Hit-run crash followup: Teen cited for DUI, no license

(Photo by Katie Meyer for WSB)
We have more information today on last night’s 44th/Stevens hit-run crash that sent four people to the hospital, including two children, who we now know are 5 and 9 years old. Police say the driver reported to have run from the scene is a juvenile – 16 years old – and that his breath test was over the legal drunkenness level. Read on for more details:

First, the report gets into the logistics of the crash – Witnesses say the suspect’s car was going southbound on 44th “at a high rate of speed” and that “when (it) approached SW Stevens St. it did not slow down or yield to the EB or WB traffic. The vehicle entered the intersection and struck the side of (the other car). The vehicle that was struck rolled over and landed on the wheels. There were no tire marks indicating the vehicle slowed down before entering the intersection and striking the other vehicle. Several witnesses at the scene stated they saw a (black male) approximately 18, brown hat worn backward, no shirt and white basketball shorts run away from the suspect vehicle.”

When police got to the scene, they say they first encountered a female (we’re still confirming her age) who said she had been driving and that she wasn’t sure why the male had run from the vehicle. The police officer who gave the report wrote “the odor of intoxicants (were) coming from her … I asked her where they were coming from. She stated they were at (a school) with a few other friends and they shared a half gallon of vodka. She stated she could not remember how much she drank and when I asked if she felt intoxicated she began to cry.” Though other evidence indicated she was a passenger, not a driver, police say she continued to insist she had been driving.

Meantime, the report says a witness called at 8:10 pm – about 23 minutes after fire was dispatched to the crash as a “heavy rescue/major” – to say she saw the suspect at 47th/Hill, after following him from the scene. Police caught up with him two minutes later, and, the report says, he admitted he had been driving, and ran from the scene because he was scared.

Back at the scene where the 16-year-old boy was found, he was arrested, and checked out by Fire Department medics. The only thing noted on the report is that he “had a very clear seatbelt mark on his left shoulder from not wearing a T-shirt during the collision.”

Police say the 16-year-old admitted to drinking vodka but claimed he had slowed down at the intersection to yield, but the vehicle didn’t stop for him. Police wrote, “I tried to explain … he had the yield sign and he was supposed to wait for the intersection to be clear before he could enter it. (He) clearly did not understand basic traffic law because he does not have a driver’s license and has not been to any driver safety courses.”

The report goes on to say that the boy’s mother was called to come pick him up at the precinct. He was cited and given a court date. The charges for which he was cited are DUI – he is reported to have blown .10 blood-alcohol level, twice – first-degree negligent driving, reckless driving, hit-run, no valid driver license/no ID. Charges are also requested against the female for “hindering law enforcement” and “false reporting.”

54 Replies to "Hit-run crash followup: Teen cited for DUI, no license"

  • OP August 24, 2011 (2:05 pm)

    God I hope the children are okay.

  • JanS August 24, 2011 (2:16 pm)

    I do hope the family that was hit will be OK…how traumatic for those little kids.

  • sven August 24, 2011 (2:29 pm)

    Whose car was it?

    • WSB August 24, 2011 (2:44 pm)

      Sven – The copy of the report that I received from police is redacted – names, DOBs, etc. are blacked out – so I am not 100 percent sure about that. There is another issue I also have asked for clarification on, but the officer who wrote the report is not on duty right now so was not reachable for that clarification. – TR

  • Brandon August 24, 2011 (2:36 pm)

    @ OP: I agree. I was in an accident when i was a little kid and man that was scary, I still remember it.

  • bg August 24, 2011 (2:48 pm)

    Technically isn’t any alcohol on the breath “over the legal limit” for a 16 year old?

  • Mom August 24, 2011 (2:48 pm)

    Who worte the above article? Some of the statements are inaccurate. As I am the mother of the passenger in the vehicle and did not talk to the police, my husband is the only one that talked to the police or fire department with the exception of our daughter. Our thoughts and prayers are with the family in the van.
    Thanks

    • WSB August 24, 2011 (2:51 pm)

      As attributed, this is all from the police report. As there is one other element I have asked police to look into relating to who talked to whom at the scene, I will remove that part until and unless confirmed. – TR

  • JanS August 24, 2011 (2:52 pm)

    Lori..the editor says it’s from the police report. So…you’re saying the police report is wrong? Guess you need to take that up with them, not the editor here.

