<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: West Seattle Wednesday: &#8216;Next Fall&#8217; opening night; 34th Dems take on GMOs&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://westseattleblog.com/2013/03/west-seattle-wednesday-next-fall-opening-night-34th-dems-take-on-gmos/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://westseattleblog.com/2013/03/west-seattle-wednesday-next-fall-opening-night-34th-dems-take-on-gmos</link>
	<description>West Seattle news, information, and discussion, updated multiple times daily, 24/7/365</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 22:54:51 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JumboJim</title>
		<link>http://westseattleblog.com/2013/03/west-seattle-wednesday-next-fall-opening-night-34th-dems-take-on-gmos#comment-983435</link>
		<dc:creator>JumboJim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 02:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westseattleblog.com/?p=144734#comment-983435</guid>
		<description>Forgot to say thanks for the beautiful pic Danny!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot to say thanks for the beautiful pic Danny!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JumboJim</title>
		<link>http://westseattleblog.com/2013/03/west-seattle-wednesday-next-fall-opening-night-34th-dems-take-on-gmos#comment-983433</link>
		<dc:creator>JumboJim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 02:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westseattleblog.com/?p=144734#comment-983433</guid>
		<description>The bird actually appears to be a Common Merganser, rather than a Red-breasted. Despite their name Common Mergansers are much less common on saltwater than Red-breasted. The sharp contrast where the gray chest and rusty head meet is the key mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bird actually appears to be a Common Merganser, rather than a Red-breasted. Despite their name Common Mergansers are much less common on saltwater than Red-breasted. The sharp contrast where the gray chest and rusty head meet is the key mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VBD</title>
		<link>http://westseattleblog.com/2013/03/west-seattle-wednesday-next-fall-opening-night-34th-dems-take-on-gmos#comment-983219</link>
		<dc:creator>VBD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westseattleblog.com/?p=144734#comment-983219</guid>
		<description>Nitro, I suggest you actually read the text of I-522.  The law would not require anywhere near the level of detail you think it would.  It would not tell you what is in the food, how much is in there or even if there is a reasonable level of certainty.


The mandated label, “may be partially produced with genetic engineering” is so utterly ambiguous, that it provides absolutely no assurance to the consumer, and does not present a reasonable basis for choice.  This is the phrase that would appear on the vast majority of the products in the typical grocery store. 


The law would declare that the only way to demonstrate that a food product does not require a label is by having a sworn statement, USDA Organic certification, or a GMO-Free test certification.  Since the only place a violation of the labeling law can occur is when the food is &quot;offered for retail sale&quot;, enforcement cannot occur anywhere but at the retail level.  This means the typical store would need to either remove a substantial amount of food from their shelves, or attempt to pressure out of state suppliers to label the food, or supply a sworn affidavit declaring the food is GE-free.  Failure to do so could result in a substantial fine.


Imagine a store like the Husky Deli.  They stock processed foods from all over the world.  Practically none of it is USDA organic or certified GMO-free.   If a foreign country has a GMO label law, that does not relieve them of the obligation of having to supply affidavits.  There is certainly no exemption in I-522 saying anything about foreign packaged foods.  There is no way to get an affidavit from every international supplier, and that puts the store at risk.  If not for a violation directly, they may be at risk of being told they can no longer sell certain products – or even MOST of their products. 


Plus, even if the food WAS labeled for GMOs per their local laws, the labels would not necessarily be compliant with I-522.  It says the label must ABSOLUTELY be on the front of the package, with VERY specific wording.  NO internationally labeled products would conform to I-522’s rule.  There are no other options for labeling of packaged food other than the two phrases specified.


