the GW community has, I feel that they’re also driving the income gap in the greater Seattle community wider by ‘buying’ a teacher when so many other schools’ communities wouldn’t be ever be able to do so. No good deed goes unpunished. Just something to think about.

  • zark00 October 8, 2014 (5:35 pm)

    I believe GW purposefully planned the staff/student ratio for smaller class sizes. This was their “reward” for being forward thinking about not having 30+ kids in a class.
    I also believe its true that FP was pretty vocal about expecting a lot more kids than SPS expected; they got the teacher count based on SPS’s estimate. Guess which estimate was actually accurate. Hint – Not SPS’s.
    I have mentioned the APP issue before as well, SPS couldn’t guess that enrollment at FP would go up, being its the only APP elementary in the area, when they reopened testing after FP was greenlit. I’m not sure, but I believe SPS estimated very few additional kids would move to FP. FP parents and staff meanwhile correctly guessed LOTS of newly APP tested kids would go to FP instead of Thurgood. My question for SPS is pretty much – how can you be SO bad at your jobs? Whomever runs stats for SPS should be sent back to school.

    Even though SPS is, insane? Just a guess, please keep voting in school funding. Your money isn’t wasted on kids. Schools need that funding so badly, its critical. Not voting in a school levy doesn’t send a message to SPS – I guess I sort of wish it did, but it never has and I doubt it ever will. All it does when we vote down funding for schools is hurt the kids.

  • brandon October 8, 2014 (6:06 pm)

    Yes LT, think about how that $90,000 could help a Roxbury, Sanislo, West Sea El schools PTA.

  • Gotta Have Hope October 8, 2014 (6:39 pm)

    I am wondering how we can get an accurate, detailed financial accounting from SPS. I know of many, many cases where they have chosen to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for each employee that they had to get rid of because of charged, illegal activities and/or total incompetence. Also, I, like so many others involved with the district, am aware of expensive district projects that are nothing but boondoggles. I would love to see a very accurate, detailed financial accounting for Seattle Public Schools. I believe that this is the only way that anything is going to change. SPS needs to be accountable to us.

  • ABC October 8, 2014 (7:16 pm)

    AMEN @LT.

  • Mike October 8, 2014 (8:16 pm)

    Can we legally fund a state/district paid position of a union salary with funds raised this way? I didn’t vote for it, did you? I’m glad they get to keep the teacher, obviously needed to better educate our kids, but this seems like a gift and no district employee or department can accept gifts, am I correct?
    .
    I think it’s time we start a fund for some investigations into how things are operating in our district. I’d bet we can save over a million with 3 consultants fee’s in one year.

  • Bigger problems in the world October 8, 2014 (8:51 pm)

    Well said @Guy and @LT I agree. Bigger issues that people should be donating to or worrying about..geez…

  • flimflam October 8, 2014 (9:04 pm)

    @mike – interesting point re: 1st sentence.

  • Heidi A October 8, 2014 (9:55 pm)

    SPS is audited by the State Auditor every year, and every year lack of internal controls and mismanagement are noted. From the 6/2014 Accountability Audit:

    “We audit the District on an annual basis. In the past three accountability audits, we reported nine accountability findings regarding insufficient internal controls over payroll, a lack of controls over safeguarding public assets, facility use and unallowable expenditures.”

    From the 2013 Accountability Audit report:
    “In the 2007 audit, we reported four findings, two of which were in the report of financial statements and federal single audit. Internal controls over payroll continued to be inadequate and, as a result, public funds were misappropriated. Associated Student Body funds were spent for unallowable purposes and processed in violation of District policies.

    ***
    In the 2008 audit, we reported six findings, four of which were in the report of financial statements and federal single audit. Internal controls over financial statement preparation and payroll processing continued to be inadequate. As a result, the financial statements contained errors and public funds were misappropriated. We also reported findings for failing to report all known or suspected losses to the State Auditor’s Office and incorrectly reporting teacher education and experience.