  • ad August 24, 2011 (3:16 pm)

    I wonder why the girl would take the blame?

  • A August 24, 2011 (3:31 pm)

    I commented in the earlier post that I am friends with the passengers in the van. I believe they are all ok but have been at Harborview receiving lots of tests. The family is so sweet and this is just sickening to me that people are so careless.

  • Ex-Westwood Resident August 24, 2011 (4:05 pm)

    The report goes on to say that the boy’s mother was called to come pick him up at the precinct.
    WHY is this “kid” NOT IN JAIL!!!!
    As long as we ignore this type of behavior with releasing to parents it WILL CONTINUE!!!!
    He, and the passenger should be in jail…NOT juvie, until the are formally charged, a trial date and bail set. THEN they could go home, or not.
    And we wonder why there is a youth crime problem [boggle]

  • Alki resident August 24, 2011 (4:16 pm)

    I hope the driver realizes how lucky he is to have not killed anyone.16 and drinking plus driving,I hope this is his lesson well learned.

  • JN August 24, 2011 (4:19 pm)

    I would hope that the driver would be locked up for a long time. He could easily have killed four people while committing various crimes. This is unacceptable behavior and an example should be made.

  • msc August 24, 2011 (4:25 pm)

    I love our West Seattle police, and I make the comment often, but why was this idiot released to his mother? A car can be a weapon, and in this case it was, he could have easily killed someone. He needs to be in jail! The same as the little punks who were shooting the pellet gun at people, get them off the streets!

  • Alki August 24, 2011 (4:38 pm)

    16 and stupid ….great combination.

    Hoping for a speedy recovery for the family in the van and full extent of the law to those who caused the accident.

  • Mike August 24, 2011 (5:14 pm)

    Old enough to get a license, old enough to be punished like an adult. These kids that were drinking are lucky to even get a chance at a court date. One of the kids I went to high school with died at 16 while driving drunk.

  • Craig August 24, 2011 (5:31 pm)

    How about charges for the parents.

  • Interrobang August 24, 2011 (5:57 pm)

    @Mike I would encourage you to do a bit of research before throwing around statements like this. Teens are treated as such (stricter laws, and the like) because of how the BRAIN develops. Now, granted, who’s to say 2 years will make any difference, but the law has to allow some leeway for adolecents.
    A young age + etoh will never result in anything good. Now, that’s not saying I don’t think they should be punished – they should, to the fullest extent – but not to the degree that adults would.
    I know for a fact I have more of my faculties than I did when I was 16, and while I never drank and drove, I very much remember my friends participating in it. No matter how much I would insist they just call for a ride if they found themselves in that situation, the 16 year old mind wanted to minimize, and justify, and they went about doing what they did.
    Hopefully they all learn from this situation, and most of all, I hope the family in the van has a safe and complete recovery.

  • Gina August 24, 2011 (6:42 pm)

    I’m thankful not to be reading about a memorial service for any of those involved.

  • bg August 24, 2011 (7:35 pm)

    @Interrobang, if anyone from that family dies would you still have the same attitude that their brain isn’t developed 2 years so they shouldn’t be punished?

  • bsmomma August 24, 2011 (8:52 pm)

    These kids are very lucky no ones life was taken! Alcohol + any age + driving = No Good. I hope these kids learn a HUGE lesson in life. The court system will most likely help that along as well. I hope the family will come home healthy ad happy soon.

  • Norma August 24, 2011 (8:57 pm)

    I am curious to know who the owner of the car was. Was it the girl who claimed she was driving? Who provided the car or was it stolen etc. Some of the answers could implicate a parent.

  • Patrick August 24, 2011 (9:23 pm)

    Interrobang, to me it sounds like you are making excuses for the drunk 16 year old driver…

  • Paul August 24, 2011 (9:39 pm)

    the driver won’t learn if he is not punished, I mean cmon.. mommy picks him up at the cop shop? when I was fifteen I was involved in a fight that I did not even start and they hauled my but to juvie for a week and this punk is at home playing xbox and eating pizza WTF?

