<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next chance to tour West Seattle fire stations: 1 month away</title>
	<atom:link href="http://westseattleblog.com/2013/01/next-chance-to-tour-west-seattle-fire-stations-1-month-away/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://westseattleblog.com/2013/01/next-chance-to-tour-west-seattle-fire-stations-1-month-away</link>
	<description>West Seattle news, information, and discussion, updated multiple times daily, 24/7/365</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 02:07:53 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WSB</title>
		<link>http://westseattleblog.com/2013/01/next-chance-to-tour-west-seattle-fire-stations-1-month-away#comment-954993</link>
		<dc:creator>WSB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 04:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westseattleblog.com/?p=136082#comment-954993</guid>
		<description>Watchdog, it&#039;s a private residence - as the buyer made very clear at the time of the purchase; we contacted her to ask for comment and (as we wrote at the time) she didn&#039;t want to be quoted or identified. Since beyond the fact the city sold it, it&#039;s not a matter of public safety or urgency, we moved on The only exception here would be the fact that it&#039;s a city landmark, so if any substantial changes had been proposed, they would need approval. We monitor the Landmarks Board agendas for West Seattle-related matters, and nothing&#039;s turned up. - TR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watchdog, it&#8217;s a private residence &#8211; as the buyer made very clear at the time of the purchase; we contacted her to ask for comment and (as we wrote at the time) she didn&#8217;t want to be quoted or identified. Since beyond the fact the city sold it, it&#8217;s not a matter of public safety or urgency, we moved on The only exception here would be the fact that it&#8217;s a city landmark, so if any substantial changes had been proposed, they would need approval. We monitor the Landmarks Board agendas for West Seattle-related matters, and nothing&#8217;s turned up. &#8211; TR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watchdog</title>
		<link>http://westseattleblog.com/2013/01/next-chance-to-tour-west-seattle-fire-stations-1-month-away#comment-954977</link>
		<dc:creator>Watchdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 03:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://westseattleblog.com/?p=136082#comment-954977</guid>
		<description>Speaking of fire stations, what&#039;s going on with the the old station that was purchased last year?  Looks like someone moved some furniture  into the garage, and hasn&#039;t done anything inside or out in months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of fire stations, what&#8217;s going on with the the old station that was purchased last year?  Looks like someone moved some furniture  into the garage, and hasn&#8217;t done anything inside or out in months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