    In the 2009 audit, we reported 12 findings, seven of which were in the report of financial statements and federal single audit. Internal controls over financial statement preparation and payroll continued to be inadequate. As a result, the financial statements contained errors and public funds were misappropriated. We also reported findings for failing to report all known or suspected losses to the State Auditor’s Office, using capital funds for unallowable expenditures and for failing to implement sufficient policies and controls to ensure the District was complying with state law and its own policies.

    In the 2010 audit, we reported seven findings, three of which were in the report of financial statements and federal single audit. We reported findings for not establishing sufficient policies and controls for the Science, Technology, Engineering and Math computer program to ensure laptops issued to students were safeguarded, paying $36,000 for charges that were unsupported, overbilled, and outside the scope of a contract and inadequate internal controls over Associated Student Body activities.

    In the 2011 audit, we reported seven findings, three of which were in the report of financial statements and federal single audit. We reported findings for charging salaries in the incorrect program or fund. We also reported findings for not monitoring fleet purchases, vehicle use and fuel card use, and inadequate controls over fleet assets and maintenance tools.

    http://www.seattleschools.org/modules/cms/pages.phtml?sessionid=&pageid=224585

  • Diana October 8, 2014 (9:56 pm)

    Will BoxTops help in this fight to keep the teacher? I’ve got quite a few that I was gonna use for our school, but I’d happily give to Gatewood. It’s not much, but every little bit helps, right?

  • Info is out there October 8, 2014 (10:27 pm)

    It is a grant. They are very common and a list of all the grants received are on the district website. The budget of every school is also on the website.

  • DV October 8, 2014 (10:42 pm)

    AHMom makes an interesting point. The money raised is just for one year. Who is going to pay for next year’s salary? And the year after? This does not seem like a long-term solution.

  • Tom Stoner, Gatewood grandparent October 8, 2014 (10:56 pm)

    What is this “@” salutation that some people are using? Sounds like twitter. If this were twitter, wouldn’t our comments be limited to 140 characters?

    Mark47n, by “caliber of Gatewood parents,” I meant their demonstrated ability to organize and respond to a suddenly revealed situation that threatened to unravel much of the work that they have done with the Gatewood staff to shape the teaching environment in desirable ways. For all I know, parents at other schools could and would respond in a similar way to a similar situation.

    It would be beneficial for SPS to think about the advantages of having supportive parents/customers for the long term instead of suddenly blowing up their hard-earned achievements and expectations.

    The statement by SPS so far that says they are proceeding to add a community-funded position to Gatewood for one year is NOT the solution that will maintain the support of SPS’s customers/parents. They felt forced to try to raise money because they were given no other choice in the short time allotted. If SPS accepts full community funding as the solution to a problem that the district should mitigate financially, there will be insufficient financial resources and parent involvement for the PTA to provide their traditionally excellent support to Gatewood. I am hoping to hear that the details of the solution contain more of a compromise that does not put the entire financial burden on the Gatewood community.

  • Tom Stoner, Gatewood grandparent October 9, 2014 (10:00 am)

    This is an update to my previous comment. I read a news item this morning that said that the district had reduced the target amount and had provided $21,000 in grant money, which, combined with $65,000 that Friends of Gatewood had raised, has preserved the teacher position at Gatewood. I commend the district for helping to close the immediate issue, and I am believing that this effort will help them focus on fixing the processes that did not provide earlier communication and also allowed the situation to develop by not managing enrollment earlier.

    • WSB October 9, 2014 (10:04 am)

      Tom – I saw that BUT please note, that final amount hasn’t been confirmed. We had already reported that the PTA expected to commit some of the money, despite trepidation. (See the 10/8 story link.) One of the parents involved told us yesterday they *thought* the district had lowered the total amount to $80K-ish but when I asked the district to reconfirm the amount, they again listed the $90,000, as quoted in our story. Hope to get some clarification today. – TR

  • 1of34 October 9, 2014 (10:31 am)

    As the parent of a child who until very recently had 34 kids in his classroom, I think the anger directed at the Gatewood parents is misplaced. Any and all anger should be focused on the district for absolutely mismanaging classroom size in West Seattle. That any classroom should have more than 26 kids is ridiculous.