  • G.G. August 24, 2011 (9:48 pm)

    I am friends with all of the people in that car. I was so sad when I heard about the crash. My mom said a girl in the neighborhood found a St. Christopher at one of my friends feet in the van. That may be what saved their lives. I asked so many questions because I just found out 2 hours ago.

  • jc August 24, 2011 (10:01 pm)

    Sorry, Interrobang, I agree with Patrick. If one is 16 and thinks he/she’s adult enough to get wasted, get in the car, and subsequently screw up other people’s lives, being treated like an adult on the consequences end of things is only fair.

  • I. Ponder August 24, 2011 (10:27 pm)

    If it was St. Christopher that saved their lives, perhaps it was St. Patrick (patron saint of drunken parades) who caused the crash.

  • nmb August 24, 2011 (10:39 pm)

    @BG, @Patrick and @JC: @Interrobang is not at all saying that the juvenile should not be punished, nor is s/he making excuses for him. S/he is merely stating the fact that juveniles are not held to the same standard as adults when being tried for crimes.
    .
    @Interrobang quite clearly states that s/he thinks that the driver should be punished to the full extent of the law. But “the law” here is that law which applies to juveniles. I believe those under 18 are considered juveniles in Washington State.
    .
    @Interrobang was simply responding to @Mike’s statement, “old enough to get a license, old enough to be punished like an adult,” which is patently false.

    • WSB August 24, 2011 (11:10 pm)

      16 is considered a juvenile unless charged as an adult. I am not sure if that option exists in this case — as of this writing the only copy of the report I have is the one with “redactions,” so I don’t have names and can’t crosscheck records, but it appears these were Seattle Municipal Court citations – the notations on the copy of the report lists the citations under SMC (Seattle Municipal Code, aka city law) numbers.

  • nmb August 24, 2011 (11:02 pm)

    To follow up on my last comment, I am no lawyer, but a quick perusal of the RCW on juvenile traffic infractions shows that traffic infractions filed in juvenile court “shall be afforded the same due process afforded to adults”, so @Mike may be correct after all.
    .
    http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=13.40.250
    .
    But again, I am no lawyer, so I’ll wait to hear what the judge has to say before making emotional statements like @Mike.

    I agree with @Interrobang that the juvenile should be punished to the full extent of the law, especially given the seriousness of this accident and its potential to have been much worse, but at the same time, I refuse to be the judge, jury and executioner and pass premature judgment before he has even been charged with a crime or all the evidence has been collected.

  • CPA August 25, 2011 (5:26 am)

    adult vs juvenile DUI procecution? in my opinion, adults generally do not receive adequate punishment for DUI and related carnage. 1/3 of all traffic fatalities in 2009 (more than 10,000) involved alcohol-impaired drivers, and another 3,000 fatalities involved drivers who were not leagaly drunk but had some alcohol in their system. How many years have we been told of the dangers of DUI? At this point, you would think that the charges should be attempted or 1st degree murder.

  • Walnut August 25, 2011 (5:40 am)

    Can whoever sold/gave them the “half-gallon” of vodka be charged as an accessory?

    Just sayin’.

  • NotMe August 25, 2011 (7:20 am)

    There are some very angry, passive-aggressive people that live amongst us. It’s a good thing that some of you write comments chock full of ignorance but you don’t actually DO anything. Always with the finger pointing as though you are somehow the One In Charge.
    .
    The law says 16 is a juvenile. This kid didn’t think as an adult. He made some really bad decisions based on being 16. As for the “science” of brain development – please. Stop with that crap already. I have seen this ‘opinion’ on here before and it wreaks of being utterly ridonkulous. I don’t poopoo the whole thing, but you are injecting a bunch of opinion into a fraction of a fact.

  • larry August 25, 2011 (8:22 am)

    People…. Once and for all. People are responsible for THEIR actions. Brain development. You are probably the person with 6 college degrees that has trouble ordering at a cafe. He did a really stupid thing and hopefully he will pay and learn. Man what is wrong with people. brain development. As my friend’s kid says “OMG” to infinity and beyond.