Regardless of whether you believe GMOs are bad for you, I-522&#039;s approach to labeling is ridiculous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nitro, I suggest you actually read the text of I-522.  The law would not require anywhere near the level of detail you think it would.  It would not tell you what is in the food, how much is in there or even if there is a reasonable level of certainty.</p>
<p>The mandated label, “may be partially produced with genetic engineering” is so utterly ambiguous, that it provides absolutely no assurance to the consumer, and does not present a reasonable basis for choice.  This is the phrase that would appear on the vast majority of the products in the typical grocery store. </p>
<p>The law would declare that the only way to demonstrate that a food product does not require a label is by having a sworn statement, USDA Organic certification, or a GMO-Free test certification.  Since the only place a violation of the labeling law can occur is when the food is &#8220;offered for retail sale&#8221;, enforcement cannot occur anywhere but at the retail level.  This means the typical store would need to either remove a substantial amount of food from their shelves, or attempt to pressure out of state suppliers to label the food, or supply a sworn affidavit declaring the food is GE-free.  Failure to do so could result in a substantial fine.</p>
<p>Imagine a store like the Husky Deli.  They stock processed foods from all over the world.  Practically none of it is USDA organic or certified GMO-free.   If a foreign country has a GMO label law, that does not relieve them of the obligation of having to supply affidavits.  There is certainly no exemption in I-522 saying anything about foreign packaged foods.  There is no way to get an affidavit from every international supplier, and that puts the store at risk.  If not for a violation directly, they may be at risk of being told they can no longer sell certain products – or even MOST of their products. </p>
<p>Plus, even if the food WAS labeled for GMOs per their local laws, the labels would not necessarily be compliant with I-522.  It says the label must ABSOLUTELY be on the front of the package, with VERY specific wording.  NO internationally labeled products would conform to I-522’s rule.  There are no other options for labeling of packaged food other than the two phrases specified.</p>
<p>Regardless of whether you believe GMOs are bad for you, I-522&#8242;s approach to labeling is ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny McMillin</title>
		<link>http://westseattleblog.com/2013/03/west-seattle-wednesday-next-fall-opening-night-34th-dems-take-on-gmos#comment-983145</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny McMillin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westseattleblog.com/?p=144734#comment-983145</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Honey Bees!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Honey Bees!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitro</title>
		<link>http://westseattleblog.com/2013/03/west-seattle-wednesday-next-fall-opening-night-34th-dems-take-on-gmos#comment-982990</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 04:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westseattleblog.com/?p=144734#comment-982990</guid>
		<description>I think that labeling food products that contain GMO&#039;s is a good idea. I WANT to know what is in my food and/or how it is produced.   I read labels on the packaging to see if the foods I buy contain trans-fats, for example. I want to be able to have the same information concerning GMO&#039;s.   For a lot of people, they might not pay attention to the label- and that is fine, that is their choice. But I also want to be allowed to make an informed choice on what I am purchasing, and labeling at the retail level is the only way to do that with non-organic foods. (Unless the product has gone through the Non-GMO certification process and is designated as such).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that labeling food products that contain GMO&#8217;s is a good idea. I WANT to know what is in my food and/or how it is produced.   I read labels on the packaging to see if the foods I buy contain trans-fats, for example. I want to be able to have the same information concerning GMO&#8217;s.   For a lot of people, they might not pay attention to the label- and that is fine, that is their choice. But I also want to be allowed to make an informed choice on what I am purchasing, and labeling at the retail level is the only way to do that with non-organic foods. (Unless the product has gone through the Non-GMO certification process and is designated as such).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honey Bees</title>
		<link>http://westseattleblog.com/2013/03/west-seattle-wednesday-next-fall-opening-night-34th-dems-take-on-gmos#comment-982936</link>
		<dc:creator>Honey Bees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 02:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westseattleblog.com/?p=144734#comment-982936</guid>
		<description>Woah. Thanks for the great photo(s) of birds, Danny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woah. Thanks for the great photo(s) of birds, Danny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VBD</title>
		<link>http://westseattleblog.com/2013/03/west-seattle-wednesday-next-fall-opening-night-34th-dems-take-on-gmos#comment-982789</link>
		<dc:creator>VBD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westseattleblog.com/?p=144734#comment-982789</guid>
		<description>Looks like they&#039;re all set to endorse I-522.  Too bad they have no idea what it says.  Apparently they think it would make farmers label their products prior to export.  It only applies to retail sale within the state.  There is absolutely no mention of producers labeling food for export, wholesale, or production.  I-522 is an awful idea that targets the wrong people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like they&#8217;re all set to endorse I-522.  Too bad they have no idea what it says.  Apparently they think it would make farmers label their products prior to export.  It only applies to retail sale within the state.  There is absolutely no mention of producers labeling food for export, wholesale, or production.  I-522 is an awful idea that targets the wrong people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