  • Tom Bishop October 10, 2014 (12:24 am)

    Some of the issues are related to the district budget current situation. They seem to have multiple surprises, and they mentioned budget constraints in several of their communications. I was surprised when the Board approved Math in Focus curriculum, at a $4M additional cost, and not even mentioned anything about where the additional money was going to come from….Based on the salary info, that could pay for 50+ teachers, more than 1 per elementary school…..also totally disregarding the district recommendation. The district recommendation, based on experts on the topic, was not Math in focus, Math in focus was the last (3rd ranked priority) and $4M cheaper for taxpayers..The vote was though 4-3. We whould ask that question to the 4 board members that vote for that $4M increase…Sue Peters, Marty McLaren, Sharon Peaslee, and Betty Patu. All 3 other board members mentioned budget responsibility, district recommendation, research that the teacher is the key element for student success, not the book/curriculum, that the book was the shinny object….but they lost to the majority of the board…..

    http://kuow.org/post/surprise-move-seattle-schools-approve-singapore-math

    http://www.kplu.org/post/seattle-school-board-rejects-districts-choice-new-math-textbooks-makes-its-own-pick

  • Marissa Turner October 10, 2014 (12:51 am)

    From my parent experience there are a lot of misconceptions that people mentioned.

    Every district I have my kids, in multiple states, did teacher adjustments in October/November, so this is not only Seattle. Some districts just have the funds to cover it so they don’t have to cut that many positions. It could be a big bill adding all schools.

    If they forecast students conservative, then you have a massive amount of teacher openings in October, which is not good either. Most teachers are hired earlier….there is a risk on both ends…

    The forecasting is not an easy process (like counting beans…as some people referred).

    A lot of parents wait until the last minute to change their address and their school, just need to go to the office of enrollment the days before start of school, a lot of lines…all that change the number of students per school, per grade

    There are all kind of factors affecting the number of students at a school and grade level, new construction, mobility rates, the 70,000 kids in Mexico border waiting to get asylum, how many will end up in Washington? how many and where in the state? how many and where in Seattle, specific school, grades, …..

    That is why districts wait until October, so they could see physical students classes. It is like checking an stock price every hour….always changing….

    I thing the state also pay the district in October so it is like you knowing how much money you will get paid before you rent an apartment……

    Have earlier deadlines for families (somebody mentioned too)…Seattle is an area enrollment, so If you move to a school enrollment area, district have to provide a seat, does not matter when Sep, Oct, Nov…, so you cannot give deadlines. It is your right to get education, so the school student numbers are moving all the time.

    It is nice to hear some people thanking the fiscal responsibility, if all schools just add teachers, then our taxes will grow a lot…..100 schools, if we add 1 teacher per school, that will be $10 MM?, funding should follow students? that sounds logical to me…

    This is the process that profit also uses….stores, retailers, chains use to forecast staffing, you could ask, it is not easy and is painful, especially when you need to cut or you don;t have funds to cover ……

    It seems that the district should explain better the process and challenges.

  • I Wonder October 11, 2014 (10:58 am)

    Tom, why do we have Board members if all they are going to do is rubber stamp recommendations as gold? We’ve used Singapore Math for several years (similar to Math in Focus) and its been an exceptional program. Many “experts” outside of the school have praised its value (Cliff Mass comes to mind), experts who did not have a conflict of interest in the text book company (superintendent MGJ). Perhaps you could comment on your “concerns” about shiny objects. Do you really believe the cheapest is always the best choice? In this case, its been shown that MIF is a much better math choice and worthy of our kids. Perhaps we go back to all the fraud in the District when we question the Board about their past actions.

  • Jeannie October 13, 2014 (4:27 pm)

    This happens to schools across the district every year. Unfortunately some schools can raise money to save a teachers while others cannot. Where families should be outraged is the disproportionate spending on school board members pet project schools. Pinehurst k-8 remains open with only 135 students, with 9 in a kindergarten class plus excessive bussing costs. The cost per student spending is ridiculously skewed throughout the district. The bleeding heart school board favors boutique schools while mainstream schools bear the financial and dysfunctional burden. Again look at the cost per student spending report provided by the district.

Sorry, comment time is over.