  • dcac August 25, 2011 (8:26 am)

    NotMe, I would argue that there is quite a bit of “science” about brain development out there, and brushing it aside as “opinion” is pretty ignorant. Yes, people do have differing opinions about teenagers’ competence levels, but I think we can all agree that they should be kept away from vodka and cars.

  • ac August 25, 2011 (8:30 am)

    The human brain does not fully develop until age 25, but common sense can be instilled at any age.

  • Jim P August 25, 2011 (9:50 am)

    ” (He) clearly did not understand basic traffic law because he does not have a driver’s license and has not been to any driver safety courses.””

    I’d say it was because he was drunk as a Lord not because of any ignorance on hi part.

    The girl needs a good evaluation too since she was willing to lie for this guy and essentailly perjuer herself. I note the girl’s mother is posting, I hope she regards this as seriously as her girl getting drunk and hanging out with scum.

    • WSB August 25, 2011 (10:06 am)

      Dear commenters: Please note that while assumptions are being made that the female in the car was a “girl,” I have NOT yet confirmed an age – there was an initial indication the person might not be a juvenile, but since the report provided had names/birthdates/etc. blacked out, there was also some confusion with another female mentioned who came to the scene after hearing the crash, was an acquaintance of the female in the car, and also may have given police incorrect information. Tangled tale – we’ll keep pursuing a followup … TR

  • Ex-West Seattleite August 25, 2011 (10:23 am)

    A DUI accident with even minor injuries should mean a year in the pokey and no license til he’s 21.

    Hope the injured family recovers quickly.

  • Todd August 25, 2011 (10:40 am)

    Kids do stupid things. Some of them learn from the mistakes and some don’t. The current law for 16 year old drivers (WITH a license) does not allow for driving at night without an adult in the car and there is a zero tolerance for alcohol.
    There seems to be much opinion on responsibility these days, and much court time spent on who is the one at fault. This discussion could go on forever, but the fact is there are 17 year olds stalking people with Airsoft guns (recent WSB story)and plenty of juvenile gang-bangers, car thieves, drug dealers…the list goes on.
    In this particular case, the suspect made a decision to drink, drive (without a license) and run from the scene. My opinion is that this is not his first time at the rodeo and should be punished appropriately. HOPEFULLY he will be one of the ones that learn from the mistakes.

  • One More Opinion August 25, 2011 (1:46 pm)

    Very interesting to me and I don’t expect honesty on this question but how many of you can HONESTLY say you’ve never ever driven after drinking? It’s illegal, stupid, senseless, and incredibly irresponsible…and almost every single one of us has done it or has seen someone do it and not done something about it. And not as a juvenile. Get off your high horses, be thankful no one was killed and do something constructive like volunteer for MADD or confiscate someone’s keys next time you witness an accident about to happen.

  • Jim P August 25, 2011 (2:01 pm)

    “Dear commenters: Please note that while assumptions are being made that the female in the car was a “girl,” I have NOT yet confirmed an age ”

    if it was an adult willing to lie to the cops to protect a drunken juvenile, then we have a lot more going on here than meets the eye. Not to mention what’s a drunk adult woman doing hanging around with a drunk juvenile male? The other way around would have the mobs howling for blood.

    The mire they are in deepens by the minute if so.

    Do keep us apprised please. Besides a good scandal, this may be more serious than it started out as being.

  • A August 25, 2011 (2:31 pm)

    Did any witnesses that saw the teens car notice if there was a red & white flowered pattern on their seat covers? I swear I drove by this car being towed on the freeway today. Just curious.

  • Kate K August 25, 2011 (3:12 pm)

    @One More Opinion – the kid didn’t even have a license, or as the police found in questioning him, know what a ‘Yield’ sign meant. In addition to him being drunk, he did not even know the rules of the road.

  • Paul August 25, 2011 (3:20 pm)

    “Very interesting to me and I don’t expect honesty on this question but how many of you can HONESTLY say you’ve never ever driven after drinking? ”

    Me

  • One More Opinion August 25, 2011 (3:44 pm)

    My point was everyone has done something REALLY stupid. Probably more than once. This person should be held accountable for sure and hopefully he understands the gravity of his actions. For the people who want him locked away, back up a bit and take another look along with looking at yourselves. Be thankful no one was killed. That’s all I’m saying.

