Paid parking in Seattle parks? Might not be worth it, report suggests

Among the items of interest for this afternoon’s meeting of the City Council Parks and Seattle Center Committee is an update on the proposal to study the possibility of raising money by charging for parking at some city parks. We brought you first word of this back in October, when Lincoln Park was mentioned as a possible candidate. What’s on the committee’s agenda today is a preliminary report about the feasibility of even studying the topic. You can read it here; it basically says so many issues would come into play, that it just might not be worth it. If councilmembers do want to give it a try, the report says, the “strongest candidates” for paid parking include the Lincoln Park south lot. And one option presented would be a “pilot program” possibly including that lot:

Implement a small pilot program at 1-3 sites, without conducting broader occupancy counts. The sites may include Lake Union Park, Lincoln Park south lot, and Green Lake Community Center. These sites have the least variation in use weekly and seasonally, good transportation alternatives, and controlled nearby street parking. If conducted at all three sites by City staff, the approximate cost of this option would be $182,000, which covers $90,000 for 6 pay stations, and $92,000 in staff costs.

The other two options include spending up to $70,000 for another consultant study – though the report also goes on to note that the possibility of paid city-park parking has been studied multiple times since 2003 – or, dropping the whole thing. The meeting’s at 2 pm (viewable live on Seattle Channel, cable 21 or online at www.seattlechannel.org).

4 PM UPDATE: We’ll have a roundup of the meeting later, including a couple other items, but topline: The committee members were leaning toward the idea of a pilot project at one location, South Lake Union. No formal vote or decision yet – we’ll keep an eye out as the proposal progresses.

15 Replies to "Paid parking in Seattle parks? Might not be worth it, report suggests"

  • steph March 10, 2011 (9:20 am)

    I dislike this idea big time. I especially feel for the nearby residents. They will likely have to deal with additional parking traffic in their neighborhood when cheap people like myself avoid parking in the paid lots by parking nearby on city streets. I’d rather park near Cafe Ladro and put that money toward a coffee, then walk to Lincoln Park.

  • RJB March 10, 2011 (9:27 am)

    OMG…I can see if park parking is being abused ie; people parking there all day/night but please…now we could get parking tickets at a city park….Seattle, rein it in!

  • KBear March 10, 2011 (10:20 am)

    I assume people who are against parking fees would be in favor of higher taxes, so we can continue to enjoy living in a city with great parks.

  • SAS March 10, 2011 (10:21 am)

    If it’s funding that they are trying to get at, why not start enforcing some of the laws that already exist like NO DOGS ON THE BEACH!

    Every day I go through Lincoln Park and within my 15 minute pass on the beach see at least 6 dogs on the beach with their owners. At $500 a fine that’s $3000 in 15 minutes.

    Pay me a 10% finders fee and I’d happily walk the beach and hand out citations.

  • Jiggers March 10, 2011 (10:30 am)

    Bye bye to that money.

  • michael March 10, 2011 (11:00 am)

    I have an idea——-how about taxing Billionaires !!!

    Time to stop beating up on middle class and poor people !!!

    m green

  • Momof3 March 10, 2011 (11:11 am)

    My list of things I like about this city are diminishing Rapidly. It’s like the city has an agenda to make it as unlivable as possible.

  • Al March 10, 2011 (11:30 am)

    This idea has been around for years, it’s nothing new. However, the studies have shown that the cost of charging for the parking would not make the revenue gained worth it. If I understand it, the revenue would not necessarily be greater than the costs incurred to pay people and install equipment to monitor the paid parking situation.

  • george March 10, 2011 (12:54 pm)

    How about a concession business on site at LP to generate some revenue? Of course, the “dirty garbage” folks will howl, but an ice cream shack would be a great fit at the park.

  • RJB March 10, 2011 (2:11 pm)

    I love SAS and George’s ideas!!! Hey…I am willing to pay taxes and they keep jackin’ them higher…and I keep paying. Not going to do both….and if paid parking does become a reality it will be here to stay. So pick one…higher taxes or paid City Park parking, not both. I know this probably not happen but….

  • mcbride March 10, 2011 (3:15 pm)

    There’s an outstanding document available by the Trust for Public Land: http://www.tpl.org/content_documents/CityParkFacts_2010.pdf
    .
    I recommend reading it. I recommend attending the Seattle Parks and Recreation 2011 Development Plan Meeting: http://www.seattle.gov/parks/publications/developmentplan.htm
    .
    The important question here isn’t “Should there be paid parking in our city parks?” The question is “As the second highest funded Parks department In The Nation, why are you so broke?”.
    .
    I’ve volunteered for SPS for the last 7 years. I love our parks, and I’m willing to put my own equity in, both sweat and financial, to see them be great. Still, I can’t shake the feeling that we’ve been throwing good money after bad for years. And y’know, I’m getting a little tired of whole “added fees” solution that seems so in vogue right now. I expect better solutions than this.

  • Bill March 10, 2011 (3:26 pm)

    I love the comment about another possible study for $70k. This drives me nuts about tax spending in the NW, repeated studies wasting tax dollars. I cannot imagine this parking proposal would come close to generating enough revenue to be worth implementing for the taxpayers.

    • WSB March 10, 2011 (3:35 pm)

      anyone checking this comment thread right this second, the item is now under discussion by the committee, hour and a half into a jampacked meeting. live at http://www.seattlechannel.org

  • foy boy March 10, 2011 (3:48 pm)

    Here in seattle we have built more parks then we can take care of. Here in westseattle we are in thf procces of buiding another park we can’t take care of, a skate board park at cost of what,100 grand. As the saying goes, Gee this new park looks great, thats because it has’nt had enough time to be neglected.

  • Robert March 10, 2011 (5:02 pm)

    This is ridiculous. The city wants to rip us off even more for taking our kids and dogs to the park to exercise. What’s next? Tolls in front of our houses? With gas prices the way they are and our struggling economy, this is the worst idea I’ve ever heard of. The city takes enough money from us for stupid ideas. Don’t let it stretch to this totally unreasonable measure.

Sorry, comment time is over.