  • msc August 25, 2011 (4:09 pm)

    One More Opinion, yes, all of use have done stupid things, but driving a car/truck drunk can be deadly. If the kid has no prior record, perhaps we might be more lenient with him (as long as he understand the seriousness of his actions). But as Todd said, this probably isn’t his first time at the rodeo.

  • bell August 25, 2011 (5:56 pm)

    Come on, anonymous commenters. How about finding another forum (like Rants and Raves) for name calling, making assumptions not based on all the information, generalizing, debating, etc. Please remember there are 3 WS families hurting right now and trying to recover and, yes, learn. Anyone who has ever raised kids through to adult hood knows that you try your best knowing that, for teens especially, the stakes for their mistakes are high. I remain optimistic that something good will come out of this horrendous experience for all involved…and for us as observers.

  • NotMe August 25, 2011 (7:04 pm)

    Well said, Bell. That is the most constructive comment in a long time. Thanks for restoring my faith that most of us are a little smarter than the quick-draw finger-pointers.

  • M August 25, 2011 (8:06 pm)

    Yes Bell I agree also. And for all you “lock em up” types, are you prepared to spend the extra tax $’s to build all these jails? Seemed a different tune when the city proposed placing a jail in West Seattle as I remember..

  • ldh August 26, 2011 (9:32 am)

    Wow. Lots of angry comments. Someone could have been killed it hurt worse…but they were not. Community service talking to his peers and others about the perils of drinking and driving, no license until 18, and a notice to he and his parents that and additional infraction will result in jail time should do the trick. Don’t take this kid and end his life before it begins. Give him a chance to learn from his mistake. As for the passenger, take her license, charge her with obstruction, community service, and if over 18 some type of probation and drug testing for a year. She also needs a chance to learn from her mistake.

    These situations are always hard and emotional. While we all have an opinion, just like mine above, just remember to put yourself in the shoes of all involved. If this were your 16 year old, and they got into an accident, hurt some, but not badly, and the community wanted you son/daughter jailed for a year, how would you feel? Would you ask for leniency? I know I would as a parent of two young boys.

    I hope the family is doing ok and that their kids will recover from the traumatic experience. My wife and kids for hit a could of years ago and it us hard to know that there us nothing you can do to protect them from these types of situations outside of not driving at all which is not very practical.

    My thoughts are with all involved.

  • Renae August 29, 2011 (12:03 am)

    So thankful that no deaths reported from this incident; but I’m sure this will not be the last of such in the West Seattle community the WS community has a high rate of underage drinking and marijuana use, that the community refused to address for five years and this will only increase due to the lack of prevention/intervention services and no adolescent chemical dependency programs in WS

  • Interrobang August 30, 2011 (10:38 pm)

    To respond to BG: I didn’t say “not punished”. I suggest you re-read my comment. If someone died my stance would remain just as firm – full extent of the law, as a juvenile. I’ll even go so far as to say juveniles are punished more accurately than adults are for DUI convictions. (and I say this with a background in such issues… just FYI)

    To respond to NotMe. It’s not actually. It’s real science. I’m sorry if you haven’t actually done the research on it, but facts are facts. It’s all education – no “opinions”. But, there is little to do with stubborn minded people. As for passive-aggression, I feel like a mirror should be involved in my explanation to you as to what that means.

    @Jc, If I think I’m old enough to apply for social security, should I receive it? No. Just because someone thinks they’re old enough to do certain things, doesn’t matter. And, it’s a giant leap to assume that was his thought pattern. Oddly enough, sometimes kids just do stupid stuff…. perception of maturity has nothing to do with it.

    I sympathize with the folks with pitchforks who want the teenager punished as an adult – I do. It’s scary to know someone out there could re-offend… and that someone you know could get hurt, or die. But, it’s not just this kid, it could be anyone. Adult, or teenager, this stuff happens. And this, was thankfully a near miss, and I hope he learns from this experience young – that he could have killed someone. I hope this changes his life in the most positive way it ever could.

Sorry, comment time is over.